5
program roles
3
steering roles
120
collaborators
2011–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
17 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Finite-size DIQKD with noisy preprocessing and random key measurements | QCRYPT 2021 | regular | Ernest Y. -Z. Tan, Xavier Valcarce, Pavel Sekatski, Jean-Daniel Bancal, René Schwonnek, Renato Renner, Nicolas Sangouard |
The security of finite-length keys is essential for the implementation of device-independent quantum key distribution (DIQKD). Presently, there are several finite-size DIQKD security proofs, but they are mostly focused on standard DIQKD protocols and do not directly apply to the recent improved DIQKD protocols based on techniques such as noisy preprocessing and random key measurements. Here, we provide a general finite-size security proof that can simultaneously encompass these approaches, using tighter finite-size bounds than previous analyses. In doing so, we develop a method to compute tight lower bounds on the asymptotic keyrate for any such DIQKD protocol with binary inputs and outputs. With this, we show that positive asymptotic keyrates are achievable up to depolarizing noise values of 9.26%, exceeding all previously known noise thresholds. Furthermore, we also consider in greater detail a particular form of generalized CHSH inequality, and derive partial closed-form results for such cases. We discuss the potential advantage of this approach for realistic photonic implementations of DIQKD. |
|||
| Security analysis of practical QKD | QCRYPT 2021 | tutorial ▸ presenter | — |
| Securing practical quantum cryptography with optical power limiters | QCRYPT 2020 | regular | Gong Zhang, Ignatius William Primaatmaja, Jing Yan Haw, Xiao Gong, Chao Wang |
Given that most implementations of quantum cryptography systems require low light operations for security reasons, limiting the energy of incoming/outgoing optical signals is a central task. In this submission, we propose and demonstrate a novel and practical power limiter using the thermo-optical defocusing effect of an acrylic prism. The results show that a power limiting in the regime of mW or lower can be achieved, and at the same time possess desirable features like compactness, robustness, polarization and spectrum dimension independence, etc. Our work provides an effective way for limiting the incoming/outgoing optical energy, which is important for practical quantum cryptographic protocols. We believe it will attract much interest and possess the potential to become a standard tool for practical quantum applications. |
|||
| Robust device-independent quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2020 | regular | René Schwonnek, Koon Tong Goh, Ignatius William Primaatmaja, Ernest Y. -Z. Tan, Ramona Wolf, Valerio Scarani |
Device-independent quantum key distribution (DIQKD) is the art of using untrusted devices to distribute secret keys in an unsecure network. It thus represents the ultimate form of cryptography, offering not only information-theoretic security against channel attacks, but also against attacks exploiting implementation loopholes~\cite{lydersen2010hacking}. At its heart, DIQKD utilises nonlocal correlations---detected and certified by a Bell inequality---to establish secret correlations between the users. In recent years, much progress has been made towards realising the first DIQKD experiments, but current proposals are just out of reach of today’s loophole-free Bell experiments. Here, in this work, we close the gap between the theory and practice of DIQKD with a simple variant of the original protocol based on the celebrated Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) Bell inequality. In using two randomly chosen key generating bases instead of one, we show that the noise tolerance of DIQKD can be significantly improved. In particular, the extended feasibility region now covers some of the most recent loophole-free CHSH experiments, hence indicating that the first realisation of DIQKD already lies within the range of these experiments. |
|||
| Computing secure key rates for quantum key distribution with untrusted devices | QIP 2020 | regular | Ernest Y. -Z. Tan, René Schwonnek, Koon Tong Goh, Ignatius William Primaatmaja |
| Almost-tight and versatile security analysis of measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2019 | regular | Ignatius William Primaatmaja, Emilien Lavie, Koon Tong Goh, Chao Wang |
Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution (MDI-QKD) is the only known QKD scheme that can completely overcome the problem of detection side-channel attacks. Yet, despite its practical importance, there is no standard approach towards proving the security of MDI-QKD. Here, we present a simple numerical method that can efficiently compute almost-tight security bounds for any discretely modulated MDI-QKD protocol. To demonstrate the broad utility of our method, we use it to analyze the security of coherent-state MDI-QKD, decoy-state MDI-QKD with leaky sources, and a variant of twin-field QKD called phase-matching QKD. In all of the numerical simulations (using realistic detection models) we find that our method gives significantly higher secret key rates than those obtained with current security proof techniques. Interestingly, we also find that phase-matching QKD using only two coherent test states is enough to overcome the fundamental rate-distance limit of QKD. Taken together, these findings suggest that our security proof method enables a versatile, fast, and possibly optimal approach towards the security validation of practical MDI-QKD systems. |
|||
| A numerical method for computing reliable secret key rates for device-independent quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2019 | regular | René Schwonnek, Ernest Y. -Z. Tan, Ramona Wolf, Koon Tong Goh |
In this QCRYPT submission, we present a numerical toolbox that is capable of producing non-trivial lower bounds on the asymptotic secret key rate of any device-independent quantum key distribution (DIQKD) protocol. The main mechanism of our toolbox is a new method for estimating the entropy production of a quantum channel, giving rise to bounds that can be computed using the family of semidefinite programs (SDPs) known as the Navascues-Pironio-Acin (NPA) hierarchy. |
|||
| Characterising the behaviour of classical-quantum broadcast networks | QCRYPT 2018 | regular | Yukun Wang, ▸Ignatius William Primaatmaja, Antonios Varvitsiotis |
| Continuous-variable QKD with a “locally” generated local oscillator | QCRYPT 2016 | regular | Bing Qi, Pavel Lougovski, Raphael Pooser, Warren Grice, Miljko Bobrek, Philip G. Evans |
| Detector-device-independent quantum key distribution: From proof of principle to a high speed implementation | QCRYPT 2015 | regular | Boris Korzh, Alberto Boaron, Anthony Martin, Gianluca Boso, Raphael Houlmann, Felix Bussieres, Robert Thew, Hugo Zbinden |
| Self-Testing Quantum Random Number Generator | QCRYPT 2015 | regular | Nicolas Brunner, Tommaso Lunghi, Jonatan Bohr Brask, Anthony Martin, Joseph Bowles, Hugo Zbinden |
| Hot topic: Application of detection-loophole-free tests of quantum nonlocality | QCRYPT 2013 | regular | ▸Bradley Christensen, Kevin T. McCusker, Joseph B. Altepeter, Brice Calkins, Thomas Gerrits, Adriana E. Lita, Aaron Miller, Lynden K. Shalm, Yanbao Zhang, Sae Woo Nam, Nicolas Brunner, Nicolas Gisin, Paul Kwiat |
| 1 Mbps coherent one-way QKD with dense wavelength division multiplexing and hardware key distillation | QCRYPT 2012 | regular | ▸Nino Walenta, Andreas Burg, Jeremy Constantin, Nicolas Gisin, Olivier Guinnard, Raphael Houlmann, Tommaso Lunghi, Hugo Zbinden |
| Quantum cryptography with local Bell tests | QCRYPT 2012 | regular ▸ presenter | Christopher Portmann, Marco Tomamichel, Renato Renner, Nicolas Gisin |
| Semi-device-independent QKD based on BB84 and a CHSH-type estimation | TQC 2012 | regular | Erik Woodhead, Stefano Pironio |
| Fast coherent-one way quantum key distribution and high-speed encryption | QCRYPT 2011 | regular | ▸Nino Walenta, Olivier Guinnard, Raphael Houlmann, Hugo Zbinden |
|
Tight Finite-Key Analysis for Quantum Cryptography ↗
|
TQC 2011 | regular | ▸Marco Tomamichel, Renato Renner, Nicolas Gisin |
Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), invented by Bennett and Brassard and Ekert can be considered the first application of quantum information science. We focus on the assumption that an arbitrarily large number M of signals can be exchanged between the legitimate parties (Alice and Bob) and subsequently used for the computation of the final key. Here, we apply a novel proof technique to the BB84 QKD protocol and derive almost tight bounds on the minimum value M required to achieve a given level of security. The technique is based on a formulation of the uncertainty relation in terms of smooth entropies. We demonstrate significant improvements of the finite-key rate over existing results. |
|||
40 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Self-testing Quantum Randomness Expansion using Silicon Photonic Chip | QCRYPT 2025 | Gong Zhang, Ignatius William Primaatmaja, Yue Chen, Si Qi Ng, Hong Jie Ng, Xiao Gong, Koon Tong Goh, Chao Wang |
The power of quantum random number generation is more than just the ability to create truly random numbers. It can also enable self-testing, which allows the user to verify the implementation integrity of critical quantum components with minimal assumptions. In this work, we develop and implement a self-testing quantum random number generator (QRNG) chipset capable of generating 15.33 Mbits of certifiable randomness in each run, producing an expansion rate of 5.11×10-4 at a repetition rate of 10 MHz. The chip design is based on a highly loss-and-noise tolerant measurement-device-independent protocol, where random coherent states encoded using quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK) are used to self-test the quantum homodyne detection unit, well-known to be challenging to characterise in practice. Importantly, this proposal opens up the possibility to implement miniaturised self-testing QRNG devices at production scale using standard silicon photonics foundry platforms. |
||
| Certified Randomness implies Secure Classical Position-Verification | QIP 2025 | Omar Amer, Kauhsik Chakraborty, David Zhiyang Cui, Fatih Kaleoglu, Minzhao Liu, Marco Pistoia |
| Client Authentication and Key Generation Enabled by Pseudorandom Basis Selection | QCRYPT 2024 | Wen Yu Kon, Jefferson Chu, Kevin Han Yong Loh, Obada Alia, Omar Amer, Marco Pistoia, Kaushik Chakraborty |
Client authentication (CA) is a cryptographic protocol where a server tries to validate the identity of a client. Fehr et. al. proposed a CA protocol with pre-shared basis information between the client and server which has a nice key recycling property, where secrets including the pre-shared basis can be securely reused after each successful round. We extend the protocol to a practical setting by including decoy state and error correction, but the leakage of pre-shared basis information via multi-photon events limits the performance of such a protocol. As such, we propose the use of a pseudorandom number generator (PRNG), assumed to be secure only during each run of the protocol, to perform basis selection to reduce information leakage. A formal proof of the protocol security is provided by modifying the entropic uncertainty relation to account for basis generated by a PRNG, which could be of independent interest as it may be applicable to other protocols such as quantum key distribution. An experimental implementation of the protocol, with appropriate post-selection, was performed to demonstrate its feasibility. We also designed a CA protocol secure in the practical setting with only two rounds of communication: a challenge by the server and a response by the client. |
||
| Integrated photonic platform with high-speed single-photon path entanglement | QCRYPT 2022 | Gong Zhang, Chao Wang, Koon Tong Goh, Si Qi Ng, Haibo Wang, Yue Chen, Jing Yan Haw, Xiao Gong |
| Security of the Six-State Protocol via Quantum Probability Estimation | QCRYPT 2022 | Frits Verhagen, Ignatius William Primaatmaja |
| Experimental proposal of discrete-variable quantum key distribution with homodyne detector | QCRYPT 2022 | Cassey C. Liang, Chao Wang, Ignatius William Primaatmaja, Gong Zhang, Jing Yan Haw |
| Large block size Toeplitz hashing implementation on FPGA | QCRYPT 2022 | Hong Jie Ng, Chao Wang |
| Analysis and Characterization Methodology of High Speed Balanced Homodyne Detector using RF MMIC Amplifier for Quantum Communication | QCRYPT 2022 | Raymond Ho, Jing Yan Haw, Xu Yan, Yong Xin Guo, Chao Wang |
| Experimental symmetric private information retrieval with measurement-device-independent quantum network | QCRYPT 2022 | Chao Wang, Wen Yu Kon |
| Quantum random number generation with uncharacterised homodyne detection | QCRYPT 2022 | Chao Wang, Ignatius William Primaatmaja, Hong Jie Ng, Jing Yan Haw, Raymond Ho, Jianran Zhang, Gong Zhang |
| One-sided Device-Independent Continuous-Variable Quantum Key Distribution with discrete modulation | QCRYPT 2022 | Shouvik Ghorai, Emilien Lavie |
| INTEGRATED ULTRA-WIDE BANDWIDTH HOMODYNE DETECTOR | QCRYPT 2022 | Si Qi Ng, Gong Zhang, Chao Wang |
| Provably secure receiver-device-independent quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2022 | Wen Yu Kon, Ignatius William Primaatmaja, Chao Wang |
| Towards experimental implementation of symmetric private information retrieval with measurement-device-independent quantum network | QCRYPT 2021 | Chao Wang, Wen Yu Kon |
Quantum key distribution (QKD) provides a practical method for distant parties to establish identical and secret keys. However, how quantum technologies can be practically used to protect user privacy with provable security remains an open question. Here, we report the first steps of our efforts to experimentally implement a symmetric private information retrieval (SPIR) scheme with QKD keys for fingerprint data retrieval. In the QKD layer, a three-user Measurement-device-independent QKD network is utilised for secure key distribution among the enquirer and data centres. In the application layer, an information-theoretically secure SPIR protocol is implemented to ensure both the privacy of the enquirer and the security of the database. Preliminary experimental results of the MDI QKD network implementation is presented, and simulations of the SPIR+QKD performance are also shown based on the experimental characterisation data. |
||
| Provably-secure quantum randomness expansion with untrusted homodyne detection secure against quantum side-information | QCRYPT 2021 | Ignatius William Primaatmaja, Jianran Zhang, Jing Yan Haw, Raymond Ho, Gong Zhang, Chao Wang |
Quantum random number generators (QRNGs) could generate numbers that are certifiably random even to a potential adversary who holds some side-information. However, many QRNGs require extremely precise characterisation of the source of the quantum states and the measurement apparatus. In this work, we propose a semi-device-independent QRNG protocol with untrusted homodyne detection. We show that our protocol is secure against quantum side-information, taking into account finite-size effects without making any assumption on the measurement device. |
||
| Generalised Decoy-State Scheme for Rigorous Characterization of Single-Photon Detectors | QCRYPT 2021 | Gong Zhang, Haibo Wang, Jishen Zhang, Chao Wang, Haiwen Xu, Yan Liang, Xiao Gong |
Characterizing the single-photon detection efficiency (SPDE) of a single-photon detector (SPD) is an essential but nontrivial task for various applications. Conventional methods require detailed detector models to calculate the estimated SPDE, which are not always available. In this work, a generalized method based on decoy-state for accurate characterization of SPDs is proposed and experimentally demonstrated. This work provides a new toolbox for rigorous SPD characterization with relaxed assumptions on the detector model, opening new possibilities in device calibration standards and quantum information applications. |
||
| Characterising the photon-number distribution of quantum channels with double-decoy method and its application to quantum cryptography | QCRYPT 2020 | Emilien Lavie, Ignatius William Primaatmaja |
Characterising the input-output photon-number distribution of an unknown optical quantum channel is an important task especially in the case of quantum cryptography. In practice, this would require true photon number sources and photon-number-resolving detectors, but these technologies are still work-in-progress. In this work, we propose an efficient technique called double-decoy method which can provide relevant partial information of the input-output photon-number distribution, including the fraction of events in which the unknown quantum channel accepts and outputs a single photon. These detections correspond to events in which the transmitted single photon survives a basis-independent filter just before the measurement. We apply the double-decoy method to quantum key distribution (QKD) and show that it can substantially reduce the background noise and systematic error at the privacy amplification level, thereby improving the current secret key rate and achievable distance for standard QKD protocols. We also believe that several applications beyond cryptography will benefit from this technique. |
||
| Ultrafast and practical Bell-based quantum randomness generation with classical optical homodyne detection | QCRYPT 2020 | Chao Wang, Yukun Wang, Koon Tong Goh, Gong Zhang, Jing Yan Haw |
By making reasonable assumptions on realistic systems, we propose and implement the first ultra-high-speed CHSH experiment working at 40GHz demonstrating a gigabit quantum certified random number throughput. Moreover, our scheme is suitable for optical chip design since it only requires standard optical components and balanced detectors. Furthermore, our scheme paves the way for the promising research direction to utilise noisy detectors for quantum system construction, which might be helpful for certain noise-sensitive applications, e.g. quantum sensing and quantum computing. |
||
| Provably secure symmetric private information retrieval with quantum cryptography | QCRYPT 2020 | Wen Yu Kon |
Private information retrieval (PIR) is a database query protocol that provides user privacy, in that the user can learn a particular entry of the database of his interest but his query would be hidden from the data centre. Symmetric private information retrieval (SPIR) takes PIR further by additionally offering database privacy, where the user cannot learn any additional entries of the database. Unconditionally secure SPIR solutions with multiple databases are known classically, but are unrealistic because they require long shared secret keys between the parties for secure communication and shared randomness in the protocol. Here, we propose using quantum key distribution (QKD) instead for a practical implementation, which can realise both the secure communication and shared randomness requirements. We prove that QKD maintains the security of the SPIR protocol and that it is also secure against any external eavesdropper. We also show how such a classical-quantum system could be implemented practically, using the example of a two-database SPIR protocol with keys generated by measurement device-independent QKD. Through key rate calculations, we show that such an implementation is feasible at the metropolitan level with current QKD technology. |
||
| The loss tolerant protocol with a twist | QCRYPT 2020 | J. Eli Bourassa, Ignatius William Primaatmaja, Hoi-Kwong Lo |
The security of measurement device-independent quantum key distribution (MDI QKD) relies on a thorough characterization of one's optical source output, especially any noise in the state preparation process. Here, we provide an extension of the loss-tolerant protocol [Phys. Rev. A 90, 052314 (2014)], a leading proof technique for analyzing the security of QKD, to MDI QKD protocols that employ mixed signal states. We first reframe the core of the proof technique, noting its generalization to treat d-dimensional signal encodings. Concentrating on the qubit signal state case, we find that the mixed states can be interpreted as providing Alice and Bob with a virtual shield system they can employ to reduce Eve's knowledge of the secret key. We then introduce a simple semidefinite programming method for optimizing the virtual twisting operations they can perform on the shield system to yield a higher key rate, along with an example calculation of fundamentally achievable key rates in the case of random polarization modulation error. |
||
| Practical quantum key distribution with non-phase-randomized coherent states | QIP 2020 | Li Liu, Yukun Wang, Emilien Lavie, Arno Ricou, Chao Wang, Fenzhuo Guo |
| Satellite quantum key distribution under restricted eavesdropping scenarios | QCRYPT 2019 | Sima Bahrani, Masoud Ghalaii, Carlo Liorni, Alexander Ling, Rupesh Kumar, Timothy Spiller, Stefano Pirandola, Bruno Huttner, Norbert Lütkenhaus, Mohsen Razavi |
| Semidefinite programming for MDI QKD security analysis employing mixed initial states | QCRYPT 2019 | J. Eli Bourassa, William Primaatmaja, Emilien Lavie, Koon Tong Goh, Hoi-Kwong Lo |
| Advantage distillation for device-independent quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2019 | Ernest Y. -Z. Tan, Renato Renner |
| An optimal local model to practically emulate Bell inequalities | QCRYPT 2019 | Shihan Sajeed, Vadim Makarov, Nigar Sultana |
| Practical quantum key distribution with non-phase-randomized coherent states | QCRYPT 2019 | Li Liu, Yukun Wang, Emilien Lavie, Arno Ricou, Chao Wang, Fenzhuo Guo |
| Hyperentangled Time-bin and Polarization Quantum Key Distribution | QCRYPT 2019 | Joseph Chapman, Paul Kwiat |
| Almost-tight and versatile security analysis of measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution | TQC 2019 | Ignatius William Primaatmaja, Emilien Lavie, Koon Tong Goh, Chao Wang |
| Quantum key distribution system with 2.5 GHz clock rate | QCRYPT 2017 | Alberto Boaron, Boris Korzh, Gianluca Boso, Raphael Houlmann, Ming-Jun Li, Daniel Nolan, Hugo Zbinden |
| Hyperentangled Time-bin and Polarization QKD for Space Applications | QCRYPT 2017 | Joseph Chapman, Christopher Zeitler, Paul Kwiat |
| High-Rate Quantum Key Distribution with Time-Bin Qudits | QCRYPT 2017 | Daniel J. Gauthier, Nurul Islam, Jungsang Kim, Clinton Cahall |
| High-Dimensional Quantum Key Distribution with Decoy States Using Discrete-Variable Time-Frequency States | QCRYPT 2016 | Nurul Islam, Clinton Cahall, Andres Aragoneses, Michael Allman, Varun Verma, Sae Woo Nam, Jungsang Kim, Daniel J. Gauthier |
| Detector-Device-Independent QKD: Security Analysis and Fast Implementation | QCRYPT 2016 | Alberto Boaron, Boris Korzh, Raphael Houlmann, Gianluca Boso, Anthony Martin, Hugo Zbinden |
| Finite-key security analysis of quantum key distribution with imperfect light sources | QCRYPT 2015 | Akihiro Mizutani, Marcos Curty, Nobuyuki Imoto, Kiyoshi Tamaki |
| A Convenient Countermeasure against Detector Blinding Attacks for Practical Quantum Key Distribution | QCRYPT 2014 | Nino Walenta, Hugo Zbinden, Nicolas Gisin, Matthieu Legré |
| Practical measurement device independent quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2013 | Feihu Xu, Marcos Curty, Bing Qi, Wei Cui, Kiyoshi Tamaki, Hoi-Kwong Lo |
We present an analysis for real-life implementations of measurement-device-independent quantum-key-distribution (MDI-QKD): a general system model, an optimized finite-decoy protocol and a rigorous finite-key analysis. This is of particular interest both to researchers hoping to demonstrate MDI-QKD and to others performing non-QKD experiments involving quantum interference. |
||
| Security of distributed-phase-reference quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2012 | Tobias Moroder, Marcos Curty, Le Phuc Thinh, Hugo Zbinden, Nicolas Gisin |
| Finite-key security analysis of a simple and efficient one-way quantum cryptography system | QCRYPT 2012 | Nino Walenta, Hugo Zbinden |
| Semi-device-independent QKD based on BB84 and a CHSH-type estimation | QCRYPT 2012 | Erik Woodhead, Stefano Pironio |
| A new Coherent One-Way protocol that is highly immune against unambiguous state discrimination attacks | QCRYPT 2011 | Nino Walenta, Hugo Zbinden |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCRYPT 2026 | steering | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2025 | program | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2025 | steering | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2024 | steering | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2023 | program | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2021 | program | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2020 | program | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2017 | program | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Chao Wang | 18 |
| Ignatius William Primaatmaja | 14 |
| Hugo Zbinden | 10 |
| Gong Zhang | 9 |
| Koon Tong Goh | 9 |
| Emilien Lavie | 7 |
| Jing Yan Haw | 7 |
| Nicolas Gisin | 6 |
| Ernest Y. -Z. Tan | 5 |
| Nino Walenta | 5 |
| Raphael Houlmann | 5 |
| Wen Yu Kon | 5 |
| Renato Renner | 4 |
| René Schwonnek | 4 |
| Xiao Gong | 4 |
| Yukun Wang | 4 |
| Alberto Boaron | 3 |
| Anthony Martin | 3 |
| Boris Korzh | 3 |
| Gianluca Boso | 3 |