1
program role
57
collaborators
2014–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
4 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental realisation of quantum oblivious transfer | QCRYPT 2020 | regular | Ryan Amiri, Robert Stárek, Michal Mičuda, Ladislav Mišta, Miloslav Dušek, Erika Andersson |
Oblivious transfer (OT) is a cryptographic primitive which is universal for multiparty computation. Unfortunately, perfect information-theoretically secure (ITS) quantum oblivious transfer is impossible. Imperfect information-theoretically secure quantum oblivious transfer is possible, but the smallest possible cheating probabilities are not known. We present an imperfect information-theoretically secure quantum oblivious transfer protocol with no restrictions on dishonest parties, and its experimental implementation. The cheating probabilities are 0.75 and 0.729 for sender and receiver respectively, which is lower than in existing protocols. Using a photonic test-bed, we have implemented the protocol with honest parties, as well as optimal cheating strategies. |
|||
| On the possibility of classical client blind quantum computing | QCRYPT 2018 | regular | Alexandru Cojocaru, ▸Léo Colisson, Elham Kashefi |
|
Robustness and device independence of verifiable blind quantum computing
Best Student Paper Award — Alexandru Gheorghiu
|
QCRYPT 2015 | regular | Alexandru Gheorghiu, Elham Kashefi |
| Advances in Experimental Quantum Digital Signatures | QCRYPT 2015 | regular | Ross Donaldson, Robert Collins, Klaudia Kleczkowska, Ryan Amiri, Vedran Dunjko, Erika Andersson, John Jeffers, Gerald Buller |
26 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Proactive Secret Sharing without Erasures | QCRYPT 2026 | Alexandru Cojocaru, Aggelos Kiayias, Yu Shen |
Proactive secret-sharing (PSS) offers security for shared secrets in a setting of a {\em mobile} adversary which, over time, may corrupt the whole shareholder set. This remarkable property is achieved by having parties proactively and in a coordinated manner refresh their shares on a regular basis, while it assumes that the adversary never manages to corrupt more than a threshold number of parties between two consecutive share refresh operations. A common assumption for achieving PSS is the ability of parties to securely erase their private state once they have performed the refresh operation. Motivated by the difficulty in the real world to ensure secure erasure, we investigate whether it is possible to achieve PSS without erasures. As in the classic model of computation it can be easily shown that PSS without erasures is impossible, we hence ask whether it is possible to achieve PSS via quantum computation, while still requiring only classical communication. We answer the question in the affirmative by utilizing one-shot signatures and post-quantum classical witness encryption. In the process of developing our result, we define and construct threshold one-shot decryption and make connections to quantum money with classical communication both of which may be of independent interest. Finally, we show how, by combining post-quantum secure witness functional encryption with our PSS, it is possible for the secret to be used without explicitly being reconstructed, something that paves the way towards proactively secure threshold cryptography without erasures. |
||
| Dynamics of discrete spacetimes with Quantum-enhanced Markov Chain Monte Carlo | QIP 2026 | ▸Stuart Ferguson, Arad Nasiri |
| Quantum Elastic Network Models and their Application to Graphene | TQC 2026 | Ioannis Kolotouros, Adithya Sireesh, Stuart Ferguson, Sean Thrasher, Julien Michel |
Molecular dynamics simulations are a central computational methodology in materials design for relating atomic composition to mechanical properties. However, simulating materials with atomic-level resolution on a macroscopic scale is infeasible on current classical hardware, even when using the simplest elastic network models (ENMs) that represent molecular vibrations as a network of coupled oscillators. To address this issue, we introduce Quantum Elastic Network Models (QENMs) and utilize the quantum algorithm of Babbush et al. (PRX, 2023), which offers an exponential advantage when simulating systems of coupled oscillators under some specific conditions and assumptions. Here, we demonstrate how our method enables the efficient simulation of planar materials. As an example, we apply our algorithm to the task of simulating a 2D graphene sheet. We analyze the exact complexity for initial-state preparation, Hamiltonian simulation, and measurement of this material, and provide two real-world applications: heat transfer and the out-of-plane rippling effect. We estimate that an atomistic simulation of a graphene sheet on the centimeter scale, classically requiring hundreds of petabytes of memory and prohibitive runtimes, could be encoded and simulated with as few as ∼160 logical qubits. |
||
| Resolving Circuit Structure in Quantum Fourier Models: A Joint Input-Parameter Fourier Framework | TQC 2026 | Kyle James Stuart Campbell, Luigi Del Debbio |
Parametrised quantum circuits are a leading model for near-term quantum machine learning, yet it remains difficult to predict—without training on data—how a circuit’s design shapes what it can learn and how trainable it will be. We introduce a data-agnostic representation that maps a broad family of circuits into a single architecture matrix built from a joint harmonic expansion over inputs and parameters. This matrix provides an explicit, interpretable link between circuit structure, the correlations among learnable features, and the geometry of training kernels. We show how correlations between learnable features arise from shared parameter-induced harmonics generated by non-commuting gate–observable interactions during Heisenberg back-propagation, and how these correlations are encoded directly in the architecture matrix. From this perspective, kernel structure and coefficient statistics can be reconstructed analytically from circuit design alone, without reference to a dataset or optimisation trajectory. The resulting framework makes circuit-induced structure explicit, separating architectural effects from data-dependent ones, and provides a principled foundation for analysing and comparing parametrised quantum circuits based on intrinsic, design-level signatures. |
||
| Random Natural Gradient | TQC 2024 | Ioannis Kolotouros |
| Adiabatic quantum computing with parameterized quantum circuits | TQC 2023 | Ioannis Kolotouros, Ioannis Petrongonas, Milos Prokop |
| Variational quantum solutions to the Shortest Vector Problem | QCRYPT 2022 | Martin R. Albrecht, Milos Prokop, Yixin Shen |
| Imperfect quantum oblivious transfer with one-sided security | QCRYPT 2021 | David Reichmuth, Ittoop Vergheese Puthoor, Erika Andersson |
Oblivious transfer (OT) is a cryptographic primitive which is universal for multiparty computation. Unfortunately, perfect information-theoretically (IT) secure quantum oblivious transfer is impossible (except with restrictions on cheating parties). Imperfect IT secure quantum oblivious transfer remains possible, but the smallest possible cheating probabilities are not known. Informally, in 1-out-of-2 oblivious transfer, a sender Alice has two bits x0, x1. A receiver Bob obtains one of these, xb, where b= 0 or b= 1. Alice should not be able to guess b, and Bob should not be able to guess the bit value he did not obtain. Bounds on cheating probabilities in quantum oblivious transfer have previously been investigated for complete protocols. “Complete” means that if sender Alice and receiver Bob both follow the protocol, the bit value Bob obtains correctly matches Alice’s bit value. Here we instead investigate incomplete protocols, where Bob obtains an incorrect bit value with probability pf. For complete protocols, both “classical” and quantum, it holds that if one party can cheat no better than with a random guess, then the other party can cheat perfectly. For incomplete protocols, in contrast, even with no restrictions on cheating parties, and when one party can cheat no better than with random guess, it is possible that the other party still cannot cheat perfectly; their cheating probability can be lower than in complete protocols. We find the optimal non-interactive protocols where Alice’s bit values are represented by four symmetric pure quantum states, and where Alice cannot cheat better than with a random guess. “Optimal” means that for a given pf, Bob’s cheating probability pr is as low as possible, and vice versa. We also show that quantum protocols can outperform classical non-interactive protocols. Our results also provide a lower bound on Bob’s cheating probability in interactive quantum protocols. An advantage of the non-interactive protocols we investigate is that they require neither entanglement nor quantum memory. The optimal protocols could be readily implemented using standard optical components. |
||
| Practical Parallel Self-testing of Bell States via Magic Rectangles | QCRYPT 2021 | Sean A. Adamson |
Self-testing is a method to verify that one has a particular quantum state from purely classical statistics. For practical applications, such as device-independent delegated verifiable quantum computation, it is crucial that one self-tests multiple Bell states in parallel while keeping the quantum capabilities required of one side to a minimum. In this work, we use the $3 \times n$ magic rectangle games (generalisations of the magic square game) to obtain a self-test for $n$ Bell states where the one side needs only to measure single-qubit Pauli observables. The protocol requires small input sizes (constant for Alice and $O(\log n)$ bits for Bob) and is robust with robustness $O(n^{5/2} \sqrt{\varepsilon})$, where $\varepsilon$ is the closeness of the observed correlations to the ideal. To achieve the desired self-test we introduce a one-side-local quantum strategy for the magic square game that wins with certainty, generalise this strategy to the family of $3 \times n$ magic rectangle games, and supplement these nonlocal games with extra check rounds (of single and pairs of observables). |
||
| Quantum magic rectangles: Characterization and application to certified randomness expansion | QCRYPT 2021 | Sean A. Adamson |
We study a generalization of the Mermin–Peres magic square game to arbitrary rectangular dimensions. After exhibiting some general properties, these rectangular games are fully characterized in terms of their optimal win probabilities for quantum strategies. We find that for $m \times n$ rectangular games of dimensions $m,n \geq 3$, there are quantum strategies that win with certainty, while for dimensions $1 \times n$ quantum strategies do not outperform classical strategies. The final case of dimensions $2 \times n$ is richer, and we give upper and lower bounds that both outperform the classical strategies. Finally, we apply our findings to quantum certified randomness expansion to find the noise tolerance and rates for all magic rectangle games. To do this, we use our previous results to obtain the winning probability of games with a distinguished input for which the devices give a deterministic outcome and follow the analysis of C. A. Miller and Y. Shi (2017). |
||
| Security Limitations of Classical-Client Delegated Quantum Computing | QIP 2021 | Christian Badertscher, Alexandru Cojocaru, Léo Colisson, Elham Kashefi, Dominik Leichtle, Atul Mantri |
| Quantum Magic Rectangles: Characterisation and Application to Certified Randomness Expansion | QIP 2021 | Sean A. Adamson |
| The Bitcoin Backbone Protocol Against Quantum Adversaries | QIP 2021 | Alexandru Cojocaru, Juan Garay, Aggelos Kiayias, Fang Song |
| The Bitcoin Backbone Protocol Against Quantum Adversaries | QCRYPT 2020 | Alexandru Cojocaru, Juan Garay, Aggelos Kiayias, Fang Song |
Bitcoin and its underlying blockchain protocol have received recently significant attention in the context of building distributed systems as well as from the perspective of the foundations of the consensus problem. At the same time, the rapid development of quantum technologies brings the possibility of quantum computing devices from a theoretical concept to an emerging technology. Motivated by this, in this work we revisit the formal security of the core of the Bitcoin protocol, called the Bitcoin backbone, in the presence of an adversary that has access to a scalable quantum computer. We prove that the protocol’s essential properties stand in the post-quantum setting assuming a general quantum adversary with suitably bounded number of queries in the Quantum Random Oracle (QRO) model. In order to achieve this, we investigate and bound the quantum complexity of a Chain-of-Proofs-of-Work search problem which is at the core of the blockchain protocol. Our results imply that security can be shown by bounding the quantum queries so that each quantum query is worth O(p^{−1/2}) classical ones and that the wait time for safe settlement is expanded by a multiplicative factor of O(p^{−1/6}), where p is the probability of success of a single classical query to the protocol’s underlying hash function. |
||
| Is Classical Remote State Preparation Composable? | QCRYPT 2020 | Christian Badertscher, Alexandru Cojocaru, Léo Colisson, Elham Kashefi, Dominik Leichtle, Atul Mantri |
Classical remote state preparation (RSPCC) is a primitive that allows an honest client to prepare a quantum state remotely with the help of an (untrustworthy) server using only a classical communication channel. With this primitive quantum protocols (such as secure delegation of quantum computations) become accessible to classical clients, by removing the need for a quantum channel. Since this cryptographic primitive’s main role is to be a building block within larger protocols, it is of utmost importance to examine its security under composition. In this work we present three results related to the composability of RSPCC protocols: 1. As our first main result, we show that no classical remote state preparation protocol RSPCC can be composable in the Abstract Cryptography framework [MR11], even when the distinguisher is computationally bounded. In other words, remote state preparation cannot be constructed with only a classical channel. 2. We further show that any classical-client delegated quantum computing protocol that uses the universal blind quantum computation (UBQC) protocol [BFK09] and a RSPCC protocol as a subroutine cannot be composable. 3. Upon relaxing the security requirement, we show that replacing the quantum channel of the UBQC protocol by the particular RSPCC protocol of [CCKW19] is secure in the game-based security framework. |
||
| QFactory: classically-instructed remote secret qubits preparation | QCRYPT 2019 | Alexandru Cojocaru, Léo Colisson, Elham Kashefi |
| Almost tight lower bounds for 1-out-of-2 quantum oblivious transfer | QCRYPT 2017 | Ryan Amiri, Erika Andersson |
| The Quantum Cut-and-Choose Technique and Quantum Two-Party Computation | QCRYPT 2017 | Elham Kashefi, Luka Music |
| The Quantum Cut-and-Choose Technique and Quantum Two-Party Computation | TQC 2017 | Elham Kashefi, Luka Music |
| Imperfect Oblivious Transfer | QCRYPT 2016 | Ryan Amiri, Erika Andersson |
| Free-Space Quantum Signatures Using Heterodyne Measurements | QCRYPT 2016 | Callum Croal, Matthew Thornton, Christian Peuntinger, Bettina Heim, Imgran Khan, Christoph Marqurdt, Gerd Leuchs, Erika Andersson, Natalia Korolkova |
| Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Digital Signatures | QCRYPT 2016 | Ittoop Puthoor, Ryan Amiri, Marcos Curty, Erika Andersson |
| Kilometer Transmission Range Quantum Digital Signatures | QCRYPT 2016 | Robert Collins, Ross Donaldson, Ryan Amiri, Mikio Fujiwara, Toshimori Honjo, Kaoru Shimizu, Kiyoshi Tamaki, Masahiro Takeoka, Vedran Dunjko, Masahide Sasaki, Erika Andersson, John Jeffers, Gerald Buller |
| Secure Quantum Signatures Using Insecure Quantum Channels | QCRYPT 2015 | Ryan Amiri, Adrian Kent, Erika Andersson |
| Multiparty Quantum Signature Schemes | QCRYPT 2015 | Juan Miguel Arrazola, Erika Andersson |
| Quantum digital signatures with quantum key distribution components | QCRYPT 2014 | Vedran Dunjko, Erika Andersson |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCRYPT 2019 | program | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Erika Andersson | 11 |
| Alexandru Cojocaru | 7 |
| Elham Kashefi | 7 |
| Ryan Amiri | 7 |
| Léo Colisson | 4 |
| Aggelos Kiayias | 3 |
| Ioannis Kolotouros | 3 |
| Sean A. Adamson | 3 |
| Vedran Dunjko | 3 |
| Atul Mantri | 2 |
| Christian Badertscher | 2 |
| Dominik Leichtle | 2 |
| Fang Song | 2 |
| Gerald Buller | 2 |
| John Jeffers | 2 |
| Juan Garay | 2 |
| Luka Music | 2 |
| Milos Prokop | 2 |
| Robert Collins | 2 |
| Ross Donaldson | 2 |