11
program roles
4
steering roles
2
organizing roles
1
leadership role
115
collaborators
2005–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
37 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entanglement accelerates quantum simulation | QIP 2025 | regular ▸ presenter | Qi Zhao, You Zhou |
| Quantum algorithms for linear differential equations and eigenvalue transformations via linear combination of Hamiltonian simulation | QIP 2025 | regular | ▸Dong An, Lin Lin, Lexing Ying |
| Quantum Routing and Entanglement Dynamics Through Bottlenecks | TQC 2025 | regular | Dhruv Devulapalli, Chao Yin, Andrew Guo, Eddie Schoute, Alexey Gorshkov, Andrew Lucas |
|
Toward a 2D Local Implementation of Quantum LDPC Codes ↗
|
TQC 2024 | regular | ▸Noah Berthusen, Dhruv Devulapalli, Eddie Schoute, Michael Gullans, Alexey Gorshkov, Daniel Gottesman |
Geometric locality is an important theoretical and practical factor for quantum low-density parity-check (qLDPC) codes which affects code performance and ease of physical realization. For device architectures restricted to 2D local gates, naively implementing the high-rate codes suitable for low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum computing incurs prohibitive overhead. In this work, we present an error correction protocol built on a bilayer architecture that aims to reduce operational overheads when restricted to 2D local gates by measuring some generators less frequently than others. We investigate the family of bivariate bicycle qLDPC codes and show that they are well suited for a parallel syndrome measurement scheme using fast routing with local operations and classical communication (LOCC). Through circuit-level simulations, we find that in some parameter regimes bivariate bicycle codes implemented with this protocol have logical error rates comparable to the surface code while using fewer physical qubits. |
|||
| Quantum Algorithms for Sampling Log-Concave Distributions and Estimating Normalizing Constants | QIP 2023 | regular ▸ presenter | Tongyang Li, Jin-Peng Liu, Chunhao Wang, Ruizhe Zhang |
| Quantum divide and conquer | QIP 2023 | regular ▸ presenter | Robin Kothari, Matt Kovacs-Deak, Aarthi Sundaram, Daochen Wang |
|
Quantum algorithms and the power of forgetting ↗
|
TQC 2023 | regular | Matthew Coudron, ▸Amin Shiraz Gilani |
The so-called welded tree problem provides an example of a black-box problem that can be solved exponentially faster by a quantum walk than by any classical algorithm. Given the name of a special ENTRANCE vertex, a quantum walk can find another distinguished EXIT vertex using polynomially many queries, though without finding any particular path from ENTRANCE to EXIT. It has been an open problem for twenty years whether there is an efficient quantum algorithm for finding such a path, or if the path-finding problem is hard even for quantum computers. We show that a natural class of efficient quantum algorithms provably cannot find a path from ENTRANCE to EXIT. Specifically, we consider algorithms that, within each branch of their superposition, always store a set of vertex labels that form a connected subgraph including the ENTRANCE, and that only provide these vertex labels as inputs to the oracle. While this does not rule out the possibility of a quantum algorithm that efficiently finds a path, it is unclear how an algorithm could benefit by deviating from this behavior. Our no-go result suggests that, for some problems, quantum algorithms must necessarily forget the path they take to reach a solution in order to outperform classical computation. |
|||
| Hamiltonian simulation with random inputs | QIP 2022 | regular | ▸Qi Zhao, You Zhou, Alexander F. Shaw, Tongyang Li |
| Quantum algorithms | QIP 2021 | tutorial | — |
Abstract While the power of quantum computers remains far from well understood, many quantum algorithms have been developed that provide various degrees of improvement over classical computation. This tutorial will present an overview of some of the major quantum algorithms and quantum algorithmic techniques. Topics to be covered include quantum query algorithms and their limitations, algebraic quantum algorithms, quantum walk, and quantum algorithms for Hamiltonian simulation, high-dimensional linear algebra, and optimization. |
|||
| Non-interactive Zero-knowledge Protocols for QMA | QIP 2021 | regular | Gorjan Alagic, Andrea Coladangelo, Alex Bredariol Grilo, Shih-Han Hung, Thomas Vidick, Tina Zhang |
Abstract A non-interactive zero-knowledge (NIZK) proof system for a language L in NP allows a prover (who is provided with an instance x and a witness w) to compute a classical certificate for the claim that x is in L, with the following properties: 1) the protocol can be verified efficiently, and 2) the protocol does not reveal any information about w, besides the fact that it exists (i.e., that x is in L). While NIZKs are known to be impossible in the plain model (i.e., with no additional trusted resource), they are well studied in alternative models and have seen widespread application in classical cryptography. Given the importance of NIZKs, and more generally zero-knowledge protocols, in classical cryptography, there has been a recent effort to achieve such protocols for QMA, a natural quantum analog of NP. However, all previous results only achieved interactive protocols, limiting their cryptographic use. Moreover, they all rely on quantum communication between the prover and the verifier, which may be difficult to achieve. In this submission, we present two NIZK protocols for QMA in the Common Reference String (CRS) model, with additional offline setup. Both protocols are achieved through the homomorphic computation of classical NIZKs for NP, and rely on the hardness of the Learning With Errors problem. However, each of them then combines this core idea with different (seemingly incomparable) techniques: 1) our first protocol makes use of quantum teleportation and quantum communication in an offline setup phase, with a classical online phase; our second protocol leverages techniques for classical verification of quantum computations, and is the only known NIZK for QMA to be completely classical, as well as reusable, meaning that a single setup allows to prove many theorems. Security of the latter is in the Quantum Random Oracle model. |
|||
| Symmetries, graph properties, and quantum speedups | QIP 2021 | regular | Shalev Ben-David, Andras Pal Gilyen, William Kretschmer, Supartha Podder, Daochen Wang |
Abstract Aaronson and Ambainis (2009) and Chailloux (2018) showed that fully symmetric (partial) functions do not admit exponential quantum query speedups. This raises a natural question: how symmetric must a function be before it cannot exhibit a large quantum speedup? In this work, we prove that hypergraph symmetries in the adjacency matrix model allow at most a polynomial separation between randomized and quantum query complexities. We also show that, remarkably, permutation groups constructed out of these symmetries are essentially the only permutation groups that prevent super-polynomial quantum speedups. We prove this by fully characterizing the primitive permutation groups that allow super-polynomial quantum speedups. In contrast, in the adjacency list model for bounded-degree graphswhere graph symmetry is manifested differentlywe exhibit a property testing problem that shows an exponential quantum speedup. These results resolve open questions posed by Ambainis, Childs, and Liu (2010) and Montanaro and de Wolf (2013). |
|||
| Implementing a fast unbounded quantum fanout gate using power-law interactions | TQC 2021 | regular | ▸Andrew Guo, Abhinav Deshpande, Su-Kuan Chu, Zachary Eldredge, Przemyslaw Bienias, Dhruv Devulapalli, Yuan Su, Alexey Gorshkov |
| Non-interactive classical verification of quantum computation | QCRYPT 2020 | regular | Gorjan Alagic, Alex Bredariol Grilo, Shih-Han Hung |
In a recent breakthrough, Mahadev constructed an interactive protocol that enables a purely classical party to delegate any quantum computation to an untrusted quantum prover. In this work, we show that this same task can in fact be performed non-interactively and in zero-knowledge. Our protocols result from a sequence of significant improvements to the original four-message protocol of Mahadev. We begin by making the first message instance-independent and moving it to an offline setup phase. We then establish a parallel repetition theorem for the resulting three-message protocol, with an asymptotically optimal rate. This, in turn, enables an application of the Fiat-Shamir heuristic, eliminating the second message and giving a non-interactive protocol. Finally, we employ classical non-interactive zero-knowledge (NIZK) arguments and classical fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) to give a zero-knowledge variant of this construction. This yields the first purely classical NIZK argument system for QMA, a quantum analogue of NP. We establish the security of our protocols under standard assumptions in quantum-secure cryptography. Specifically, our protocols are secure in the Quantum Random Oracle Model, under the assumption that Learning with Errors is quantumly hard. The NIZK construction also requires circuit-private FHE. |
|||
| A Theory of Trotter Error | QIP 2020 | regular | Yuan Su, Minh Cong Tran, Nathan Wiebe, Shuchen Zhu |
| Quantum algorithm for estimating volumes of convex bodies | QIP 2020 | regular | Shouvanik Chakrabarti, Shih-Han Hung, Tongyang Li, Chunhao Wang, Xiaodi Wu |
| Quantum Coupon Collector | TQC 2020 | regular | Srinivasan Arunachalam, Aleksandrs Belovs, Robin Kothari, Ansis Rosmanis, ▸Ronald de Wolf |
We study how efficiently a k-element set S subseteq [n] can be learned from a uniform superposition ket{S} of its elements. One can think of ket{S}=sum_{i in S} ket{i}/sqrt{|S|} as the quantum version of a uniformly random sample over S, as in the classical analysis of the “coupon collector problem.” We show that if k is close to n, then we can learn S using asymptotically fewer quantum samples than random samples. In particular, if there are n-k=O(1) missing elements then O(k) copies of ket{S} suffice, in contrast to the Theta(k log k) random samples needed by a classical coupon collector. On the other hand, if n-k=Omega(k), then Omega(k log k) quantum samples are necessary. More generally, we give tight bounds on the number of quantum samples needed for every k and n, and we give efficient quantum learning algorithms. We also give tight bounds in the model where we can additionally reflect through ket{S}. Finally, we relate coupon collection to a known example separating proper and improper PAC learning that turns out to show no separation in the quantum case. |
|||
| Algorithms and lower bounds for convex optimization using quantum oracles | QIP 2019 | regular | ▸Joran van Apeldoorn, Shouvanik Chakrabarti, Andras Pal Gilyen, Sander Gribling, Tongyang Li, Ronald de Wolf, Xiaodi Wu |
| Faster quantum simulation by randomization | TQC 2019 | regular | Aaron Ostrander, Yuan Su |
| Nearly optimal lattice simulation by product formulas | TQC 2019 | regular | Yuan Su |
| Circuit Transformations for Quantum Architectures | TQC 2019 | regular | Eddie Schoute, Cem M. Unsal |
| Toward the first quantum simulation with quantum speedup | QIP 2018 | regular | Dmitri Maslov, Yunseong Nam, Neil J. Ross, ▸Yuan Su |
| Quantum linear systems algorithm with exponentially improved dependence on precision | QIP 2016 | regular ▸ presenter | Robin Kothari, Rolando Somma |
| Hamiltonian simulation with nearly optimal dependence on all parameters | QIP 2015 | regular | Dominic Berry, Robin Kothari |
| Nested quantum walk | QIP 2014 | regular ▸ presenter | Stacey Jeffery, Robin Kothari, Frédéric Magniez |
| The Bose-Hubbard model is QMA-complete | QIP 2014 | regular ▸ presenter | David Gosset, Zak Webb |
| Quantum simulation of sparse Hamiltonians and continuous queries with optimal error dependence | QIP 2014 | regular ▸ presenter | Robin Kothari |
|
“Universal computation by multi-particle quantum walk.” | | ↗
|
QIP 2013 | regular | David Gosset, Zachary Webb |
| Easy and Hard Functions for the Boolean Hidden Shift Problem | TQC 2013 | regular | Robin Kothari, Maris Ozols, Martin Rötteler |
|
Quantum query complexity of minor-closed graph properties ↗
|
QIP 2011 | regular | Robin Kothari |
|
Constructing elliptic curve isogenies in quantum subexponential time ↗
|
QIP 2011 | regular | David Jao, Vladimir Soukharev |
|
Black-box Hamiltonian simulation and unitary implementation ↗
|
QIP 2010 | regular | Dominic Berry |
| Simulating Sparse Hamiltonians with Star Decompositions | TQC 2010 | regular | Robin Kothari |
| Universal computation by quantum walk | QIP 2009 | invited ▸ presenter | — |
In some of the earliest work on quantum mechanical computers, Feynman showed how to implement universal quantum computation by the dynamics of a time-independent Hamiltonian. I show that this remains possible even if the Hamiltonian is restricted to be a sparse matrix with all entries equal to 0 or 1, i.e., the adjacency matrix of a low-degree graph. Thus quantum walk can be regarded as a universal computational primitive, with any desired quantum computation encoded entirely in some underlying graph. The main idea of the construction is to implement quantum gates by scattering processes |
|||
| Searching an ordered list with a quantum computer | TQC 2008 | invited ▸ presenter | — |
| Quantum algorithms for hidden nonlinear structures | QIP 2007 | invited | — |
| From optimal measurement to efficient quantum algorithms for the hidden subgroup problem over semidirect product groups | QIP 2006 | regular | Wim van Dam, David Bacon |
| Optimal measurements for the dihedral hidden subgroup problem | QIP 2005 | invited | David Bacon, Wim van Dam |
40 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Measuring gravitational lensing time delays with quantum information processing | QIP 2026 | Zhenning Liu, William DeRocco, Shiming Gu, ▸Emil T. Khabiboulline, Soonwon Choi, Anson Hook, Alexey Gorshkov, Daniel Eric Gottesman |
| Low Depth Fermion Routing without Ancillas | QIP 2026 | ▸Nathan Constantinides, Jeffery Yu, Dhruv Devulapalli, Ali Fahimniya, Michael Gullans, Alex Schuckert, Alexey Gorshkov |
| Time Independence Does Not Limit Information Flow | QIP 2026 | Dong Yuan, ▸Timothy Connor Mooney, Chao Yin, Adam Ehrenberg, Christopher L. Baldwin, Alexey Gorshkov |
| Quantum Routing and Entanglement Capacity Through Bottlenecks | QIP 2025 | Dhruv Devulapalli, Chao Yin, Andrew Guo, Adam Ehrenberg, Eddie Schoute, Alexey Gorshkov, Andrew Lucas |
| Low-depth quantum symmetrization | QIP 2025 | Zhenning Liu, Daniel Gottesman |
| Efficient preparation of Dicke states | QIP 2025 | Jeffery Yu, Yuxin Wang, Sean R. Muleady, Nathan Schine, Alexey Gorshkov |
| Optimal Routing on Reconfigurable Neutral Atom Arrays | QIP 2025 | Nathan Constantinides, Ali Fahimniya, Dhruv Devulapalli, Michael Gullans, James V. Porto, Alexey V. orshkov |
| Verification of Spatially Distributed Entanglement | QCRYPT 2024 | Yusuf Alnawakhtha, Manasi Mangesh Shingane, Carl Miller |
Certifying the existence of entanglement between two parties is a fundamental problem in quantum information science. In this work, we develop a protocol for verifying that two parties located at specified positions share an entangled quantum state. We accomplish this by embedding the CHSH game in a quantum position verification protocol. This provides a form of entanglement testing that not only ensures that provers passing the protocol share entanglement, but that they are also located where they claim to be. This prevents parties from passing the verification test by simply forwarding the input of the verification protocol to other parties that share entanglement. The protocol has low requirements on the quantum computational abilities of honest provers---namely, it only requires the honest provers to manipulate two qubits each. It achieves security against adversaries located at incorrect positions that share at most a logarithmic amount of quantum memory with respect to the size of the classical input. |
||
| Verification of Quantum Channels | QIP 2024 | Yusuf Alnawakhtha, Carl Miller, Manasi Mangesh Shingane |
| Quantum Algorithms for Simulating Nuclear Effective Field Theories | QIP 2024 | James Watson, Jake Bringewatt, Alexander F. Shaw, Zohreh Davoudi, Alexey Gorshkov |
| Efficiently verifiable quantum advantage on near-term analog quantum simulators | QIP 2024 | Zhenning Liu, Dhruv Devulapalli, Dominik Hangleiter, Yi-Kai Liu, Alicia Kollár, Alexey Gorshkov |
| Efficiently verifiable quantum advantage on near-term analog quantum simulators | TQC 2024 | Zhenning Liu, Dhruv Devulapalli, Dominik Hangleiter, Yi-Kai Liu, Alicia Kollár, Alexey Gorshkov |
| Verification of Quantum Networks | TQC 2024 | Manasi Mangesh Shingane, Yusuf Alnawakhtha, Carl Miller |
| Efficient and practical Hamiltonian simulation from time-dependent product formulas | TQC 2024 | Raul A. Santos, Jan Lukas Bosse, Filippo Maria Gambetta, Ashley Montanaro, Charles Derby |
| Quantum algorithms and the power of forgetting | QIP 2023 | Matthew Coudron, Amin Shiraz Gilani |
| Spatial Search on Lattices with Continuous Time Quantum Walks | QIP 2023 | Dhruv Devulapalli |
| Quantum routing | QIP 2020 | Aniruddha Bapat, Alexey Gorshkov, Eddie Schoute |
| Time-dependent Hamiltonian simulation with L1-norm scaling | QIP 2020 | Dominic Berry, Yuan Su, Xin Wang, Nathan Wiebe |
| High-precision quantum algorithms for partial differential equations | QIP 2020 | Jin-Peng Liu, Aaron Ostrander |
| Two-message verification of quantum computation | QIP 2020 | Gorjan Alagic, Shih-Han Hung |
| Nearly-optimal time-independent reversal of a spin chain | TQC 2020 | Aniruddha Bapat, Eddie Schoute, Alexey Gorshkov |
| Circuit Transformations for Quantum Architectures | QIP 2019 | Eddie Schoute, Cem M. Unsal |
| Faster quantum simulation by randomization | QIP 2019 | Aaron Ostrander, Yuan Su |
| Quantum spectral methods for differential equations | QIP 2019 | Jin-Peng Liu |
| Locality and digital quantum simulation of power-law interactions | TQC 2019 | Andrew Guo, Minh Cong Tran, Yuan Su, James Garrison, Zachary Eldredge, Michael Foss-Feig, Alexey Gorshkov |
| Quantum Spectral Methods for Differential Equations | TQC 2019 | Jin-Peng Liu |
| Quantum algorithm for multivariate polynomial interpolation | QIP 2017 | Jianxin Chen, Shih-Han Hung |
| Efficient simulation of sparse Markovian quantum dynamics | QIP 2017 | Tongyang Li |
| Quantum Algorithm for Linear Differential Equations with Exponentially Improved Dependence on Precision 50 | QIP 2017 | Dominic Berry, Aaron Ostrander, Guoming Wang |
| Optimal Quantum Algorithm for Polynomial Interpolation | QCRYPT 2016 | Wim van Dam, Shih-Han Hung, Igor Shparlinski |
| Optimal quantum algorithm for polynomial interpolation | QIP 2016 | Wim van Dam, Shih-Han Hung, Igor Shparlinski |
We consider the number of quantum queries required to determine the coefficients of a degree-d polynomial over GF(q). A lower bound shown independently by Kane and Kutin and by Meyer and Pommersheim shows that d/2+1/2 quantum queries are needed to solve this problem with bounded error, whereas an algorithm of Boneh and Zhandry shows that d quantum queries are sufficient. We show that the lower bound is achievable: d/2+1/2 quantum queries suffice to determine the polynomial with bounded error. Furthermore, we show that d/2+1 queries suffice to achieve probability approaching 1 for large q. These upper bounds improve results of Boneh and Zhandry on the insecurity of cryptographic protocols against quantum attacks. We also show that our algorithm's success probability as a function of the number of queries is precisely optimal. Furthermore, the algorithm can be implemented with gate complexity poly(log q) with negligible decrease in the success probability. |
||
| Complexity of the Bose-Hubbard Model on simple graphs | QIP 2015 | David Gosset, Zak Webb |
| Momentum switches | QIP 2015 | David Gosset, Daniel Nagaj, Mouktik Raha, Zak Webb |
| Multiregister quantum algorithms to compute convolutions and hidden shifts | QIP 2014 | Robin Kothari, Maris Ozols, Martin Rötteler |
| A framework for bounding nonlocality of state discrimination | QIP 2013 | Debbie Leung, Laura Mančinska, Maris Ozols |
| The quantum query complexity of read-many formulas. | QIP 2012 | Shelby Kimmel, Robin Kothari |
| The quantum query complexity of read-many formulas | QIP 2012 | Shelby Kimmel, Robin Kothari |
| Limitations on the simulation of non-sparse Hamiltonians | QIP 2010 | Robin Kothari |
| Quantum algorithms for testing bipartiteness and expansion of bounded-degree graphs | QIP 2010 | Yi-Kai Liu |
| Characterization of Universal 2-qubit Hamiltonians | QIP 2009 | Debbie Leung, Laura Mančinska, Maris Ozols |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2026 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2024 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2023 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2022 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2020 | program | chair | — |
| QIP 2019 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2019 | organizing | member | — |
| QIP 2018 | steering | member | — |
| TQC 2018 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2017 | steering | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2016 | organizing | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2016 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2016 | steering | member | — |
| TQC 2015 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2013 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2011 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2010 | program | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Alexey Gorshkov | 14 |
| Robin Kothari | 13 |
| Dhruv Devulapalli | 9 |
| Yuan Su | 8 |
| Eddie Schoute | 7 |
| Shih-Han Hung | 7 |
| Tongyang Li | 5 |
| Aaron Ostrander | 4 |
| Andrew Guo | 4 |
| David Gosset | 4 |
| Dominic Berry | 4 |
| Jin-Peng Liu | 4 |
| Maris Ozols | 4 |
| Wim van Dam | 4 |
| Zhenning Liu | 4 |
| Carl Miller | 3 |
| Chao Yin | 3 |
| Gorjan Alagic | 3 |
| Manasi Mangesh Shingane | 3 |
| Michael Gullans | 3 |