8
program roles
76
collaborators
2000–2024
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
18 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Passive Quantum Key Distribution: Removing Modulator Side-Channel | QCRYPT 2024 | invited ▸ presenter | — |
| Passive continuous variable quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2023 | regular | Chenyang Li, Chengqiu Hu, ▸Wenyuan Wang, Rong Wang |
Passive quantum key distribution (QKD) has been proposed for discrete variable (DV) protocols to eliminate side channels in the source. Unfortunately, the key rate of passive DV-QKD protocols suffers from sifting loss and additional quantum errors. In this work, we propose the general framework of passive continuous variable quantum key distribution. Rather surprisingly, we find that the passive source is a perfect candidate for the discrete-modulated continuous variable quantum key distribution (DMCV QKD) protocol. With the phase space remapping scheme, we show that passive DMCV QKD offers the same key rate as its active counterpart. Considering the important advantage of removing side channels that have plagued the active ones, passive DMCV QKD is a promising alternative. In addition, our protocol makes the system much simpler by allowing modulator-free quantum key distribution. Finally, we experimentally characterize the passive DMCV QKD source, thus showing its practicality. |
|||
| Fully-Passive Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution | QCRYPT 2023 | regular | Wenyuan Wang, Rong Wang |
We propose a fully-passive twin-field quantum key distribution (QKD) setup where basis choice, decoy-state preparation and encoding are all implemented entirely by post-processing without any active modulation. Our protocol can remove the potential side-channels from both source modulators and detectors, and additionally retain the high key rate advantage offered by twin-field QKD, thus offering great implementation security and good performance. Importantly, we also propose a post-processing strategy that uses mismatched phase slices and minimizes the effect of sifting. We show with numerical simulation that the new protocol can still beat the repeaterless bound and provide satisfactory key rate. |
|||
| Fully-Passive Quantum Key Distribution | QCRYPT 2022 | regular | Wenyuan Wang, Rong Wang, Víctor Zapatero, Li Qian, Bing Qi, Marcos Curty |
| Quantum Complementarity Approach to Device-Independent Security | TQC 2022 | regular | Xingjian Zhang, ▸Pei Zeng, Tian Ye, Xiongfeng Ma |
| Proof-of-principle experimental demonstration of twin-field type quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2019 | regular | Xiaoqing Zhong, Jianyong Hu, Marcos Curty, Li Qian |
The twin-field (TF) quantum key distribution (QKD) protocol and its variants are highly attractive because they can beat the well-known fundamental limit of secret key rate for point-to-point (point-to-point bound) QKD without quantum repeaters. In this paper, we perform a proof-of-principle experimental demonstration of TF-QKD based on the protocol proposed by Curty et al., which removes the need for post-selection on the matching of a global phase from the original TF-QKD. Furthermore, we employ a Sagnac loop structure to overcome the major difficulty in the practical implementation of TF-QKD, namely, the need to stabilize the phase of the quantum state over kilometers of fiber. The experimental results show that the secret key rate of TF-QKD at high loss region can surpass the point-to-point bound of QKD with current technology. |
|||
|
Enabling a Scalable High-Rate Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution Network: theory and experiment
Best Student Paper Award — Wenyuan Wang
|
QCRYPT 2018 | regular | ▸Wenyuan Wang, Hui Liu, Teng-Yun Chen, Feihu Xu |
| Towards secure QKD with testable assumptions on modulation devices | QCRYPT 2016 | regular | Akihiro Mizutani, Yuichi Nagamatsu, Marcos Curty, Koji Azuma, Rikizo Ikuta, Takashi Yamamoto, Nobuyuki Imoto, Kiyoshi Tamaki |
| Battling with Quantum Hackers | QCRYPT 2016 | invited ▸ presenter | — |
| All-photonic quantum repeaters | QCRYPT 2015 | regular | Koji Azuma, Kiyoshi Tamaki |
| Experimental Quantum Fingerprinting | QCRYPT 2015 | regular | Feihu Xu, Juan Miguel Arrazola, Kejin Wei, Wenyuan Wang, Pablo Palacios-Avila, Chen Feng, Shihan Sajeed, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
|
Experimental quantum key distribution with source flaws and tight finite-key analysis
Best Student Paper Award — Feihu Xu
|
QCRYPT 2014 | regular | ▸Feihu Xu, Shihan Sajeed, Sarah Kaiser, Zhiyuan Tang, Li Qian, Vadim Makarov |
| Experimental demonstration of polarization encoding measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2013 | regular | ▸Zhiyuan Tang, Zhongfa Liao, Feihu Xu, Bing Qi, Li Qian |
|
Increasing Entanglement by Separable Operations and New Monotones for W-type Entanglement ↗
|
QIP 2012 | plenary | Eric Chitambar, Wei Cui |
| A high speed quantum random number generator with quantum phase noise | QCRYPT 2011 | regular | ▸Feihu Xu, Bing Qi, Xiongfeng Ma, He Xu, Haoxuan Zheng |
| Quantum hacking: experimental demonstration of time-shift attack | QIP 2008 | regular | ▸Yi Zhao, Fred Fung, Bing Qi, Christine Chen |
| On the (Im)Possibility of Quantum String Commitment | QIP 2005 | invited | Matthias Christandl, Harry Buhrman, Patrick Hayden, Stephanie Wehner |
| Classical communication cost in quantum information processing --- A generalization of quantum communication complexity | QIP 2000 | invited | — |
30 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Fully passive state preparation in quantum cryptography | TQC 2023 | Víctor Zapatero, Wenyuan Wang, Li Qian, Bing Qi, Marcos Curty |
| Passive decoy-state quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2022 | Víctor Zapatero, Marcos Curty, Wenyuan Wang |
| Quantum Key Infrastructure: A scalable, quantum-proof key distribution system | QCRYPT 2022 | Mattia Montagna, Manfred von Willich |
| Characterisation of state preparation uncertainty in quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2022 | Anqi Huang, Akihiro Mizutani, Vadim Makarov, Kiyoshi Tamaki |
| Simple and Practical Device-Independent Security Analysis | QCRYPT 2022 | Xingjian Zhang, Pei Zeng, Tian Ye, Xiongfeng Ma |
| Experiment on scalable multi-user Sagnac twin-field quantum key distribution network | QCRYPT 2021 | Xiaoqing Zhong, Wenyuan Wang, Reem Mandil, Li Qian |
Twin-field quantum key distribution (TFQKD) systems have shown great promise for implementing practical long-distance secure quantum communication due to its measurement-device-independent nature and its ability to offer fundamentally superior rate-loss scaling than conventional point-to-point QKD systems. A surge of research has produced many variants of protocols and experimental demonstrations. To make TFQKD more applicable in quantum communication, a study of TFQKD in a networking setting is essential. In this work, we experimentally demonstrate a proof-of-principle Sagnac-interferometer based TFQKD network with three users and one untrusted central node. We show that our network enables users to share secure keys with channel losses up to 58dB, and channel loss asymmetric up to 15dB. In some cases, the secure key rates still beat the rate-loss bounds for conventional point-to-point repeaterless QKD systems. It is to our knowledge the first multi-user-pair TFQKD network demonstration, an important step in advancing quantum communication network technologies. |
||
| Measurement device-independent quantum key distribution with time-dependent source side-channels | QCRYPT 2021 | Amita Gnanapandithan, J. Eli Bourassa, Li Qian |
We identify a time-dependent passive source side-channel in common measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution implementations that rely on Faraday mirrors for stable phase modulation. We model the time-dependence of the side channel and use this information in conjunction with a recently developed numerical security proof technique based on semidefinite programming to quantify the impact on the secure key rate of the protocol. We explore the sensitivity of security to the parameters of the side channel and the choice of model for the signal. |
||
| Simple Method for Asymmetric Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution | QCRYPT 2020 | Wenyuan Wang |
Twin-Field quantum key distribution (TF-QKD) can beat the linear bound of repeaterless QKD systems. After the proposal of the original protocol, multiple papers have extended the protocol to prove its security. However, these works are limited to the case where the two channels have equal amount of loss (i.e. are symmetric). In a practical network setting, it is very likely that the channels are asymmetric due to e.g. geographical locations. In this work we extend a version of the TF-QKD protocol to the scenario with asymmetric channels. We show that by simply adjusting the two signal states of the two users (and not necessarily the decoy states) they can effectively compensate for channel asymmetry and consistently obtain higher key rate than either using no compensation or using the strategy of deliberately adding fibre to the shorter channel. We perform simulation with realistic parameters and finite data size, and show that our method works well and has a clear advantage over prior art methods in the presence of channel asymmetry. |
||
| The loss tolerant protocol with a twist | QCRYPT 2020 | J. Eli Bourassa, Ignatius William Primaatmaja, Charles Ci Wen Lim |
The security of measurement device-independent quantum key distribution (MDI QKD) relies on a thorough characterization of one's optical source output, especially any noise in the state preparation process. Here, we provide an extension of the loss-tolerant protocol [Phys. Rev. A 90, 052314 (2014)], a leading proof technique for analyzing the security of QKD, to MDI QKD protocols that employ mixed signal states. We first reframe the core of the proof technique, noting its generalization to treat d-dimensional signal encodings. Concentrating on the qubit signal state case, we find that the mixed states can be interpreted as providing Alice and Bob with a virtual shield system they can employ to reduce Eve's knowledge of the secret key. We then introduce a simple semidefinite programming method for optimizing the virtual twisting operations they can perform on the shield system to yield a higher key rate, along with an example calculation of fundamentally achievable key rates in the case of random polarization modulation error. |
||
| Tagging idea in the security proofs of continuous-variable Quantum Key distribution | QIP 2020 | Chenyang Li, Li Qian |
| Prefixed-threshold Real-Time Selection for Free-Space Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution | QCRYPT 2019 | Wenyuan Wang, Feihu Xu |
| Machine Learning for Optimal Parameter Prediction in Quantum Key Distribution | QCRYPT 2019 | Wenyuan Wang |
| Remote blind state preparation with weak coherent pulses in field | QCRYPT 2019 | Yangfan Jiang, Kejin Wei, Liang Huang, Ke Xu, Qichao Sun, Yuzhe Zhang, Weijun Zhang, Hao Li, Lixing You, Zhen Wang, Feihu Xu, Qiang Zhang, Jianwei Pan |
| Semidefinite programming for MDI QKD security analysis employing mixed initial states | QCRYPT 2019 | J. Eli Bourassa, William Primaatmaja, Emilien Lavie, Koon Tong Goh, Charles Ci Wen Lim |
| Quantum key distribution secure against malicious optical devices and classical post-processing units | QCRYPT 2019 | Marcos Curty |
| Experimental time-reversed adaptive Bell measurement towards all-photonic quantum repeaters | QCRYPT 2019 | Rikizo Ikuta, Yasushi Hasegawa, Nobuyuki Matsuda, Kiyoshi Tamaki, Takashi Yamamoto, Koji Azuma, Nobuyuki Imoto |
| A simple security proof for continuous variable quantum Quantum Key distribution with intensity fluctuating source | QCRYPT 2019 | Chenyang Li |
| Secure quantum key distribution in the presence of phase- and polarization-dependent loss | QIP 2019 | Chenyang Li |
| Necessary criteria for quantum secure direct communication and how to achieve them | QCRYPT 2018 | Shihan Sajeed |
| Post-selection technique against phase and polarization dependent loss in quantum communication | QCRYPT 2018 | Chenyang Li, Marcos Curty, Feihu Xu, Olinka Bedroya |
| Simple security proof of twin-field type quantum key distribution protocol | QCRYPT 2018 | Marcos Curty, Koji Azuma |
| Efficient quantum fingerprinting with wavelength division multiplexing | QCRYPT 2018 | Xiaoqing Zhong, Li Qian |
| Security implications of pre-measurement filters in time-frequency QKD | QIP 2018 | J. Eli Bourassa |
| Characterizing locally equivalent all-photonic repeater graph states | QIP 2018 | Ilan Tzitrin |
| Improving performance of decoy-state free-space QKD using information on fluctuating transmittance in turbulent channel | QCRYPT 2017 | Wenyuan Wang, Feihu Xu |
| Theory of the quantum internet | QIP 2017 | Koji Azuma, Akihiro Mizutani, Go Kato |
| Tampering with source harms the security of quantum cryptography | QCRYPT 2015 | Shihai Sun, Feihu Xu, Mu-Sheng Jiang, Xiang-Chun Ma, Linmei Liang |
| All photonic quantum repeaters | QIP 2015 | Koji Azuma, Kiyoshi Tamaki |
| Protocol choice and parameter optimization in decoy-state measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2014 | Feihu Xu, He Xu |
| Practical measurement device independent quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2013 | Feihu Xu, Marcos Curty, Bing Qi, Wei Cui, Charles Ci Wen Lim, Kiyoshi Tamaki |
We present an analysis for real-life implementations of measurement-device-independent quantum-key-distribution (MDI-QKD): a general system model, an optimized finite-decoy protocol and a rigorous finite-key analysis. This is of particular interest both to researchers hoping to demonstrate MDI-QKD and to others performing non-QKD experiments involving quantum interference. |
||
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCRYPT 2022 | program | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2019 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2017 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2015 | program | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2011 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2011 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2010 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2008 | program | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Feihu Xu | 12 |
| Wenyuan Wang | 12 |
| Li Qian | 9 |
| Marcos Curty | 9 |
| Bing Qi | 6 |
| Kiyoshi Tamaki | 6 |
| Koji Azuma | 6 |
| Chenyang Li | 5 |
| J. Eli Bourassa | 4 |
| Akihiro Mizutani | 3 |
| Charles Ci Wen Lim | 3 |
| Rong Wang | 3 |
| Shihan Sajeed | 3 |
| Víctor Zapatero | 3 |
| Xiaoqing Zhong | 3 |
| Xiongfeng Ma | 3 |
| He Xu | 2 |
| Kejin Wei | 2 |
| Nobuyuki Imoto | 2 |
| Pei Zeng | 2 |