4
talks
9
posters
2
committee roles
1
leadership roles
2014–2025
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continuous variable quantum key distribution multiplexed with high throughput coherent channels Abstract | QCRYPT 2019 | regular | Tobias Eriksson, Takuya Hirano, Benjamin Puttnam, Georg Rademacher, Ruben Luis, Mikio Fujiwara, Ryo Namiki, Yoshinari Awaji, Naoya Wada, Masahide Sasaki |
| An efficient countermeasure against correlated intensity fluctuations in optical pulses on high-speed decoy BB84 QKD systems | QCRYPT 2017 | regular | Akihisa Tomita, Ken-Ichiro Yoshino, Mikio Fujiwara, Tatsuya Sumiya, Toshihiko Sasaki, Kensuke Nakata, Akio Tajima, Masato Koashi, Masahide Sasaki |
| Quantum data locking and the locking capacity of a quantum channel | QCRYPT 2014 | regular | Saikat Guha, Patrick Hayden, Hari Krovi, Seth Lloyd, ▸Cosmo Lupo, Jeffrey H. Shapiro, Mark M. Wilde, Andreas Winter |
| Fundamental rate-loss tradeoff for optical quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2014 | regular ▸ presenter | Saikat Guha, Mark M. Wilde |
Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Relaxing detection efficiency thresholds in device-indepent quantum key distribution with optical tools | QCRYPT 2025 | Anthony Brendan, Makoto Ishihara, Wojciech Roga |
Device-Independent quantum key distribution (DI-QKD) enables the distribution of secret keys over an untrusted network with uncharacterized devices1, whose security is guaranteed by certification of quantum correlations between remote, legitimate parties through violation of Bell inequalities2. However, implementations of DI-QKD protocols in practice are impeded by the detection loophole, imposing stringent detection efficiency thresholds, preventing practical realizations of DI-QKD. To overcome this limitation, the novel concept of routed Bell tests was recently introduced3,4,5.
Here, we propose a DI-QKD protocol based on the routed Bell tests with only standard quantum optical tools, namely two-mode squeezed states, displacement-based measurements and on/off detectors. Fig. 1(a) illustrates this in more detail. Two honest, distant parties, Alice and Bob, each receive one mode of a two-mode squeezed state, and perform displacement-operations, D(α) and D(β_L ), on their received mode and detect it with an on/off detector with detection efficiencies η_A and η_(B_L ), where Alice has her input choices x∈{0,1}, and Bob has his input choices y∈{0,1,2}, obtaining classical outputs a,b∈{0,1}. In addition, Bob can route his mode via a switch with input z∈{S,L} towards another displacement-based measurement device with displacement operation D(β_S ), with input choices and classical outputs denoted by y ̂∈{0,1} and b ̂∈{0,1} respectively, and detection efficiency η_(B_S ), where η_(B_S )≥η_(B_L ). It is crucial that Bob’s routing choice z should not have an influence on Alice’s measurement input and outcomes. We denote (x,y,z)=(0,2,L) as key generation rounds where some rounds are used for estimating error correction cost, and others to construct their keys, and all other input combinations are used to certify their correlations. We optimize for Alice and Bob’s displacement operation D(α),D(β_S ) and D(β_L) and compute the lower bounds on the key rate using numerical optimization6, setting η_A=η_(B_L ). In Fig. 1(b), we observe that our protocol allows us to relax the detection efficiency requirements and see improved key rates against an unrouted protocol, facilitating the possibility of realizing long-distance DI-QKD in the future. |
||
| Bell inequalities tailored for W states and their applications to device-independent quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2025 | Makoto Ishihara, Wojciech Roga |
Device-independent conference key agreement (DI-CKA) realizes information-theoretically secure key distribution among more than two remote parties without any assumptions on the inner workings of the devices, relying instead on the violation of Bell inequalities. While several DI-CKA protocols based on Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states have been proposed, it remains an open question whether W states can also be used for DI-CKA. In this study, we affirmatively answer this open question by constructing Bell inequalities that are maximally violated by W states. |
||
| State estimation of multi-partite single photon path entanglement | QCRYPT 2024 | Hikaru Shimizu, Joe Yoshimoto, Junko Hayase, Tomoyuki Horikiri, Rikizo Ikuta |
We propose a new method for the measurement of multi-mode single photon path entanglement which can be distributed with the same rate of bi-partite entanglement. We also demonstrate the method with two different states and succeeded to reconstruct the density matrix for each of them with high accuracy. |
||
| Long-distance device-independent conference key agreement | QCRYPT 2024 | Makoto Ishihara, Anders J. E. Bjerrum, Wojciech Roga, Jonatan B. Brask, Ulrik L. Andersen |
We propose a long-distance device-independent conference key agreement (DI-CKA) protocol. We use an efficient GHZ state distribution protocol based on entanglement swapping. We calculate a key rate of our protocol from violation of a multipartite Bell inequality and show that our protocol can distribute a secret key over longer distance than a direct transmission DI-CKA protocol. We also consider practical displacement-based measurement and show experimental feasibility of our protocol. |
||
| Quantum Digital Signatures Transmitted Over a Channel Loss Equivalent to 134 km | QCRYPT 2017 | Robert Collins, Ryan Amiri, Mikio Fujiwara, Toshimori Honjo, Kaoru Shimizu, Kiyoshi Tamaki, Ross Donaldson, Masahide Sasaki, Erika Andersson, Gerald Buller |
| Unconstrained capacities of quantum key distribution and entanglement distillation for pure-loss bosonic broadcast channels | QCRYPT 2017 | Kaushik Seshadreesan, Mark M. Wilde |
| Double-port pumped time-bin entangled photon pair generation using Si ring resonator | QCRYPT 2017 | Mikio Fujiwara, Ryota Wakabayashi, Masahide Sasaki |
| Quantum key distribution with an efficient countermeasure against intensity fluctuations in optical pulses | QCRYPT 2017 | Ken-Ichiro Yoshino, Mikio Fujiwara, Kensuke Nakata, Tatsuya Sumiya, Toshihiko Sasaki, Masahide Sasaki, Akio Tajima, Masato Koashi, Akihisa Tomita |
| Security of decoy-state QKD with alternate key distillation | QCRYPT 2017 | Tatsuya Sumiya, Toshihiko Sasaki, Masato Koashi, Ken-Ichiro Yoshino, Mikio Fujiwara, Kensuke Nakata, Masahide Sasaki, Akio Tajima, Akihisa Tomita |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCRYPT 2018 | PC | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2015 | Local | chair | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Masahide Sasaki | 6 |
| Mikio Fujiwara | 6 |
| Akihisa Tomita | 3 |
| Akio Tajima | 3 |
| Ken-Ichiro Yoshino | 3 |
| Kensuke Nakata | 3 |
| Makoto Ishihara | 3 |
| Mark M. Wilde | 3 |
| Masato Koashi | 3 |
| Tatsuya Sumiya | 3 |
| Toshihiko Sasaki | 3 |
| Wojciech Roga | 3 |
| Saikat Guha | 2 |
| Anders J. E. Bjerrum | 1 |
| Andreas Winter | 1 |
| Anthony Brendan | 1 |
| Benjamin Puttnam | 1 |
| Cosmo Lupo | 1 |
| Erika Andersson | 1 |
| Georg Rademacher | 1 |