8
program roles
8
steering roles
1
organizing role
4
leadership roles
116
collaborators
2006–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
40 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
|
The firewall paradox is Wigner's friend paradox ↗
|
QIP 2026 | regular | ▸Ladina Hausmann |
In Wigner's friend-type experiments, unlike in standard QIP setups, the participating agents are modelled as quantum systems. Recent versions of such experiments have revealed that the usual rules for combining information held by different agents are inconsistent with quantum theory. Here, we show that this insight is relevant to paradoxes in quantum gravity, such as the black hole firewall paradox. This is because their structure is similar to Wigner's friend experiments: they rely on combining knowledge of multiple agents, some of whom enter the black hole, which is treated as a quantum system. |
|||
| Commuting operations factorise | QIP 2024 | regular ▸ presenter | Ramona Wolf |
| Generalised entropy accumulation | QIP 2023 | plenary_short | ▸Tony Metger, Omar Fawzi, David Sutter |
| Experimental quantum key distribution certified by Bell’s theorem | QIP 2023 | regular | David Nadlinger, Peter Drmota, Bethan Nichol, Gabriel Araneda, Dougal Main, Raghavendra Srinivas, David Lucas, Chris Ballance, Kirill Ivanov, Ernest Y. -Z. Tan, Pavel Sekatski, Rüdiger Urbanke, Nicolas Sangouard, ▸Jean-Daniel Bancal |
| The nonequilibrium cost of accurate information processing | TQC 2023 | regular | Giulio Chiribella, ▸Fei Meng, Man-hong Yung |
Accurate information processing is crucial both in technology and in nature. To achieve it, any information processing system needs an initial supply of resources away from thermal equilibrium. Here we establish a fundamental limit on the accuracy achievable with a given amount of nonequilibrium resources. The limit applies to arbitrary information processing tasks and arbitrary information processing systems subject to the laws of quantum mechanics. It is easily computable and is expressed in terms of an entropic quantity, which we name the reverse entropy, associated to a time reversal of the information processing task under consideration. The limit is achievable for all deterministic classical computations and for all their quantum extensions. As an application, we establish the optimal tradeoff between nonequilibrium and accuracy for the fundamental tasks of storing, transmitting, cloning, and erasing information. Our results set a target for the design of new devices approaching the ultimate efficiency limit, and provide a framework for demonstrating thermodynamical advantages of quantum devices over their classical counterparts. This also implies a thermodynamic benchmark to certify genuine quantum devices from their classical simulation. |
|||
|
Generalised entropy accumulation for quantum cryptography
Best Student Paper Award (Theory) — Tony Metger
|
QCRYPT 2022 | regular | Tony Metger, Omar Fawzi, David Sutter |
| Finite-size DIQKD with noisy preprocessing and random key measurements | QCRYPT 2021 | regular | Ernest Y. -Z. Tan, Xavier Valcarce, Pavel Sekatski, Jean-Daniel Bancal, René Schwonnek, Nicolas Sangouard, Charles Ci Wen Lim |
The security of finite-length keys is essential for the implementation of device-independent quantum key distribution (DIQKD). Presently, there are several finite-size DIQKD security proofs, but they are mostly focused on standard DIQKD protocols and do not directly apply to the recent improved DIQKD protocols based on techniques such as noisy preprocessing and random key measurements. Here, we provide a general finite-size security proof that can simultaneously encompass these approaches, using tighter finite-size bounds than previous analyses. In doing so, we develop a method to compute tight lower bounds on the asymptotic keyrate for any such DIQKD protocol with binary inputs and outputs. With this, we show that positive asymptotic keyrates are achievable up to depolarizing noise values of 9.26%, exceeding all previously known noise thresholds. Furthermore, we also consider in greater detail a particular form of generalized CHSH inequality, and derive partial closed-form results for such cases. We discuss the potential advantage of this approach for realistic photonic implementations of DIQKD. |
|||
| Optimal universal programming of unitary gates | QIP 2021 | regular | Yuxiang Yang, Giulio Chiribella |
Abstract A universal quantum processor is a device that takes as input a (quantum) program, containing an encoding of an arbitrary unitary gate, and a (quantum) data register, on which the encoded gate is applied. While no perfect universal quantum processor can exist, approximate processors have been proposed in the past two decades. A fundamental open question is how the size of the smallest quantum program scales with the approximation error. Here we answer the question, by proving a bound on the size of the program and designing a concrete protocol that attains the bound in the asymptotic limit. Our result is based on a connection between optimal programming and the Heisenberg limit of quantum metrology, and establishes an asymptotic equivalence between the tasks of programming, learning, and estimating unitary gates. |
|||
| A chain rule for the quantum relative entropy | QIP 2020 | regular | Kun Fang, Omar Fawzi, David Sutter |
| The energy requirement of quantum processors | QIP 2020 | regular | Giulio Chiribella, Yuxiang Yang |
| Geometric Renyi Divergence and its Applications in Quantum Information Theory | QIP 2020 | regular | Kun Fang, Hamza Fawzi, Omar Fawzi, David Sutter |
| Quantum clocks are more accurate than classical ones | QIP 2019 | regular | Mischa Woods, ▸Ralph Silva, Gilles Pütz, Sandra Stupar |
| Finite size effect in QKD | QCRYPT 2018 | tutorial ▸ presenter | — |
| Fundamental work cost of quantum processes | QIP 2018 | regular | ▸Philippe Faist |
| Entropy accumulation in device-independent protocols | QIP 2017 | plenary | ▸Rotem Arnon-Friedman, Frédéric Dupuis, Omar Fawzi, Thomas Vidick |
| Catalytic decoupling | QIP 2017 | regular | ▸Christian Majenz, Mario Berta, Frédéric Dupuis, Matthias Christandl, Fernando G. S. L. Brandão, Mark M. Wilde |
| Quantum conditional mutual information and approximate Markov chains | QIP 2016 | plenary | ▸Omar Fawzi |
| Quantum Boxes: A Framework for Modeling and Composing Quantum Reactive Systems | QIP 2016 | regular | ▸Christopher Portmann, Christian Matt, Ueli Maurer, Björn Tackmann |
| Universal recoverability in quantum information theory | QIP 2016 | regular | ▸Omar Fawzi, Marius Junge, David Sutter, Mark M. Wilde, Andreas Winter |
| Approximate degradable quantum channels | QIP 2016 | regular | ▸David Sutter, Volkher Scholz, Andreas Winter |
| Efficient Secret Key Distillation over Quantum Channels | QCRYPT 2014 | regular | Joseph M. Renes, ▸David Sutter, Frédéric Dupuis |
| Classical leakage resilience from fault-tolerant quantum computation | QCRYPT 2014 | regular | ▸Felipe G. Lacerda, Joseph M. Renes |
| Quantifying security | QCRYPT 2014 | tutorial ▸ presenter | — |
| The physics of cryptography | QCRYPT 2013 | invited ▸ presenter | — |
| Security of continuous-variable quantum key distribution against general attacks | QCRYPT 2012 | regular | ▸Anthony Leverrier, Raul Garcia-Patron, Nicolas Cerf |
| Quantum cryptography with local Bell tests | QCRYPT 2012 | regular | ▸Charles Ci Wen Lim, Christopher Portmann, Marco Tomamichel, Nicolas Gisin |
| Quantum Polar Coding | QIP 2012 | regular | Joseph M. Renes, Frédéric Dupuis |
| Impossibility of Growing Commitments | QCRYPT 2011 | regular | ▸Severin Winkler, Marco Tomamichel, Stefan Hengl |
| The Uncertainty Relation and its Applications in Cryptography | QCRYPT 2011 | regular | ▸Marco Tomamichel |
|
Tight Finite-Key Analysis for Quantum Cryptography ↗
|
TQC 2011 | regular | ▸Marco Tomamichel, Charles Ci Wen Lim, Nicolas Gisin |
Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), invented by Bennett and Brassard and Ekert can be considered the first application of quantum information science. We focus on the assumption that an arbitrarily large number M of signals can be exchanged between the legitimate parties (Alice and Bob) and subsequently used for the computation of the final key. Here, we apply a novel proof technique to the BB84 QKD protocol and derive almost tight bounds on the minimum value M required to achieve a given level of security. The technique is based on a formulation of the uncertainty relation in terms of smooth entropies. We demonstrate significant improvements of the finite-key rate over existing results. |
|||
| A Conceptually Simple Proof of the Quantum Reverse Shannon Theorem | TQC 2010 | regular | Mario Berta, Matthias Christandl |
| Postselection-technique with applications to quantum cryptography and the parallel repetition problem | QIP 2009 | regular | ▸Matthias Christandl, Dejan Dukaric, Robert König |
| The Operational Meaning of Min- and Max-Entropy | QIP 2009 | regular | ▸Robert König, Christian Schaffner |
| Generalized entropies | QIP 2008 | invited ▸ presenter | — |
| A Tight High-Order Entropic Quantum Uncertainty Relation With Applications | QIP 2008 | regular | ▸Ivan Damgaard, Serge Fehr, Louis Salvail, Christian Schaffner |
| Sampling of min-entropy relative to quantum knowledge | QIP 2008 | regular | ▸Robert König |
| Quantum Cryptography with Finite Resources | TQC 2008 | regular | ▸Valerio Scarani |
| Quantum extractors | TQC 2008 | invited ▸ presenter | — |
| A de Finetti theorem for finite quantum states - Locked correlations and secret keys | QIP 2006 | regular | Robert König |
| An exponential de Finetti theorem and its applications to quantum cryptography | QIP 2006 | invited | — |
57 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| The nonequilibrium cost of accurate information processing | QIP 2024 | Giulio Chiribella, Fei Meng, Man-hong Yung |
| How to characterise a clock: putting clocks against each other | QIP 2023 | Nuriya Nurgalieva, Ralph Silva |
| Thought experiments in a quantum computer | TQC 2023 | Nuriya Nurgalieva, Simon Mathis, Lidia del Rio |
| Embedding cyclic causal structures in acyclic spacetimes: no-go results for process matrices | TQC 2023 | V. Vilasini |
| Ultimate limit on time signal generation | QIP 2021 | Yuxiang Yang |
| Independent security analysis of a commercial quantum random number generator Quantis from ID Quantique | QCRYPT 2020 | Mikhail Petrov, Igor V. Radchenko, Damian Steiger, Matthias Troyer, Vadim Makarov |
We reverse-engineer, test and analyse hardware and firmware of the commercial quantum-optical random number generator Quantis from ID Quantique. We show that > 99% of its output data originates in physically random processes: random timing of photon absorption in a semiconductor material, and random growth of avalanche owing to impact ionisation. We have also found minor non-random contributions from imperfections in detector electronics and an internal processing algorithm. Our work shows that the design quality of a commercial quantum-optical randomness source can be verified without cooperation of the manufacturer and without access to the engineering documentation. |
||
| Noisy pre-processing facilitating a photonic realisation of device-independent quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2020 | Melvyn Ho, Pavel Sekatski, Ernest Y. -Z. Tan, Jean-Daniel Bancal, Nicolas Sangouard |
Device-independent quantum key distribution provides security even when the equipment used to communicate over the quantum channel is largely uncharacterized. An experimental demonstration of device-independent quantum key distribution is however challenging. A central obstacle in photonic implementations is that the global detection efficiency, i.e., the probability that the signals sent over the quantum channel are successfully received, must be above a certain threshold. We here propose a method to significantly relax this threshold, while maintaining provable device-independent security. This is achieved with a protocol that adds artificial noise, which cannot be known or controlled by an adversary, to the initial measurement data (the raw key). Focusing on a realistic photonic setup using a source based on spontaneous parametric down conversion, we give explicit bounds on the minimal required global detection efficiency. |
||
| Accuracy enhancing protocols for quantum clocks | QIP 2020 | Yuxiang Yang, Lennart Baumgärtner, Ralph Silva |
| Advantage distillation for device-independent quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2019 | Ernest Y. -Z. Tan, Charles Ci Wen Lim |
| Bounds on device-independent advantage distillation in the IID scenario | QCRYPT 2018 | Ernest Y. -Z. Tan |
| Closing loopholes in no-go theorems | QIP 2018 | Raban Iten, Lidia del Rio |
| Confidence Region in Quantum State Tomography | QIP 2018 | Jinzhao Wang |
| Partial Thermalizations Allow for Optimal Thermodynamic Processes | QIP 2018 | Elisa Bäumer, Marti Perarnau-Llobet, Philipp Kammerlander |
| Numerical approach towards device-independent bounds on von Neumann entropy | QIP 2018 | Ernest Y. -Z. Tan, Volkher Scholz |
| Quantum clocks are more accurate than classical ones | QIP 2018 | Mischa Woods, Ralph Silva, Gilles Puitz |
| The coherent relative entropy: a new parent entropy measure | QIP 2017 | Philippe Faist |
| A mathematical framework for classical thermodynamics | QIP 2016 | Philipp Kammerlander |
| Resource theories of knowledge | QIP 2016 | Lidia del Rio, Lea Krämer |
| Efficient Quantum Communication over Noisy Quantum Channels | QIP 2015 | Joseph M. Renes, David Sutter, Frédéric Dupuis |
| Local and global clocks in quantum mechanics - limitations to building global ordering scales out of two local quantum clocks | QIP 2015 | Sandra Rankovic, Yeong-Cherng Liang |
| Efficient Approximation of Quantum Channel Capacities | QIP 2015 | David Sutter, Tobias Sutter, Peyman Mohajerin Esfahani |
| Non-signalling parallel repetition using de Finetti reductions | QIP 2015 | Rotem Arnon-Friedman, Thomas Vidick |
| Two-party alternate events game | QIP 2014 | Sandra Rankovic, Yeong-Cherng Liang |
| True Randomness from Realistic Quantum Devices | QIP 2014 | Daniela Frauchiger, Matthias Troyer |
| The Minimal Work Cost of Information Processing: Gambling Against the Second Law of Thermodynamics | QIP 2014 | Philippe Faist, Lea Krämer, Frédéric Dupuis, Jonathan Oppenheim |
| de Finetti reductions beyond quantum theory | QIP 2014 | Rotem Arnon-Friedman |
| Quantum Exams | QIP 2014 | Normand Beaudry, Omar Fawzi |
| Autonomous work extraction within a Szilard engine model | QIP 2014 | Philipp Kammerlander, Lidia del Rio |
| An Axiomatic Relation between Information Theoretic and Thermodynamic Entropies | QIP 2014 | Mirjam Weilenmann, Lea Krämer, Philippe Faist |
| Duality for the conditional min-information | QIP 2014 | Paul Erker, Normand Beaudry |
| Classical leakage resilience from fault-tolerant quantum computation | QIP 2014 | Felipe G. Lacerda, Joseph M. Renes |
| A high-speed QRNG for security applications | QCRYPT 2013 | Mathilde Soucarros, Samuel Burri, Edoardo Charbon, Christopher J. Chunnilall, Daniela Frauchiger, Alessio Meneghetti, Jean-Benoît Page, Francesco Regazzoni, Damien Stucki |
In security applications, it is necessary to use random numbers with the highest possible entropy. Quantum Random Number Generators (QRNG) are most suitable for creating such numbers due to the non-deterministic nature of quantum physics. In this work we present the different steps of the construction of a new design for a high-speed QRNG. Furthermore, in order to make our QRNG suitable for use in security applications, we explain the steps we are taking to make it conform to security standards. Such standards exist and define guidelines for the design of classical Random Number Generators. However, for QRNG, it is necessary to make adaptations, which requires additional work in its design, realization and evaluation with respect to security standards. |
||
| Cryptographic security of quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2013 | Christopher Portmann |
Although the secrecy condition for quantum key distribution (QKD) introduced by Renner is broadly accepted, it does not conform with the simulation-based notion of security used by the cryptographic community. In particular, previous arguments as to why this condition provides security do not consider parallel composition of protocols. We remedy this situation by giving the first complete proof that when combined with a notion of correctness, it implies cryptographic (simulation-based) security for QKD. To do this, we first revisit the notion of simulatable security necessary for a general protocol to be usable in a larger cryptographic context, and derive the corresponding security criterion for QKD. We then prove that the known notions of secrecy and correctness are sufficient to achieve this security criterion. We also illustrate the composition of various protocols with QKD with several examples. |
||
| de Finetti reductions beyond quantum physics | QCRYPT 2013 | Rotem Arnon-Friedman |
The ability to reduce proofs of quantum information processing tasks from any permutation in-variant state to a de-Finetti state, that is, a convex combination of i.i.d. states, is useful in several tasks, such as cryptographic quantum protocols and quantum tomography. It is thus interesting to see whether such de-Finetti type theorems are unique for quantum theory or can be proven for more general theories. We prove that this can indeed be done under the framework of conditional probability distributions. That is, a physical system is described by a conditional probability distribution PA|X where X denotes the possible measurements and A the possible outcomes. For such systems we prove a post selection theorem which states that any permutation invariant system PA|X can be post selected by a measurement of a de-Finetti type system with high enough probability. We use this theorem to simplify security proofs of non-signalling cryptographic protocols. |
||
| A practical approach to true quantum randomness generation | QCRYPT 2013 | Daniela Frauchiger |
A natural definition for a process to be truly random is that its outcome is not predictable from any information available before the process has been started. The advantage of using quantum systems for random number generation compared to classical approaches lies in the fact that the unpredictability of the randomness can be proven based on physical principles. In practice however, due to imperfections of the devices, the resulting raw randomness also depends on classical noise and therefore does not fulfil this definition either. Here we provide a framework for generating almost perfect true randomness using noisy devices by appropriate post-processing (hashing) of the raw randomness. Compared to previous work on random number generators (RNGs), we take this noise into account as side information, which is necessary to meet the above definition of true randomness. Our approach assumes that the process generating the raw randomness is correctly described by a quantum model. Compared to device- independent randomness expansion, this has the advantage of being practical (it is applicable to commercially available devices) and does not require pre-existing randomness. We stress, however, that our results do not rely on any completeness assumption regarding the model or quantum theory. We illustrate our proposal for a Quantum Random Number Generator (QRNG) based on a beam splitter and show how the post-processing procedure used in some of the current devices can be improved. |
||
| Quantum exams | QCRYPT 2013 | Normand Beaudry, Omar Fawzi |
Removing assumptions about devices and signals from quantum cryptography protocols is an important task. Often it is assumed that measurements are memoryless and each signal is measured independently. We aim to remove this assumption by considering a related problem involving what we call quantum exams: First assume a student has a quantum memory which has an encoding of a classical string. Consider that the student is asked to produce a small subset of the string (i.e. and exam), and then is asked for another subset of the string. If the student can make a good estimate in the first exam, he should be able to also make a good estimate in the second exam. We examine this problem in the case of a classical or quantum memory for the student, and its relation to quantum cryptography. |
||
| Composable security of delegated quantum computation | QCRYPT 2013 | Vedran Dunjko, Joseph F. Fitzsimons, Christopher Portmann |
Delegating difficult computations to remote large computation facilities, with appropriate security guarantees, is a possible solution for the ever-growing needs of personal computing power. For delegated computation protocols to be usable in a larger context—or simply to securely run two protocols in parallel—the security definitions need to be composable. Here, we define composable security for delegated quantum computation, and prove that several known protocols are composable, including Broadbent, Fitzsimons and Kashefi’s Universal Blind Quantum Computation protocol.We distinguish between protocols which provide only blindness—the computation is hidden from the server—and those that are also verifiable—the client can check that it has received the correct result. We show that the composable security definition capturing both these notions can be reduced to a combination of two distinct stand-alone security definitions. |
||
| Composability of secure delegated quantum computation | QIP 2013 | Vedran Dunjko, Joseph F. Fitzsimons, Christopher Portmann |
| Quantitative Quantum Landauer’s Principle | QIP 2013 | Philippe Faist, Frédéric Dupuis, Jonathan Oppenheim |
| Entropic relations for time measurements on quantum clocks | QIP 2013 | Sandra Rankovic, Joseph M. Renes |
| Security proof of two-way quantum key distribution protocols with partial device independence | QIP 2013 | Normand Beaudry, Stefano Mancini |
| Generalized Entropies | QIP 2013 | Frédéric Dupuis, Lea Krämer, Philippe Faist, Joseph M. Renes |
| Security proof of two-way quantum key distribution protocols with partial device independence | QCRYPT 2012 | Normand Beaudry, Marco Lucamarini, Stefano Mancini |
| Dipole-Dipole-Interaction-Induced Anyon Dynamics in the Toric Code | QIP 2012 | Christian Schuette-Nuetgen, Cyril Stark |
| An information-driven approach to thermodynamics | QIP 2012 | Adrian Hutter, Lidia del Rio, Stephanie Wehner |
| On the Optimality of Work Extraction in Small Thermodynamical Systems | QIP 2012 | Philippe Faist, Johan Aaberg |
| In the search of operational quantities for characterizing large quantum systems | QIP 2012 | Pascal Basler, Normand Beaudry |
| Tsirelson's bound from a Generalised Data Processing Inequality | QIP 2012 | Oscar Dahlsten, Daniel Lercher |
| An intuitive proof of the data processing inequality | QIP 2011 | Normand Beaudry |
| Repurposing (quantum) information processing protocols: from randomness extraction to channel coding | QIP 2011 | Joseph M. Renes |
| The uncertainty relation for smooth entropies and its application to QKD: security in a model that is fully device-independent for the receiver | QIP 2011 | Marco Tomamichel |
| The thermodynamic meaning of negative entropy | QIP 2011 | Lidia del Rio, Johan Aaberg, Oscar Dahlsten, Vlatko Vedral |
| On Trevisan's extractor in the context of quantum side information | QIP 2010 | Christopher Portmann |
| A New Proof of the Quantum Reverse Shannon Theorem | QIP 2010 | Mario Berta, Matthias Christandl |
| Amplification of Non-Signaling Secrecy | QIP 2010 | Esther Hänggi, Stefan Wolf |
| A Quantum Asymptotic Equipartition Property | QIP 2009 | Marco Tomamichel, Roger Colbeck |
| One-Shot Classical Capacities of Quantum Channels | QIP 2009 | Ligong Wang |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2026 | program | area_chair | — |
| QIP 2019 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2018 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2017 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2016 | program | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2015 | program | chair | — |
| QCRYPT 2014 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2014 | program | chair | — |
| QCRYPT 2013 | program | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2012 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2012 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2012 | program | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2011 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2011 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2010 | organizing | chair | — |
| QIP 2010 | steering | chair | — |
| QIP 2009 | steering | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| David Sutter | 9 |
| Omar Fawzi | 9 |
| Frédéric Dupuis | 8 |
| Joseph M. Renes | 8 |
| Normand Beaudry | 7 |
| Philippe Faist | 7 |
| Christopher Portmann | 6 |
| Ernest Y. -Z. Tan | 6 |
| Lidia del Rio | 6 |
| Marco Tomamichel | 6 |
| Charles Ci Wen Lim | 4 |
| Giulio Chiribella | 4 |
| Lea Krämer | 4 |
| Matthias Christandl | 4 |
| Ralph Silva | 4 |
| Robert König | 4 |
| Rotem Arnon-Friedman | 4 |
| Yuxiang Yang | 4 |
| Daniela Frauchiger | 3 |
| Jean-Daniel Bancal | 3 |