41
talks
143
posters
29
regular papers
8
invited talks
2
awards
610
unique authors
43
committee members
Programme
| Title | Type | Date | Min | Authors | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implementation security of QKD | tutorial | 2019-08-26 09:00 | — | ▸Norbert Lütkenhaus | — |
In this tutorial we will clarify the difference between protocol and implementation security. While the framework for protocol security is well developed, the field of studying implementation security is still in flow. We will see several examples how implementations of QKD devices may be attacked via side-channel attacks. These attacks use the difference between actual implementations and the model assumptions of security proofs as a lever. Subsequently, we will discuss what can be done to mitigate the issues arising from potential side-channel attacks. Finally, we will discuss what statements we can actually make about QKD implementations. |
|||||
| Quantum networks of diamond spins | invited | 2019-08-26 10:45 | — | ▸Ronald Hanson | — |
Entanglement – the property that particles can share a single quantum state – is arguably the most counterintuitive yet potentially most powerful element in quantum theory. The non-local features of quantum theory are highlighted by the conflict between entanglement and local causality discovered by John Bell. Decades of Bell inequality tests, culminating in a series of loophole-free tests in 2015, have confirmed the non- locality of nature [1]. Future quantum networks [2] may harness these unique features of entanglement in a range of exciting applications, such as quantum computation and simulation, secure communication, enhanced metrology for astronomy and time-keeping as well as fundamental investigations. To fulfill these promises, a strong worldwide effort is ongoing to gain precise control over the full quantum dynamics of multi-particle nodes and to wire them up using quantum-photonic channels. Here I will present recent and ongoing work with the specific target of realizing the first multi-node network wired by quantum entanglement, including first primitive network experiments [3,4] using diamond-based quantum network nodes. [1] For a popular account of these experiments, see e.g. Ronald Hanson and Krister Shalm, Scientific American 319, 58-65 (2018). [2] Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead, S Wehner, D Elkouss, R Hanson, Science 362 (6412), eaam9288 (2018). [3] N. Kalb et al., Science 356, 928 (2017). [4] P.C. Humphreys et al., Nature 558, 268 (2018). |
|||||
| On the capacity region of bipartite and tripartite entanglement switching and key distribution | regular | 2019-08-26 11:20 | — | Gayane Vardoyan, Saikat Guha, Philippe Nain, Don Towsley | — |
We study a quantum switch serving a set of users. The function of the switch is to convert bipartite entanglement generated over individual links connecting each user to the switch, into bipartite or tripartite entangled states among (pairs or groups of) users at the highest possible rates at a fixed ratio. Such entanglement can then be converted to quantum-secure shared secret bits among pairs or triples of users using E91-like Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) protocols. The switch can store a certain number of qubits in a quantum memory for a certain length of time, and can make two-qubit Bell-basis measurements or three-qubit GHZ-basis projective measurements on qubits held in the memory. We model a set of randomized switching policies. Discovering that some are better than others, we present analytical results for the case where the switch stores one qubit per user at a given time step, and find that the best policies outperform a time division multiplexing (TDM) policy for sharing the switch between bipartite and tripartite entanglement generation. This performance improvement decreases as the number of users grows. The model is easily augmented to study the capacity region in the presence of qubit decoherence, obtaining similar results. Moreover, decoherence appears to have little effect on capacity. We also study a smaller class of policies when the switch can store two qubits per user. The full manuscript can be found at https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.06786. |
|||||
| High-dimensional chip-to-chip entanglement distribution through multicore fibre | regular | 2019-08-26 11:40 | — | Daniel Llewellyn, Caterina Vigliar, Benjamin Slater, Beatrice Da Lio, Stefano Paesani, Jorge Barreto, Dondu Sahin, Massimo Borghi, John Rarity, Leif Katsuo Oxenløwe, Karsten Rottwitt, Jianwei Wang, Yunhong Ding, Mark Thompson, Davide Bacco | — |
In this work we report the first chip-to-chip multidimensional entanglement distribution. The faithful generation and transmission of the multidimensional quantum states relies on two main ingredients: silicon integrated photonics, offering a compelling platform for quantum information processing, and multicore fibres, which allows the reliable transmission of path encoded qudits. |
|||||
| QKD based on satellite-ground entanglement distribution | invited | 2019-08-26 13:30 | — | ▸Jigang Ren | — |
Micius satellite was successfully launched into orbit in 2016. In the past three years, we have implemented a series of experimental works, including satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution, quantum entanglement distribution over 1000 km, ground-to-satellite quantum teleportation. The feasibility of a global quantum network has been demonstrated with ground quantum communication networks with optical fiber. In this report, we will present recent works based on Micius satellite, such as: space quantum key distribution and its application, quantum experiment based on quantum entanglement distribution, and expanded application of space quantum communication. The ongoing project in China of high orbit quantum satellite will also be introduced with results of several tests in ground. |
|||||
| QCoSOne: A chip-based prototype for daylight free-space QKD at telecom wavelength for future satellite optical payloads | regular | 2019-08-26 14:05 | — | Marco Avesani, Luca Calderaro, Matteo Schiavon, Costantino Agnesi, Alberto Santamato, Andrea Stanco, Mujtaba Zahidy, Alessia Scriminich, Giulio Foletto, Giampiero Contestabile, Marco Chiesa, Alessandro Nottola, Davide Rotta, Stefano Tirelli, Massimo Artiglia, Alberto Montanaro, Marco Romagnoli, Vito Sorianello, Daniele Dequal, Giuseppe Bianco, Claudia Facchinetti, Alberto Tuozzi, Francesco Vedovato, Giuseppe Vallone, Paolo Villoresi | — |
Space-based quantum key distribution would allow, in the near future, secure communications be- tween parties over continental distances, complementing short-range fiber-based quantum networks. However, further demonstrations of daylight operations over free-space channels and the full compatibility with the telecom-based fiber infrastructure are still necessary. Here we present the prototype for daylight QKD at 1550 nm we developed as a demonstrator for application of QKD both on ground and in Space. Our QKD source, exploiting integrated silicon photonics technology, allows to reach a QBER of 1% during the field-test performed over a 145 m link, and represents a promising resource to design quantum optical payloads to be implemented in future satellite missions. |
|||||
| Chip-based measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution | regular | 2019-08-26 14:25 | — | Henry Semenenko, Philip Sibson, Andy Hart, Mark Thompson, Christopher Erven | — |
Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution (MDI-QKD) offers a method of distributing shared randomness for use in symmetric key cryptography, while integrated optics provides a promising platform for ubiquitous quantum communication. This work experimentally demonstrates the use of indium phosphide (InP) devices for MDI-QKD. We generate 100 ps pulses for 2 GHz clocked, time-bin encoded BB84 states with random phases through a novel gain switching technique. By interfering two independent InP devices, we achieve 50 bps at 100 km and pre-empt the availability of integrated receivers which will increase rates through inherent scalability. |
|||||
| Continuous variable quantum key distribution multiplexed with high throughput coherent channels | regular | 2019-08-26 14:45 | — | Tobias Eriksson, Takuya Hirano, Benjamin Puttnam, Georg Rademacher, Ruben Luís, Mikio Fujiwara, Ryo Namiki, Yoshinari Awaji, Masahiro Takeoka, Naoya Wada, Masahide Sasaki | — |
We show joint propagation of CV-QKD with successful secret key generation over 24 hours with 100 state-of-the-art EDFA amplified coherent WDM channels amounting to a total classical bitrate of 18.3~Tbit/s. |
|||||
| Almost-tight and versatile security analysis of measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution | regular | 2019-08-26 15:35 | — | Ignatius William Primaatmaja, Emilien Lavie, Koon Tong Goh, Chao Wang, Charles Ci Wen Lim | — |
Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution (MDI-QKD) is the only known QKD scheme that can completely overcome the problem of detection side-channel attacks. Yet, despite its practical importance, there is no standard approach towards proving the security of MDI-QKD. Here, we present a simple numerical method that can efficiently compute almost-tight security bounds for any discretely modulated MDI-QKD protocol. To demonstrate the broad utility of our method, we use it to analyze the security of coherent-state MDI-QKD, decoy-state MDI-QKD with leaky sources, and a variant of twin-field QKD called phase-matching QKD. In all of the numerical simulations (using realistic detection models) we find that our method gives significantly higher secret key rates than those obtained with current security proof techniques. Interestingly, we also find that phase-matching QKD using only two coherent test states is enough to overcome the fundamental rate-distance limit of QKD. Taken together, these findings suggest that our security proof method enables a versatile, fast, and possibly optimal approach towards the security validation of practical MDI-QKD systems. |
|||||
| Erasable bit commitment from temporary quantum trust | regular | 2019-08-26 15:55 | — | Norbert Lütkenhaus, Ashutosh Marwah, David Touchette | — |
We introduce the idea of temporarily trusted quantum nodes. We introduce a new primitive in that model, erasable bit commitment, which is a variant on standard two-party bit commitment. We show how to implement this primitive in our new model with temporarily trusted nodes. The erasable property allows Alice, in the case that the trust period is about to expire, to ask the trusted nodes to erase her commitment in such a way that a future coalition, after the trust period, of all trusted nodes together with Bob cannot extract any information about the commitment. This is impossible classically. A caveat is that after such an erasure, Alice is not committed to a classical value anymore. We provide a robust protocol which requires a constant number of trusted nodes and which can handle a small fraction of dishonest trusted nodes as well as implementation errors. Our approach lends itself to actual optical implementations, and requires memory during the trust period. |
|||||
| Building a more secure quantum future | regular | 2019-08-26 19:00 | — | ▸Michele Mosca Biography | — |
While quantum computers will bring immense computing capability that cannot be achieved with any feasible amount of regular computing power, they also break some of the mostly widely used codes that we depend on to protect our digital systems. For the advent of a quantum computer to be a positive milestone in human history, we must first fix these fundamental building blocks of cyber security. Come hear how this threat is actually a great opportunity to make our digital infrastructures more secure than they otherwise would be. And learn about the exciting science that underpins new tools for making our world more safe and secure, including quantum satellite communications. |
|||||
| DI-QKD and DI-QRNG, discussing security proofs and practical challenges | tutorial | 2019-08-27 09:00 | — | ▸Rotem Arnon-Friedman | — |
Device-independent cryptography goes beyond conventional quantum cryptography by providing security that holds independently of the quality of the physical devices used to implement the cryptographic protocols. In this tutorial we will present existing device-independent quantum key distribution protocols and discuss the ideas underlying their security proofs. In particular, the tutorial will cover the best practices for using known techniques to prove security of device-independent protocols. Lastly, we will present several open questions whose solutions have the potential of bringing the quantum cryptography community closer to an experimental realization of device-independent quantum key distribution. |
|||||
| Fundamental limits on key rates in DI-QKD | invited | 2019-08-27 10:45 | — | ▸Eneet Kaur | — |
Conditional mutual information-based measures such as intrinsic information and squashed entanglement have been important theoretical tools to obtain upper bounds on distillable secret-key rates, with the latter playing an important role for device-dependent quantum key distribution protocols. Inspired by this line of work, we propose an information-theoretic quantifier for Bell non-locality called intrinsic non-locality. It uses conditional mutual information to measure the deviation of a given bipartite correlation from one having a local-hidden-variable model. We prove that it satisfies certain desirable properties such as faithfulness, convexity, and monotonicity under local operations and shared randomness. Most especially, we then prove that intrinsic non-locality is an upper bound on the secret-key-agreement capacity of a large class of device-independent protocols conducted using a device characterized by a bipartite correlation. In other words, given a device characterized by such a bipartite correlation, the secret-key rate that can be extracted from this device with a device-independent protocol is bounded from above by intrinsic non-locality. Finally, we evaluate intrinsic non-locality to obtain an explicit bound on the secret-key rate that can be obtained from a specific bipartite correlation studied extensively in the device-independent literature. |
|||||
| A numerical method for computing reliable secret key rates for device-independent quantum key distribution | regular | 2019-08-27 11:20 | — | René Schwonnek, Ernest Y. -Z. Tan, Ramona Wolf, Koon Tong Goh, Charles Ci Wen Lim | — |
In this QCRYPT submission, we present a numerical toolbox that is capable of producing non-trivial lower bounds on the asymptotic secret key rate of any device-independent quantum key distribution (DIQKD) protocol. The main mechanism of our toolbox is a new method for estimating the entropy production of a quantum channel, giving rise to bounds that can be computed using the family of semidefinite programs (SDPs) known as the Navascues-Pironio-Acin (NPA) hierarchy. |
|||||
| A simple protocol for verifiable delegation of quantum computation in one round | regular | 2019-08-27 11:40 | — | ▸Alex Bredariol Grilo | — |
The importance of being able to verify quantum computation delegated to remote servers increases with recent development of quantum technologies. In some of the proposed protocols for this task, a client delegates her quantum computation to non-communicating servers in multiple rounds of communication. In this work, we propose the first protocol where the client delegates her quantum computation to two servers in one-round of communication. Another advantage of our protocol is that it is conceptually simpler than previous protocols. The parameters of our protocol also make it possible to prove security even if the servers are allowed to communicate, but respecting the plausible assumption that information cannot be propagated faster than speed of light, making it the first relativistic protocol for quantum computation. |
|||||
| Device-independent certification of one-shot distillable entanglement | regular | 2019-08-27 12:00 | — | Rotem Arnon-Friedman, Jean-Daniel Bancal | — |
Sources producing high amounts of entanglement are essential for quantum cryptography. Given an uncharacterized source, manufactured by a possibly untrusted entity, how can we certify that it produces a lot of entanglement? We initiate the study of operational device-independent entanglement certification by presenting a device-independent protocol that lower-bounds the one-shot distillable entanglement of the remaining quantum state after the execution of the protocol. By this, the protocol certifies the amount of “useful entanglement†available for proceeding applications. Importantly, our protocol does not abort, with high probability, when testing realistically noisy sources. |
|||||
| Zero-knowledge proofs meet quantum computing | tutorial | 2019-08-28 09:00 | — | ▸Fang Song | — |
Zero-knowledge proof systems have played a fundamental role in complexity theory and cryptography since its invention. I will introduce the basic definitions and constructions of zero-knowledge proof systems, and discuss the new questions that arise in a quantum setting. This includes making classical ZK proofs secure against quantum adversaries as well as making quantum interactive proof systems zero-knowledge. |
|||||
| Quantum fully homomorphic encryption | invited | 2019-08-28 10:45 | — | ▸Zvika Brakerski | — |
Fully homomorphic encryption schemes (FHE) allow to apply arbitrary efficient computation to encrypted data without decrypting it first. This allows a client to delegate computation to a computationally powerful server without compromising the privacy of the input. This notion was proposed by Rivest, Adleman and Dertouzos in 1978, but a first candidate was only proposed 30 years later by Gentry. Broadbent and Jeffery (2015) asked whether it is possible to construct a *quantum* analog, which will allow to apply an arbitrary quantumly efficient computation to (classical or quantum) encrypted data. The ultimate notion of Quantum FHE (QFHE) scheme will allow even to a classical client privately delegate computation to a quantum server. The talk will survey the exciting recent advancement on this question, through the first “ultimate” candidate proposed by Mahadev (2018) and beyond. Connections to other quantum-cryptographic primitives and open questions will also be discussed. |
|||||
| Classical zero-knowledge arguments for quantum computations | regular | 2019-08-28 11:20 | — | Thomas Vidick, Tina Zhang | — |
We show that every language in QMA admits a classical-verifier, quantum-prover zero-knowledge argument system which is sound against quantum polynomial-time provers and zero-knowledge for classical (and quantum) polynomial-time verifiers. The protocol builds upon two recent results: a computational zero-knowledge proof system for languages in QMA, with a quantum verifier, introduced by Broadbent et al. (FOCS 2016), and an argument system for languages in QMA, with a classical verifier, introduced by Mahadev (FOCS 2018). |
|||||
| Perfect zero knowledge for quantum multiprover interactive proofs | regular | 2019-08-28 11:40 | — | Alex Bredariol Grilo, William Slofstra, Henry Yuen | — |
In this work we consider the interplay between multiprover interactive proofs, quantum entanglement, and zero knowledge proofs — notions that are central pillars of complexity theory, cryptography, and quantum information. In particular, we study the relationship between the complexity class MIP∗, the set of languages decidable by multiprover interactive proofs with quantumly entangled provers, and the class PZK-MIP∗, which is the set of languages decidable by MIP∗ protocols that furthermore possess the perfect zero knowledge property. Our main result is that the two classes are equal, i.e., MIP∗ = PZK-MIP∗ . This result provides a quantum analogue of the celebrated result of Ben-Or, Goldwasser, Kilian, and Wigderson (STOC 1988) who show that MIP = PZK-MIP (in other words, all classical multiprover interactive protocols can be made zero knowledge). We prove our result by showing that every MIP∗ protocol can be efficiently transformed into an equivalent zero knowledge MIP∗ protocol in a manner that preserves the completeness-soundness gap. Combining our transformation with previous results by Slofstra (Forum of Mathematics, Pi 2019) and Fitzsimons, Ji, Vidick and Yuen (STOC 2019) yields the corollary that all co-recursively enumerable languages (which include undecidable problems and every decidable problem) have zero knowledge MIP∗ protocols withvanishing promise gap. |
|||||
| Secure computing with classical and quantum resources | invited | 2019-08-28 13:30 | — | ▸Stefanie Barz | — |
Secure delegated computing is a key task for both classical and quantum networks. There exist both classical and quantum protocols for performing secure (quantum) computations in networks. In this talk, I will first give an overview of secure delegated quantum computing. Here, a client with no quantum-computational power can delegate a quantum computation to a fully fledged quantum server. I will particularly focus on experiments and vulnerabilities in the implementations. Further, I will focus on the interplay of classical and quantum approaches for delegated computing. I will demonstrate a way to perform classical (multiparty) computing amongst parties with limited computational resources. Our method harnesses quantum resources to increase the computational power of the individual parties. As particular examples, I will show how a client restricted to XOR gates can perform universal classical computation using single qubits. Further, I will demonstrate how a set of clients restricted to linear classical processing are able to jointly compute a non-linear multivariable function that lies beyond their individual capabilities. Finally, I will show proof-of-concept implementations using photonic qubits. Thus, this work highlights how minimal quantum and classical resources can be combined and exploited for classical computing. |
|||||
| Operator dominance method: a simple monitoring scheme of a TF-type QKD in finite-size regime | regular | 2019-08-28 14:05 | — | Kento Maeda, Toshihiko Sasaki, Masato Koashi | — |
Quantum key distribution (QKD) with conventional optics tools is limited to a linear scaling of the repeaterless bound. Recently, twin field (TF) QKD was conjectured to beat the limit by using an untrusted central station conducting a single-photon interference detection. So far, the effort to prove the conjecture was confined to the infinite key limit which neglected the time and cost for monitoring an adversary’s act. Here we propose a variant of TF-type QKD protocol equipped with a novel monitoring scheme and provide a finite-size-key security proof. We show that the protocol beats the linear bound in a reasonable running time of sending 10^12 pulses, which positively solves the conjecture. |
|||||
| Experimental twin field quantum key distribution beyond the repeaterless secret key capacity bound | regular | 2019-08-28 14:25 | — | Mariella Minder, Mirko Pittaluga, George Roberts, Marco Lucamarini, James Dynes, Zhiliang Yuan, Andrew Shields | Best Student Paper Award (Experiment) — Mariella Minder & Mirko Pittaluga |
We demonstrate the first experimental overcoming of the repeaterless secret key capacity (PLOB) bound through the implementation of the Twin Field Quantum Key Distribution (TF-QKD) protocol. We distribute secret keys at record channel losses (> 90 dB). We assess the prospects for real-world implementation of TF-QKD. |
|||||
| Proof-of-principle experimental demonstration of twin-field type quantum key distribution | regular | 2019-08-28 14:45 | — | Xiaoqing Zhong, Jianyong Hu, Marcos Curty, Li Qian, Hoi-Kwong Lo | — |
The twin-field (TF) quantum key distribution (QKD) protocol and its variants are highly attractive because they can beat the well-known fundamental limit of secret key rate for point-to-point (point-to-point bound) QKD without quantum repeaters. In this paper, we perform a proof-of-principle experimental demonstration of TF-QKD based on the protocol proposed by Curty et al., which removes the need for post-selection on the matching of a global phase from the original TF-QKD. Furthermore, we employ a Sagnac loop structure to overcome the major difficulty in the practical implementation of TF-QKD, namely, the need to stabilize the phase of the quantum state over kilometers of fiber. The experimental results show that the secret key rate of TF-QKD at high loss region can surpass the point-to-point bound of QKD with current technology. |
|||||
| Experimental Twin-field quantum key distribution through sending-or-not-sending | regular | 2019-08-28 14:55 | — | Yang Liu, Zong-Wen Yu, Weijun Zhang, Jian-Yu Guan, Jiu-Peng Chen, Chi Zhang, Xiao-Long Hu, Hao Li, Teng-Yun Chen, Lixing You, Zhen Wang, Xiang-Bin Wang, Qiang Zhang, Jian-Wei Pan | — |
Channel loss is one of the most severe limitation to extend the transmission distance of quan- tum key distribution in practice. The twin-field quantum key distribution can achieve a much longer transmission distance with improving the key rate from the linear scale of channel loss in the traditional decoy-state method to the square root scale of the channel transmittance. Here we demonstrate the real-optical-fibre experimental results of twin-field quantum key distribution through the sending-or-not-sending protocol, which is fault tolerant to large misalignment error. The phase locking technology developed in the frequency transfer field is adopted to ensure Alice’s and Bob’s source wavelengths are locked to each other. Phase reference pulses are used to monitor the phase difference between the channel. Further with a high performance single photon detector, we obtain the positive key rates for different distances, specifically, the obtained secure key rate at 150 km is higher than that of the measurement device independent QKD. |
|||||
| Uncloneable quantum encryption via oracles | regular | 2019-08-28 15:40 | — | Anne Broadbent, Sébastien Lord | — |
Quantum information is well-known to achieve cryptographic feats that are unattainable using classical information alone. Here, we add to this repertoire by introducing a new cryptographic functionality called uncloneable encryption. This functionality allows the encryption of a classical message such that two collaborating but isolated adversaries are prevented from simultaneously recovering the message, even when the encryption key is revealed. Clearly, such functionality is unattainable using classical information alone. We formally define uncloneable encryption, and show how to achieve it using Wiesner’s conjugate coding, combined with a quantum-secure pseudorandom function (qPRF). Modelling the qPRF as a quantum oracle, we show security by adapting techniques from the quantum one-way-to-hiding lemma, as well as using bounds from quantum monogamy-of-entanglement games. |
|||||
| Quantum advantage for probabilistic one-time programs | regular | 2019-08-28 16:00 | — | Marie-Christine Roehsner, Joshua Kettlewell, Tiago Batalhao, Joseph F. Fitzsimons, Philip Walther | — |
One-time programs, computer programs which self-destruct after being run only once, are a powerful building block in cryptography and would allow for new forms of secure software distribution. However, ideal one-time programs have been proved to be unachievable using either classical or quantum resources. Here we relax the definition of one-time programs to allow some probability of error in the output and show that quantum mechanics offers security advantages over purely classical resources. We introduce a scheme for encoding probabilistic one-time programs as quantum states with prescribed measurement settings, explore their security, and experimentally demonstrate various one-time programs using measurements on single-photon states. These include classical logic gates, a program to solve Yao’s millionaires problem, and a one-time delegation of a digital signature. By combining quantum and classical technology, we demonstrate that quantum techniques can enhance computing capabilities even before full-scale quantum computers are available. |
|||||
| Security analysis of quantum physical unclonable functions | regular | 2019-08-28 16:20 | — | Myrto Arapinis, Mahshid Delavar, Mina Doosti, Elham Kashefi | — |
Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) are physical devices that have unique behaviour which is hard to clone. These hardware structures are considered as an effective and feasible security primitive. The application of a wide variety of PUF structures for different security purposes such as identification and key generation has been widely studied in the context of Classical PUFs. In addition, the quantum-readout PUF (QR-PUF) has been studied as a proposition for a quantum version of classical PUFs. In this paper, we do a comprehensive study on Quantum Physical Unclonable Functions with quantum cryptographic tools. We use a quantum game-based security framework for our analysis and we define a new class of quantum attacks, called General Quantum Emulation Attack (GQEA), applicable on current quantum-readout and hybrid quantum-classical PUFs. This class of attacks are based on using a database of inputs and outputs to emulate the action of an unknown quantum transformation on a new input. We define a concrete attack based on an existing emulation algorithm and use it to show the vulnerability of the current schemes under this attack. Furthermore, we formally define a QPUF for the first time and discuss the security of Unitary QPUFs (UQPUFs) by formally defining the unforgeability property of UQPUFs. We prove any UQPUF provides selective unforgeability property while they cannot provide unconditional and existential unforgeabilities. |
|||||
| Practical Quantum Security: A user perspective | tutorial | 2019-08-29 09:00 | — | ▸Manfred Lochter | — |
QKD is attracting more and more interest. In order to introduce QKD into networks, several aspects have to be considered. In the talk I will present BSI’s view on QKD, focussing mainly on security aspects. These security aspects include certification and approval requirements, evaluation criteria, the combination of QKD with “traditional” cryptography and the role of random number generation. I will argue that at the moment QKD is a technology that should only be used in hybrid modes, e.g. one should combine the Quantum Key-Agreement with a quantum-safe key-agreement in order to generate keys for symmetric encryption algorithms. It is well known that existing QKD devices are vulnerable to sidechannel atttacks. Therefore performance standards and evaluation criteria are needed, where evaluation should be performed according to internationally accepted criteria, e.g. the Common Criteria (CC). I will report on the status of a project that aims at developing a Protection Profile (PP) for QKD devices. |
|||||
| Quantum techniques in post-quantum crypto | invited | 2019-08-29 10:45 | — | ▸Mark Zhandry | — |
The quantum random oracle model (QROM) has become the standard model in which to prove the post-quantum security of random-oracle-based constructions. Unfortunately, none of the known proof techniques allow the reduction to record information about the adversary’s queries, a crucial feature of many classical ROM proofs. In this work, we give a new QROM proof technique that overcomes this “recording barrier”, allowing for efficient on-the-fly simulation of random oracles, roughly analogous to the usual classical simulation. We then use this new technique to give the first proof of indifferentiability for domain extension, as well as other applications. |
|||||
| Efficient randomness certification by quantum probability estimation | regular | 2019-08-29 11:20 | — | Yanbao Zhang, Honghao Fu, Krister Shalm, Joshua C. Bienfang, Martin Stevens, Michael Mazurek, Sae Woo Nam, Carlos Abellan, Waldimar Amaya, Morgan Mitchell, Carl Miller, Alan Mink, Emanuel Knill | — |
Applications of randomness such as private key generation and public randomness beacons require small blocks of certified random bits on demand. Device-independent quantum random number generators can produce such random bits, but existing quantum-proof protocols and loophole-free implementations suffer from high latency, requiring many hours to produce any random bits. Here we develop a broadly applicable framework, quantum probability estimation, for yielding efficient quantum-proof protocols. The framework is general and encompasses methods from previous works [Miller and Shi, SIAM Journal on Computing 46, 1304 (2017); Arnon-Friedman et al., Nature Communications 9, 459 (2018)]. Quantum probability estimation can adapt to changing experimental conditions, allows stopping the experiment as soon as the prespecified randomness goal is achieved, and can tolerate imperfect knowledge of the input distribution. Moreover, we demonstrate device-independent quantum randomness generation from a loophole-free Bell test with quantum probability estimation, obtaining multiple blocks of 512 random bits with an average experiment time of less than 5 minutes per block and with certified error bounded by $2^{-64}\approx 5.42\times 10^{-20}$. |
|||||
| Correlations and Randomness Generation based on an Energy Constraint | regular | 2019-08-29 11:40 | — | Thomas Van Himbeeck, Stefano Pironio | — |
| Fast and practical implementation of self-testing QRNG based on an energy bound **merged with** Correlations and randomness generation based on an energy constraint | regular | 2019-08-29 11:40 | — | Davide Rusca, Thomas Van Himbeeck, Anthony Martin, Jonatan Bohr Brask, Hamid Tebyanian, Stefano Pironio, Nicolas Brunner, Hugo Zbinden | — |
**merged with** Thomas Van Himbeeck and Stefano Pironio. Correlations and Randomness Generation based on an Energy Constraint In a previous paper, we introduced a semi-device-independent scheme consisting of an untrusted source sending quantum states to an untrusted measuring device, with the sole assumption that the average energy of the states emitted by the source is bounded. Given this energy constraint, we showed that certain correlations between the source and the measuring device can only occur if the outcomes of the measurement are non-deterministic, i.e., these correlations certify the presence of randomness. In the present paper, we go further and show how to quantify the randomness as a function of the correlations and prove the soundness of a QRNG protocol exploiting this relation. For this purpose, we introduce (1) a semidefinite characterization of the set of quantum correlations, (2) an algorithm to lower-bound the Shannon entropy as a function of the correlations and (3) a proof of soundness using finite trials compatible with our energy assumption. |
|||||
| 10~Mb/s quantum key distribution | invited | 2019-08-29 13:30 | — | ▸Zhiliang Yuan | — |
I will start this talk with a review of various technological advances that have enabled the first 10 Mb/s quantum key distribution (QKD) system. I will then introduce our latest developments on photonic integration and implementation security of QKD optics. |
|||||
| Can you sign a quantum state? | invited | 2019-08-30 09:00 | — | ▸Gorjan Alagic | — |
Cryptography with quantum states exhibits a number of surprising and counterintuitive features. In an intriguing 2002 paper, Barnum et al. argued that these strange features imply that digital signatures for quantum states are impossible. In this work, we thoroughly explore this question from a theoretical crypto perspective. We expand on the work of Barnum et al. and show that even very weak forms of signing quantum states are impossible; essentially, if a signature scheme is secure, then it is classical. We then show a positive result: it is possible to sign quantum states, provided that they are also encrypted with the public key of the intended recipient. Following classical nomenclature, we call this notion quantum signcryption. Classically, signcryption is only interesting if it provides superior efficiency to simultaneous encryption and signing. Our results imply that, quantumly, it is far more interesting: by the laws of quantum mechanics, it is the only signing method available. We develop security definitions for quantum signcryption, ranging from a simple one-time two-user setting, to a chosen-ciphertext-secure many-time multi-user setting. We also give secure constructions based on post-quantum public-key primitives. (Joint work with Tommaso Gagliardoni and Christian Majenz.) |
|||||
| Security of the Fiat-Shamir transformation in the quantum random-oracle model | regular | 2019-08-30 09:35 | — | Jelle Don, Serge Fehr, Christian Majenz, Christian Schaffner | — |
The famous Fiat-Shamir transformation turns any public-coin three-round interactive proof, i.e., any so-called sigma-protocol, into a non-interactive proof in the random-oracle model. We study this transformation in the setting of a quantum adversary that in particular may query the random oracle in quantum superposition. Our main result is a generic reduction that transforms any quantum dishonest prover attacking the Fiat-Shamir transformation in the quantum random-oracle model into a similarly successful quantum dishonest prover attacking the underlying sigma-protocol (in the standard model). Applied to the standard soundness and proof-of-knowledge definitions, our reduction implies that both these security properties, in both the computational and the statistical variant, are preserved under the Fiat-Shamir transformation even when allowing quantum attacks. Our result improves and completes the partial results that have been known so far, but it also proves wrong certain claims made in the literature. In the context of post-quantum secure signature schemes, our results imply that for any sigma-protocol that is a proof-of-knowledge against quantum dishonest provers (and that satisfies some additional natural properties), the corresponding Fiat-Shamir signature scheme is secure in the quantum random-oracle model. For example, we can conclude that the non-optimized version of Fish, which is the bare Fiat-Shamir variant of the NIST candidate Picnic, is secure in the quantum random-oracle model. |
|||||
| Composable and finite computational security of quantum message transmission | regular | 2019-08-30 09:55 | — | Fabio Banfi, Ueli Maurer, Christopher Portmann, Jiamin Zhu | — |
Recent research in quantum cryptography has led to the development of schemes that encrypt and authenticate quantum messages with computational security. The security definitions used so far in the literature are asymptotic, game-based, and not known to be composable. We show how to define finite, composable, computational security for secure quantum message transmission. The new definitions do not involve any games or oracles, they are directly operational: a scheme is secure if it transforms an insecure channel and a shared key into an ideal secure channel from Alice to Bob, i.e., one which only allows Eve to block messages and learn their size, but not change them or read them. By modifying the ideal channel to provide Eve with more or less capabilities, one gets an array of different security notions. By design these transformations are composable, resulting in composable security. Crucially, the new definitions are finite. Security does not rely on the asymptotic hardness of a computational problem. Instead, one proves a finite reduction: if an adversary can distinguish the constructed (real) channel from the ideal one (for some fixed security parameters), then she can solve a finite instance of some computational problem. Such a finite statement is needed to make security claims about concrete implementations. We then prove that (slightly modified versions of) protocols proposed in the literature satisfy these composable definitions. And finally, we study the relations between some game-based definitions and our composable ones. In particular, we look at notions of quantum authenticated encryption and QCCA2, and show that they suffer from the same issues as their classical counterparts: they exclude certain protocols which are arguably secure. |
|||||
| Quantum lazy sampling and game-playing proofs for quantum indifferentiability | regular | 2019-08-30 10:45 | — | Jan Czajkowski, Christian Majenz, Christian Schaffner, Sebastian Zur | Best Student Paper Award (Theory) — Jan Czajkowski |
Game-playing proofs constitute a powerful framework for classical cryptographic security arguments, most notably applied in the context of indifferentiability. An essential ingredient in such proofs is lazy sampling of random primitives. We develop a quantum game-playing proof framework by generalizing two recently developed proof techniques. First, we describe how Zhandry’s compressed quantum oracles~\cite{zhandry2018record} can be used to do quantum lazy sampling from non-uniform function distributions. Second, we observe how Unruh’s one-way-to-hiding lemma~\cite{unruh2015revocable} can also be applied to compressed oracles, providing a quantum counterpart to the fundamental lemma of game-playing. Subsequently, we use our game-playing framework to prove quantum indifferentiability of the sponge construction, assuming a random internal function or a random permutation. Our results upgrade post-quantum security of SHA-3 to the same level that is proven against classical adversaries. |
|||||
| Computationally-secure and composable remote state preparation | regular | 2019-08-30 11:05 | — | Alexandru Gheorghiu, Thomas Vidick | — |
We introduce a protocol between a classical polynomial-time verifier and a quantum polynomial-time prover that allows the verifier to securely delegate to the prover the preparation of certain single-qubit quantum states. The protocol realizes the following functionality, with computational security: the verifier chooses one of the observables Z, X, Y, (X+Y)/sqrt(2), (X-Y)/sqrt(2); the prover receives a uniformly random eigenstate of the observable chosen by the verifier; the verifier receives a classical description of that state. The prover is unaware of which state he received and moreover, the verifier can check with high confidence whether the preparation was successful. The delegated preparation of single-qubit states is an elementary building block in many quantum cryptographic protocols. We expect our implementation of “random remote state preparation with verification”, a functionality first defined in (Dunjko and Kashefi 2014), to be useful for removing the need for quantum communication in such protocols while keeping functionality. The main application that we detail is to a protocol for blind and verifiable delegated quantum computation (DQC) that builds on the work of (Fitzsimons and Kashefi 2018), who provided such a protocol with quantum communication. Recently, both blind an verifiable DQC were shown to be possible, under computational assumptions, with a classical polynomial-time client (Mahadev 2017, Mahadev 2018). Compared to the work of Mahadev, our protocol is more modular, applies to the measurement-based model of computation (instead of the Hamiltonian model) and is composable. Our proof of security builds on ideas introduced in (Brakerski et al. 2018). |
|||||
| Non-malleability for quantum public-key encryption | regular | 2019-08-30 11:25 | — | Christian Majenz, Christian Schaffner, Jeroen van Wier | — |
We present a definition for non-malleability in the setting of public-key quantum cryptography. Overcoming the notorious “recording barrier” known from generalizing other integrity-like security notions to quantum encryption, we generalize one of the equivalent classical definitions, comparison-based non-malleability, and show how it can be fulfilled. In addition, we further explore one-time non-malleability notions for symmetric-key quantum encryption known from the literature by defining plaintext and ciphertext variants and characterizing their relation. To show satisfiability of our presented definition, we use these refined one-time notions, as well as a post-quantum CNM scheme, to construct a hybrid scheme. |
|||||
| Experimental demonstration of quantum advantage for one-way communication complexity with application in construction of robust quantum money | regular | 2019-08-30 11:45 | — | Niraj Kumar, Iordanis Kerenidis, Eleni Diamanti | — |
The goal of demonstrating a quantum advantage with currently available experimental systems is of utmost importance in quantum information science. While this remains elusive for quantum computation, the field of communication complexity offers the possibility to already explore and showcase this advantage for useful tasks. Here, we define such a task, the Sampling Matching problem, which is inspired by the Hidden Matching problem and features an exponential gap between quantum and classical protocols in the one-way communication model. Our problem allows by its conception a proof-of-principle photonic implementation based on encoding in the phase of coherent states of light, the use of a fixed size linear optic circuit, and single-photon detection. This enables us to demonstrate experimentally an advantage in the transmitted information resource beyond a threshold input size, which would have been impossible to reach for the original Hidden Matching problem. Our demonstration has implications in various communication and cryptographic settings. Specifically we have used it to introduce a robust practical quantum money-scheme. Our scheme involves an honest Bank who prepares the note by independently and uniformly selecting multiple n-bit binary secret strings which are encoded into the single photon states. The note is then distributed among untrusted holders. To carry out the transaction, the note holder sends the note to the honest local verifiers of the Bank. The verifier runs the Sampling Matching scheme on some randomly selected copies of the note and forwards the classical measurement outcome to the Bank. The Bank then declares the validity of the note. Our private-key money scheme includes multiple features such as single round classical interaction of the local verifier with the Bank, optimal note re-usability (linear in the size of Bank note), linear verification circuit size, and an unconditional security against any adversary trying to forge the Bank note while tolerating the noise of up to 21.4%. The simplistic nature of our verification scheme using Sampling Matching allows for the ability to reach a maximal theoretical noise tolerance of 25%, as conjectured by Amiri et al [Phys Rev A 95, 062334]. |
|||||
| A continuous variable quantum repeater based on entanglement distillation with quantum scissors | poster | — | — | Kaushik Seshadreesan, Hari Krovi, Saikat Guha | — |
| A quantum random number generator based on vacuum fluctuations with security against quantum side-information | poster | — | — | Tobias Gehring, Cosmo Lupo, Arne Kordts, Dino Solar Nikolic, Nitin Jain, Stefano Pirandola, Thomas Brochmann Pedersen, Ulrik Lund Andersen | — |
| A simple security proof for continuous variable quantum Quantum Key distribution with intensity fluctuating source | poster | — | — | Chenyang Li, Hoi-Kwong Lo | — |
| A theoretical framework for PUFs and QR-PUFs | poster | — | — | Giulio Gianfelici, Hermann Kampermann, Dagmar Bruß | — |
| AIT QKD Post Processing and Network Software | poster | — | — | Oliver Maurhart, Christoph Pacher, Stefan Petscharnig, Michael Hentschel | — |
| Achieving high key rates in satellite-based QKD | poster | — | — | Sebastian Ecker, Bo Liu, Matthias Fink, Johannes Handsteiner, Dominik Rauch, Fabian Steinlechner, Thomas Scheidl, Anton Zeilinger, Rupert Ursin | — |
| Advantage distillation for device-independent quantum key distribution | poster | — | — | Ernest Y. -Z. Tan, Charles Ci Wen Lim, Renato Renner | — |
| Afterpulse Analysis for Quantum Key Distribution | poster | — | — | Yuanguanjie Fan, Chao Wang, Shuang Wang, Zhen-Qiang Yin, He Liu, Wei Chen, De-Yong He, Zheng-Fu Han, Guangcan Guo | — |
| Algorithmic Approach to Design Highly Efficient MET-LDPC Codes with Cascade Structure | poster | — | — | Hossein Mani, Tobias Gehring, Christoph Pacher, Ulrik Lund Andersen | — |
| An adaptive framework for quantum-secure device-independent randomness expansion | poster | — | — | Peter Brown, Sammy Ragy, Roger Colbeck | — |
| An approach for security evaluation and certification of a complete quantum communication system | poster | — | — | Shihan Sajeed, Poompong Chaiwongkhot, Anqi Huang, Vadim Makarov, Hao Qin, Vladimir Egorov, Artur Gleim, Anton Kozubov, Andrei Gaidash, Vladimir Chistiakov, Artur Vasiliev | — |
| An improved shot-noise unit calibration method for continuous-variable quantum key distribution | poster | — | — | Yichen Zhang, Yundi Huang, Zhengyu Li, Bingjie Xu, Song Yu, Hong Guo | — |
| An optimal local model to practically emulate Bell inequalities | poster | — | — | Shihan Sajeed, Vadim Makarov, Nigar Sultana, Charles Ci Wen Lim | — |
| Anonymity for practical quantum networks | poster | — | — | Anupama Unnikrishnan, Ian MacFarlane, Richard Yi, Eleni Diamanti, Damian Markham, Iordanis Kerenidis | — |
| Array receiver for continuous variable quantum key distribution | poster | — | — | Rupesh Kumar, Timothy Spiller | — |
| Asymptotic security analysis of discrete-modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution | poster | — | — | Jie Lin, Twesh Upadhyaya, Norbert Lütkenhaus | — |
| Asymptotic security of continuous-variable quantum key distribution with a discrete modulation | poster | — | — | Shouvik Ghorai, Philippe Grangier, Eleni Diamanti, Anthony Leverrier | — |
| Asymptotic security of discrete-modulation protocols for continuous-variable quantum key distribution | poster | — | — | Eneet Kaur, Saikat Guha, Mark M. Wilde | — |
| Atmospheric continuous-variable quantum key distribution based on adaptive optics | poster | — | — | Geng Chai, Zhengwen Cao, Peng Huang, Guihua Zeng | — |
| Attack-resistant quantum random number generator based on the interference of laser pulses with random phase | poster | — | — | Roman Shakhovoy, Violetta Sharoglazova, Alexandr Udaltsov, Vladimir Kurochkin, Yury Kurochkin | — |
| Beating the repeaterless bound with adaptive measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution | poster | — | — | Róbert Trényi, Koji Azuma, Marcos Curty | — |
| Bipartite and multipartite QKD via single-photon interference | poster | — | — | Federico Grasselli, Álvaro Navarrete, Marcos Curty, Hermann Kampermann, Dagmar Bruß | — |
| Bounding the information leakage in quantum hacking using photon statistics | poster | — | — | Gaëtan Gras, Davide Rusca, Hugo Zbinden, Felix Bussieres | — |
| Bragg-Reflection Waveguides as Photon Pair Sources for Polymer Photonic Circuits | poster | — | — | Hannah Thiel | — |
| Building UKQNtel – creating a practical, commercially viable Quantum Network | poster | — | — | Joseph Pearse, Adrian Wonfor, Arash Bahrami, Gordon Duan, Catherine White, Richard Penty, Andrew Lord, Timothy Spiller | — |
| Challenges in high-speed quantum key distribution | poster | — | — | Alberto Boaron, Davide Rusca, Gianluca Boso, Raphael Houlmann, Fadri Grünenfelder, Cédric Vulliez, Misael Caloz, Matthieu Perrenoud, Gaëtan Gras, Claire Autebert, Felix Bussieres, Anthony Martin, Hugo Zbinden | — |
| Characterization of Gram matrices of multimode coherent states | poster | — | — | Ashutosh Marwah, Norbert Lütkenhaus | — |
| Coherent State Oblivious Transfer using Homodyne Detection | poster | — | — | David Reichmuth | — |
| Coincidence Detection Quantum Key Distribution Protocol | poster | — | — | Ayan Biswas, Anindya Banerji, Nijil Lal C.K., Ravindra P. Singh | — |
| Continuous-variable QKD network in Qingdao | poster | — | — | Yichen Zhang, Ziyang Chen, Bingjie Chu, Chao Zhou, Xiangyu Wang, Yijia Zhao, Yifan Xu, Chao Xu, Hongjie Wang, Ziyong Zheng, Yundi Huang, Chunchao Xu, Xiaoxiong Zhang, Tao Shen, Ge Huang, Yunwu Zheng, Zhaoxuan Fei, Weinan Huang, Menglin Zhu, Luyu Huang, Bin Luo, Song Yu, Hong Guo | — |
| Controlling single-photon detector ID210 with bright light | poster | — | — | Vladimir Chistiakov, Anqi Huang, Vladimir Egorov, Vadim Makarov | — |
| Controlling single-photon negative-feedback avalanche diodes using bright illumination | poster | — | — | Nigar Sultana, Anqi Huang, Vadim Makarov, Thomas Jennewein | — |
| Developing Characterisation Measurements for Quantum Key Distribution | poster | — | — | Sophie Albosh | — |
| Development of post-processing board for efficiently biased random bits | poster | — | — | Ken-Ichiro Yoshino | — |
| Device-independent secret key rate from optimized Bell inequality violation | poster | — | — | Sarnava Datta, Timo Holz, Hermann Kampermann, Dagmar Bruß | — |
| Discrete-continuous variable quantum key distribution with untrusted homodyne measurement | poster | — | — | Emilien Lavie | — |
| Discrete-modulated continuous-variable measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution | poster | — | — | Hong-Xin Ma, Peng Huang, Dong-Yun Bai, Tao Wang, Shi-Yu Wang, Wan-Su Bao, Gui-Hua Zeng | — |
| Drone-Based Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) | poster | — | — | Andrew Conrad, Kyle Herndon, Brian Wilens, Samantha Isaac, Alexander Hill, Daniel Sanchez-Rosales, Daniel J. Gauthier, Paul Kwiat | — |
| Estimation of side channels in QKD via second-order interference | poster | — | — | Alexander Duplinskiy, Denis Sych | — |
| Experimental demonstration of four-party conference key agreeement | poster | — | — | Joseph Ho, Massimilliano Proietti, Alessandro Fedrizzi | — |
| Experimental demonstration of machine learning aided carrier phase recovery for CV-QKD | poster | — | — | Hou-Man Chin, Nitin Jain, Darko Zibar, Tobias Gehring, Ulrik Lund Andersen | — |
| Experimental feasibility of 6-4 State Reference Frame Independent channel for Quantum Key Distribution | poster | — | — | Ramy Tannous, Zhangdong Ye, Jeongwan Jin, Katanya Kuntz, Norbert Lütkenhaus, Thomas Jennewein | — |
| Experimental nonlocality-based randomness generation with nonprojective measurements | poster | — | — | Santiago Gómez López, Alejandro Mattar, Esteban Gómez, Daniel Cavalcanti, Antonio Acin, Gustavo Lima | — |
| Experimental time-reversed adaptive Bell measurement towards all-photonic quantum repeaters | poster | — | — | Rikizo Ikuta, Yasushi Hasegawa, Nobuyuki Matsuda, Kiyoshi Tamaki, Hoi-Kwong Lo, Takashi Yamamoto, Koji Azuma, Nobuyuki Imoto | — |
| Faking photon number on transition-edge sensor | poster | — | — | Poompong Chaiwongkhot, Anqi Huang, Jiaqiang Zhong, Hao Qin, Sheng-Cai Shi, Vadim Makarov | — |
| Feasibility of All-day Quantum Communication with Coherent Detection | poster | — | — | Shiyu Wang, Peng Huang, Tao Wang, Hongxin Ma, Dengwen Li, Guihua Zeng | — |
| Field trial of a finite-key quantum key distribution system in the Florence metropolitan area | poster | — | — | Davide Bacco, Ilaria Vagniluca, Beatrice Da Lio, Nicola Biagi, Adriano Della Frera, Davide Calonico, Costanza Toninelli, Francesco Saverio Cataliotti, Marco Bellini, Leif Katsuo Oxenløwe, Alessandro Zavatta | — |
| Field trials of quantum key distribution over a etropolitan fiber network | poster | — | — | Peiyu zhang | — |
| Finite-key analysis for differential phase encoded measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution | poster | — | — | Shashank Kumar Ranu, Anil Prabhakar, Prabha Mandayam | — |
| Finite-key security analysis of a simple twin-field quantum key distribution protocol | poster | — | — | Guillermo Curras Lorenzo, Marcos Curty, Koji Azuma, Mohsen Razavi | — |
| Finite-key security analysis of quantum key distribution with flawed and leaky sources | poster | — | — | Margarida Pereira, Marcos Curty, Kiyoshi Tamaki | — |
| Free-space Hong-Ou-Mandel interference under atmospheric turbulence | poster | — | — | Shuang-Lin Li, Yu-Huai Li, Kui-Xing Yang, Yuan Cao, Juan Yin, Cheng-Zhi Peng, Jian-Wei Pan | — |
| General optimization of SPDC sources for quantum communication applications | poster | — | — | Mikolaj Lasota, Karolina Sedziak-Kacprowicz, Piotr Kolenderski | — |
| Generalized framework for security analysis of continuous-variable quantum key distribution | poster | — | — | Vladyslav Usenko | — |
| Generation of polarization-entangled photon-pairs in Sagnac interferometer with polarization maintaining fiber | poster | — | — | Youn Seok Lee, Mengyu Xie, Ramy Tannous, Thomas Jennewein | — |
| Hacking single-photon detector in quantum key distribution via pulse illumination | poster | — | — | Zhihao Wu, Anqi Huang, Huan Chen, Shi-Hai Sun, Jiangfang Ding, Xiaogang Qiang, Ping Xu, Xiang Fu, Mingtang Deng, Junjie Wu | — |
| High Accuracy Phase Compensation Scheme in Continuous-Variable Quantum Key Distribution | poster | — | — | Dengwen Li, Peng Huang, Tao Wang, Shiyu Wang, Rui Chen, Zeng Guihua | — |
| High-Dimensional Quantum Communication Complexity beyond Strategies Based on Bell’s Theorem | poster | — | — | Daniel Martínez, Armin Tavakoli, Mauricio Casanova, Gustavo Cañas, Breno Marques, Gustavo Lima | — |
| High-efficiency reconciliation protocol for continuous-variable quantum key distribution under wide SNR range | poster | — | — | Chao Zhou, Xiangyu Wang, Yichen Zhang, Zhiguo Zhang, Song Yu, Hong Guo | — |
| Hong-Ou-Mandel interference between heralded pulsed photon sources with PPKTP crystal at NIR wavelength | poster | — | — | Bo Li, Yu-Huai Li, Yuan Cao, Juan Yin, Cheng-Zhi Peng, Jian-Wei Pan | — |
| Hyperentangled Time-bin and Polarization Quantum Key Distribution | poster | — | — | Joseph Chapman, Charles Ci Wen Lim, Paul Kwiat | — |
| Implementation of a polarization-based BB84 protocol at 5 GHz repetition rate | poster | — | — | Fadri Grünenfelder, Alberto Boaron, Davide Rusca, Anthony Martin, Hugo Zbinden | — |
| Improvement of continuous variable quantum key distribution system using cascaded parametric amplifier | poster | — | — | Yupeng Gong, Rupesh Kumar, Adrian Wonfor, Peter Vasil’Ev, Richard Penty, Ian White | — |
| Improvement of unidimensional continuous-variable quantum key distribution by using heralded hybrid amplifier | poster | — | — | Kunlin Zhou, Ying Guo, Liao Qin | — |
| Influence of the Imperfect Faraday Mirror on the Continuous Variable Quantum Key Distribution System | poster | — | — | Cao Zhengwen, Liang Kexin | — |
| Investigation of the dependence of noise characteristics of SPAD on the gate parameters in SWG single-photon detectors | poster | — | — | Anton Losev, Vladimir Zavodilenko, Yuri Kurochkin | — |
| Key distribution in Quantum Computational Hybrid (QCH) security model with performance beyond QKD | poster | — | — | Nilesh Vyas, Romain Alléaume | — |
| LEO trusted node constellations for global QKD | poster | — | — | Antia Lamas-Linares, Tom Vergoossen, Robert Bedington, Sergio Loarte, Hans Kuiper, Alexander Ling | — |
| Laser Annealing of InGaAs/InP Single Photon Avalanche Detectors with Application in QKD in Space | poster | — | — | Mujtaba Zahidy, Nigar Sultana, Thomas Jennewein, Alberto Tosi, Fabio Signorelli, Klaus Pasquinelli, Andrea Giudice, Marta Bagatin, Simone Gerardin, Giuseppe Vallone, Paolo Villoresi | — |
| Leftover hashing from quantum error correction: Unifying the two approaches to the security proof of quantum key distribution | poster | — | — | Toyohiro Tsurumaru | — |
| Long-Distance Continuous-Variable Quantum Key Distribution with Entangled States | poster | — | — | Yongmin Li, Ning Wang, Shanna Du, Wenyuan Liu, Xuyang Wang, Kunchi Peng | — |
| Machine Learning for Optimal Parameter Prediction in Quantum Key Distribution | poster | — | — | Wenyuan Wang, Hoi-Kwong Lo | — |
| Machine learning continuous-variable quantum key distribution | poster | — | — | Qin Liao, Hai Zhong, Ying Guo | — |
| Measurements towards providing security assurance of the UKQNtel QKD link | poster | — | — | Anthony Vaquero-Stainer, Christopher J. Chunnilall, Alastair Sinclair, Catherine White, Joseph Pearse, Adrian Wonfor, Andrew Lord, Timothy Spiller | — |
| Modular QKD setup for research and development applications | poster | — | — | Yury Kurochkin, Vadim Rodimin, Vladimir Kurochkin, Mikhail Ponomarev, Tatiana Kazieva, Aleksey Fedorov | — |
| Multilayer Structure of a Scalable Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) Network | poster | — | — | Andrey Zhilyaev, Anastasiia Nikolaeva, Mikhail Borodin, Vladimir Sergeev | — |
| New protocols in high-dimensional quantum key distribution with twisted photons | poster | — | — | Frédéric Bouchard, Khabat Heshami, Alicia Sit, Felix Hufnagel, Robert Fickler, Duncan England, Ebrahim Karimi | — |
| No purification in all discrete theories and the power of the complete extension | poster | — | — | Marek Winczewski, Tamoghna Das, Karol Horodecki, Pawel Horodecki, Lukasz Pankowski, Marco Piani, Ravishankar Ramanathan | — |
| Numerical Calculations of Finite Key Rate for General QKD Protocols | poster | — | — | Ian George, Norbert Lütkenhaus | — |
| Numerical analysis of decoy state BBM92 quantum key distribution protocol with multi-photon rejection source | poster | — | — | Takumi Matsuura, Liang Min, Kazuhisa Ogawa, Atsushi Okamoto, Akihisa Tomita | — |
| Oblivious-Transfer is harder than Bit-Commitment in realistic Measurement-Device Independent settings | poster | — | — | Jeremy Ribeiro, Stephanie Wehner | — |
| On the obfuscatability of quantum point functions | poster | — | — | Tao Shang, Ranyiliu Chen, Jianwei Liu | — |
| On-chip near-perfect quality entanglement for multi-user quantum key distribution | poster | — | — | Dorian Oser, Florent Mazeas, Carlos Alonso Ramos, Xavier Le Roux, Laurent Vivien, Sébastien Tanzilli, Éric Cassan, Laurent Labonté | — |
| One-out-of-m spacetime-constrained oblivious transfer | poster | — | — | Damian Pitalua Garcia | — |
| Optimal collective CV-QKD attack through all-optical teleportation | poster | — | — | Spyros Tserkis, Nedasadat Hosseinidehaj, Nathan Walk, Timothy C. Ralph | — |
| POGNAC: an all-fiber self-compensating polarization modulator for QKD | poster | — | — | Costantino Agnesi, Marco Avesani, Andrea Stanco, Paolo Villoresi, Giuseppe Vallone | — |
| POVM based quantum random number generator | poster | — | — | Hamid Tebyanian, Marco Avesani, Giuseppe Vallone, Paolo Villoresi | — |
| Ping-pong authentication protocol for quantum key distribution | poster | — | — | Evgeny Kiktenko, Aleksei Malyshev, Maxim Gavreev, Anton Bozhedarov, Nikolai Pozhar, Maxim Anufriyev, Aleksey Fedorov | — |
| Polarization-state tracking in continuous-variable quantum key distribution | poster | — | — | Tao Wang, Peng Huang, Shiyu Wang, Hongxin Ma, Dengwen Li, Guihua Zeng | — |
| Practical Implementation of Privacy Amplification in Quantum Key Distribution | poster | — | — | Ririka Takahashi, Yoshimichi Tanizawa, Alexander Dixon | — |
| Practical Quantum Key Distribution with Geometrically Uniform States | poster | — | — | Konstantin S. Kravtsov, Sergei N. Molotkov | — |
| Practical quantum digital signature with a gigahertz BB84 quantum key distribution system | poster | — | — | Xue-Bi An | — |
| Practical quantum key distribution with non-phase-randomized coherent states | poster | — | — | Li Liu, Yukun Wang, Charles Ci Wen Lim, Emilien Lavie, Arno Ricou, Chao Wang, Fenzhuo Guo | — |
| Practical quantum tokens without quantum memories | poster | — | — | Damian Pitalua Garcia, Adrian Kent | — |
| Precision metrology of novel components for high bit rate QKD devices | poster | — | — | Robert Kirkwood Starkwood, Ke Guo, Christopher J. Chunnilall, Alastair Sinclair, Taofiq K Paraiso, Thomas Roger, Mirko Sanzaro, Innocenzo De Marco, Zhiliang Yuan, Andrew Shields | — |
| Predicting Optimal Parameters using Random Forest for Quantum Key Distribution | poster | — | — | Huajian Ding, Jing-Yang Liu, Chun-Mei Zhang, Qin Wang | — |
| Prefixed-threshold Real-Time Selection for Free-Space Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution | poster | — | — | Wenyuan Wang, Feihu Xu, Hoi-Kwong Lo | — |
| Provably Private Storage | poster | — | — | Xavier Coiteux-Roy, Bart van der Vecht, Stefan Wolf | — |
| Pseudorandom basis choice in quantum cryptography on symmetric coherent states | poster | — | — | Ashot Avanesov, Dmitry Kronberg | — |
| QFactory: classically-instructed remote secret qubits preparation | poster | — | — | Alexandru Cojocaru, Léo Colisson, Elham Kashefi, Petros Wallden | — |
| Quantum Key Distribution System Immune to Polarization-Induced Signal Fading with Quarter-Wave Plate Reflector-Michelson Interferometers | poster | — | — | Huaxing Xu, Shaohua Wang, Yang Huang, Yaqi Song, Changlei Wang | — |
| Quantum Key Distribution with Small Satellites | poster | — | — | Ömer Bayraktar, Peter Freiwang, Daniel Garbe, Matthias Grünefeld, Roland Haber, Lukas Knips, Christoph Marquardt, Leonhard Mayr, Florian Moll, Jonas Pudelko, Benjamin Rödiger, Wenjamin Rosenfeld, Klaus Schilling, Christopher Schmidt, Harald Weinfurter | — |
| Quantum Random Oracle Model based on Remote State Preparation | poster | — | — | Min-Sung Kang, Yeon-Ho Choi, Yong-Su Kim, Young-Wook Cho, Sang Wook Han, Sung Moon | — |
| Quantum Sampling and Entropic Uncertainty, with Applications | poster | — | — | Walter Krawec | — |
| Quantum Walks and Quantum Key Distribution | poster | — | — | Chrysoula Vlachou, Walter Krawec, Paulo Mateus, Nikola Paunkovic, Andre Souto | — |
| Quantum control attack on quantum key distribution systems | poster | — | — | Anton Kozubov, Andrei Gaidash, George Miroshnichenko | — |
| Quantum key distribution over quantum repeaters with repetition codes | poster | — | — | Yumang Jing, Daniel Leal, Mohsen Razavi | — |
| Quantum key distribution secure against malicious optical devices and classical post-processing units | poster | — | — | Hoi-Kwong Lo, Marcos Curty | — |
| Quantum key distribution with simply characterized light sources | poster | — | — | Akihiro Mizutani, Toshihiko Sasaki, Yuki Takeuchi, Kiyoshi Tamaki, Masato Koashi | — |
| Quantum key repeater based quantum networks for secret sharing | poster | — | — | Minjin Choi, Soojoon Lee | — |
| Quantum model of decoherence for coherent states in the fiber optical channels | poster | — | — | Andrei Gaidash, Anton Kozubov, George Miroshnichenko | — |
| Quantum model of decoherence in polarization domain for the fiber channel | poster | — | — | Anton Kozubov, Andrei Gaidash, George Miroshnichenko | — |
| Quantum steering using optical hybrid continuous- and discrete-variable entanglement | poster | — | — | Adrien Cavaillès, Hanna Le Jeannic, Jeremy Raskop, Tom Darras, Giovanni Guccione, Damian Markham, Eleni Diamanti, Julien Laurat | — |
| Qubit-based Quantum Key Recycling over a noisy channel | poster | — | — | Daan Leermakers, Boris Skoric | — |
| Remote blind state preparation with weak coherent pulses in field | poster | — | — | Yangfan Jiang, Kejin Wei, Liang Huang, Ke Xu, Qichao Sun, Yuzhe Zhang, Weijun Zhang, Hao Li, Lixing You, Zhen Wang, Hoi-Kwong Lo, Feihu Xu, Qiang Zhang, Jianwei Pan | — |
| Resource Analysis of Verifiable Quantum Secret Sharing on Quantum Repeater Networks | poster | — | — | Mohammad Amin Taherkhani, Keivan Navi | — |
| Resource-efficient verification of quantum computing using Serfling’s bound | poster | — | — | Yuki Takeuchi, Atul Mantri, Tomoyuki Morimae, Akihiro Mizutani, Joseph F. Fitzsimons | — |
| S-money: virtual tokens for a relativistic economy | poster | — | — | Adrian Kent | — |
| Satellite quantum key distribution under restricted eavesdropping scenarios | poster | — | — | Sima Bahrani, Masoud Ghalaii, Carlo Liorni, Alexander Ling, Charles Ci Wen Lim, Rupesh Kumar, Timothy Spiller, Stefano Pirandola, Bruno Huttner, Norbert Lütkenhaus, Mohsen Razavi | — |
| Satellite-based links for Quantum Key Distribution: beam effects and weather dependence | poster | — | — | Carlo Liorni, Hermann Kampermann, Dagmar Bruß | — |
| Secret Key Reconciliation for Long-Distance Quantum Key Distribution with Discrete and Continuous Variables | poster | — | — | Laszlo Gyongyosi | — |
| Secure Quantum Communication by Preserving an Optimal Measurement | poster | — | — | Joonwoo Bae | — |
| Secure quantum key distribution with dishonest devices | poster | — | — | Víctor Zapatero, Marcos Curty | — |
| Security of the round-robin differential phase shift protocol with a non-i.i.d. source and an imperfect passive phase modulation | poster | — | — | Takaya Matsuura, Toshihiko Sasaki, Masato Koashi | — |
| Semi-Device Independent Quantum Money | poster | — | — | Karol Horodecki, Maciej Stankiewicz | — |
| Semi-device-independent quantum money with coherent states | poster | — | — | Mathieu Bozzio, Eleni Diamanti, Frédéric Grosshans | — |
| Semidefinite programming for MDI QKD security analysis employing mixed initial states | poster | — | — | J. Eli Bourassa, William Primaatmaja, Emilien Lavie, Koon Tong Goh, Charles Ci Wen Lim, Hoi-Kwong Lo | — |
| Sensitivity analysis of Local-Local Oscillator CV-QKD by reference pulse modulation voltage fluctuation | poster | — | — | Shengjun Ren, Shuai Yang, Adrian Wonfor, Richard Penty, Ian White | — |
| Simple source device independent continuous variable quantum random number generator | poster | — | — | Davide G. Marangon, Peter Raymond Smith, Marco Lucamarini, Zhiliang Yuan, Andrew Shields | — |
| Switch-based quantum network for the cost reduction of QKD | poster | — | — | Alexander Duplinskiy, Oleg Fat’yanov, Igor Pavlov, Aleksey Fedorov, Vladimir Kurochkin, Yury Kurochkin | — |
| Test of Local Realism into the Past without Detection and Locality Loopholes | poster | — | — | Ming-Han Li, Cheng Wu, Yanbao Zhang, Wen-Zhao Liu, Bing Bai, Yang Liu, Weijun Zhang, Qi Zhao, Hao Li, Zhen Wang, Lixing You, W.J. Munro, Juan Yin, Jun Zhang, Cheng-Zhi Peng, Xiongfeng Ma, Qiang Zhang, Jingyun Fan, Jian-Wei Pan | — |
| The Art of Post-truth in Quantum Cryptography | poster | — | — | Gilles Brassard, Norbert Lütkenhaus, Louis Salvail, Sara Zafar Jafarzadeh | — |
| The CHSH inequality for a single qutrit | poster | — | — | Don Jean Baptiste Anoman, François Arnault, Simone Naldi | — |
| The OPENQKD project – An Open European Quantum Key Distribution Testbed | poster | — | — | Hannes Hübel, Christoph Pacher, Fabian Laudenbach, Christian Monyk, Martin Stierle, Helmut Leopold | — |
| The reduced optical attenuation opens a loophole for Eve in practical continuous-variable quantum key distribution systems | poster | — | — | Yi Zheng, Peng Huang, Anqi Huang, Jinye Peng, Zhengwen Cao, Guihua Zeng | — |
| True randomness certified from loop-hole free Bell test | poster | — | — | Xing Chen, Ilja Gerhardt, Jörg Wrachtrup, Robert Garthoff, Kai Redeker, Wenjamin Rosenfeld | — |
| Trusted Devices in Continuous-Variable Quantum Key Distribution | poster | — | — | Fabian Laudenbach, Christoph Pacher | — |
| Two protocols in Twin-Field QKD | poster | — | — | Xiang-Bin Wang | — |
| Unambiguous state discrimination of phase-coded multi-mode weak coherent states | poster | — | — | Andrei Gaidash, Anton Kozubov, George Miroshnichenko | — |
| Underwater Quantum Communication with Twisted Photons | poster | — | — | Felix Hufnagel, Frédéric Bouchard, Alicia Sit, Florence Grenapin, Khabat Heshami, Duncan England, Yingwen Zhang, Gerd Leuchs, Ebrahim Karimi | — |
| Upper bounds on secure key against non-signaling adversary via non-signaling squashed secrecy monotones | poster | — | — | Marek Winczewski, Tamoghna Das, Karol Horodecki | — |
| Urban free-space quantum cryptography with structured photons | poster | — | — | Alicia Sit, Frédéric Bouchard, Robert Fickler, Khabat Heshami, Christoph Marquardt, Gerd Leuchs, Robert W. Boyd, Ebrahim Karimi | — |
| Verifiable Hybrid Secret Sharing: Reducing Quantum Resources | poster | — | — | Victoria Lipinska, Glaucia Murta, Stephanie Wehner | — |
Committees
Organizing Committee
| Name | Position | Role | Affiliation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Crepeau | member | — | McGill University |
| Gilles Brassard | member | — | Université de Montréal |
| Louis Salvail | member | — | Université de Montréal |
| Sébastien Gambs | member | — | Université du Québec à Montréal |
Program Committee
| Name | Position | Role | Affiliation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anthony Leverrier | chair | — | Inria Paris |
| Eleni Diamanti | chair | — | CNRS, Sorbonne Université |
| Alexander Ling | member | — | Centre for Quantum Technologies, Singapore |
| Alexandru Gheorghiu | member | — | California Institute of Technology |
| Anthony Martin | member | — | University of Geneva |
| Chao-Yang Lu | member | — | University of Science and Technology of China |
| Charles Lim Ci Wen | member | — | National University of Singapore |
| Christopher Portmann | member | — | ETH Zurich |
| David Elkouss | member | — | TU Delft |
| Giuseppe Vallone | member | — | University of Padova |
| Glaucia Murta | member | — | Technical University Delft |
| Hoi-Kwong Lo | member | — | University of Toronto |
| Hugues de Riedmatten | member | — | ICFO |
| Marco Tomamichel | member | — | University of Technology Sydney |
| Masahiro Takeoka | member | — | National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Tokyo |
| Petros Wallden | member | — | University of Edinburgh |
| Rotem Arnon-Friedman | member | — | UC Berkeley |
| Stefano Pironio | member | — | Université Libre de Bruxelles |
| Thomas Jennewein | member | — | Institute for Quantum Computing |
| Tracy Northup | member | — | University of Innsbruck |
| Ulrik Lund Andersen | member | — | Technical University of Denmark |
| Wolfgang Tittel | member | — | Technical University Delft |
| Zheshen Zhang | member | — | University of Arizona |
Steering Committee
| Name | Position | Role | Affiliation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hugo Zbinden | chair | — | U Geneva, Switzerland |
| Marcos Curty | chair | — | University of Vigo |
| Akihisa Tomita | member | — | Hokkaido University |
| Anne Broadbent | member | — | University of Ottawa |
| Artur Ekert | member | — | CQT Singapore and Oxford University |
| Charles H. Bennett | member | — | IBM Research |
| Christoph Marquardt | member | — | Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light |
| Gilles Brassard | member | — | Université de Montréal |
| Ivan Damgård | member | — | Aarhus University |
| Jian-Wei Pan | member | — | University of Science and Technology of China |
| Michele Mosca | member | — | IQC, University of Waterloo |
| Nicolas Gisin | member | — | Université de Genève |
| Qiang Zhang | member | — | University of Science and Technology of China |
| Richard Hughes | member | — | Unaffiliated |
| Serge Fehr | member | — | CWI, Leiden University, QuSoft |
| Yi-Kai Liu | member | — | NIST / University of Maryland |