Xavier Coiteux-Roy

We present the first \emph{local} problems that show a super-constant separation between the classical randomized LOCAL model of distributed computing and its quantum counterpart. By prior work, such a separation was known only for an artificial graph problem with an inherently \emph{global} definition [Le Gall et al.\ 2019]. This submission consists of two works: \begin{itemize} \item The first work\footnote{{\bf Distributed Quantum Advantage for Local Problems} by Balliu, Brandt, Coiteux-Roy, d'Amore, Equi, Le Gall, Lievonen, Modanese, Olivetti, Renou, Suomela, Tendick and Veeren. \emph{Proceedings of the 57th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2025)}, pp. 451-462, 2025.} presents a problem that we call \emph{iterated GHZ}, which is defined using only local constraints. We show that in graphs of maximum degree $\Delta$, any classical (deterministic or randomized) LOCAL model algorithm will require $\Omega(\Delta)$ rounds to solve the iterated GHZ problem, while the problem can be solved in $1$ round in quantum-LOCAL. \item The second work\footnote{{\bf Distributed Quantum Advantage in Locally Checkable Labeling Problems} by Balliu, Casagrande, d'Amore, Equi, Keller, Lievonen, Olivetti, Schmid and Suomela. arXiv:2504.05191, 2025.} shows the first known example of a local problem \emph{over a constant-degree graph} that admits asymptotic distributed quantum advantage in the LOCAL model of distributed computing: our problem can be solved in $O(\log n)$ communication rounds in the quantum-LOCAL model, but it requires $\Omega(\log n\cdot\log^{0.99}\log n)$ communication rounds in the classical randomized-LOCAL model. \end{itemize}

We give an almost complete characterization of the hardness of c-coloring χ-chromatic graphs with distributed algorithms, for a wide range of models of distributed computing. In particular, we show that these problems do not admit any distributed quantum advantage. To do that: beginenumerate ıtem We give a new distributed algorithm that finds a c-coloring in χ-chromatic graphs in tildemathcalO(n^frac1alpha) rounds, with alpha = biglłfloorfracc-1chi - 1bigrrfloor. ıtem We prove that any distributed algorithm for this problem requires Ømega(n^frac1alpha) rounds. endenumerate Our upper bound holds in the classical, deterministic mathsfLOCAL model, while the near-matching lower bound holds in the emphnon-signaling model. This model, introduced by Arfaoui and Fraigniaud in 2014, captures all models of distributed graph algorithms that obey physical causality; this includes not only classical deterministic mathsfLOCAL and randomized mathsfLOCAL but also mathsfquantum-mathsfLOCAL, even with a pre-shared quantum state. We also show that similar arguments can be used to prove that, e.g., 3-coloring 2-dimensional grids or c-coloring trees remain hard problems even for the non-signaling model, and in particular do not admit any quantum advantage. Our lower-bound arguments are purely graph-theoretic at heart; no background on quantum information theory is needed to establish the proofs.

We extend the theory of locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs) from the classical LOCAL model to a number of other models that have been studied recently, including the quantum-LOCAL model, finitely-dependent processes, non-signaling model, dynamic-LOCAL model, and online-LOCAL model [e.g. STOC 2024, ICALP 2023]. First, we demonstrate the advantage that finitely-dependent processes have over the classical LOCAL model. We show that all LCL problems solvable with locality O(log⋆n) in the LOCAL model admit a finitely-dependent distribution (with constant locality). In particular, this gives a finitely-dependent coloring for regular trees, answering an open question by Holroyd [2023]. This also introduces a new formal barrier for understanding the distributed quantum advantage: it is not possible to exclude quantum advantage for any LCL in the Θ(log⋆n) complexity class by using non-signaling arguments. Second, we put limits on the capabilities of all of these models. To this end, we introduce a model called randomized online-LOCAL, which is strong enough to simulate e.g. SLOCAL and dynamic-LOCAL, and we show that it is also strong enough to simulate any non-signaling distribution and hence any quantum-LOCAL algorithm. We prove the following result for rooted trees: if we can solve an LCL problem with locality o(loglogn) in the randomized online-LOCAL model, we can solve it with locality O(log⋆n) in the classical deterministic LOCAL model. Put together, these results show that in rooted trees the set of LCLs that can be solved with locality O(log⋆n) is the same across all these models: classical deterministic and randomized LOCAL, quantum-LOCAL, non-signaling model, dynamic-LOCAL, and deterministic and randomized online-LOCAL.

We present a computational problem with the following properties: (i) Every instance can be solved with near-certainty by a constant-depth quantum circuit using only nearest-neighbor gates in 3D even when its implementation is corrupted by noise. (ii) Any constant-depth classical circuit composed of unbounded fan-in AND, OR, as well as NOT gates, i.e., an AC0-circuit, of size smaller than a certain subexponential, fails to solve a uniformly random instance with probability greater than a certain constant. Such an advantage against unbounded fan-in classical circuits was previously only known in the noise-free case or without locality constraints. We overcome these limitations, proposing a quantum advantage demonstration amenable to experimental realizations. Subexponential circuit-complexity lower bounds have traditionally been referred to as exponential. We use the term colossal since our fault-tolerant 3D architecture resembles a certain Roman monument.