48
collaborators
2006–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
7 Talks
29 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Cost of a Quantum Operation: From Axioms to a Hamiltonian Framework | QIP 2026 | ▸Marek Winczewski, Leonard Sikorski, Paweł Mazurek, Mikolaj Czechlewski, Raja Yehia |
| Update on the Bound Key Conjecture | QIP 2026 | Stefan Bäuml, Matthias Christandl, ▸Leonard Sikorski |
| Quantification of the energy consumption of entanglement distribution | QIP 2026 | Marek Winczewski, Leonard Sikorski, Paweł Mazurek, ▸Mikolaj Czechlewski, Raja Yehia |
| Cost of quantum secret key | QCRYPT 2024 | Leonard Sikorski, Siddhartha Das, Mark M. Wilde |
In this paper, we develop the resource theory of quantum secret key. Operating under the assumption that entangled states with zero distillable key do not exist, we define the key cost of a quantum state, and device. We study its properties through the lens of a quantity that we call the key of formation. The main result of our paper is that the regularized key of formation is an upper bound on the key cost of a quantum state. The core protocol underlying this result is privacy dilution, which converts states containing ideal privacy into ones with diluted privacy. Next, we show that the key cost is bounded from below by the regularized relative entropy of entanglement, which implies the irreversibility of the privacy creation-distillation process for a specific class of states. We further focus on mixed-state analogues of pure quantum states in the domain of privacy, and we prove that a number of entanglement measures are equal to each other for these states, similar to the case of pure entangled states. The privacy cost and distillable key in the single-shot regime exhibit a yield-cost relation, and basic consequences for quantum devices are also provided. |
||
| Optimal Measurement Structures for Contextuality Applications | TQC 2024 | Yuan Liu, Ravishankar Ramanathan, Monika Rosicka, Pawel Horodecki |
| Universal limitations on quantum key distribution over a network | QIP 2021 | Siddhartha Das, Stefan Bäuml, Marek Winczewski |
| Universal limitations on quantum key distribution over a network | QCRYPT 2020 | Siddhartha Das, Stefan Bäuml, Marek Winczewski |
Entanglement is an intriguing quantum phenomenon with crucial implications for both fundamental physics and technological applications, e.g., quantum key distribution (QKD). In this paper, we show that multipartite private states from which secret keys are directly accessible to trusted partners are genuinely multipartite entangled states. With application to secure Quantum Internet, we consider the most general setup of multipartite quantum process (channel) in a network setting: multiplex quantum channel with involved parties having one of the three possible roles-- that of only sender or receiver, or both sender and receiver. We derive divergence-based measures for entangling abilities of multipartite quantum channels. We describe an LOCC-assisted secret key agreement (SKA) protocol for generation or distillation of key (private random bits) among multiple trusted allies connected through a quantum multiplex channel secure against a quantum eavesdropper, of which measurement-device-independent QKD and SKA protocols over quantum network laced with key repeaters are particular instances. We are able to provide upper bounds on the non-asymptotic private capacities, maximum rate at which secret key can be distilled via finite uses of channels, and lower bounds on asymptotic capacities. These bounds are expressed in terms of the divergence-based entanglement measures of the channels. Some of these measures lead to strong converse bounds on the private capacities. Our upper bounds on the private capacities also are upper bound on the multipartite quantum capacities where goal is to distill Greenberger{Horne{Zeilinger (GHZ) state. Also, we are able to derive upper bound on the secret key bits that can be distilled via LOCC among trusted allies sharing finite copies of multipartite quantum states. |
||
| Limitations on device independent secure key via squashed non-locality | QCRYPT 2020 | Marek Winczewski, Tamoghna Das |
We initiate a systematic study to provide upper bounds on device-independent key, secure against a non-signaling adversary (NSDI), distilled by a wide class of operations, currently used in both quantum and non-signaling device-independent protocols. These operations consist of a direct measurements on the devices followed by Local Operations and Public Communication (MDLOPC). We formulate a security condition for the considered class of protocols, that is based on the newly introduced non-signaling norm. This norm takes supremum over certain operations, that can be used to discriminate devices. It is shown that the security condition based on this norm, is equivalent to two security conditions present in the literature. We employ the idea of ``squashing" on the secrecy monotones, which provide upper bounds on the key rate in secret key agreement (SKA) scenario, and show that squashed secrecy monotones are the upper bounds on NSDI key. As an important instance, an upper bound on NSDI key rate called ``squashed non-locality", has been constructed. It exhibits several important properties, including convexity, monotonicity, and additivity on tensor products. Using this bound, we identify numerically a domain of two binary inputs and two binary outputs non-local devices for which the squashed non-locality is zero. Therefore one can not distill key from them via MDLOPC operations. These are mixtures of Popescu-Rohrlich (PR) and anti-PR box with the weight of PR less than 80%. This example confirms the intuition that non-locality need not imply secrecy in the non-signaling scenario. The approach is general, describing how to construct other tighter yet possibly less computable upper bounds. Our technique for obtaining upper bounds is based on the non-signaling analog of quantum purification: the complete extension. This extension provides the ultimate eavesdropping power with the minimal consumption of eavesdropper's memory and, as we prove, yields equivalent security conditions as previously known in the literature. |
||
| Limitations on device independent secure key via squashed non-locality | QIP 2020 | Marek Winczewski, Tamoghna Das |
| No purification in all discrete theories and the power of the complete extension | QIP 2020 | Marek Winczewski, Tamoghna Das, Pawel Horodecki, Lukasz Pankowski, Marco Piani, Ravishankar Ramanathan |
| Memory Cost of an Anti-malware Quantum Network Design | QIP 2020 | Omer Sakarya, Adam Rutkowski, Marek Winczewski |
| Memory Cost of an Anti-malware Quantum Network Design | TQC 2020 | Marek Winczewski, Adam Rutkowski, Omer Sakarya |
| Upper bounds on secure key against non-signaling adversary via non-signaling squashed secrecy monotones | QCRYPT 2019 | Marek Winczewski, Tamoghna Das |
| Semi-Device Independent Quantum Money | QCRYPT 2019 | Maciej Stankiewicz |
| No purification in all discrete theories and the power of the complete extension | QCRYPT 2019 | Marek Winczewski, Tamoghna Das, Pawel Horodecki, Lukasz Pankowski, Marco Piani, Ravishankar Ramanathan |
| On distilling secure key from reducible private states and (non) existence of entangled key-undistillable states | QIP 2019 | Michal Studzinski, Adam Rutkowski, Piotr Cwiklinski |
| Upper bounds on secure key against non-signaling and quantum adversaries via squashed secrecy monotones | QIP 2019 | Marek Winczewski, Tamoghna Das |
| No purification in all discrete theories and the power of the complete extension Ramanathan | QIP 2019 | Marek Winczewski, Tamoghna Das, Pawel Horodecki, Lukasz Pankowski, Marco Piani, R. Ravishankar |
| Quantum money with verification by untrusted measurement devices | QCRYPT 2018 | Maciej Stankiewicz |
| Quantum measurement distance | QIP 2018 | Łukasz Pawela, Zbigniew Puchała, Aleksandra Krawiec, Ryszard Kukulski |
| Amplifying the Randomness of Weak Sources Correlated with Devices | QCRYPT 2016 | Hanna Wojewódka, Fernando G. S. L. Brandão, Andrzej Grudka, Michał Horodecki, Pawel Horodecki, Marcin Pawlowski, Ravishankar Ramanathan |
| Amplifying the randomness of weak sources correlated with devices | TQC 2016 | Hanna Wojewódka, Fernando G. S. L. Brandão, Andrzej Grudka, Michał Horodecki, Pawel Horodecki, Marcin Pawlowski, Ravishankar Ramanathan |
| Fraction of Determinism Restricts Winnning Chances of 2xn Input Cardinality Games | QIP 2015 | Michał Horodecki, Pawel Horodecki, Ryszard Horodecki, P. Joshi, Stanislaw Szarek, Tomasz Szarek |
| Bounds on quantum non-locality via partial transposition | QIP 2015 | Glaucia Murta |
| Randomness amplification without Markov condition | QIP 2015 | Fernando G. S. L. Brandão, Andrzej Grudka, Michał Horodecki, Pawel Horodecki, Marcin Pawlowski, R. Ravishankar, Hanna Wojewódka |
| Bounds on quantum non-locality via partial transposition | TQC 2015 | Glaucia Murta |
| On equivalence between Popescu-Rohrlich boxes and random access codes | QIP 2014 | Waldemar Klobus, Andrzej Grudka, Michał Horodecki, Marcin Pawlowski |
| Free randomness amplification using bipartite chain correlations | QCRYPT 2013 | Andrzej Grudka, Michał Horodecki, Pawel Horodecki, Marcin Pawlowski, Ravishankar Ramanathan |
A direct analysis of the protocol of randomness amplification using Bell inequality violation is performed in terms of the convex combination of no-signaling boxes required to simulate quantum violation of the inequality. The probability distributions of bits generated by a Santha-Vazirani source are shown to be mixtures of permutations of Bernoulli distributions with parameter defined by the source. An intuitive proof is provided for the range of partial randomness from which perfect randomness can be extracted using quantum correlations violating the chain inequalities. Exact values are derived in the asymptotic limit of a large number of measurement settings. |
||
| Quantifying contextuality | QIP 2013 | Andrzej Grudka, Michał Horodecki, Pawel Horodecki, Ryszard Horodecki, Pankaj Joshi, Waldemar Klobus, Antoni Wojcik |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Marek Winczewski | 13 |
| Pawel Horodecki | 12 |
| Michał Horodecki | 10 |
| Ravishankar Ramanathan | 8 |
| Andrzej Grudka | 7 |
| Tamoghna Das | 7 |
| Fernando G. S. L. Brandão | 5 |
| Marcin Pawlowski | 5 |
| Stefan Bäuml | 5 |
| Hanna Wojewódka | 4 |
| Leonard Sikorski | 4 |
| Matthias Christandl | 4 |
| Adam Rutkowski | 3 |
| Andreas Winter | 3 |
| Lukasz Pankowski | 3 |
| Marco Piani | 3 |
| Siddhartha Das | 3 |
| Glaucia Murta | 2 |
| Maciej Stankiewicz | 2 |
| Mikolaj Czechlewski | 2 |