30
collaborators
2021–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
6 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum algorithms for linear differential equations and eigenvalue transformations via linear combination of Hamiltonian simulation | QIP 2025 | regular ▸ presenter | Andrew Childs, Lin Lin, Lexing Ying |
| Linear combination of Hamiltonian simulation for non-unitary dynamics with optimal state preparation cost | QIP 2024 | regular ▸ presenter | Jin-Peng Liu, Lin Lin |
|
Multi-product Hamiltonian simulation with explicit commutator scaling ↗
|
TQC 2024 | regular | ▸Junaid Aftab, Konstantina Trivisa |
The well-conditioned multi-product formula (MPF), proposed by [Low, Kliuchnikov, and Wiebe, 2019], is a simple high-order time-independent Hamiltonian simulation algorithm that implements a linear combination of standard product formulas of low order. While the MPF aims to simultaneously exploit commutator scaling among Hamiltonians and achieve near-optimal time and precision dependence, its lack of a rigorous error bound on the nested commutators renders its practical advantage ambiguous. In this work, we conduct a rigorous complexity analysis of the well-conditioned MPF, demonstrating explicit commutator scaling and near-optimal time and precision dependence at the same time. Using our improved complexity analysis, we present several applications of practical interest where the MPF based on a second-order product formula can achieve a polynomial speedup in both system size and evolution time, as well as an exponential speedup in precision, compared to second-order and even higher-order product formulas. Compared to post-Trotter methods, the MPF based on a second-order product formula can achieve polynomially better scaling in system size, with only poly-logarithmic overhead in evolution time and precision. |
|||
| Optimal scaling quantum linear systems solver via discrete adiabatic theorem | QIP 2022 | regular | ▸Pedro C.S. Costa, Yuval Rishu Sanders, Yuan Su, Ryan Babbush, Dominic Berry |
| Time-dependent Hamiltonian Simulation of Highly Oscillatory Dynamics and superconvergence for the Schrödinger equation | TQC 2022 | regular | ▸Di Fang, Lin Lin |
| Quantum-accelerated multilevel Monte Carlo methods for stochastic differential equations in mathematical finance | TQC 2021 | regular | Noah Linden, ▸Jin-Peng Liu, Ashley Montanaro, Changpeng Shao, Jiasu Wang |
14 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| On the Role of Fourier Structure in the Training of Parameterized Quantum Circuits | QIP 2026 | ▸Zhijian Lai, Jiang Hu, Taehee Ko, Jiayuan Wu, Zaiwen Wen |
| Fast-forwarding quantum algorithms for linear dissipative differential equations | QIP 2026 | Gengzhi Yang, Akwum Onwunta |
| Exponential Lindbladian fast forwarding and exponential amplification of certain Gibbs state properties | QIP 2026 | ▸Zhong-Xia Shang, Changpeng Shao |
| Constant Factor Analysis of Optimal Quantum Linear Solvers in Practice | TQC 2026 | Pedro C.S. Costa, Alexander M. Dalzell, Dominic Berry |
We extend the findings of (Quantum \textbf{9}, 1887 (2025)), which demonstrated that the discrete adiabatic quantum linear system solver exhibits constant factors approximately 1,200 times smaller in practice than previously estimated by worst-case bounds and about an order of magnitude more efficient than using a randomised approach from [arXiv:2305.11352]. In the present work, we introduce a comparison between the adiabatic-based quantum walk method and the more recent ``shortcut'' quantum linear system solver proposed in [arXiv:2406.12086], which also achieves the asymptotically optimal scaling $O(\kappa\log(1/\varepsilon))$, but with a better constant factor guarantee than the quantum walk method, especially when the solution norm is known. Specifically, we conduct a comprehensive numerical analysis contrasting the two methods in two regimes: when the norm of the solution is unknown and when it is known. Our results indicate that in cases where we know \emph{a priori} $\|x\|$, the shortcut method achieves a lower total cost than QW, providing a potential practical application for problems where the norm of the solution is available. |
||
| Design nearly optimal quantum algorithm for linear differential equations via Lindbladians | TQC 2026 | Zhong-Xia Shang, Naixu Guo, Qi Zhao |
Solving linear ordinary differential equations (ODE) is one of the most promising applications for quantum computers to demonstrate exponential advantages. The challenge of designing a quantum ODE algorithm is how to embed non-unitary dynamics into intrinsically unitary quantum circuits. In this work, we propose a new quantum algorithm for solving ODEs by harnessing open quantum systems. Specifically, we propose a novel technique called non-diagonal density matrix encoding, which leverages the inherent non-unitary dynamics of Lindbladians to encode general linear ODEs into the non-diagonal blocks of density matrices. This framework enables us to design quantum algorithms with both theoretical simplicity and high performance. Combined with the state-of-the-art quantum Lindbladian simulation algorithms, our algorithm can outperform all existing quantum ODE algorithms and achieve near-optimal dependence on all parameters under a plausible input model. We also give applications of our algorithm including the Gibbs state preparations and the partition function estimations. |
||
| Exponential Lindbladian fast forwarding and exponential amplification of certain Gibbs state properties | TQC 2026 | Zhongxia Shang, Changpeng Shao |
We investigate Lindbladian fast-forwarding and its applications to estimating Gibbs state properties. Fast-forwarding refers to the ability to simulate a system of time $t$ using significantly fewer than $t$ queries or circuit depth. While various Hamiltonian systems are known to circumvent the no fast-forwarding theorem, analogous results for dissipative dynamics, governed by Lindbladians, remain largely unexplored. We first present a quantum algorithm for simulating purely dissipative Lindbladians with unitary jump operators, achieving additive query complexity $ \mathcal{O}\left(t + \frac{\log(\varepsilon^{-1})}{\log\log(\varepsilon^{-1})}\right)$ up to error~$\varepsilon$, improving previous algorithms. When the jump operators have certain structures (i.e., block-diagonal Paulis), the algorithm can be modified to achieve exponential fast-forwarding, attaining circuit depth $\mathcal{O}\left(\log\left(t + \frac{\log(\varepsilon^{-1})}{\log\log(\varepsilon^{-1})}\right)\right)$, while preserving query complexity. Using these fast-forwarding techniques, we develop a quantum algorithm for estimating Gibbs state properties of the form $\langle \psi_1 | e^{-\beta(H + I)} | \psi_2 \rangle$, up to additive error $\epsilon$, with $H$ the Hamiltonian and $\beta$ the inverse temperature. For input states exhibiting certain coherence conditions ---e.g.,~$\langle 0|^{\otimes n} e^{-\beta(H + I)} |+\rangle^{\otimes n}$---our method achieves exponential improvement in complexity (measured by circuit depth), $\mathcal{O} (2^{-n/2} \epsilon^{-1} \log \beta ),$ compared to the quantum singular value transformation-based approach, with complexity $\tilde{\mathcal{O}} (\epsilon^{-1} \sqrt{\beta} )$. We show how to apply this exponential improvement to applications such as the ground state overlap testing and amplitude estimation. For general $| \psi_1 \rangle$ and $| \psi_2 \rangle$, we also show how the level of improvement is changed with the coherence resource in $| \psi_1 \rangle$ and $| \psi_2 \rangle$. |
||
| Fast-forwarding quantum algorithms for linear dissipative differential equations | QIP 2025 | Akwum Onwunta, Gengzhi Yang |
| Nearly optimal quantum algorithm design for linear differential equations via Lindbladians | QIP 2025 | Zhong-Xia Shang, Naixu Guo, Qi Zhao |
| The discrete adiabatic quantum linear system solver has lower constant factors than the randomized adiabatic solver | TQC 2024 | Pedro C.S. Costa, Ryan Babbush, Dominic Berry |
| Time discretization of near-adiabatic quantum dynamics with a large time step size | TQC 2024 | Pedro C.S. Costa, Dominic Berry |
| Quantum Signal Processing with Errors | TQC 2024 | Murphy Yuezhen Niu |
| A theory of quantum differential equation solvers: limitations and fast-forwarding | QIP 2023 | Jin-Peng Liu, Daochen Wang, Qi Zhao |
| A theory of quantum differential equation solvers: limitations and fast-forwarding | TQC 2023 | Jin-Peng Liu, Daochen Wang, Qi Zhao |
| Quantum-accelerated multilevel Monte Carlo methods for stochastic differential equations in mathematical finance | QIP 2021 | Noah Linden, Jin-Peng Liu, Ashley Montanaro, Changpeng Shao, Jiasu Wang |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Jin-Peng Liu | 5 |
| Changpeng Shao | 4 |
| Dominic Berry | 4 |
| Pedro C.S. Costa | 4 |
| Qi Zhao | 4 |
| Lin Lin | 3 |
| Zhong-Xia Shang | 3 |
| Akwum Onwunta | 2 |
| Ashley Montanaro | 2 |
| Daochen Wang | 2 |
| Gengzhi Yang | 2 |
| Jiasu Wang | 2 |
| Naixu Guo | 2 |
| Noah Linden | 2 |
| Ryan Babbush | 2 |
| Alexander M. Dalzell | 1 |
| Andrew Childs | 1 |
| Di Fang | 1 |
| Jiang Hu | 1 |
| Jiayuan Wu | 1 |