26
collaborators
2015–2025
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
1 Talk
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Towards secure QKD with testable assumptions on modulation devices | QCRYPT 2016 | regular | Yuichi Nagamatsu, Marcos Curty, Hoi-Kwong Lo, Koji Azuma, Rikizo Ikuta, Takashi Yamamoto, Nobuyuki Imoto, Kiyoshi Tamaki |
15 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Security of loss-tolerant QKD with source and receiver imperfections | QCRYPT 2025 | Alessandro Marcomini, Fadri Grünenfelder, Marcos Curty, Kiyoshi Tamaki |
Current implementations of quantum key distribution (QKD) typically rely on prepare-and-measure (P&M) schemes. Unfortunately, these implementations are not completely secure, unless security proofs fully incorporate all imperfections of real devices. So far, existing proofs have primarily focused on imperfections of either the light source or the measurement device. In this work, we establish a security proof for the loss-tolerant P&M QKD protocol that incorporates imperfections in both the source and the detectors. Specifically, we demonstrate the security of this scheme when the emitted states deviate from the ideal ones and Bob’s measurement device does not meet the basis-independent detection efficiency condition. Furthermore, we conduct an experiment to characterise the detection efficiency mismatch of commercial single-photon detectors as a function of the polarisation state of the input light, and determine the expected secret key rate in the presence of state preparation flaws when using such detectors. Our work provides a way towards guaranteeing the security of actual implementations of widely deployed P&M QKD. |
||
| Quantum key distribution with unbounded pulse correlations | QCRYPT 2024 | Margarida Pereira, Guillermo Currás-Lorenzo, Davide Rusca, Marcos Curty, Kiyoshi Tamaki |
Typical security proofs of quantum key distribution (QKD) require that the emitted signals are independent and identically distributed. In practice, however, this assumption is not met because intrinsic device flaws inevitably introduce correlations between the emitted signals. Although analyses addressing this issue have been recently proposed, they only consider a restrictive scenario in which the correlations have a finite and known maximum length that is much smaller than the total number of emitted signals. While it is expected that the magnitude of the correlations decreases as the pulse separation increases, the assumption that this magnitude is exactly zero after a certain point does not seem to have any physical justification. Concerningly, this means that existing analyses cannot guarantee the security of current QKD implementations. Here, we solve this pressing problem by developing a general framework that can handle pulse correlations of unbounded length. Our framework allows us to directly use existing proofs addressing this imperfection without the need to construct them from scratch, thus reestablishing the security of QKD in a simple and versatile manner. |
||
| Quantum key distribution with unbounded pulse correlations | TQC 2024 | Margarida Pereira, Guillermo Currás-Lorenzo, Davide Rusca, Marcos Curty, Kiyoshi Tamaki |
| Numerical studies on quantum state verification with single-qubit measurements | TQC 2024 | Seiseki Akibue, Yuki Takeuchi |
| Modified BB84 quantum key distribution protocol robust to source imperfections | TQC 2023 | Margarida Pereira, Guillermo Currás-Lorenzo, Álvaro Navarrete, Go Kato, Marcos Curty, Kiyoshi Tamaki |
| Characterisation of state preparation uncertainty in quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2022 | Anqi Huang, Hoi-Kwong Lo, Vadim Makarov, Kiyoshi Tamaki |
| Quantum key distribution with simply characterized light sources | QCRYPT 2019 | Toshihiko Sasaki, Yuki Takeuchi, Kiyoshi Tamaki, Masato Koashi |
| Resource-efficient verification of quantum computing using Serfling’s bound | QCRYPT 2019 | Yuki Takeuchi, Atul Mantri, Tomoyuki Morimae, Joseph F. Fitzsimons |
| Resource-efficient verification of quantum computing using Serfling's bound | QIP 2019 | Yuki Takeuchi, Atul Mantri, Tomoyuki Morimae, Joseph F. Fitzsimons |
| Information-theoretic security proof of differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution protocol based on complementarity | QCRYPT 2017 | Toshihiko Sasaki, Go Kato, Yuki Takeuchi, Kiyoshi Tamaki |
| Theory of the quantum internet | QIP 2017 | Koji Azuma, Hoi-Kwong Lo, Go Kato |
| Robustness of Round-Robin Differential-Phase-Shift Quantum-Key-Distribution Protocol Against Source Flaws | QCRYPT 2016 | Nobuyuki Imoto, Kiyoshi Tamaki |
| Differential Phase Shift QKD Protocol with Small Number of Random Delays | QCRYPT 2016 | Yuki Hatakeyama, Nobuyuki Imoto, Kiyoshi Tamaki |
| Finite-key security analysis of quantum key distribution with imperfect light sources | QCRYPT 2015 | Marcos Curty, Charles Ci Wen Lim, Nobuyuki Imoto, Kiyoshi Tamaki |
| Security of quantum key distribution with non-I.I.D. light sources | QCRYPT 2015 | Yuichi Nagamatsu, Rikizo Ikuta, Takashi Yamamoto, Nobuyuki Imoto, Kiyoshi Tamaki |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Kiyoshi Tamaki | 12 |
| Marcos Curty | 6 |
| Nobuyuki Imoto | 5 |
| Yuki Takeuchi | 5 |
| Go Kato | 3 |
| Guillermo Currás-Lorenzo | 3 |
| Hoi-Kwong Lo | 3 |
| Margarida Pereira | 3 |
| Atul Mantri | 2 |
| Davide Rusca | 2 |
| Joseph F. Fitzsimons | 2 |
| Koji Azuma | 2 |
| Rikizo Ikuta | 2 |
| Takashi Yamamoto | 2 |
| Tomoyuki Morimae | 2 |
| Toshihiko Sasaki | 2 |
| Yuichi Nagamatsu | 2 |
| Alessandro Marcomini | 1 |
| Anqi Huang | 1 |
| Charles Ci Wen Lim | 1 |