3
talks
3
posters
0
committee roles
0
leadership roles
2009–2025
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Device-independent Randomness Expansion with Entangled Photons | QCRYPT 2020 | regular | Yanbao Zhang, Lynden K. Shalm, Joshua C. Bienfang, Collin Schlager, Martin Stevens, Michael Mazurek, Carlos Abellan, Waldimar Amaya, Morgan Mitchell, Mohammad A. Alhejji, Honghao Fu, Joel Ornstein, Richard P. Mirin, Sae Woo Nam |
| Efficient randomness certification by quantum probability estimation Abstract | QCRYPT 2019 | regular | Yanbao Zhang, Honghao Fu, Krister Shalm, Joshua C. Bienfang, Martin Stevens, Michael Mazurek, Sae Woo Nam, Carlos Abellan, Waldimar Amaya, Morgan Mitchell, Carl Miller, Alan Mink |
| Restrictions on Transversal Encoded Quantum Gate Sets | QIP 2009 | regular | ▸Bryan Eastin |
Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| The Weak Generalized Bunching Conjecture | QIP 2025 | Shawn Geller, Scott Glancy |
| An efficient method for certifying quantum properties with non-i.i.d. spot-checking trials | QCRYPT 2023 | Yanbao Zhang, Akshay Seshadri |
The reliability of quantum resources can be compromised in practice due to the complexity of their generation processes and/or the potential manipulations by untrusted parties during transmission. When performing an information task with an unreliable quantum resource, it is incorrect to treat the random variables associated with repeated experimental trials as independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.). To certify the performance of such a task, one can make a random decision in each trial, either to spot-check some property of the quantum resource or to utilize the resource for the task. The task considered can be quantum key distribution, quantum randomness expansion, verifiable quantum computation, or resource allocation in quantum networks. Unfortunately, existing methods for certifying quantum performance through spot-checking are not suitable for non-i.i.d. repeated trials without additional assumptions. Here we present a novel method to address this challenge. The method works efficiently with a finite number of non-i.i.d. trials. Furthermore, our method can be adapted to estimate quantum properties in situations where the quantum resource is spot-checked and destroyed by a measurement during each non-i.i.d. repeated trial. |
||
| Quantum Randomness from Probability Estimation with Classical Side Information | QCRYPT 2017 | Yanbao Zhang, Peter Bierhorst, Scott Glancy |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Yanbao Zhang | 4 |
| Carlos Abellan | 2 |
| Honghao Fu | 2 |
| Joshua C. Bienfang | 2 |
| Martin Stevens | 2 |
| Michael Mazurek | 2 |
| Morgan Mitchell | 2 |
| Sae Woo Nam | 2 |
| Scott Glancy | 2 |
| Waldimar Amaya | 2 |
| Akshay Seshadri | 1 |
| Alan Mink | 1 |
| Bryan Eastin | 1 |
| Carl Miller | 1 |
| Collin Schlager | 1 |
| Joel Ornstein | 1 |
| Krister Shalm | 1 |
| Lynden K. Shalm | 1 |
| Mohammad A. Alhejji | 1 |
| Peter Bierhorst | 1 |