5
talks
7
posters
1
committee roles
0
leadership roles
2004–2025
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security of quantum key distribution with imperfect phase randomisation | QCRYPT 2023 | regular | ▸Guillermo Currás-Lorenzo, Marcos Curty |
The performance of quantum key distribution (QKD) is severely limited by multiphoton emissions, due to the photon-number-splitting attack. The most efficient solution, the decoy-state method, requires that the phases of all transmitted pulses are independent and uniformly random. In practice, however, these phases are often correlated, especially in high-speed systems, which opens a security loophole. Here, we address this pressing problem by providing a security proof for decoy-state QKD with correlated phases that offers key rates close to the ideal scenario. Our work paves the way towards high-performance secure QKD with practical laser sources, and may have applications beyond QKD. |
|||
| Security bounds for quantum key distribution with arbitrary phase randomization | QCRYPT 2023 | regular | Xoel Sixto, Guillermo Currás-Lorenzo, Marcos Curty |
Decoy-state quantum key distribution (QKD) is undoubtedly the most efficient solution to handle multi-photon signals emitted by laser sources, and provides the same secret key rate scaling as ideal single-photon sources. It requires, however, that the phase of each emitted pulse is uniformly random. This might be difficult to guarantee in practice, due to inevitable device imperfections and/or the use of an external phase modulator for phase randomization, which limits the possible selected phases to a finite set. Here, we investigate the security of decoy-state QKD with arbitrary, continuous or discrete, non-uniform phase randomization, and show that this technique is quite robust to deviations from the ideal uniformly random scenario. For this, we combine a novel parameter estimation technique based on semi-definite programming, with the use of basis mismatched events, to tightly estimate the parameters that determine the achievable secret key rate. In doing so, we demonstrate that our analysis can significantly outperform previous results that address more restricted scenarios. |
|||
| All-photonic quantum repeaters | QCRYPT 2015 | regular | Koji Azuma, Hoi-Kwong Lo |
| Research and development of the Tokyo QKD network project | QCRYPT 2013 | invited ▸ presenter | — |
| Unconditional security of the Bennett 1992 quantum key distribution protocol over lossy and noisy channel | QIP 2004 | invited | — |
Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Security of loss-tolerant QKD with source and receiver imperfections | QCRYPT 2025 | Alessandro Marcomini, Akihiro Mizutani, Fadri Grünenfelder, Marcos Curty |
Current implementations of quantum key distribution (QKD) typically rely on prepare-and-measure (P&M) schemes. Unfortunately, these implementations are not completely secure, unless security proofs fully incorporate all imperfections of real devices. So far, existing proofs have primarily focused on imperfections of either the light source or the measurement device. In this work, we establish a security proof for the loss-tolerant P&M QKD protocol that incorporates imperfections in both the source and the detectors. Specifically, we demonstrate the security of this scheme when the emitted states deviate from the ideal ones and Bob’s measurement device does not meet the basis-independent detection efficiency condition. Furthermore, we conduct an experiment to characterise the detection efficiency mismatch of commercial single-photon detectors as a function of the polarisation state of the input light, and determine the expected secret key rate in the presence of state preparation flaws when using such detectors. Our work provides a way towards guaranteeing the security of actual implementations of widely deployed P&M QKD. |
||
| Experimental characterisation of second-order phase correlations in gain-switched laser sources for decoy-state QKD | QCRYPT 2024 | Alessandro Marcomini, Fadri Grünenfelder, Guillermo Currás-Lorenzo, Angel Valle, Hugo Zbinden, Marcos Curty, Davide Rusca |
Quantum key distribution (QKD) protocols leverage quantum mechanics to achieve information theoretically secure communication, yet real-world implementations must address experimental limitations, particularly phase correlations in weak coherent laser pulses (WCPs). High-speed gain-switching lasers, commonly used in QKD, can exhibit residual photons causing phase correlations between consecutive pulses, challenging the perfect phase randomization assumption crucial for the decoy-state BB84 protocol. Theoretical work has proposed security proofs that require knowledge of how closely each phase's probability distribution approximates uniformity, which is complex to estimate experimentally. In this study we introduce an experimental method to characterise phase correlations of any length under realistic conditions by modelling the phase generation process within the laser cavity. Additionally, we experimentally benchmark this practical routine for measuring second-order correlations using a double Michelson interferometer with tunable amplitude attenuators, allowing comprehensive characterisation of the phase generation process and accurate measurement of the phase probability distribution, thus enhancing the security of QKD systems. |
||
| Security of decoy-state quantum key distribution with information leakage | QCRYPT 2024 | Xoel Sixto, Álvaro Navarrete, Margarida Pereira, Guillermo Currás-Lorenzo, Marcos Curty |
A crucial assumption in most quantum key distribution (QKD) security proofs, is that no information about the selected settings is leaked to the channel. A secure space around the users' devices is usually required to ensure both parties can generate and handle classical data securely. However, this condition is not feasible in practice, since the devices usually leak some information passively, and an eavesdropper could even run a Trojan horse attack (THA) by injecting bright light into the QKD apparatuses, causing an active leak of information. In this paper, we present the first security proof for a decoy state protocol that considers an arbitrary leakage from every setting selected in the source due to passive or active information leakage. Furthermore, we apply our security proof to various cases of practical interest and we analyze the effectiveness of placing an extra phase modulator in the source to improve the secret key rate. Our analysis is also experimentally friendly, as it only requires one parameter to encapsulates all side-channel imperfections. We believe that our results constitute a vital step in closing the existing gap between theory and implementation in QKD. |
||
| A security framework for quantum key distribution implementations | QCRYPT 2024 | Guillermo Currás-Lorenzo, Margarida Pereira, Go Kato, Marcos Curty |
Quantum key distribution (QKD) promises theoretically unbreakable encryption by exploiting the principles of quantum mechanics. However, the security of real-world implementations is compromised by inevitable device imperfections, unless these are accounted for in the security proof. In this work, we introduce an innovative and powerful security proof framework that guarantees robustness against all practical source imperfections while maintaining high performances, thereby significantly bridging the gap between the theoretical promise and practical realization of QKD. In combination with measurement-device-independent QKD, which closes all security loopholes related to the measurement units, our framework can guarantee an unprecedented level of implementation security. |
||
| Quantum key distribution with unbounded pulse correlations | QCRYPT 2024 | Margarida Pereira, Guillermo Currás-Lorenzo, Akihiro Mizutani, Davide Rusca, Marcos Curty |
Typical security proofs of quantum key distribution (QKD) require that the emitted signals are independent and identically distributed. In practice, however, this assumption is not met because intrinsic device flaws inevitably introduce correlations between the emitted signals. Although analyses addressing this issue have been recently proposed, they only consider a restrictive scenario in which the correlations have a finite and known maximum length that is much smaller than the total number of emitted signals. While it is expected that the magnitude of the correlations decreases as the pulse separation increases, the assumption that this magnitude is exactly zero after a certain point does not seem to have any physical justification. Concerningly, this means that existing analyses cannot guarantee the security of current QKD implementations. Here, we solve this pressing problem by developing a general framework that can handle pulse correlations of unbounded length. Our framework allows us to directly use existing proofs addressing this imperfection without the need to construct them from scratch, thus reestablishing the security of QKD in a simple and versatile manner. |
||
| Quantum Digital Signatures Transmitted Over a Channel Loss Equivalent to 134 km | QCRYPT 2017 | Robert Collins, Ryan Amiri, Mikio Fujiwara, Toshimori Honjo, Kaoru Shimizu, Masahiro Takeoka, Ross Donaldson, Masahide Sasaki, Erika Andersson, Gerald Buller |
| Information-theoretic security proof of differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution protocol based on complementarity | QCRYPT 2017 | Akihiro Mizutani, Toshihiko Sasaki, Go Kato, Yuki Takeuchi |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCRYPT 2014 | PC | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Marcos Curty | 7 |
| Guillermo Currás-Lorenzo | 6 |
| Akihiro Mizutani | 3 |
| Margarida Pereira | 3 |
| Alessandro Marcomini | 2 |
| Davide Rusca | 2 |
| Fadri Grünenfelder | 2 |
| Go Kato | 2 |
| Xoel Sixto | 2 |
| Angel Valle | 1 |
| Erika Andersson | 1 |
| Gerald Buller | 1 |
| Hoi-Kwong Lo | 1 |
| Hugo Zbinden | 1 |
| Kaoru Shimizu | 1 |
| Koji Azuma | 1 |
| Masahide Sasaki | 1 |
| Masahiro Takeoka | 1 |
| Mikio Fujiwara | 1 |
| Robert Collins | 1 |