12
talks
3
posters
10
committee roles
1
leadership roles
2008–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
|
When Quantum Nonlocality Does Not Play Dice \&\\ No Bound Randomness in Quantum Nonlocality ↗
|
QIP 2026 | regular | Ravishankar Ramanathan, Yuan Liu, Yutian Wu |
Violations of Bell inequalities are often regarded as evidence that quantum nonlocality guarantees intrinsic randomness, effectively playing the role of a “dice” at the heart of device-independent (DI) cryptographic protocols. Yet the precise connection between nonlocality and randomness is more nuanced. We first show that there exist nontrivial Bell inequalities that are maximally violated by quantum correlations while certifying no randomness for any fixed input pair, rendering them ineffective for a large class of standard DI schemes. Moreover, we construct maximally nonlocal quantum correlations that remain deterministic for every fixed input pair, in the sense that for any chosen inputs they can be decomposed into strategies with fixed outputs. Conversely, we show when all input pairs are used for randomness generation, any amount of quantum nonlocality suffices to certify randomness, implying that no form of bound randomness exists in quantum nonlocality: every nonlocal behavior can be useful for DI randomness generation under an appropriately designed protocol.
Building on this, we introduce the average guessing probability over all inputs, in contrast to the hitherto considered fixed-input guessing probability, as a faithful and monotonic quantifier of nonlocality. Using this measure, we prove that, contrary to recent findings in PRL 134, 090201, the detection efficiency threshold for certifying randomness is never lower than that required for detecting nonlocality. Finally, we analytically compute the average guessing probability by a quantum adversary in the standard CHSH test and show how this leads to improved generation rates in state-of-the-art amplification protocols. Together, our results precisely delineate the limits of determinism compatible with quantum nonlocality and establish average guessing probability as the correct operational bridge between nonlocality and DI randomness. |
|||
|
Almost qudits in the prepare-and-measure scenario ↗
|
TQC 2023 | regular | Jef Pauwels, Erik Woodhead, ▸Armin Tavakoli |
Quantum communication is often investigated in scenarios where only the dimension of Hilbert space is known. However, assigning a precise dimension is often an approximation of what is actually a higher-dimensional process. Here, we introduce and investigate quantum information encoded in carriers that nearly, but not entirely, correspond to standard qudits. We demonstrate the relevance of this concept for semi-device-independent quantum information by showing how small higher-dimensional components can significantly compromise the conclusions of established protocols. Then we provide a general method, based on semidefinite relaxations, for bounding the set of almost qudit correlations, and apply it to remedy the demonstrated issues. This method also offers a novel systematic approach to the well-known task of device-independent tests of classical and quantum dimensions with unentangled devices. Finally, we also consider viewing almost qubit systems as a physical resource available to the experimenter and determine the optimal quantum protocol for the well-known Random Access Code. |
|||
| Correlations in entanglement-assisted prepare-and-measure scenarios | QIP 2022 | regular | ▸Armin Tavakoli, Jef Pauwels, Erik Woodhead |
| Fast and practical implementation of self-testing QRNG based on an energy bound Abstract **merged with** Correlations and randomness generation based on an energy constraint Abstract | QCRYPT 2019 | regular | Davide Rusca, Thomas Van Himbeeck, Anthony Martin, Jonatan Bohr Brask, hamid tebyanian, Nicolas Brunner, Hugo Zbinden |
| Correlations and Randomness Generation based on an Energy Constraint | QCRYPT 2019 | regular | Thomas Van Himbeeck |
| A semi-device-independent framework based on natural physical assumptions and its application to random number generation | QCRYPT 2017 | regular | Thomas Van Himbeeck, Erik Woodhead, Nicolas Cerf, Raul Garcia-Patron Sanchez |
| Semi-device-independent framework based on natural physical assumptions | TQC 2017 | regular | Thomas Van Himbeeck, Erik Woodhead, Nicolas Cerf, Raul Garcia-Patron |
| Device-independent randomness generation with sublinear shared quantum resources | TQC 2017 | regular | Cédric Bamps, Serge Massar |
| Secure device-independent quantum key distribution with causally independent measurement devices | QCRYPT 2011 | regular | Lluis Masanes, ▸Antonio Acin |
|
Random numbers certified by Bell’s theorem ↗
|
QIP 2010 | regular | Antonio Acin, Antoine Boyer de la Giroday, Serge Massar |
| Quantum probabilities, semidefinite programming, and optimization over Hilbert spaces | QIP 2008 | regular ▸ presenter | Miguel Navascués, Antonio Acin |
| Device-independent security of Quantum Key Distribution | QIP 2008 | regular ▸ presenter | Antonio Acin, Nicolas Brunner, Nicolas Gisin, Serge Massar, Valerio Scarani |
Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| A generalization of the Schrödinger--HJW theorem and application to quantum key distribution from bounded basis dependency | QCRYPT 2025 | Victoria Wright, Chirag Srivastava, Erik Woodhead, Mate Farkas |
Performing a measurement on one half of an entangled pair of systems remotely prepares the other half in an ensemble of quantum states. Now consider any set of ensembles that mix to the same density operator. The Schrödinger--HJW theorem states that one can remotely prepare any chosen ensemble from this set by a choice of measurement performed on one half of a fixed entangled state. We generalise this result to show that any set of ensembles can be remotely prepared if one is allowed to post-select on the outcome of the preparing measurement. The probability that the remote preparation is successful is then lower bounded in terms of the distance between the ensembles. In a prepare-and-measure quantum key distribution protocol the distance between the ensembles represents the amount of information that is leaked about the choice of ensemble, e.g. the choice of basis in the BB84 protocol. Using our generalised result, we can prove the security of such protocols from only the fundamental assumption of how much information is leaked about the choice of ensemble/basis, i.e. from bounded basis-dependency. |
||
| Grobner basis of partially commuting variables | QCRYPT 2024 | Abhishek Mishra, Moisés Moran |
Our motivation is to exploit the partial commutation structure between the variables in non-commutative polynomial optimisation problems to boost the performance. We provide an efficient normal form for free words in partially commuting letters based on the maximal cliques of the non-commutation graph between the letters. We adapt several non-commutative computations to the partially commuting setting exploiting this additional structure. In particular, we provide an algorithm to compute Grobner bases for polynomial ideals in partially commuting variables that overcomes some difficulties appearing in the non-commutative cases: sometimes infinite Grobner basis can be avoided using the normal form based on these cliques. |
||
| Routed Bell tests and their application to device-independent quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2024 | Tristan Le Roy-Deloison, Edwin Peter Lobo, Jef Pauwels |
Losses in the transmission channel, which increase with distance, pose a major obstacle to photonics demonstrations of quantum nonlocality and its applications to device-independent protocols such as device-independent quantum key distribution. Recently, Chaturvedi, Viola, and Pawlowski (CVP) arXiv:2211.14231 introduced a variation of standard Bell experiments, which we call routed Bell experiments, with the goal of extending the range over which quantum nonlocality can be demonstrated. In these experiments, in some of the rounds, photons from the source are routed by an actively controlled switch to a nearby test device instead of the distant one. CVP showed that there are quantum correlations in routed Bell experiments such that the outcomes of the remote device cannot be classically predetermined, even when its detection efficiency is arbitrarily low. In our work, we show that the correlations considered by CVP, though they cannot be classically predetermined, do not require the transmission of quantum systems to the remote device. This leads us to properly define the concept of 'short-range' and 'long-range' quantum correlations in routed Bell experiments. We then explore the conditions under which short-range quantum correlations can be ruled out. We find that routed Bell experiments do allow for reducing the detection efficiency threshold but the improvements are smaller than those suggested by CVP's analysis. We then investigate DIQKD protocols based on the routed setup. We show how to analyze the security of these protocols and compute lower bounds on the key rates using non-commutative polynomial optimization and the Brown-Fawzi-Fawzi method. We determine lower bounds on the asymptotic key rates of several simple two-qubit routed DIQKD protocols based on CHSH or BB84 correlations and compare their performance to standard protocols. We find that in an ideal case routed DIQKD protocols can significantly improve detection efficiency requirements, by up to 30%, compared to their non-routed counterparts. Notably, the routed BB84 protocol achieves a positive key rate with a detection efficiency as low as 50% for the distant device, the minimal threshold for any DIQKD protocol featuring two untrusted measurements. However, the advantages we find are highly sensitive to noise and losses affecting the short-range correlations involving the additional test device. |
||
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCRYPT 2025 | PC | member | PC Member |
| QCRYPT 2023 | PC | member | — |
| QIP 2023 | PC | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2022 | PC | member | — |
| TQC 2022 | PC | member | — |
| QIP 2017 | PC | member | — |
| TQC 2015 | Local | chair | Chair |
| QCRYPT 2014 | PC | member | — |
| TQC 2013 | PC | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2012 | PC | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Erik Woodhead | 5 |
| Antonio Acin | 4 |
| Thomas Van Himbeeck | 4 |
| Jef Pauwels | 3 |
| Serge Massar | 3 |
| Armin Tavakoli | 2 |
| Nicolas Brunner | 2 |
| Nicolas Cerf | 2 |
| Abhishek Mishra | 1 |
| Anthony Martin | 1 |
| Antoine Boyer de la Giroday | 1 |
| Chirag Srivastava | 1 |
| Cédric Bamps | 1 |
| Davide Rusca | 1 |
| Edwin Peter Lobo | 1 |
| Hugo Zbinden | 1 |
| Jonatan Bohr Brask | 1 |
| Lluis Masanes | 1 |
| Mate Farkas | 1 |
| Miguel Navascués | 1 |