6
program roles
3
steering roles
1
organizing role
1
leadership role
98
collaborators
2006–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
19 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
|
All pure multipartite entangled states of qubits can be self-tested up to complex conjugation ↗
|
QIP 2026 | regular | ▸Ivan Supic, Maria Balanzo Juando, Andrea Coladangelo, Remigiusz Augusiak |
Device-independent self-testing refers to the certification of quantum states based entirely on the correlations exhibited by measurements on separate subsystems. The fact that such a certification is possible at all is remarkable in its own right, and is intimately connected to the violation Bell’s inequalities by entangled quantum systems. In the bipartite case, self-testing of states has been completely characterized, up to local isometries, as there exist protocols that self-test arbitrary pure states of any local dimension. Despite the growing interest in device-independent certification protocols, an analogous result in the general multipartite case has remained elusive. In this work, we give a complete characterization of the qubit case, showing that any multipartite entangled state of qubits can be self-tested. |
|||
| Quantum networks self-test all entangled states | QIP 2023 | regular | ▸Ivan Supic, Joseph Bowles, Marc-Olivier Renou, Matty Hoban |
| Security of continuous variable QKD with discrete modulation | QCRYPT 2022 | regular | Stefan Bäuml, Omar Fawzi, Carlos Pascual, Victoria Wright |
| Quantum networks self-test all entangled states | QCRYPT 2022 | regular | Ivan Supic, Joseph Bowles, Marc Olivier Renou, Matty Hoban |
| Quantum Theory Needs Complex Numbers | QIP 2022 | plenary_short | ▸Marc-Olivier Renou, David Trillo, Mirjam Weilenmann, Thinh Le Phuc, Armin Tavakoli, Nicolas Gisin, Miguel Navascués |
| Measurement-device-independent entanglement detection for continuous- variable systems | QIP 2022 | regular | Paolo Abiuso, Stefan Bäuml, Daniel Cavalcanti |
| Connector tensor networks: a renormalization-type approach to quantum certification | QIP 2020 | regular | Miguel Navascués, Sukhwinder Singh |
| Energy as a detector of nonlocality of many-body spin systems | QIP 2017 | regular | ▸Jordi Tura Brugues, Gemma De las Cuevas, Remigiusz Augusiak, Maciej Lewenstein, Ignacio Cirac |
| A single entangled system is an unbounded source of nonlocal correlations and of certified random numbers | TQC 2017 | regular | Florian John Curchod, Markus Johansson, Remigiusz Augusiak, Matty Hoban, Peter Wittek |
| Almost quantum | QIP 2014 | regular | ▸Miguel Navascués, Yelena Guryanova, Matty Hoban |
|
“Full randomness from arbitrarily deterministic events.” ↗
|
QIP 2013 | invited | Rodrigo Gallego, Lluis Masanes, Gonzalo de La Torre, Chirag Dhara, Leandro Aolita |
| Certifying the Absence of Apparent Randomness under Minimal Assumptions | TQC 2013 | regular | Gonzalo de La Torre, Chirag Dhara |
|
Quantum correlations require multipartite information principles ↗
|
QIP 2012 | regular | Rodrigo Gallego, Lars Erik Würflinger, Miguel Navascués |
| Secure device-independent quantum key distribution with causally independent measurement devices | QCRYPT 2011 | regular ▸ presenter | Lluis Masanes, Stefano Pironio |
| Secure Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution with Causally Independent Measurement Devices | TQC 2011 | regular | ▸Lluis Masanes, Stefano Pironio |
Device-independent quantum key distribution aims to provide key distribution schemes whose security is based on the laws of quantum physics but which does not require any assumptions about the internal working of the quantum devices used in the protocol. We provide a general security proof valid for a large class of device-independent quantum key distribution protocols in a model in which the raw key elements are generated by causally independent measurement processes. The validity of this independence condition may be justifiable in a variety of implementations and is necessarily satisfied in a physical realization where the raw key is generated by N separate pairs of devices. |
|||
|
Random numbers certified by Bell’s theorem ↗
|
QIP 2010 | regular | Antoine Boyer de la Giroday, Serge Massar, Stefano Pironio |
| Quantum probabilities, semidefinite programming, and optimization over Hilbert spaces | QIP 2008 | regular | ▸Stefano Pironio, Miguel Navascués |
| Device-independent security of Quantum Key Distribution | QIP 2008 | regular | ▸Stefano Pironio, Nicolas Brunner, Nicolas Gisin, Serge Massar, Valerio Scarani |
| From Bell's Theorem to Secure Quantum Key Distribution | QIP 2006 | regular | Nicolas Gisin, Lluis Masanes |
36 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Swap Network Augmented Ansätze on Arbitrary Connectivity | QIP 2026 | ▸Teodor Parella Dilme, Jakob Kottmann |
| Hamiltonian learning via quantum Zeno effect | QIP 2026 | ▸Giacomo Franceschetto, Egle Pagliaro, Leonardo Zambrano, Luciano Pereira |
| Long-distance DIQKD using single-photon entanglement | QCRYPT 2025 | Mariana Navarro, Anna Steffinlongo, Marina Cenni, Xavier Valcarce, Enky Outdot |
Device-independent quantum key distribution (DIQKD) provides the strongest form of quantum security, as it allows two honest users to establish secure communication channels even when using fully uncharacterized quantum devices. The security proof of DIQKD is derived from the violation of a Bell inequality, mitigating side-channel attacks by asserting the presence of nonlocality. This enhanced security comes at the cost of a challenging implementation, especially over long distances, as losses make Bell tests difficult to conduct successfully. Here, we propose a photonic realization of DIQKD, utilizing a heralded preparation of a single-photon path entangled state between the honest users. Being based on single-photon interference effects, the obtained secret key rate scales with the square root of the quantum channel transmittance. This leads to positive key rates over distances of up to hundreds of kilometers, making the proposed setup a promising candidate for securing long-distance communication in quantum networks. |
||
| Decrease of certifiable randomness when entanglement is allowed in energy-constrained QRNGs | QCRYPT 2024 | Gabriel Ignacio Senno |
In this work, we study the consequences of entanglement-assistance (EA) for randomness generation in the semi-DI framework based on energy constraints introduced in (van Himbeeck et al., Quantum 1, 33 (2017)). We show that, given an energy bound $\omega$, the minimum min-entropy that non-EA honest devices can certify decreases when entanglement between the prepare and measurement boxes (of the devices prepared by Eve) is allowed. |
||
| Improved finite-size key rates for discrete-modulated continuous variable quantum key distribution in the presence of coherent attacks | QCRYPT 2024 | Carlos Pascual-Garcia, Stefan Bäuml, Mateus Araújo, Rotem Liss |
Continuous variable quantum key distribution (CVQKD) with discrete modulation combines advantages of CVQKD, such as the implementability using readily available technologies, with advantages of discrete variable quantum key distribution, such as easier error correction procedures. In this work we consider a phase-shift keying protocol using four coherent states (4-PSK protocol) and coarse-grained heterodyne measurements. We provide a security proof against coherent attacks and compute the achievable key rate in a finite size setting, i.e. with a finite number of rounds. To this end, we employ the generalized entropy accumulation theorem, as well conic optimisation, providing us with improved key rates compared to previous works. At metropolitan distances our method can provide positive key rates for the order of $10^9$ rounds. We also provide a theoretical method to overcome the assumption of a finite photon number cutoff made in previous works. |
||
| Maximal intrinsic randomness of a quantum state | TQC 2024 | Shuyang Meng, Fionnuala Curran, Gabriel Ignacio Senno, Victoria Wright, Mate Farkas, Valerio Scarani |
| Improved finite-size key rates for discrete-modulated continuous variable quantum key distribution in the presence of coherent attacks | TQC 2024 | Carlos Pascual, Stefan Bäuml, Mateus Araújo, Rotem Liss |
| Unveiling Quantum Entanglement in Many-Body Systems from Partial Information | QIP 2023 | Flavio Baccari, Irenee Frerot |
| Security of continuous variable QKD with discrete modulation | QIP 2023 | Stefan Bäuml, Carlos Pascual, Victoria Wright, Omar Fawzi |
| Quantifying the intrinsic randomness of quantum measurements | QIP 2023 | Gabriel Ignacio Senno, Thomas Strohm |
| Local quantum overlapping tomography | TQC 2023 | Bruna Araújo, Márcio Taddei, Daniel Cavalcanti |
| Quantifying the intrinsic randomness of quantum measurements | QCRYPT 2022 | Gabriel Ignacio Senno, Thomas Strohm |
| Bell nonlocality is not sufficient for the security of standard device-independent quantum key distribution protocols | QCRYPT 2021 | Mate Farkas, Maria Balanzó-Juandó, Karol Łukanowski, Jan Kołodyński |
Device-independent quantum key distribution is a secure quantum cryptographic paradigm that allows two honest users to establish a secret key, while putting minimal trust in their devices. Most of the existing protocols have the following structure: First, a bipartite nonlocal quantum state is distributed between the honest users, who perform local projective measurements to establish nonlocal correlations. Then, they announce the implemented measurements and extract a secure key by post-processing their measurement outcomes. We show that no protocol of this form allows for establishing a secret key when implemented on certain entangled nonlocal states, namely on a range of entangled two-qubit Werner states. To prove this result, we introduce a technique for upper-bounding the asymptotic key rate of device-independent quantum key distribution protocols, based on a simple eavesdropping attack. Our results imply that either different tools---such as different reconciliation techniques or non-projective measurements---are needed for device-independent quantum key distribution in the large-noise regime, or Bell nonlocality is not sufficient for this task. |
||
| Measurement-device-independent entanglement detection for continuous-variable systems | TQC 2021 | Paolo Abiuso, Stefan Bäuml, Daniel Cavalcanti |
| Bell nonlocality is not sufficient for the security of standard device-independent quantum key distribution protocols | TQC 2021 | Mate Farkas, Maria Balanzó-Juandó, Karol Łukanowski, Jan Kołodyński |
| Systematic construction of $k$-uniform states | QIP 2020 | Zahra Raissi, Adam Teixido, Christian Gogolin |
| Quantum Inflation: A general approach to quantum causal compatibility | QIP 2020 | Elie Wolfe, Alejandro Pozas-Kerstjens, Matan Grinberg, Denis Rosset, Miguel Navascués |
| Experimental nonlocality-based randomness generation with nonprojective measurements | QCRYPT 2019 | Santiago Gómez López, Alejandro Mattar, Esteban Gómez, Daniel Cavalcanti, Gustavo Lima |
| Constructing k-uniform states of non-minimal support and study the graph state representation | QIP 2019 | Zahra Raissi, Christian Gogolin, Adam Teixido, Arnau Riera |
| Verification of Quantum Optimizers | TQC 2019 | Flavio Baccari, Christian Gogolin, Peter Wittek |
| Constructing optimal quantum error correcting codes from absolute maximally entangled states | QIP 2018 | Zahra Raissi, Christian Gogolin, Arnau Riera |
| Constructing optimal quantum error correcting codes from absolute maximally entangled states | QCRYPT 2017 | Zahra Raissi, Christian Gogolin, Arnau Riera |
| Simulating positive-operator-valued measures with projective measurements | QIP 2017 | Michal Oszmaniec, Leonardo Guerini, Peter Wittek |
| Certifying maximal randomness from a pair of entangled qubits | QIP 2016 | Remigiusz Augusiak, Florian John Curchod, Matty Hoban, Markus Johansson, Stefano Pironio, Tamás Vértesi, Peter Wittek |
| Entanglement-Swapping based Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution | QCRYPT 2014 | Alejandro Mattar, Jonatan Bohr-Brask, Daniel Cavalcanti, Paul Skrzypczyk |
| Detecting the nonlocality of many-body quantum states | QIP 2014 | Jordi Tura Brugues, Remigiusz Augusiak, Ana Belén Sainz, Tamás Vértesi, Maciej Lewenstein |
| Maximally non-local theories cannot be maximally random | QIP 2014 | Gonzalo de La Torre, Matty Hoban, Chirag Dhara, Giuseppe Prettico |
| Atomic monogamies of correlations | QIP 2014 | Remigiusz Augusiak, Maciej Demianowicz, Marcin Pawlowski, Jordi Tura Brugues |
| Device Independent quantum key distribution with spin-coupled cavities | QIP 2014 | Alejandro Mattar, Jonatan Bohr-Brask |
| Distinguishing the undistinguishable | QIP 2014 | Ariel Bendersky, Gonzalo de La Torre, Gabriel Ignacio Senno, Santiago Figueira |
| Local Orthogonality: a multipartite principle for correlations | QIP 2013 | Tobias Fritz, Ana Belén Sainz, Remigiusz Augusiak, Jonatan Bohr Brask, Rafael Chaves, Anthony Leverrier |
| Attacks on Semi-Device-Independent Quantum Protocols. | QIP 2013 | Michele Dall’Arno, Elsa Passaro, Rodrigo Gallego, Marcin Pawlowski |
| Robustness of Device Independent Dimension Witnesses. | QIP 2013 | Michele Dall’Arno, Elsa Passaro, Rodrigo Gallego |
| Quantum correlations require multipartite information principles | QIP 2012 | Rodrigo Gallego, Lars Erik Würflinger, Miguel Navascués |
| Revealing nonlocal correlations without measuring them: Hidden influence explanations of quantum correlations can not remain hidden | QIP 2012 | Jean-Daniel Bancal, Stefano Pironio, Yeong-Cherng Liang, Valerio Scarani, Nicolas Gisin |
| Conditional information transfer | QIP 2010 | Mafalda L. Almeida, Stefano Pironio, Nicolas Brunner, Nicolas Gisin |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2022 | program | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2021 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2019 | program | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2018 | program | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2016 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2015 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2014 | organizing | chair | — |
| QIP 2014 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2013 | steering | member | — |
| TQC 2013 | program | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Stefano Pironio | 8 |
| Miguel Navascués | 7 |
| Remigiusz Augusiak | 7 |
| Matty Hoban | 6 |
| Stefan Bäuml | 6 |
| Christian Gogolin | 5 |
| Daniel Cavalcanti | 5 |
| Gabriel Ignacio Senno | 5 |
| Nicolas Gisin | 5 |
| Rodrigo Gallego | 5 |
| Gonzalo de La Torre | 4 |
| Lluis Masanes | 4 |
| Peter Wittek | 4 |
| Zahra Raissi | 4 |
| Alejandro Mattar | 3 |
| Arnau Riera | 3 |
| Carlos Pascual | 3 |
| Chirag Dhara | 3 |
| Ivan Supic | 3 |
| Jordi Tura Brugues | 3 |