8
program roles
34
collaborators
2011–2025
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
15 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| NISQ Security and Complexity via Simple Classical Reasoning | QCRYPT 2025 | regular | Alexandru Cojocaru, Juan Garay, Qipeng Liu |
We give novel and tighter lifting theorems for security games in the quantum random oracle model (QROM), as well as in Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) settings such as the hybrid query model, the noisy oracle and the bounded-depth models. At the core of our main results lies a novel measure-and-reprogram framework that we call coherent reprogramming. This framework gives a tighter lifting theorem for query complexity problems. Secondly, we provide, for the first time, a hybrid lifting theorem for hybrid algorithms that can perform both quantum and classical queries, as well as a lifting theorem for quantum algorithms with access to noisy oracles or bounded quantum depth. At the core of these results lies a novel measure-and-reprogram framework, called hybrid coherent measure-and-reprogramming, tailored specifically for hybrid algorithms. Equipped with both lifting theorems, we are able to prove directly both quantum and NISQ security and complexity results by calculating a single combinatorial quantity, relying solely on classical reasoning. Crucially, we derive the first direct product theorems in the average case, both in the quantum and the hybrid settings— i.e., an enabling tool to determine the hardness of solving multi-instance security games. This allows us to derive in a straightforward manner the hardness of various security games, for example (i) the non-uniform hardness of salted games, (ii) the hardness of specific cryptographic tasks such as the multiple instance version of one-wayness and collision-resistance, and (iii) uniform or non-uniform hardness of many other games. |
|||
| Quantum Pseudorandom Scramblers | QIP 2024 | regular | ▸Chuhan Lu, Minglong Qin, Penghui Yao, Mingnan Zhao |
|
Quantum State Learning Implies Circuit Lower Bounds ↗
|
TQC 2024 | regular | ▸Nai-Hui Chia, Daniel Liang |
We establish connections between state tomography, pseudorandomness, quantum state synthesis, and circuit lower bounds. In particular, let C be a family of non-uniform quantum circuits of polynomial size and suppose that there exists an algorithm that, given copies of |ψ⟩, distinguishes whether |ψ⟩ is produced by C or is Haar random, promised one of these is the case. For arbitrary fixed constant c, we show that if the algorithm uses at most O(2^n^c) time and 2^n^0.99 samples then stateBQE⊄stateC. Here stateBQE:=stateBQTIME[2^O(n)] and stateC are state synthesis complexity classes as introduced by Rosenthal and Yuen (ITCS 2022), which capture problems with classical inputs but quantum output. Note that efficient tomography implies a similarly efficient distinguishing algorithm against Haar random states, even for nearly exponential-time algorithms. Because every state produced by a polynomial-size circuit can be learned with 2O(n) samples and time, or O(n^ω(1)) samples and 2^O(n^ω(1)) time, we show that even slightly non-trivial quantum state tomography algorithms would lead to new statements about quantum state synthesis. Finally, a slight modification of our proof shows that distinguishing algorithms for quantum states can imply circuit lower bounds for decision problems as well. This help sheds light on why time-efficient tomography algorithms for non-uniform quantum circuit classes has only had limited and partial progress. Our work parallels results by Arunachalam et al. (FOCS 2021) that revealed a similar connection between quantum learning of Boolean functions and circuit lower bounds for classical circuit classes, but modified for the purposes of state tomography and state synthesis. |
|||
| Secure Computation is in MiniQCrypt | QIP 2021 | invited | Alex Bredariol Grilo, Huijia Lin, Vinod Vaikuntanathan |
Abstract MiniQCrypt is a world where quantum-secure one-way functions exist, and quantum communication is possible. We construct an oblivious transfer (OT) protocol in MiniQCrypt that achieves simulation-security against malicious quantum polynomial-time adversaries, building on the foundational work of Bennett, Brassard, Crépeau and Skubiszewska (CRYPTO 1991). Combining the OT protocol with prior works, we obtain secure two-party and multi-party computation protocols also in MiniQCrypt. This is in contrast to the classical world, where it is widely believed that one-way functions alone do not give us OT. |
|||
| General Linear Group Action on Tensors: A Candidate for Post-Quantum Cryptography | QIP 2020 | regular | Zhengfeng Ji, Youming Qiao, Aaram Yun |
| Zero-knowledge proofs meet quantum computing | QCRYPT 2019 | tutorial ▸ presenter | — |
Zero-knowledge proof systems have played a fundamental role in complexity theory and cryptography since its invention. I will introduce the basic definitions and constructions of zero-knowledge proof systems, and discuss the new questions that arise in a quantum setting. This includes making classical ZK proofs secure against quantum adversaries as well as making quantum interactive proof systems zero-knowledge. |
|||
| Pseudorandom Quantum States | QCRYPT 2018 | regular | ▸Zhengfeng Ji, Yi-Kai Liu |
| Quantum-secure message authentication via blind-unforgeability | QCRYPT 2018 | regular | Gorjan Alagic, ▸Christian Majenz, Alexander Russell |
| On Basing One-way Permutations on NP-hard problems under Quantum Reductions | QCRYPT 2018 | regular | ▸Nai-Hui Chia, Sean Hallgren |
| A polynomial time quantum algorithm for computing class groups and solving the principal ideal problem in arbitrary degree number fields | QIP 2017 | regular | ▸Jean-Francois Biasse |
| Zero-knowledge proof systems for QMA | QIP 2017 | regular ▸ presenter | Anne Broadbent, Zhengfeng Ji, John Watrous |
| Zero-Knowledge Proof Systems for QMA | QCRYPT 2016 | regular | Anne Broadbent, Zhengfeng Ji, John Watrous |
| A quantum algorithm for computing the unit group of an arbitrary degree number field | QIP 2015 | plenary | Kirsten Eisentraeger, Sean Hallgren, Alexei Kitaev |
| Making Existential-unforgeable Signatures Strongly Unforgeable in the Quantum Random-oracle Model | TQC 2015 | regular | Edward Eaton |
| Classical cryptographic protocols in a quantum world | QIP 2011 | invited | Sean Hallgren, Adam Smith |
14 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Parallel Kac’s Walk Generates PRU | QCRYPT 2025 | Chuhan Lu, Minglong Qin, Penghui Yao, Mingnan Zhao |
Ma and Huang recently proved that the PFC construction, introduced by Metger, Poremba, Sinha and Yuen [MPSY24], gives an adaptive-secure pseudorandom unitary family (PRU). Their proof developed a new path recording technique. In this work, we show that a linear number of sequential repetitions of the parallel Kac's Walk, introduced by Lu, Qin, Song, Yao and Zhao [LQSY+24], also forms an adaptive-secure PRU, confirming a conjecture therein. Moreover, it additionally satisfies strong security against adversaries making inverse queries. This gives an alternative PRU construction, and provides another instance demonstrating the power of the path recording technique. We also discuss some further simplifications and implications. |
||
| Parallel Kac’s Walk Generates PRU | QIP 2025 | Chuhan Lu, Minglong Qin, Penghui Yao, Mingnan Zhao |
| A Cryptographic Perspective on the Verifiability of Quantum Advantage | QIP 2024 | Nai-Hui Chia, Honghao Fu, Penghui Yao |
| Generalized Hybrid Search with Applications to Blockchain and Hash Function Security | TQC 2024 | Alexandru Cojocaru, Juan Garay |
| Query Complexity in Limited Quantum Oracle Models | TQC 2024 | Mehil Agarwal, Shravas Rao |
| A Cryptographic Perspective on the Verifiability of Quantum Advantage | TQC 2024 | Nai-Hui Chia, Honghao Fu, Penghui Yao |
| Simple Vertex Coloring in the Quantum Query Model | QIP 2021 | Jackson Morris |
| The Bitcoin Backbone Protocol Against Quantum Adversaries | QIP 2021 | Alexandru Cojocaru, Juan Garay, Aggelos Kiayias, Petros Wallden |
| The Bitcoin Backbone Protocol Against Quantum Adversaries | QCRYPT 2020 | Alexandru Cojocaru, Juan Garay, Aggelos Kiayias, Petros Wallden |
Bitcoin and its underlying blockchain protocol have received recently significant attention in the context of building distributed systems as well as from the perspective of the foundations of the consensus problem. At the same time, the rapid development of quantum technologies brings the possibility of quantum computing devices from a theoretical concept to an emerging technology. Motivated by this, in this work we revisit the formal security of the core of the Bitcoin protocol, called the Bitcoin backbone, in the presence of an adversary that has access to a scalable quantum computer. We prove that the protocol’s essential properties stand in the post-quantum setting assuming a general quantum adversary with suitably bounded number of queries in the Quantum Random Oracle (QRO) model. In order to achieve this, we investigate and bound the quantum complexity of a Chain-of-Proofs-of-Work search problem which is at the core of the blockchain protocol. Our results imply that security can be shown by bounding the quantum queries so that each quantum query is worth O(p^{−1/2}) classical ones and that the wait time for safe settlement is expanded by a multiplicative factor of O(p^{−1/6}), where p is the probability of success of a single classical query to the protocol’s underlying hash function. |
||
| On reducing SAT to inverting one-way functions via quantum reductions | QIP 2019 | Nai-Hui Chia, Sean Hallgren |
| Quantum security of hash functions and property-preservation of iterated hashing | QIP 2019 | Ben Hamlin |
| On Basing One-way Permutations on NP-hard Problems under Quantum Reductions | TQC 2019 | Nai-Hui Chia, Sean Hallgren |
| On Basing One-way Permutations on NP-hard problems under Quantum Reductions | QIP 2018 | Nai-Hui Chia, Sean Hallgren |
| On the quantum attacks against schemes relying on the hardness of finding a short generator of an ideal in Q(zeta_{p^n}) | QIP 2016 | Jean-Francois Biasse |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCRYPT 2025 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2025 | program | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2024 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2024 | program | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2023 | program | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2020 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2018 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2017 | program | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Nai-Hui Chia | 7 |
| Sean Hallgren | 6 |
| Penghui Yao | 5 |
| Alexandru Cojocaru | 4 |
| Juan Garay | 4 |
| Zhengfeng Ji | 4 |
| Chuhan Lu | 3 |
| Minglong Qin | 3 |
| Mingnan Zhao | 3 |
| Aggelos Kiayias | 2 |
| Anne Broadbent | 2 |
| Honghao Fu | 2 |
| Jean-Francois Biasse | 2 |
| John Watrous | 2 |
| Petros Wallden | 2 |
| Aaram Yun | 1 |
| Adam Smith | 1 |
| Alex Bredariol Grilo | 1 |
| Alexander Russell | 1 |
| Alexei Kitaev | 1 |