27
collaborators
2009–2024
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
4 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum repeaters for a quantum internet) | QCRYPT 2022 | tutorial ▸ presenter | — |
| Quantum Network Coding | QCRYPT 2017 | invited ▸ presenter | — |
| Towards secure QKD with testable assumptions on modulation devices | QCRYPT 2016 | regular | Akihiro Mizutani, Yuichi Nagamatsu, Marcos Curty, Hoi-Kwong Lo, Rikizo Ikuta, Takashi Yamamoto, Nobuyuki Imoto, Kiyoshi Tamaki |
| All-photonic quantum repeaters | QCRYPT 2015 | regular | Kiyoshi Tamaki, Hoi-Kwong Lo |
18 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Second-generation quantum repeaters enabled by high-dimensional entanglement | QCRYPT 2024 | Tomohiro Yamazaki |
Linear-optical entanglement swapping works only probabilistically. Quantum repeater protocols based on it, classified in the first generation, inevitably need classical communication between non-adjacent nodes, which makes the protocols very slow and requires quantum memories with long coherence time. One way to realize faster quantum repeater protocols, classified in the second generation, is to use matter qubits, which enables deterministic entanglement swapping. However, such matter qubits are still experimentally challenging. Here we propose a linear-optical circuit that projects two input qudits of dimension d onto a Bell state defined in a two-qubit subspace with the probability of 1 − d−1, which can be used to realize almost deterministic entanglement swapping for large d. Based on it, we propose a quantum repeater protocol consisting of linear optical elements, photon detectors, high-dimensional quantum memories, and photonic three-qudit GHZ states. In the protocol, the classical communication between non-adjacent nodes becomes unnecessary thanks to the high success probability of the entanglement swapping, making the protocol be categorized into the second generation. |
||
| Networking quantum networks with minimum cost aggregation | QCRYPT 2024 | — |
A quantum internet holds promise for achieving distributed quantum sensing and large-scale quantum computer networks, as well as quantum communication among arbitrary clients all over the globe. The main building block is efficient distribution of entanglement,entangled bits (ebits), between arbitrary clients in a quantum network with fixed error, irrespective of their distance. In practice, this should be accomplished across multiple quantum networks, analogously to what the current Internet does in conventional communication. Here we present a practical recipe on how to give arbitrary clients ebits with fixed error efficiently, regardless of their distance, across multiple quantum networks. This recipe is composed of two new concepts, minimum cost aggregation and network concatenation. Our recipe forms the basis of designing a quantum internet protocol for networking self-organizing quantum networks to make a global-scale quantum internet. |
||
| Security of time-bin encoding BB84 protocol with passive interferometer | QCRYPT 2024 | Shun Kawakami, Atsushi Taniguchi, Hirokazu Takahashi, Koichi Takasugi |
Time-bin encoding is more favorable in fiber-based implementation of quantum key distribution (QKD) than polarization encoding as it avoids issues inherent for polarization encoding, such as birefringence, caused by optical fibers. QKD only with passive devices is desirable to prevent side-channel attacks possible in the case of use of active devices such as modulators. The Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) protocol is a strong candidate for an implementation with satisfying these; it can be implemented using time bins with a passive delayed interferometer that inevitably generates "satellite time bins", two pulses outside the phase-interference timing. Although time-bin encoding BB84 has been frequently demonstrated, there is no consensus whether satellite time bins can be used to extract a key. Besides, there is no security proof for either case. Here, we prove the security of time-bin encoding BB84 protocol with a passive delayed interferometer and threshold detectors. If satellite time bins are used for key generation, we show that an additional operation is necessary for security. The result is not limited only to BB84 but can be applied to Bennett-Brassard-Mermin 1992 and quantum conference key agreement based on time bins. |
||
| Linear programs for entanglement and key distribution in the quantum internet | QCRYPT 2020 | Stefan Bäuml, Go Kato, David Elkouss |
Quantum networks will allow to implement communication tasks beyond the reach of their classical counterparts. A pressing and necessary issue for the design of quantum network protocols is the quantification of the rates at which these tasks can be performed. Here, we propose a simple recipe that yields efficiently computable lower and upper bounds on the maximum achievable rates. For this we make use of the max-flow min-cut theorem and its generalization to multi-commodity flows to obtain linear programs. We exemplify our recipe deriving the linear programs for bipartite settings, settings where multiple pairs of users obtain entanglement in parallel as well as multipartite settings, covering almost all known situations. We also make use of a generalization of the concept of paths between user pairs in a network to Steiner trees spanning a group of users wishing to establish Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states. |
||
| Finite-key security analysis of a simple twin-field quantum key distribution protocol | QCRYPT 2019 | Guillermo Curras Lorenzo, Marcos Curty, Mohsen Razavi |
| Beating the repeaterless bound with adaptive measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2019 | Róbert Trényi, Marcos Curty |
| Experimental time-reversed adaptive Bell measurement towards all-photonic quantum repeaters | QCRYPT 2019 | Rikizo Ikuta, Yasushi Hasegawa, Nobuyuki Matsuda, Kiyoshi Tamaki, Hoi-Kwong Lo, Takashi Yamamoto, Nobuyuki Imoto |
| Linear programs for entanglement and key distribution in the quantum internet | QIP 2019 | Stefan Bäuml, Go Kato, David Elkouss |
| Simple security proof of twin-field type quantum key distribution protocol | QCRYPT 2018 | Marcos Curty, Hoi-Kwong Lo |
| Versatile relative entropy bounds for quantum networks | QCRYPT 2018 | Luca Rigovacca, Go Kato, Stefan Bäuml, Myungshik Kim, William J. Munro |
| Fundamental limitation on quantum broadcast networks | QIP 2017 | Stefan Bäuml |
| Theory of the quantum internet | QIP 2017 | Akihiro Mizutani, Hoi-Kwong Lo, Go Kato |
| Security of CV-QKD with transmitted local oscillator | QIP 2016 | Go Kato, Kiyoshi Tamaki, Masaki Owari |
| All photonic quantum repeaters | QIP 2015 | Kiyoshi Tamaki, Hoi-Kwong Lo |
| Security of CV-QKD with transmitted local oscillator | QCRYPT 2013 | Go Kato, Kiyoshi Tamaki, Masaki Owari |
In most of the security proofs of continuous variable quantum key distribution (CV-QKD), except for the security proof of an entangle-based protocol by F. Furrer et. al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 , 100502 (2012)], it is required that Bob’s local oscillator (LO) for homodyne or heterodyne measurements is perfectly prepared. Since Eve can freely manipulate LO transmitted from Alice to Bob in standard CV-QKD systems, this requirement cannot be met. Moreover, the requirement includes the assumption that the intensity of Bob’s LO must be infinite, which is impossible to achieve in reality. In this work, we fill the gap between a standard CV-QKD system and the existing security proofs by providing a security proof accommodating the manipulation of LO by Eve. |
||
| Optimal entanglement manipulation via coherent-state transmission | QIP 2012 | Go Kato |
| Quantum repeaters and computation by a single module: remote nondestructive parity measurement | QIP 2011 | Hitoshi Takeda, Masato Koashi, Nobuyuki Imoto |
| Accessing genuinely quantum information without causing disturbance | QIP 2009 | Masato Koashi, Nobuyuki Imoto |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Go Kato | 7 |
| Hoi-Kwong Lo | 6 |
| Kiyoshi Tamaki | 6 |
| Marcos Curty | 4 |
| Nobuyuki Imoto | 4 |
| Stefan Bäuml | 4 |
| Akihiro Mizutani | 2 |
| David Elkouss | 2 |
| Masaki Owari | 2 |
| Masato Koashi | 2 |
| Rikizo Ikuta | 2 |
| Takashi Yamamoto | 2 |
| Atsushi Taniguchi | 1 |
| Guillermo Curras Lorenzo | 1 |
| Hirokazu Takahashi | 1 |
| Hitoshi Takeda | 1 |
| Koichi Takasugi | 1 |
| Luca Rigovacca | 1 |
| Mohsen Razavi | 1 |
| Myungshik Kim | 1 |