2
talks
3
posters
1
committee roles
0
leadership roles
2021–2025
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Symmetries, graph properties, and quantum speedups | QIP 2021 | regular | Shalev Ben-David, Andrew Childs, Andras Gilyen, William Kretschmer, Daochen Wang |
Abstract Aaronson and Ambainis (2009) and Chailloux (2018) showed that fully symmetric (partial) functions do not admit exponential quantum query speedups. This raises a natural question: how symmetric must a function be before it cannot exhibit a large quantum speedup? In this work, we prove that hypergraph symmetries in the adjacency matrix model allow at most a polynomial separation between randomized and quantum query complexities. We also show that, remarkably, permutation groups constructed out of these symmetries are essentially the only permutation groups that prevent super-polynomial quantum speedups. We prove this by fully characterizing the primitive permutation groups that allow super-polynomial quantum speedups. In contrast, in the adjacency list model for bounded-degree graphswhere graph symmetry is manifested differentlywe exhibit a property testing problem that shows an exponential quantum speedup. These results resolve open questions posed by Ambainis, Childs, and Liu (2010) and Montanaro and de Wolf (2013). |
|||
| Secure Software Leasing Without Assumptions | QIP 2021 | regular | Anne Broadbent, Stacey Jeffery, Sébastien Lord, Aarthi Sundaram |
Quantum cryptography is known for enabling functionalities that are unattainable using classical information alone. Recently, Secure Software Leasing (SSL) has emerged as one of these areas of interest. Given a target circuit C from a circuit class, SSL produces an encoding of C which enables the evaluation of C, and also enables a verify procedure, by which the originator of the software becomes convinced that the software is returned --- meaning that the recipient has relinquished the possibility of any further use of the software. Clearly, such functionality is unachievable using classical information alone, since it is impossible to prevent a user from keeping a copy of the software. Recent results have shown the achievability of SSL using quantum information for a class of functions called compute-and-compare (these are a generalization of the well-known point functions). These prior works, however, all make use of setup or computational assumptions. Here, we show that SSL is achievable for compute-and-compare circuits without any assumptions. Our technique is a generic reduction from any quantum message authentication code to such an SSL scheme. Along the way, we also show that point functions can be copy-protected without any assumptions, for a security definition that involves one honest and one malicious evaluator. |
|||
Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Are uncloneable proof and advice states strictly necessary? | QIP 2025 | Rohit Chatterjee, Srijita Kundu |
| The role of piracy in quantum proofs | QIP 2025 | Anne Broadbent, Alex Grilo, Jamie Sikora |
| Revisiting BQP with Non-Collapsing Measurements | QIP 2025 | David Miloschewsky |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| TQC 2024 | PC | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Anne Broadbent | 2 |
| Aarthi Sundaram | 1 |
| Alex Grilo | 1 |
| Andras Gilyen | 1 |
| Andrew Childs | 1 |
| Daochen Wang | 1 |
| David Miloschewsky | 1 |
| Jamie Sikora | 1 |
| Rohit Chatterjee | 1 |
| Shalev Ben-David | 1 |
| Srijita Kundu | 1 |
| Stacey Jeffery | 1 |
| Sébastien Lord | 1 |
| William Kretschmer | 1 |