4
talks
1
posters
4
committee roles
0
leadership roles
2015–2025
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enumerating all bilocal Clifford distillation protocols through symmetry reduction | TQC 2021 | regular | Sarah Jansen, Kenneth Goodenough, Sebastian de Bone, Dion Gijswijt |
| Realistic parameter regimes for a single sequential quantum repeater | QCRYPT 2017 | regular | Filip Rozpedek, Kenneth Goodenough, Jeremy Ribeiro, Norbert Kalb, Valentina Caprara Vivoli, Andreas Reiserer, Ronald Hanson, Stephanie Wehner |
| Benchmarking the utility of a quantum channel for secure communications | QCRYPT 2015 | regular | Sergii Strelchuk |
|
Unbounded number of channel uses are required to see quantum capacity ↗
|
QIP 2015 | regular | Toby Cubitt, William Matthews, Maris Ozols, David Perez-Garcia, Sergii Strelchuk |
Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Pseudo-Entanglement is Necessary for EFI Pairs | QCRYPT 2025 | Manuel Goulão |
Regarding minimal assumptions, most of classical cryptography is known to depend on the existence of One-Way Functions (OWFs). However, recent evidence has shown that this is not the case when considering quantum resources. Besides the well known unconditional security of Quantum Key Distribution, it is now known that computational cryptography may be built on weaker primitives than OWFs, e.g., pseudo-random states [JLS18], one-way state generators [MY23], or EFI pairs of states [BCQ23]. We consider a new quantum resource, pseudo-entanglement, and show that the existence of EFI pairs, one of the current main candidates for the weakest computational assumption for cryptography (necessary for commitments, oblivious transfer, secure multi-party computation, computational zero-knowledge proofs), implies the existence of pseudo-entanglement, as defined by [ABF+24, ABV23] under some reasonable adaptations. We prove this by constructing a new family of pseudo-entangled quantum states given only EFI pairs. Our result has important implications for the field of computational cryptography. It shows that if pseudo-entanglement does not exist, then most of cryptography cannot exist either. Moreover, it establishes pseudo-entanglement as a new minimal assumption for most of computational cryptography, which may pave the way for the unification of other assumptions into a single primitive. Finally, pseudo-entanglement connects physical phenomena and efficient computation, thus, our result strengthens the connection between cryptography and the physical world. |
||
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| TQC 2022 | PC | member | — |
| QIP 2018 | Local | member | — |
| TQC 2018 | PC | member | — |
| TQC 2017 | PC | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Kenneth Goodenough | 2 |
| Sergii Strelchuk | 2 |
| Andreas Reiserer | 1 |
| David Perez-Garcia | 1 |
| Dion Gijswijt | 1 |
| Filip Rozpedek | 1 |
| Jeremy Ribeiro | 1 |
| Manuel Goulão | 1 |
| Maris Ozols | 1 |
| Norbert Kalb | 1 |
| Ronald Hanson | 1 |
| Sarah Jansen | 1 |
| Sebastian de Bone | 1 |
| Stephanie Wehner | 1 |
| Toby Cubitt | 1 |
| Valentina Caprara Vivoli | 1 |
| William Matthews | 1 |