18
collaborators
2016–2025
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
14 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Quantum Security Analysis of the Key-Alternating Ciphers | QIP 2025 | Chen Bai, Mehdi Esmaili |
| Lattice-Based Quantum Advantage from Rotated Measurements | QCRYPT 2023 | Yusuf Alnawakhtha, Carl Miller, Daochen Wang |
Trapdoor claw-free functions (TCFs) are immensely valuable in cryptographic interactions between a classical client and a quantum server. Typically, a protocol has the quantum server prepare a superposition of two-bit strings of a claw and then measure it using Pauli-X or Z measurements. In this paper, we demonstrate a new technique that uses the entire range of qubit measurements from the XY-plane. We show the advantage of this approach in two applications. First, building on (Brakerski et al. 2018, Kalai et al. 2022), we show an optimized two-round proof of quantumness whose security can be expressed directly in terms of the hardness of the LWE (learning with errors) problem. Second, we construct a one-round protocol for blind remote preparation of an arbitrary state on the XY-plane up to a Pauli-Z correction. |
||
| Lattice-Based Quantum Advantage from Rotated Measurements | QIP 2023 | Yusuf Alnawakhtha, Carl Miller, Daochen Wang |
| Secure Two-Party Quantum Computation Over Classical Channels | TQC 2023 | Michele Ciampi, Alexandru Cojocaru, Elham Kashefi |
| Lattice-Based Quantum Advantage from Rotated Measurements | TQC 2023 | Carl Miller, Yusuf Alnawakhtha, Daochen Wang |
| Secure Two-Party Quantum Computation Over Classical Channels | QCRYPT 2021 | Michele Ciampi, Alexandru Cojocaru, Elham Kashefi |
Secure two-party computation considers the problem of two parties computing a joint function of their private inputs without revealing anything beyond the output of the computation. In this work, we take the first steps towards understanding the setting where: 1) the two parties (Alice and Bob) can communicate only via a classical channel, 2) the input of Bob is quantum and 3) the input of Alice is classical. Our first result indicates that in this setting it is in general impossible to realize a two-party quantum functionality with black-box simulation in the case of malicious quantum adversaries. In particular, we show that the existence of a secure protocol that relies only on classical channels would contradict the quantum no-cloning argument. We circumvent this following three different approaches. The first is by considering a weaker security notion called one-sided simulation security. This notion protects the input of one party (the quantum Bob) in the standard simulation-based sense, and protects the privacy of the other party's input (the classical Alice). We realize our protocol relying on the learning with errors assumption. As a result, we put forward a first construction of secure one-sided quantum two-party computation over classical networks. The second way to circumvent the impossibility result, while at the same time providing standard simulation-based security also against Bob, is by assuming that the quantum input has an efficient classical representation. Finally, we focus our attention on the class of zero-knowledge functionalities, and provide a protocol for such a class for specific QMA relations. We note that the direct implication of our result is that Mahadev's protocol for classical verification of quantum computations (FOCS'18) can be turned into a zero-knowledge proof of quantum knowledge protocol with classical verifiers. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to instantiate such a primitive. |
||
| Secure Quantum Two-Party Computation: Impossibility and Constructions | QIP 2021 | Michele Ciampi, Alexandru Cojocaru, Elham Kashefi |
| Security Limitations of Classical-Client Delegated Quantum Computing | QIP 2021 | Christian Badertscher, Alexandru Cojocaru, Léo Colisson, Elham Kashefi, Dominik Leichtle, Petros Wallden |
| Is Classical Remote State Preparation Composable? | QCRYPT 2020 | Christian Badertscher, Alexandru Cojocaru, Léo Colisson, Elham Kashefi, Dominik Leichtle, Petros Wallden |
Classical remote state preparation (RSPCC) is a primitive that allows an honest client to prepare a quantum state remotely with the help of an (untrustworthy) server using only a classical communication channel. With this primitive quantum protocols (such as secure delegation of quantum computations) become accessible to classical clients, by removing the need for a quantum channel. Since this cryptographic primitive’s main role is to be a building block within larger protocols, it is of utmost importance to examine its security under composition. In this work we present three results related to the composability of RSPCC protocols: 1. As our first main result, we show that no classical remote state preparation protocol RSPCC can be composable in the Abstract Cryptography framework [MR11], even when the distinguisher is computationally bounded. In other words, remote state preparation cannot be constructed with only a classical channel. 2. We further show that any classical-client delegated quantum computing protocol that uses the universal blind quantum computation (UBQC) protocol [BFK09] and a RSPCC protocol as a subroutine cannot be composable. 3. Upon relaxing the security requirement, we show that replacing the quantum channel of the UBQC protocol by the particular RSPCC protocol of [CCKW19] is secure in the game-based security framework. |
||
| Resource-efficient verification of quantum computing using Serfling’s bound | QCRYPT 2019 | Yuki Takeuchi, Tomoyuki Morimae, Akihiro Mizutani, Joseph F. Fitzsimons |
| Resource-efficient verification of quantum computing using Serfling's bound | QIP 2019 | Yuki Takeuchi, Tomoyuki Morimae, Akihiro Mizutani, Joseph F. Fitzsimons |
| Flow ambiguity: A path towards classically driven blind quantum computation | QCRYPT 2017 | Tommaso Demarie, Nicolas Menicucci, Joseph F. Fitzsimons |
| Flow ambiguity: A path towards classically driven blind quantum computation | TQC 2016 | Tommaso Demarie, Nicolas Menicucci, Joseph F. Fitzsimons |
| Universality of quantum computation with cluster states and (X,Y)-plane measurements | TQC 2016 | Tommaso Demarie, Joseph F. Fitzsimons |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Alexandru Cojocaru | 5 |
| Elham Kashefi | 5 |
| Joseph F. Fitzsimons | 5 |
| Carl Miller | 3 |
| Daochen Wang | 3 |
| Michele Ciampi | 3 |
| Tommaso Demarie | 3 |
| Yusuf Alnawakhtha | 3 |
| Akihiro Mizutani | 2 |
| Christian Badertscher | 2 |
| Dominik Leichtle | 2 |
| Léo Colisson | 2 |
| Nicolas Menicucci | 2 |
| Petros Wallden | 2 |
| Tomoyuki Morimae | 2 |
| Yuki Takeuchi | 2 |
| Chen Bai | 1 |
| Mehdi Esmaili | 1 |