3
talks
6
posters
1
committee roles
0
leadership roles
2020–2025
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orthogonality Broadcasting and Quantum Position Verification | QCRYPT 2025 | regular | Rene Allerstorfer, Philip Verduyn Lunel, Eric Chitambar |
The no-cloning theorem leads to information-theoretic security in various quantum cryptographic protocols. However, this security typically derives from a possibly weaker property that classical information encoded in certain quantum states cannot be broadcast. To formally capture this property, we introduce the study of ``orthogonality broadcasting." When attempting to broadcast the orthogonality of two different qubit bases, we establish that the power of classical and quantum communication is equivalent. However, quantum communication is shown to be strictly more powerful for broadcasting orthogonality in higher dimensions. We then relate orthogonality broadcasting to quantum position verification and provide a new method for establishing error bounds in the no pre-shared entanglement model that can address protocols previous methods could not. Our key technical contribution is an uncertainty relation that uses the geometric relation of the states that undergo broadcasting rather than the non-commutative aspect of the final measurements. |
|||
| Orthogonality Broadcasting and Quantum Position Verification | TQC 2025 | regular | Rene Allerstorfer, Philip Verduyn Lunel, Eric Chitambar |
| Numerical Calculations of Finite Key Rate for General Quantum Key Distribution Protocols | QCRYPT 2020 | regular | Jie Lin, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Orthogonality Broadcasting and Quantum Position Verification | QIP 2025 | Rene Allerstorfer, Philip Verduyn Lunel, Eric Chitambar |
| Online learning of a panoply of quantum objects | QIP 2025 | Akshay Bansal, Soumik Ghosh, Jamie Sikora, Alice Zheng |
| Capacities of entanglement distribution from a central source | QIP 2025 | Xinan Chen, Stefano Chessa, Felix Leditzky, Eric Chitambar |
| Security against coherent attacks in discrete-modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2024 | Archishna Bhattacharyya, Florian Kanitschar, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
Discrete-Modulated Continuous-Variable Quantum Key Distribution (DMCVQKD) protocols are amenable for deployment in quantum communication networks due to their experimental simplicity, but pose theoretical challenges impeding their tight security analyses. Major progress has recently been made in the finite-size regime against independent and identical (iid) collective attacks (Kanitschar, F. et. al., (2023), PRX Quantum, 4(4), p.040306). However, a complete and rigorous analysis must take into account correlated rounds of attack beyond the iid-collective assumption, and must not assume a photon-number cutoff on the signal states. The difficulty of achieving this lies in the absence of an information-theoretic framework for proving security that handles infinite dimensional multipartite quantum states that are a priori unstructured, i.e., beyond the asymptotic iid setting. We present a composable security proof against coherent attacks in the finite-size regime for a general DMCVQKD protocol. We introduce a framework to handle states that are in part iid and in part unstructured (almost iid) in infinite dimensional Hilbert spaces. We use a de Finetti reduction for infinite dimensional almost iid states (Renner, R., Cirac, J. I., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 110504 (2009)), and generalise the acceptance test and the energy test to almost iid states handling Eve’s correlated infinite dimensional side information. As work in progress, we address the issue of a missing chain rule that formulates an explicit key rate expression. Numerical simulation of key rates (Winick, A. et. al., Quantum 2, 77 (2018)) can then be performed, demonstrating the efficacy of the security proof. |
||
| Finite-size analysis of prepare-and-measure and decoy-state QKD via entropy accumulation | QCRYPT 2024 | Lars Kamin, Amir Arqand, Norbert Lütkenhaus, Ernest Y.-Z. Tan |
An important goal in quantum key distribution (QKD) is the task of providing a finite-size security proof without the assumption of collective attacks. For prepare-and-measure QKD, one approach for obtaining such proofs is the generalized entropy accumulation theorem (GEAT), but thus far it has only been applied to study a small selection of protocols. In this work, we present techniques for applying the GEAT in finite-size analysis of generic prepare-and-measure protocols, with a focus on decoy-state protocols. In particular, we present an improved approach for computing entropy bounds for decoy-state protocols, which has the dual benefits of providing tighter bounds than previous approaches (even asymptotically) and being compatible with methods for computing min-tradeoff functions in the GEAT. Furthermore, we develop methods to incorporate some improvements to the finite-size terms in the GEAT, and implement techniques to automatically optimize the min-tradeoff function. Our approach also addresses some numerical stability challenges specific to prepare-and-measure protocols, which were not addressed in previous works. |
||
| Finite-size analysis of prepare-and-measure and decoy-state quantum key distribution via entropy accumulation | QCRYPT 2023 | Lars Kamin, Amir Arqand, Jie Lin, Norbert Lütkenhaus, Ernest Y.-Z. Tan |
An important goal in quantum key distribution (QKD) is the task of providing a finite-size security proof without assuming that the states across the protocol rounds are independent and identically distributed (IID). For prepare-and-measure QKD, one recently developed approach for obtaining such proofs is the generalized entropy accumulation theorem (GEAT), but thus far it has only been applied to study a small selection of protocols. In this work, we present techniques for applying the GEAT in finite-size analysis of generic prepare-and-measure protocols, incorporating several methods to optimize the min-tradeoff function and minimize the second-order term in the GEAT. As a particular focus, we analyze decoy-state protocols and present a method for generically obtaining min-tradeoff functions for such protocols, even those where a closed-form expression for the asymptotic rate is not known. Furthermore, we highlight that the techniques we develop in the process should also yield improved bounds on the keyrates of decoy-state protocols even in the asymptotic limit. |
||
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCRYPT 2025 | PC | member | PC Member |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Eric Chitambar | 4 |
| Norbert Lütkenhaus | 4 |
| Philip Verduyn Lunel | 3 |
| Rene Allerstorfer | 3 |
| Amir Arqand | 2 |
| Ernest Y.-Z. Tan | 2 |
| Jie Lin | 2 |
| Lars Kamin | 2 |
| Akshay Bansal | 1 |
| Alice Zheng | 1 |
| Archishna Bhattacharyya | 1 |
| Felix Leditzky | 1 |
| Florian Kanitschar | 1 |
| Jamie Sikora | 1 |
| Soumik Ghosh | 1 |
| Stefano Chessa | 1 |
| Xinan Chen | 1 |