7
talks
3
posters
12
committee roles
1
leadership roles
2010–2024
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tight analytic bound on the trade-off between device-independent randomness and nonlocality | QCRYPT 2022 | regular | Lewis Wooltorton, Peter Brown |
| Tutorial on Device-independent QKD | QCRYPT 2022 | tutorial ▸ presenter | — |
| Device-independent randomness expansion against quantum side information | QCRYPT 2020 | regular | Wen-Zhao Liu, Ming-Han Li, Sammy Ragy, Si-Ran Zhao, Bing Bai, Yang Liu, Peter Brown, Jun Zhang, Jingyun Fan, Qiang Zhang, Jian-Wei Pan |
| Device-independent Quantum Information Processing | QIP 2015 | tutorial | — |
|
“Unconditionally secure device-independent quantum key distribution with only two devices.” ↗
|
QIP 2013 | regular | Jonathan Barrett, Adrian Kent |
| Memory attacks on device-independent quantum cryptography | QCRYPT 2012 | regular ▸ presenter | Jonathan Barrett, Adrian Kent |
|
All reversible dynamics in maximally non-local theories are trivial ↗
|
QIP 2010 | regular | David Gross, Markus Mueller, Oscar Dahlsten |
Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Maximizing extractable randomness from optical device-independent randomness expansion experiments using robust self-testing families of Bell inequalities | QCRYPT 2024 | Shashank Kumar Ranu |
Recent advancements in device-independent randomness expansion (DIRE) protocols have shown significant improvements in random bit generation rates yet remain slower than other methods. Optical systems, ideal for long-distance quantum information transmission, face challenges due to noisy photon sources and inefficient detectors, resulting in lower randomness rates of photonics-based DIRE implementations. In this work, we demonstrate how to tune DIRE protocols and the underlying Bell tests to specific noise levels, thereby enhancing the extractable randomness in photonics-based DIRE implementations. |
||
| Maximal device-independent randomness certification by more than two observers through bipartite Bell tests | QCRYPT 2023 | Lewis Wooltorton, Peter Brown |
Nonlocal tests on multipartite quantum correlations can certify randomness in a device-independent (DI) way. Such correlations admit a rich structure, making the task of choosing an appropriate witness, known as a Bell inequality, difficult. For example, extremal Bell inequalities are tight witnesses of nonlocality, however achieving their maximum violation places constraints on the underlying quantum system, which are often incompatible with optimal randomness generation. As a result we find a trade-off between maximum randomness and Bell violation. Understanding this trade-off for more than two parties has not been explored, and would inform the best way to generate DI randomness in this setting. Moreover, suitable techniques that enable maximum randomness certification for arbitrarily many parties are missing. Here, we study the maximum amount of randomness that can be certified by correlations exhibiting a violation of the Mermin-Ardehali-Belinskii-Klyshko (MABK) inequality. We find that maximum quantum violation and maximum randomness are incompatible for any even number of parties, with incompatibility diminishing as the number of parties grow, and conjecture the precise trade-off. We also show that maximum MABK violation is not necessary for maximum randomness for odd numbers of parties. To obtain our results, we derive new families of Bell inequalities certifying maximum randomness from a new technique for randomness certification, which we call "expanding Bell inequalities". Our technique allows one to take a bipartite Bell expression, known as the seed, and transform it into a multipartite Bell inequality tailored for randomness certification, showing how intuition learned in the bipartite case can find use in more complex scenarios. |
||
| Exploiting no-Signalling Extremal Distributions to find Bell Inequalities | QCRYPT 2017 | Thomas Cope |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCRYPT 2021 | PC | member | — |
| QIP 2021 | PC | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2018 | PC | chair | — |
| QCRYPT 2017 | PC | member | — |
| TQC 2017 | PC | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2015 | SC | member | — |
| QIP 2015 | PC | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2014 | SC | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2013 | SC | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2012 | SC | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2011 | SC | member | — |
| QIP 2010 | Local | member | poster session |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Peter Brown | 3 |
| Adrian Kent | 2 |
| Jonathan Barrett | 2 |
| Lewis Wooltorton | 2 |
| Bing Bai | 1 |
| David Gross | 1 |
| Jian-Wei Pan | 1 |
| Jingyun Fan | 1 |
| Jun Zhang | 1 |
| Markus Mueller | 1 |
| Ming-Han Li | 1 |
| Oscar Dahlsten | 1 |
| Qiang Zhang | 1 |
| Sammy Ragy | 1 |
| Shashank Kumar Ranu | 1 |
| Si-Ran Zhao | 1 |
| Thomas Cope | 1 |
| Wen-Zhao Liu | 1 |
| Yang Liu | 1 |