8
program roles
2
organizing roles
113
collaborators
2011–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
11 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Approximate Quantum Error Correction with 1D Log-Depth Circuits ↗
|
QIP 2026 | regular | ▸Guoding Liu, Zhenyu Du, Zi-Wen Liu |
Efficient and high-performance quantum error correction is essential for achieving fault-tolerant quantum computing. Low-depth random circuits offer a promising approach to identifying effective and practical encoding strategies. In this work, we rigorously prove through information-theoretic analysis that one-dimensional logarithmic-depth random Clifford encoding circuits can achieve high quantum error correction performance. We demonstrate that these random codes typically exhibit good approximate quantum error correction capability by proving that their encoding rate achieves the hashing bound for Pauli noise and the channel capacity for erasure errors. We show that the error correction inaccuracy decays once a threshold of logarithmic depth is exceeded, resulting in negligible recovery errors. This threshold is shown to be lower than that of the simple separate block encoding, and the decay rate is higher. We further establish that these codes are optimal by proving that logarithmic depth is necessary to maintain a constant encoding rate and high error correction performance. To prove our results, we propose new decoupling theorems for one-dimensional low-depth circuits. These results also imply strong decoupling and rapid thermalization properties in low-depth random circuits and have potential applications in quantum information science and physics. |
|||
| Experimental mode-pairing quantum key distribution surpassing the repeaterless bound | QCRYPT 2025 | regular | Likang Zhang, Wei Li, Jiawei Pan, Yichen Lu, Wenwen Li, Zheng-Ping Li, Yizhi Huang, Feihu Xu, Jianwei Pan |
We demonstrate a practical high-performance mode-pairing quantum key distribution system that is able to surpass the repeaterless key rate bound using commercial lasers. We propose a frequency tracking scheme to address phase fluctuations and a theoretical model to analyze the phase noise and optimize the system parameters. Our system achieves a secret key rate of 47.8 bit/s over 403 km standard fiber, which is 2.92 times of the repeaterless bound. Furthermore, we compare the performance between MP-QKD and no-phase-locking TF-QKD under various practical conditions and show that MP-QKD exhibits superior performance at short distances with low error rates, while TF-QKD is more advantageous for long distances with consistent error rates. |
|||
| Implementation of mode-pairing quantum key distribution in inter-city networks | QCRYPT 2024 | regular | Yizhi Huang, Hao-Tao Zhu, Wen-Xin Pan, Chao-Wu Zhou, Mi Zou, Shibiao Tang, Teng-Yun Chen, Jian-Wei Pan |
Quantum key distribution is a cornerstone of quantum technology, offering information-theoretical secure keys for remote parties. With many quantum communication networks established globally, the mode-pairing protocol stands out for its efficacy over inter-city distances using simple setups, emerging as a promising solution. In this study, we employ the mode-pairing scheme into existing inter-city fiber links, conducting field tests across distances ranging from tens to about a hundred kilometers. Our system achieves a key rate of $1.217$ kbit/s in a $195.85$ km symmetric link and $3.089$ kbit/s in a $127.92$ km asymmetric link without global phase locking. The results demonstrate that the mode-pairing protocol can achieve key rates comparable to those of a single quantum link between two trusted nodes on the Beijing-Shanghai backbone line, effectively reducing the need for half of the trusted nodes. These field tests confirm the mode-pairing scheme's adaptability, efficiency, and practicality, positioning it as a highly suitable protocol for quantum networks. |
|||
| Recent Advancement in Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution | QCRYPT 2023 | tutorial ▸ presenter | — |
| Quantum Complementarity Approach to Device-Independent Security | TQC 2022 | regular | Xingjian Zhang, ▸Pei Zeng, Tian Ye, Hoi-Kwong Lo |
| Global Phase Encoding Quantum Key Distribution | QCRYPT 2018 | regular | ▸Pei Zeng, Hongyi Zhou |
| Device-independent quantum random number generation | QCRYPT 2018 | regular | ▸Yang Liu, Qi Zhao, Ming-Han Li, Jian-Yu Guan, Yanbao Zhang, Bing Bai, Wei-Jun Zhang, Wen-Zhao Liu, Cheng Wu, Xiao Yuan, Hao Li, Zhen Wang, Lixing You, Jun Zhang, Jingyun Fan, Qiang Zhang, Jian-Wei Pan |
| Reaching beyond existing quantum key distribution links: How to take advantage of imperfect quantum memories | QCRYPT 2014 | regular | ▸Nicolò Lo Piparo, Christiana Panayi, Mohsen Razavi, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
| Full experimental verifications towards practical deployment of measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2014 | regular | Yan-Lin Tang, Hua-Lei Yin, Si-Jing Chen, Yang Liu, Wei-Jun Zhang, Xiao Jiang, Lu Zhang, Jian Wang, Li-Xing You, Jian-Yu Guan, Dong-Xu Yang, Zhen Wang, Hao Liang, Zhen Zhang, Nan Zhou, Teng-Yun Chen, Qiang Zhang, Jian-Wei Pan |
| Free-space quantum network with trusted relay | QCRYPT 2013 | regular | Wei-Yue Liu, Hai-Lin Yong, ▸Zhu Cao, Ji-Gang Ren, Cheng-Zhi Peng, Jian-Wei Pan |
| A high speed quantum random number generator with quantum phase noise | QCRYPT 2011 | regular | ▸Feihu Xu, Bing Qi, He Xu, Haoxuan Zheng, Hoi-Kwong Lo |
25 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Certifying localizable quantum properties with constant sample complexity | QIP 2026 | ▸Zhenyu Du, Jinchang Liu, Elias X. Huber, Zi-Wen Liu |
| State complexity and phase identification in low-resource adaptive circuits | QIP 2026 | Guoding Liu, ▸Junjie Chen |
| Enhanced Analysis for the Decoy-State Method | QCRYPT 2025 | Zitai Xu, Yizhi Huang |
Quantum key distribution stands as a cornerstone of quantum information science, enabling secure communication based on fundamental quantum principles. In reality, practical implementations often rely on the decoy-state method to ensure security against photon-number-splitting attacks. A significant challenge in realistic quantum cryptosystems arises from statistical fluctuations due to finite data sizes, which complicate the key-rate estimation because of the nonlinear dependence on the phase error rate. In this study, we refine and enhance the key rate bound for the decoy-state method and introduce an improved statistical fluctuation analysis framework. By integrating our refined bound with this advanced fluctuation analysis, we achieve higher key generation rates, as demonstrated in numerical simulations of the one-decoy-state method --- a simple yet increasingly practical protocol --- under typical experimental conditions. Notably, our approach to fluctuation analysis extends beyond quantum cryptography, offering broad applicability to various quantum information processing tasks, particularly those involving linear relationships between objectives and experimental variables. |
||
| Advantage Distillation for Quantum Key Distribution | QCRYPT 2025 | Zhenyu Du, Guoding Liu, Xingjian Zhang |
Enhancing the performance of quantum key distribution is crucial, driving the exploration of various key distillation techniques to increase the key rate and tolerable error rate. It is imperative to develop a comprehensive framework to encapsulate and enhance the existing methods. In this work, we propose an advantage distillation framework for quantum key distribution. Building on the entanglement distillation protocol, our framework integrates all the existing key distillation methods and offers better generalization and performance. Using classical linear codes, our framework can achieve higher key rates, particularly without one-time pad encryption for postprocessing. Our approach provides insights into existing protocols and offers a systematic way for future enhancements of quantum key distribution protocols. |
||
| Group Twirling and Noise Tailoring for Multi-Qubit-Controlled Phase Gates | TQC 2024 | Guoding Liu, Ziyi Xie, Zitai Xu |
| Limitations of Noisy Quantum Devices in Computing and Entangling Power | TQC 2024 | Yuxuan Yan, Zhenyu Du, Junjie Chen |
| Fundamental Limitation on the Detectability of Entanglement | QIP 2023 | Pengyu Liu, Zhenhuan Liu, Shu Chen |
| Detecting entanglement in quantum many-body systems via permutation moments | QIP 2023 | Zhenhuan Liu, Yifan Tang, Hao Dai, Pengyu Liu, Shu Chen |
| Detecting Entanglement in Quantum Many-Body Systems via Permutation Moments | TQC 2023 | Zhenhuan Liu, Yifan Tang, Hao Dai, Pengyu Liu, Shu Chen |
| Stream privacy amplification for quantum cryptography | QCRYPT 2022 | Yizhi Huang, Xingjian Zhang |
| Device-Independent-Quantum-Randomness-Enhanced Zero-Knowledge Proof | QCRYPT 2022 | Cheng-Long Li, Kai-Yi Zhang, Xingjian Zhang, Kui-Xing Yang, Yu Han, Su-Yi Cheng, Hongrui Cui, Wen-Zhao Liu, Ming-Han Li, Yang Liu, Bing Bai, Hai-Hao Dong, Jun Zhang, Yu Yu, Jingyun Fan, Qiang Zhang, Jian-Wei Pan |
| Simple and Practical Device-Independent Security Analysis | QCRYPT 2022 | Xingjian Zhang, Pei Zeng, Tian Ye, Hoi-Kwong Lo |
| Test of Local Realism into the Past without Detection and Locality Loopholes | QCRYPT 2019 | Ming-Han Li, Cheng Wu, Yanbao Zhang, Wen-Zhao Liu, Bing Bai, Yang Liu, Weijun Zhang, Qi Zhao, Hao Li, Zhen Wang, Lixing You, W.J. Munro, Juan Yin, Jun Zhang, Cheng-Zhi Peng, Qiang Zhang, Jingyun Fan, Jian-Wei Pan |
| One-Shot Resource Theory of Quantum Coherence and Andreas Winter | QIP 2019 | Qi Zhao, Yunchao Liu, Xiao Yuan, Eric Chitambar |
| Quantum randomness certified by coherence witness with untrusted measurement devices | QCRYPT 2018 | You-Qi Nie, Hongyi Zhou, Jian-Yu Guan, Qiang Zhang, Jun Zhang, Jian-Wei Pan |
| Experimental Quantum Data Locking | QCRYPT 2016 | Yang Liu, Zhu Cao, Cheng Wu, Daiji Fukuda, Lixing You, Jiaqiang Zhong, Takayuki Numata, Sijing Chen, Weijun Zhang, Sheng-Cai Shi, Chao-Yang Lu, Zhen Wang, Jingyun Fan, Qiang Zhang, Jian-Wei Pan |
| Quantum randomness and coherence | TQC 2016 | Xiao Yuan, Qi Zhao, Hongyi Zhou, Davide Girolami, Zhu Cao |
| High-speed quantum random number generator by measuring photon arrival times using external references | QCRYPT 2014 | Zhen Zhang, You-Qi Nie, Hong-Fei Zhang, Jian Wang, Jun Zhang, Jian-Wei Pan |
| Detection Loopholes in Entanglement Witness and the Counter-Measure | QCRYPT 2014 | Xiao Yuan, Ping Xu, Luo-Kan Chen, He Lu, Xing-Can Yao, Yu-Ao Chen, Jian-Wei Pan |
| Experimental realization of measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2013 | Yang Liu, Teng-Yun Chen, Liu-Jun Wang, Hao Liang, Guo-Liang Shentu, Jian Wang, Ke Cui, Hua-Lei Yin, Nai-Le Liu, Li Li, Jason S. Pelc, M. M. Fezr, Cheng-Zhi Peng, Qiang Zhang, Jian-Wei Pan |
In this presentation, I will introduce two of our recent works: experimental realization of measurement-device-independent (MDI) quantum key distribution (QKD) [arXiv:1209.6178] and unambiguous-state-discrimination (USD) attack on a decoy-state QKD system without phase randomization [arXiv:1304.2541]. On one hand, the MDI-QKD is able to shield all practical attacks realized so far. We experimentally demonstrate the MDI-QKD protocol by implementing high-speed and low-noise up-conversion single photon detectors. The security of MDI-QKD relies on a trusted source scenario, where the decoy-state method is assumed. On the other hand, phase randomization is commonly ignored from the decoy-state method. We demonstrate a USD attack on a decoy-state QKD system when the phase randomization is ignored. |
||
| Memory-assisted measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2013 | Christiana Panayi, Mohsen Razavi, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
Quantum memories are used to improve the ate-versus-distance behavior in measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution (MDI-QKD) systems. The required specifications in terms of reading and writing times for such memories are obtained. It is shown that the faster the access times are, the higher the repetition rates and the lower the required coherence times would be. Additionally this protocol offers an immense security by removing side-attack channels over protocols such as the standard decoy-state BB84 protocol. A comparison of this protocol with the original MDI-QKD is given in terms of secret key generation rate under practical assumptions. Various sources of imperfection such as reading and writing efficiencies of the memories, channel and detector efficiencies and dark count rates are considered. The crossover distance is determined after which the present protocol outperforms the MDI-QKD and a typical quantum repeater network. |
||
| Efficient decoy-state quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2013 | Zhen Zhang, Zhengchao Wei, Weilong Wang |
We propose a quantum key distribution scheme that combines a biased basis choice with the decoy-state method. In this scheme, Alice sends all signal states in the Z basis and decoy states in the X and Z basis with certain probabilities, and Bob measures received pulses with optimal basis choice. This scheme simplifies the system and reduces the random number consumption. From the simulation result taking into account of statistical fluctuations, we find that in a typical experimental setup, the proposed scheme can increase the key rate by at least 45% comparing to the standard decoy-state scheme. In the postprocessing, we also apply a rigorous method to upper bound the phase error rate of the single-photon components of signal states. |
||
| Decoy state quantum key distribution with a simplified trusted node | QCRYPT 2013 | William Stacey, Razieh Annabestani, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
We examine the security of a class of quantum key distribution (QKD) protocols that implement a simplified trusted node. The simplified node acts as a legitimate party, carrying out the quantum phase of a QKD protocol with each end user; however, the node is not involved in error correction or privacy amplification. Invoking symmetries inherent within the protocol, we place a lower bound on the key rate. We further examine the specific cases when the trusted parties implement a decoy state BB84 protocol or a decoy state 6-state protocol. |
||
| Alternative Schemes for Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution | QCRYPT 2012 | Mohsen Razavi |
| Implementation of extractors and privacy amplification | QCRYPT 2012 | Zhen Zhang, Myung Gi Lee |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCRYPT 2024 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2024 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2023 | program | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2021 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2021 | program | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2020 | program | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2018 | organizing | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2018 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2016 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2013 | organizing | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Jian-Wei Pan | 11 |
| Qiang Zhang | 7 |
| Yang Liu | 6 |
| Jun Zhang | 5 |
| Xingjian Zhang | 5 |
| Guoding Liu | 4 |
| Jingyun Fan | 4 |
| Qi Zhao | 4 |
| Xiao Yuan | 4 |
| Yizhi Huang | 4 |
| Zhen Wang | 4 |
| Zhen Zhang | 4 |
| Zhenyu Du | 4 |
| Bing Bai | 3 |
| Cheng Wu | 3 |
| Cheng-Zhi Peng | 3 |
| Hoi-Kwong Lo | 3 |
| Hongyi Zhou | 3 |
| Jian Wang | 3 |
| Jian-Yu Guan | 3 |