6
talks
1
posters
0
committee roles
0
leadership roles
2014–2024
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upper bounds on device-independent quantum key distribution rates | TQC 2021 | regular | Rotem Arnon-Friedman, Matthias Christandl, Roberto Ferrara, Felix Leditzky |
| Distributed private randomness distillation | QCRYPT 2018 | regular | ▸Dong Yang, Andreas Winter |
| Randomness amplification against no-signaling adversaries using two devices | QCRYPT 2015 | regular | Ravishankar Ramanathan, Fernando Brandao, Michał Horodecki, Pawel Horodecki, Hanna Wojewódka |
|
Limitations on Quantum Key Repeaters ↗
|
QIP 2015 | regular | Stefan Baeuml, Matthias Christandl, Andreas Winter |
| Limitations on Quantum Key Repeaters | QCRYPT 2014 | regular ▸ presenter | Stefan Baeuml, Matthias Christandl, Andreas Winter |
| Robust device-independent randomness amplification with few devices | QIP 2014 | regular | ▸Fernando Brandao, Ravishankar Ramanathan, Andrzej Grudka, Michał Horodecki, Pawel Horodecki |
Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of quantum secret key | QCRYPT 2024 | Leonard Sikorski, Siddhartha Das, Mark M. Wilde |
In this paper, we develop the resource theory of quantum secret key. Operating under the assumption that entangled states with zero distillable key do not exist, we define the key cost of a quantum state, and device. We study its properties through the lens of a quantity that we call the key of formation. The main result of our paper is that the regularized key of formation is an upper bound on the key cost of a quantum state. The core protocol underlying this result is privacy dilution, which converts states containing ideal privacy into ones with diluted privacy. Next, we show that the key cost is bounded from below by the regularized relative entropy of entanglement, which implies the irreversibility of the privacy creation-distillation process for a specific class of states. We further focus on mixed-state analogues of pure quantum states in the domain of privacy, and we prove that a number of entanglement measures are equal to each other for these states, similar to the case of pure entangled states. The privacy cost and distillable key in the single-shot regime exhibit a yield-cost relation, and basic consequences for quantum devices are also provided. |
||
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Andreas Winter | 3 |
| Matthias Christandl | 3 |
| Fernando Brandao | 2 |
| Michał Horodecki | 2 |
| Pawel Horodecki | 2 |
| Ravishankar Ramanathan | 2 |
| Stefan Baeuml | 2 |
| Andrzej Grudka | 1 |
| Dong Yang | 1 |
| Felix Leditzky | 1 |
| Hanna Wojewódka | 1 |
| Leonard Sikorski | 1 |
| Mark M. Wilde | 1 |
| Roberto Ferrara | 1 |
| Rotem Arnon-Friedman | 1 |
| Siddhartha Das | 1 |