98
collaborators
2015–2025
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
2 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plug-and-play attack on a quantum key distribution system as black box | QCRYPT 2025 | regular | Qingquan Peng, Xialong Yuan, Junxuan Liu, Yichen Liu, Zihao Chen, Vadim Makarov |
Quantum key distribution (QKD) protocol has been proven to be informationally-theoretical security. Unfortunately, due to device imperfections in practice, QKD systems have exposed various vulnerabilities that are exploited by an eavesdropper to conduct quantum hackings, such as laser-seeding attacks, blinding attacks, etc. Most of these attacks currently remain only at the stage of possibility verification or white-box testing. In this paper, we propose and implemented plug-and-play attack on a QKD system as a black box, whose interface and access for the public are the only known information. Through this attack, we actively modified the gate positions and synchronization parameters of the QKD system during the calibration procedure, allowing the attack operate during the whole lifetime of the system running without being noticed. Furthermore, the implemented hacking system only connects to the quantum channel but has no access to the inside of QKD engine, which takes minutes to optimize the hacking parameters to start the eavesdropping. This work illustrates Eve's capability to successfully eavesdrop on keys from QKD systems under current conditions in a more intuitive and concrete way. |
|||
| Insecurity of Detector-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution | QCRYPT 2016 | regular ▸ presenter | Shihan Sajeed, Shihai Sun, Feihu Xu, Vadim Makarov, Marcos Curty |
27 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Muted attack on a high-speed quantum key distribution system | QCRYPT 2025 | Jialei Su, Jialin Chen, Fengyu Lu, Zihao Chen, Junxuan Liu, Deyong He, Shuang Wang |
High-speed quantum key distribution (QKD) systems have achieved repetition frequencies above gigahertz through advanced technologies and devices, laying an important foundation for the deployment of high-key-rate QKD system. However, these advancements may introduce unknown security loopholes into the QKD system. For an eavesdropper Eve, it is challenging to exploit these security loopholes performing the intercept-and-resend attacks due to the limited time window under the high repetition frequency. Here, we propose a muted attack that does not require intercept-and-resend operation, which is applicable to high-speed QKD systems. By exploiting the security loophole of the width discriminator on the single photon avalanche detector (SPAD), Eve can control whether Bob’s detector is capable of receiving photons from Alice, allowing her to learn nearly all the keys. Additionally, we verified through experimental tests that Eve only needs to match the period of the hacking pulse with the dead time of the SPAD and ensure that each pulse contains hundreds of photons. This study reveals the security loopholes introduced by the state-of-the-art devices in high-speed QKD systems. |
||
| Cross polarization-intensity correlations in chip-based QKD | QCRYPT 2025 | Tianyi Xing, Álvaro Navarrete, Yongqiang Du, Zhengeng Zhao, Daniil Trefilov, Xin Hua, Xi Xiao, Vadim Makarov, Kejin Wei, Marcos Curty |
Chip-based quantum key distribution (QKD) systems offer improved efficiency but may also introduce previously unrecognized security vulnerabilities. In this work, we identify and experimentally characterize cross-polarization-intensity (CPI) correlations in a real-world chip-based QKD system. Moreover, we introduce a security analysis that incorporates CPI correlations and apply it to evaluate the performance of an integrated high-speed QKD system. Our results emphasize the need for rigorous security assessments in chip-based QKD implementations. |
||
| Certification of a commercial quantum key distribution system against implementation loopholes | QCRYPT 2024 | Vadim Makarov, Alexey Abrikosov, Poompong Chaiwongkhot, Aleksey Fedorov, Evgeny Kiktenko, Mikhail Petrov, Anastasiya Ponosova, Daria Ruzhitskaya, Andrey Tayduganov, Daniil Trefilov, Konstantin Zaitsev |
We report recent advances in the development of certification for quantum key distribution (QKD) systems. We give an example of a commercial QKD system that we have analysed for possible loopholes, improved to close the vulnerabilities identified, and designed a set of tests for that can be used by a certification lab [arXiv:2310.20107]. We explain some of the testbenches in this lab, such as an ultrawide spectral characterisation testbench, automated detector testing, and laser damage testbench that verifies the quality of a power limiter. This work is in line with the requirements of the ISO standard for QKD and paves the way for the creation of certification services. |
||
| Intensity correlations in decoy-state BB84 QKD systems | QCRYPT 2024 | Daniil Trefilov, Xoel Sixto, Víctor Zapatero, Marcos Curty, Vadim Makarov |
The decoy-state method is a prominent approach to enhance the performance of quantum key distribution (QKD) systems that operate with weak coherent laser sources. Current experimental decoy-state QKD setups increase their secret key rate by raising the repetition rate of the transmitter, which can lead to correlations between subsequently emitted optical pulses. This phenomenon leaks information about the encoding settings, including the intensities of the generated signals, thus invalidating a basic premise of decoy-state QKD. Here, we experimentally characterize intensity correlations between the nearest-neigbouring optical pulses in two commercial prototypes of decoy-state BB84 QKD systems and show that they significantly reduce the asymptotic key rate. In addition, we study intensity correlations between pulses spaced further apart (higher-order correlations) and find that, in contrast to what has been conjectured, their impact on the intensity of the generated signals can be much higher than that of the nearest-neighbour (first-order) correlations. |
||
| Weak-trace-free Counterfactual Communication via Quantum Zeno effect | QCRYPT 2024 | Tianyi Xing, Junjie Wu, Ping Xu, Pingyu Zhu, Chao Wu, Yizhi Wang, Jiangfang Ding, Dongyang Wang, Yaxuan Wang, Yingwen Liu |
The Quantum Zeno effect inhibits the evolution of quantum states through repeated yet weak measurements, thereby significantly enhancing the detection probability of interaction-free measurement (IFM). This fundamental mechanism facilitates high-efficiency counterfactual quantum communication that information delivery without particle transmission through the channel. Regrettably, the original protocol left the weak trace of particles in the channel; fortunately, an upgraded counterfactual communication protocol eliminates this issue by modifying the structure unit according to two-state vector formalism~(TSVF). However, no study has realized the application of the quantum Zeno effect in weak-trace-free counterfactual communication to achieve efficient information transmission. In this paper, we experimentally demonstrate weak-trace-free counterfactual communication via the quantum Zeno effect on a nanophotonic chip, achieving a transmission probability of 74.2 ± 1.6% for bit 0 and 85.1 ± 1.3% for bit 1. Furthermore, we successfully transmit our Quanta group's logo through counterfactual communication implemented on the chip. |
||
| Characterization of Intensity Correlation via Single-photon Detection in Quantum Key Distribution | QCRYPT 2024 | Tianyi Xing, Junxuan Liu, Likang Zhang, Min-Yan Wang, Yu-Huai Li, Ruiyin Liu, Qingquan Peng, Dongyang Wang, Yaxuan Wang, Haifang Zhou, Hongwei Liu, Wei Li, Yuan Cao |
One of the most significant vulnerabilities in the source unit of quantum key distribution~(QKD) is the correlation between quantum states after modulation, which shall be characterized and evaluated for its practical security performance. In this work, we propose a methodology to characterize the intensity correlation according to the single-photon detection results in the measurement unit without modifying the configuration of the QKD system. In contrast to the previous research that employs extra classical optical detector to measure the correlation, our method can directly analyse the detection data generated during the raw key exchange, enabling to characterize the feature of correlation in real-time system operation. The basic method is applied to a BB84 QKD system and the characterized correlation significantly decreases the secure key rate shown by the security proof. Furthermore, the method is extended and applied to characterize the correlation from the result of Bell-state measurement, which demonstrates its applicability to a running full-scheme MDI QKD system. This study provides an approach for standard certification of a QKD system. |
||
| Characterisation of state preparation uncertainty in quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2022 | Akihiro Mizutani, Hoi-Kwong Lo, Vadim Makarov, Kiyoshi Tamaki |
| Hacking the self-differencing avalanche detectors via pulse illumination | QCRYPT 2021 | Binwu Gao, Zhihao Wu, Yingwen Liu, Weixu Shi, Ping Xu, Junjie Wu |
Quantum key distribution (QKD) has been proved to be information-theoretically secure in theory. In practice, the self-differencing avalanche photodiode detectors (SD-APDs) are commonly used in high-speed QKD systems. However, we experimentally show that the SD- APD under test can be successfully hacked by the pulse-illumination attack. This attack might compromise the security of a high-speed QKD system with SD-APDs. This study also indicates that the best-practice criteria for practical security of SD-APDs might take the threat of pulse-illumination attack into account. |
||
| Protecting QKD sources against light-injection attacks | QCRYPT 2020 | Daria Ruzhitskaya, Anastasiya Ponosova, Friederike Johlinger, Poompong Chaiwongkhot, Vladimir Egorov, Djeylan Aktas, John Rarity, Christopher Erven, Vadim Makarov |
In the age of measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution (MDI QKD) and twin- field QKD (TF QKD), the source units of these QKD schemes may become a new ``Achilles' heel" of the whole system. An adversary, Eve, can conduct various attacks on the sources by injecting lasers, whose power is limited by the laser-induced damage threshold of the quantum channel. Such an amount of power may modify the characteristics of components in a source. In this work, we study possible components to protect the source from the light-injected attacks, i.e., Trojan-horse attack, the laser-seeding attack, and the laser-damage attack. Experimental testing shows that fiber-optics isolators and circulators are good passive countermeasures because they sacrifice themselves' isolation under a high-power laser to protect other components behind them. Moreover, we find that illuminated by the high-power laser, integrated photonics QKD chips only lose the transmission of the coupler before any other change happens for the other components in the chips. |
||
| Hacking single-photon avalanche detector in quantum key distribution via pulseillumination | QIP 2020 | Zhihao Wu, Huan Chen, Shi-Hai Sun, Jiangfang Ding, Xiaogang Qiang, Ping Xu, Xiang Fu, Mingtang Deng, Junjie Wu |
| General-purpose quantum circuit simulator with Projected Entangled-Pair States and the quantum supremacy frontier | QIP 2020 | Yong Liu, Chu Guo, Min Xiong, Shichuan Xue, Xiang Fu, Xiaogang Qiang, Ping Xu, Mingtang Deng, Junjie Wu |
| PhotoniQLAB: A simulator for Photonic Quantum Information Processing | QIP 2020 | Zhihao Wu, Yong Liu, Dongyang Wang, Shichuan Xue, Yingwen Liu, Yizhi Wang, Pingyu Zhu, Xiang Fu, Xiaogang Qiang, Ping Xu, Mingtang Deng, Junjie Wu |
| A Cycle-Accurate Simulator for the Quantum Control Architectures | QIP 2020 | Xiang Fu, Mengyu Zhang, Shichuan Xue, Leon Riesebos, Xiaogang Qiang, Ping Xu, Mingtang Deng, Koen Bertels, Junjie Wu |
| Faking photon number on transition-edge sensor | QCRYPT 2019 | Poompong Chaiwongkhot, Jiaqiang Zhong, Hao Qin, Sheng-Cai Shi, Vadim Makarov |
| The reduced optical attenuation opens a loophole for Eve in practical continuous-variable quantum key distribution systems | QCRYPT 2019 | Yi Zheng, Peng Huang, Jinye Peng, Zhengwen Cao, Guihua Zeng |
| Controlling single-photon negative-feedback avalanche diodes using bright illumination | QCRYPT 2019 | Nigar Sultana, Vadim Makarov, Thomas Jennewein |
| Hacking single-photon detector in quantum key distribution via pulse illumination | QCRYPT 2019 | Zhihao Wu, Huan Chen, Shi-Hai Sun, Jiangfang Ding, Xiaogang Qiang, Ping Xu, Xiang Fu, Mingtang Deng, Junjie Wu |
| Controlling single-photon detector ID210 with bright light | QCRYPT 2019 | Vladimir Chistiakov, Vladimir Egorov, Vadim Makarov |
| An approach for security evaluation and certification of a complete quantum communication system | QCRYPT 2019 | Shihan Sajeed, Poompong Chaiwongkhot, Vadim Makarov, Hao Qin, Vladimir Egorov, Artur Gleim, Anton Kozubov, Andrei Gaidash, Vladimir Chistiakov, Artur Vasiliev |
| Laser damage attack against optical attenuators in quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2018 | Ruoping Li, Serguei Tchouragoulov, Vladimir Egorov, Vadim Makarov |
| Security vulnerabilities of trusted noise detector model in continuous-variable quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2018 | Hao Qin, Jan Gulla, Vadim Makarov |
| Eve strikes back in the era of measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2018 | Álvaro Navarrete, Ruoping Li, Vladimir Egorov, Shi-Hai Sun, Poompong Chaiwongkhot, Marcos Curty, Vadim Makarov |
| Effect of atmospheric turbulence on spatial-mode detector efficiency mismatch | QCRYPT 2017 | Poompong Chaiwongkhot, Katanya Kuntz, Jean-Philippe Bourgoin, Shihan Sajeed, Norbert Lütkenhaus, Thomas Jennewein, Vadim Makarov |
| Short pulse attack on continuous-variable quantum key distribution system | QCRYPT 2017 | Hao Qin, Vadim Makarov |
| Decoy state quantum key distribution with imperfect source | QCRYPT 2017 | Shi-Hai Sun, Zhihong Liu, Vadim Makarov |
| An Advanced Eve of QKD: Breaking a Security Assumption and Hacking a Black Box | QCRYPT 2016 | Shihan Sajeed, Poompong Chaiwongkhot, Mathilde Soucarros, Matthieu Legré, Vadim Makarov |
| Gap between industrial and academic solutions to implementation loopholes: testing random-gate-removal countermeasure in commercial QKD system | QCRYPT 2015 | Shihan Sajeed, Poompong Chaiwongkhot, Mathilde Soucarros, Matthieu Legré, Vadim Makarov |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Vadim Makarov | 19 |
| Poompong Chaiwongkhot | 8 |
| Junjie Wu | 7 |
| Ping Xu | 7 |
| Mingtang Deng | 5 |
| Shihan Sajeed | 5 |
| Vladimir Egorov | 5 |
| Xiang Fu | 5 |
| Xiaogang Qiang | 5 |
| Hao Qin | 4 |
| Marcos Curty | 4 |
| Shi-Hai Sun | 4 |
| Zhihao Wu | 4 |
| Daniil Trefilov | 3 |
| Dongyang Wang | 3 |
| Jiangfang Ding | 3 |
| Junxuan Liu | 3 |
| Shichuan Xue | 3 |
| Tianyi Xing | 3 |
| Yingwen Liu | 3 |