1
program role
16
collaborators
2015–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
2 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Secure Software Leasing Without Assumptions | QIP 2021 | regular | Anne Broadbent, Stacey Jeffery, Sébastien Lord, Aarthi Sundaram |
Quantum cryptography is known for enabling functionalities that are unattainable using classical information alone. Recently, Secure Software Leasing (SSL) has emerged as one of these areas of interest. Given a target circuit C from a circuit class, SSL produces an encoding of C which enables the evaluation of C, and also enables a verify procedure, by which the originator of the software becomes convinced that the software is returned --- meaning that the recipient has relinquished the possibility of any further use of the software. Clearly, such functionality is unachievable using classical information alone, since it is impossible to prevent a user from keeping a copy of the software. Recent results have shown the achievability of SSL using quantum information for a class of functions called compute-and-compare (these are a generalization of the well-known point functions). These prior works, however, all make use of setup or computational assumptions. Here, we show that SSL is achievable for compute-and-compare circuits without any assumptions. Our technique is a generic reduction from any quantum message authentication code to such an SSL scheme. Along the way, we also show that point functions can be copy-protected without any assumptions, for a security definition that involves one honest and one malicious evaluator. |
|||
| Symmetries, graph properties, and quantum speedups | QIP 2021 | regular | Shalev Ben-David, Andrew Childs, Andras Pal Gilyen, William Kretschmer, Daochen Wang |
Abstract Aaronson and Ambainis (2009) and Chailloux (2018) showed that fully symmetric (partial) functions do not admit exponential quantum query speedups. This raises a natural question: how symmetric must a function be before it cannot exhibit a large quantum speedup? In this work, we prove that hypergraph symmetries in the adjacency matrix model allow at most a polynomial separation between randomized and quantum query complexities. We also show that, remarkably, permutation groups constructed out of these symmetries are essentially the only permutation groups that prevent super-polynomial quantum speedups. We prove this by fully characterizing the primitive permutation groups that allow super-polynomial quantum speedups. In contrast, in the adjacency list model for bounded-degree graphswhere graph symmetry is manifested differentlywe exhibit a property testing problem that shows an exponential quantum speedup. These results resolve open questions posed by Ambainis, Childs, and Liu (2010) and Montanaro and de Wolf (2013). |
|||
9 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Tweaking Quantum Mechanics to Probe the Space Between BQP and PSPACE | QIP 2026 | ▸David Miloschewsky |
| The role of piracy in quantum proofs | QIP 2025 | Anne Broadbent, Alex Bredariol Grilo, Jamie Sikora |
| Revisiting BQP with Non-Collapsing Measurements | QIP 2025 | David Miloschewsky |
| Are uncloneable proof and advice states strictly necessary? | QIP 2025 | Rohit Chatterjee, Srijita Kundu |
| Secure Software Leasing Without Assumptions | QCRYPT 2021 | Anne Broadbent, Stacey Jeffery, Sébastien Lord, Aarthi Sundaram |
Quantum cryptography is known for enabling functionalities that are unattainable using classical information alone. Recently, Secure Software Leasing (SSL) has emerged as one of these areas of interest. Given a target circuit C from a circuit class, SSL produces an encoding of C that enables a recipient to evaluate C, and also enables the originator of the software to verify that the software has been returned --- meaning that the recipient has relinquished the possibility of any further use of the software. Clearly, such a functionality is unachievable using classical information alone, since it is impossible to prevent a user from keeping a copy of the software. Recent results have shown the achievability of SSL using quantum information for a class of functions called compute-and-compare (these are a generalization of the well-known point functions). These prior works, however all make use of setup or computational assumptions. Here, we show that SSL is achievable for compute-and-compare circuits without any assumptions. Our technique involves the study of quantum copy-protection, which is a notion related to SSL, but where the encoding procedure inherently prevents a would-be quantum software pirate from splitting a single copy of an encoding for C into two parts, each of which enables a user to evaluate C. We show that point functions can be copy-protected without any assumptions, for a novel security definition involving one honest and one malicious evaluator; this is achieved by showing that from any quantum message authentication code, we can derive such an honest-malicious copy-protection scheme. We then show that a generic honest-malicious copy-protection scheme implies SSL; by prior work, this yields SSL for compute-and-compare functions. |
||
| Uncloneable Proofs for QMA | QIP 2019 | Anne Broadbent |
| QMA vs. QCMA via Subset States | TQC 2019 | Anne Broadbent |
| Quantum Query Complexity of Subgraph Isomorphism and Homomorphism | QIP 2016 | Raghav Kulkarni |
One of the most intriguing problem in computer science is the Graph Isomorphism Problem: determining whether two finite graphs are isomorphic. The Subgraph Isomorphism Problem is a generalization of the Graph Isomorphism Problem where one asks whether a graph H is isomorphic to a subgraph of another graph G. Formally, let $H$ be a (non-empty) graph on $n$ vertices, possibly containing isolated vertices.. Let $f_H(G) = 1$ iff the input graph $G$ on $n$ vertices contains $H$ as a (not necessarily induced) subgraph. Let $\alpha_H$ denote the cardinality of a maximum independent set of $H$. In this work we show: \[Q(f_H) = \Omega\left( \sqrt{\alpha_H \cdot n}\right),\] where $Q(f_H)$ denotes the quantum query complexity of $f_H$. As a consequence we obtain a lower bounds for $Q(f_H)$ in terms of several other parameters of $H$ such as the average degree, minimum vertex cover, chromatic number, and the critical probability. We also use the above bound to show that $Q(f_H) = \Omega(n^{3/4})$ for any $H$, improving on the previously best known bound of $\Omega(n^{2/3})$. Until very recently, it was believed that the quantum query complexity is at least square root of the randomized one. Our $\Omega(n^{3/4})$ bound for $Q(f_H)$ matches the square root of the current best known bound for the randomized query complexity of $f_H$, which is $\Omega(n^{3/2})$ due to Gr\"oger. Interestingly, the randomized bound of $\Omega(\alpha_H \cdot n)$ for $f_H$ still remains open. We also study the Subgraph Homomorphism Problem, denoted by $f_{[H]}$, and show that $Q(f_{[H]}) = \Omega(n)$. Finally we extend our results to the $3$-uniform hypergraphs. In particular, we show an $\Omega(n^{4/5})$ bound for quantum query complexity of the Subgraph Isomorphism, improving on the previously known $\Omega(n^{3/4})$ bound. For the Subgraph Homomorphism, we obtain an $\Omega(n^{3/2})$ bound for the same. |
||
| Two Results about Quantum Messages | QIP 2015 | Hartmut Klauck |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| TQC 2024 | program | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Anne Broadbent | 5 |
| Aarthi Sundaram | 2 |
| David Miloschewsky | 2 |
| Stacey Jeffery | 2 |
| Sébastien Lord | 2 |
| Alex Bredariol Grilo | 1 |
| Andras Pal Gilyen | 1 |
| Andrew Childs | 1 |
| Daochen Wang | 1 |
| Hartmut Klauck | 1 |
| Jamie Sikora | 1 |
| Raghav Kulkarni | 1 |
| Rohit Chatterjee | 1 |
| Shalev Ben-David | 1 |
| Srijita Kundu | 1 |
| William Kretschmer | 1 |