48
collaborators
2016–2024
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
3 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Composable discrete-modulated continuous-variable QKD and its application to urban atmospheric channels | QCRYPT 2024 | regular | Kevin Jaksch, Thomas Dirmeier, Jan Schreck, Yannick Weiser, Stefan Richter, Ömer Bayraktar, Bastian Hacker, Conrad Rößler, Imran Khan, Andrej Kržič, Markus Rothe, Markus Leipe, Nico Döll, Christopher Spiess, Matthias Goy, Stefan Petscharning, Thomas Grafenauer, Bernhard Ömer, Christoph Pacher, Florian Kanitschar, Twesh Upadhyaya, Norbert Lütkenhaus, Gerd Leuchs, Christoph Marquardt |
In our work, we developed an optical CVQKD system that uses polarization-based QPSK modulation designed for atmospheric quantum communication and a corresponding post-processing pipeline including error correction and privacy amplification. In a first laboratory experiment, we applied the security statement of a recently published security proof to calculate composable key rates with a total security parameter of ε = 1e-10 in the finite size regime against i.i.d. collective attacks. We also used the post-processing pipeline to study the effect of error correction and frame errors on the actual key extraction in a finite-size system – finding that the common approach of going to high frame errors to increase the ECC efficiency β does not optimize the extractable key length.Furthermore, we deployed the system over an ad-hoc atmospheric channel of 1.7 km in Mai 2023 in the city of Jena, Germany. In a first proof-of-principle study, we were able to apply the full optical and post-processing pipeline to extract pseudo-asymptotic keys and discuss the further steps necessary to move the system to the finite-size regime. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first CVQKD demonstration over a real atmospheric channel combining both the new class of DMCVQKD security proofs without Gaussian optimality and error correction steps. |
|||
| Security proof of practical quantum key distribution with detection-efficiency mismatch | QCRYPT 2020 | regular | Yanbao Zhang, Patrick Coles, Adam Winick, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
Quantum key distribution (QKD) protocols with threshold detectors are driving high-performance QKD demonstrations. The corresponding security proofs usually assume that all physical detectors have the same detection efficiency. However, the efficiencies of the detectors used in practice might show a mismatch depending on the manufacturing and setup of these detectors. A mismatch can also be induced as the different spatial-temporal modes of an incoming signal might couple differently to a detector. Here we develop a method that allows to provide security proofs without the usual assumption. Our method can take the detection-efficiency mismatch into account without having to restrict the attack strategy of the adversary. Especially, we do not rely on any photon-number cut-off of incoming signals such that our security proof is complete. Though we consider polarization encoding in the demonstration of our method, the method applies to a variety of coding mechanisms, including time-bin encoding, and also allows for general manipulations of the spatial-temporal modes by the adversary. We thus can close the long-standing question how to provide a valid, complete security proof of a QKD setup with characterized efficiency mismatch. Our method also shows that in the absence of efficiency mismatch, the key rate increases if the loss due to detection inefficiency is assumed to be outside of the adversary's control, as compared to the view where for a security proof this loss is attributed to the action of the adversary. |
|||
| Numerical Calculations of Finite Key Rate for General Quantum Key Distribution Protocols | QCRYPT 2020 | regular | Ian George, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
Finite key analysis of quantum key distribution (QKD) is an important tool for any QKD implementation. While much work has been done on the framework of finite key analysis, the application to individual protocols often relies on the the specific protocol being simple or highly symmetric as well as represented in small finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. In this work, we extend our preexisting reliable, efficient, tight, and generic numerical method for calculating the asymptotic key rate of device-dependent QKD protocols in finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces to the finite key regime using the security analysis framework of Renner. We explain how this extension preserves the reliability, efficiency, and tightness of the asymptotic method. We then explore examples which illustrate both the generality of our method as well as the importance of parameter estimation and data processing within the framework. |
|||
14 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Demonstration of free-space discrete-modulated continuous-variable QKD using real error correction codes and finite-size effects | QCRYPT 2023 | Kevin Jaksch, Thomas Dirmeier, Yannick Weiser, Stefan Richter, Ömer Bayraktar, Bastian Hacker, Conrad Rößler, Imran Khan, Stefan Petscharning, Thomas Grafenauer, Bernhard Ömer, Christoph Pacher, Florian Kanitschar, Twesh Upadhyaya, Norbert Lütkenhaus, Gerd Leuchs, Christoph Marquardt |
Besides discrete-variable QKD, where single photon detection is used, continuous-variable (CV) protocols are using homodyne detection and are thus promising to be compatible with existing classical coherent communication technology. Originally, the research on CV QKD protocols mostly focused on Gaussian modulation (see review [1]), where one assumes that Alice can continuously displace coherent states according to a 2D Gaussian distribution. This modulation allows the security proofs to take advance of Gaussian optimality conditions, but experimental implementations can only reach this pattern up to some finite discretization. Another approach is to directly use a discrete-modulated (DM) CV QKD protocol. Here, Alice is required to prepare a finite number of displaced coherent states, aiming for a higher experimental simplicity, with the drawback of higher theoretical complexity. Recently, new security proofs such as [2] and corresponding experiments [3,4] could show the feasibility of systems using quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) with 64 and 256 displaced states. However, the security proof was limited to the asymptotic regime and since the experiments did not use implemented error correction codes, one could only estimate the achievable key rates, but could not generate the secret key itself. In this poster, we demonstrate experiments with a protocol with a smaller constellation size of four coherent states that share the same amplitude but are shifted by 90° in phase (QPSK modulation). We exploit a recently published security proof providing tight secret key rates for collective attacks even in the finite size regime [5]. Furthermore, we show that the QPSK data is compatible with our implemented low density parity check (LDPC) codes for binary symmetric channels. This allows us to perform the full QKD protocol from experimental quantum state exchange to classical post processing and to generate a secret key shared between Alice and Bob. For this purpose, we use a laboratory system based on polarization encoding in the Stokes parameters which is equivalent to a QPSK pattern in phase space. This scheme is designed to cope with the challenges of a turbulent atmospheric channel. While the fluctuating nature of such a channel can be targeted by sub-binning the transmission channels [6], the atmosphere is in general non-birefringent, allowing for atmospheric quantum communications [7]. [1] F. Laudenbach et al., Adv. Quantum Technol. 1, 1800011 (2018) [2] A. Denys et al., Quantum 5, 540 (2021) [3] F. Roumestan et al., arXiv:2207.11702 (2022) [4] Y. Pan et al., Optics Letters 47, 3307-3310 (2022) [5] F. Kanitschar et al., arXiv:2301.08686v1 (2023) [6] V. Usenko et al., New J. Phys. 14, 093048 (2012) [7] B. Heim et al., New J. Phys. 16, 113018 (2014) |
||
| Finite-size analysis of prepare-and-measure and decoy-state quantum key distribution via entropy accumulation | QCRYPT 2023 | Lars Kamin, Amir Arqand, Ian George, Norbert Lütkenhaus, Ernest Y. -Z. Tan |
An important goal in quantum key distribution (QKD) is the task of providing a finite-size security proof without assuming that the states across the protocol rounds are independent and identically distributed (IID). For prepare-and-measure QKD, one recently developed approach for obtaining such proofs is the generalized entropy accumulation theorem (GEAT), but thus far it has only been applied to study a small selection of protocols. In this work, we present techniques for applying the GEAT in finite-size analysis of generic prepare-and-measure protocols, incorporating several methods to optimize the min-tradeoff function and minimize the second-order term in the GEAT. As a particular focus, we analyze decoy-state protocols and present a method for generically obtaining min-tradeoff functions for such protocols, even those where a closed-form expression for the asymptotic rate is not known. Furthermore, we highlight that the techniques we develop in the process should also yield improved bounds on the keyrates of decoy-state protocols even in the asymptotic limit. |
||
| Finite-Key Analysis of Quantum Key Distribution with Characterized Devices Using Entropy Accumulation | QCRYPT 2022 | Ian George, Thomas Van Himbeeck, Kun Fang, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
| Finite-Size Security Proof for Discrete-Modulated Continuous-Variable Quantum Key Distribution | QCRYPT 2022 | Florian Kanitschar, Twesh Upadhyaya, Ian George, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
| Robust Interior Point Method for Quantum Key Distribution Rate Computation | QCRYPT 2021 | Hao Hu, Jiyoung Im, Norbert Lütkenhaus, Henry Wolkowicz |
Security proof methods for quantum key distribution, QKD, that are based on the numerical key rate calculation problem, are powerful in principle. However, the practicality of the methods are limited by computational resources and the efficiency and accuracy of the underlying algorithms for convex optimization. We derive a stable reformulation of the convex nonlinear semidefinite programming, SDP, model for the key rate calculation problems. We use this to develop an efficient, accurate algorithm. The reformulation is based on novel forms of facial reduction, FR, for both the linear constraints and nonlinear relative entropy objective function. This allows for a Gauss-Newton type interior-point approach that avoids the need for perturbations to obtain strict feasibility, a technique currently used in the literature. The result is high accuracy solutions with theoretically proven lower bounds for the original QKD from the FR stable reformulation. This provides novel contributions for FR for general SDP. We report on empirical results that dramatically improve on speed and accuracy, as well as solving previously intractable problems. |
||
| An Open-source Software Platform for Numerical Key Rate Calculation of General Quantum Key Distribution Protocols | QCRYPT 2021 | Wenyuan Wang, Ian George, Twesh Upadhyaya, Adam Winick, Shlok Ashok Nahar, Kai-Hong Li, Kun Fang, Natansh Mathur, John Burniston, Max Chemtov, Shahabeddin M. Aslmarand, Yanbao Zhang, Christopher Boehm, Patrick Coles, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
In this work, we present an open-source software platform that calculates key rate for general QKD protocols, building upon the numerical framework proposed by our group that can perform automated security proof of QKD protocols. The software platform is fully modularized with mutually independent modules for descriptions of protocols/channels, solvers for bounding key rate, and parameter optimization algorithms. It currently supports BB84 and measurement-device-independent QKD (including decoy states), as well as discrete-modulated continuous variable QKD. It also supports finite-size analysis for non-decoy-state protocols. We hope that the open-sourcing can attract theorists to test new protocols and/or contribute to new solvers, as well as appeal to experimentalists who wish to analyze their data or optimize parameters for new experiments. |
||
| Finite-Key Analysis of Quantum Key Distribution using Entropy Accumulation | QCRYPT 2021 | Thomas Van Himbeeck, Ian George, Kun Fang, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
The pursuit of tight finite-key analysis for general QKD protocols is an exciting but challenging task for theorists. Entropy accumulation theorem (EAT) was developed recently and been successfully applied to device-independent QKD protocols. In the present work, we use EAT to prove the security of a very large class of entanglement-based QKD protocols, covering most discrete-variable protocols as well as their optical implementations. |
||
| Towards an Open-source Software Platform for Numerical Key Rate Calculation of General Quantum Key Distribution Protocols | QCRYPT 2020 | Ian George, Kai-Hong Li, Kun Fang, Twesh Upadhyaya, Natansh Mathur, Max Chemtov, Shlok Ashok Nahar, Shahabeddin M. Aslmarand, Thomas Van Himbeeck, Yanbao Zhang, Christopher Boehm, Patrick Coles, Adam Winick, Wenyuan Wang, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
A numerical approach for the calculation of QKD key rates allows a uniform framework to be applied to general QKD protocols. Based on our group's previous work, we would like to build a universal software platform that is fully modularized and user-friendly, where one can easily swap in and out different QKD protocol descriptions, channel simulation models or experimental data, backend numerical solvers, and parameter optimization algorithms. Our goal is to build an open-source platform that can be both useful for theorists testing new protocols as well as experimentalists looking for optimal parameters or analyzing their experimental data. |
||
| Security Proof for Discrete-Modulated Continuous-Variable Quantum Key Distribution without Photon-Number Cut-off Assumption | QCRYPT 2020 | Twesh Upadhyaya, Thomas Van Himbeeck, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
In this work, we provide a complete, unconditional, asymptotic security analysis of DMCVQKD with four or more states. We do not need the photon-number cut-off assumption required in previous proofs. We derive inequalities that relate the result of a suitably chosen finite-dimensional optimization to the key rate. We solve the optimization numerically and utilize uniform continuity bounds to derive tight key rate lower bounds. We find that the key rates are comparable to previous conditional security proofs with the cut-off assumption, and to those achieved by Gaussian-modulated CVQKD. |
||
| Security analysis of discrete-modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2020 | Twesh Upadhyaya, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
Discrete-modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution protocols are favorable due to the experimental simplicity and inherited properties of continuous-variable protocols. We provide a tight numerical key rate analysis of discrete-modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution protocols in the asymptotic limit against collective attacks. As a specific example, we analyze the key rate of the quadrature phase-shift keying (QPSK) scheme in both the paranoid and realistic scenarios. When the detector noises are trusted, the QPSK scheme is expected to reach around 100 km with currently feasible experimental parameters. For both scenarios, we also investigate the performance of post-selection of data for the reverse reconciliation scheme and show that post-selection can provide improvements in the key rate as well as reducing the amount of data for post-processing. |
||
| Asymptotic security analysis of discrete-modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2019 | Twesh Upadhyaya, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
| A simple security proof of twin-field quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2018 | Norbert Lütkenhaus |
| Quantum Key Distribution with Coherent States | QCRYPT 2017 | Patrick Coles, Adam Winick, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
| Software for Numerical Calculation of Key Rates | QCRYPT 2016 | Patrick Coles, Adam Winick, Yanbao Zhang, Eric Metodiev, Shouzhen Gu, Electra Eleftheriadou, Filippo Miatto, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Norbert Lütkenhaus | 17 |
| Twesh Upadhyaya | 8 |
| Ian George | 7 |
| Adam Winick | 5 |
| Patrick Coles | 5 |
| Kun Fang | 4 |
| Thomas Van Himbeeck | 4 |
| Yanbao Zhang | 4 |
| Florian Kanitschar | 3 |
| Bastian Hacker | 2 |
| Bernhard Ömer | 2 |
| Christoph Marquardt | 2 |
| Christoph Pacher | 2 |
| Christopher Boehm | 2 |
| Conrad Rößler | 2 |
| Gerd Leuchs | 2 |
| Imran Khan | 2 |
| Kai-Hong Li | 2 |
| Kevin Jaksch | 2 |
| Max Chemtov | 2 |