5
talks
5
posters
6
committee roles
0
leadership roles
2011–2025
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genuine time-bin-based quantum key distribution over a turbulent depolarizing free-space channel | QCRYPT 2018 | regular | ▸Jeongwan Jin, Jean-Philippe Bourgoin, Ramy Tannous, Sascha Agne, Christopher Pugh, Katanya Kuntz, Brendon Higgins |
| Implementing Free-Space QKD Systems Between Moving Platforms: Polarization vs. Time-Bin Encoding | QCRYPT 2016 | invited ▸ presenter | — |
| Spatial-mode detector efficiency mismatch security loophole in free-space QKD | QCRYPT 2015 | regular | Poompong Chaiwongkhot, Shihan Sajeed, Jean-Philippe Bourgoin, Norbert Lütkenhaus, Vadim Makarov |
| On-demand Entanglement Distribution Network | QCRYPT 2011 | regular | ▸Andreas Poppe, Isabelle Herbauts, Bibiane Blauensteiner, Hannes Huebel |
| Detailed link analysis of satellite quantum communication | QCRYPT 2011 | regular | ▸Jean-Philippe Bourgoin, Evan Meyer-Scott, Bassam Helou |
Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Finite resource performance of small satellite-based quantum key distribution missions | QCRYPT 2024 | Tanvirul Islam, Jasminder S. Sidhu, Brendon Higgins, Thomas Brougham, Tom Vergoossen, Daniel K. L. Oi, Alexander Ling |
In satellite-based quantum key distribution (QKD), the number of secret bits that can be generated in a single satellite pass over the ground station is severely restricted by the pass duration and the free-space optical channel loss. High channel loss may decrease the signal-to-noise ratio due to background noise, reduce the number of generated raw key bits, and increase the quantum bit error rate (QBER), all of which have detrimental effects on the output secret key length. Under finite-size security analysis, higher QBER increases the minimum raw key length necessary for non-zero secret key length extraction due to less efficient reconciliation and post-processing overheads. We show that recent developments in finite key analysis allow three different small-satellite-based QKD projects CQT-Sat, UK-QUARC-ROKS, and QEYSSat to produce secret keys even under very high loss conditions, improving on estimates based on previous finite key bounds. This suggests that satellites in low Earth orbit can satisfy finite-size security requirements, but remains challenging for satellites further from Earth. We analyse the performance of each mission to provide an informed route toward improving the performance of small-satellite QKD missions. We highlight the short and long-term perspectives on the challenges and potential future developments in small-satellite-based QKD and quantum networks. In particular, we discuss some of the experimental and theoretical bottlenecks, and improvements necessary to achieve QKD and wider quantum networking capabilities in daylight and at different altitudes. |
||
| A reconfigurable multi-user quantum network with ground to space link | QCRYPT 2024 | Stephane Vinet, Ramy Tannous |
We present a reconfigurable quantum network architecture which enables the interconnectivity between a satellite node and a multitude of users on the ground. The network has dual-functionality : during the satellite-pass the network adopts a point-to-multipoint topology where all the users communicate with the satellite in an uplink configuration. Outside of a satellite pass, the signal is rerouted through telecom fibre to form a fully-connected network on the ground. To minimize the hardware requirements, we consider a multiplexed pulsed entangled photon source combined with a frequency-to-time mapping. We evaluate the potential of the proposed network configuration by simulating its performance for different quantum key distribution scenarios. Our results show that high key rates can be achieved in spite of limited resources on the satellite. An experimental verification of the protocol is under way, and we will present the latest findings. The promising scalability and easy integration make this network architecture a good candidate for future quantum communication networks. |
||
| Time-resolved Quantum Key Distribution using Semiconductor Quantum Dots with Oscillating Photonic States | QCRYPT 2023 | Matteo Pennacchietti, Brady Cunard, Mohd Zeeshan, Shlok Nahar, Sayan Gangopadhyay, Philip J. Poole, Dan Dalacu, Andreas Fognini, Klaus Jöns, Val Zwiller, Norbert Lütkenhaus, Michael E. Reimer |
Quantum dot-based entangled photon sources are promising candidates for quantum key distribution (QKD), as they can in principle emit deterministically, with high brightness and low multiphoton contribution. However, quantum dots (QD) often inherently possess a fine structure splitting (FSS). Since the entangled photonic state in the presence of non-zero FSS is oscillating, one must settle for a lower efficiency source through temporal post-selection or a lower measured entanglement fidelity. In both cases, the overall key rate is reduced.
Our QKD analysis shows that this trade-off can be overcome by constructing a time-resolved QKD protocol where all photon pairs emitted by a QD with non-zero FSS can be used in secret key generation. This protocol works only when the detection system's temporal resolution is much smaller than the FSS period. By implementing our protocol, higher key rates can be achieved as compared to previous QKD experiments with QD entangled photon pair sources.
Additionally, unlike previous security analyses that assume perfect qubit states, we rigorously bound the effect of any multi-photon components of the optical state on the key rate, which is more applicable to practical implementations. |
||
| CubeSat detector assembly for investigating in-orbit mitigation of radiation damage | QCRYPT 2017 | Nigar Sultana, Jin Gyu Lim, Jean-Philippe Bourgoin, Vadim Makarov |
| Effect of atmospheric turbulence on spatial-mode detector efficiency mismatch | QCRYPT 2017 | Poompong Chaiwongkhot, Katanya Kuntz, Anqi Huang, Jean-Philippe Bourgoin, Shihan Sajeed, Norbert Lütkenhaus, Vadim Makarov |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCRYPT 2025 | PC | member | PC Member |
| QCRYPT 2024 | PC | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2021 | PC | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2018 | PC | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2013 | Local | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2012 | PC | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Jean-Philippe Bourgoin | 5 |
| Norbert Lütkenhaus | 3 |
| Vadim Makarov | 3 |
| Brendon Higgins | 2 |
| Katanya Kuntz | 2 |
| Poompong Chaiwongkhot | 2 |
| Ramy Tannous | 2 |
| Shihan Sajeed | 2 |
| Alexander Ling | 1 |
| Andreas Fognini | 1 |
| Andreas Poppe | 1 |
| Anqi Huang | 1 |
| Bassam Helou | 1 |
| Bibiane Blauensteiner | 1 |
| Brady Cunard | 1 |
| Christopher Pugh | 1 |
| Dan Dalacu | 1 |
| Daniel K. L. Oi | 1 |
| Evan Meyer-Scott | 1 |
| Hannes Huebel | 1 |