2
program roles
1
organizing role
105
collaborators
2012–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
22 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Efficient Quantum Optimization via Dynamical Simulation ↗
|
QIP 2026 | regular | ▸Ahmet Burak Catli, Sophia Simon |
We provide several quantum algorithms for continuous optimization that do not require gradient estimation. Instead, we encode the optimization problem into the dynamics of a physical system and coherently simulate the time evolution. Our first two algorithms can find local optima of a differentiable function $f: \mathbb{R}^N \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ by simulating either classical or quantum dynamics with friction via a time-dependent Hamiltonian. We show that for the benchmark problem of optimizing a locally quadratic objective function, these methods require a total of $O(N^2\kappa^2/h_x^2\epsilon)$ queries to a phase oracle to find an $\epsilon$-approximate local optimum, where $\kappa$ is the condition number of the Hessian matrix and $h_x$ is the discretization spacing. In contrast, we show that methods based on gradient descent require $O(N^{3/2}(1/\epsilon)^{\kappa \log(3)/4})$ queries. This corresponds to an exponential separation between the query upper bounds for the benchmark problem. Our third algorithm can find the global optimum of $f$ by preparing a classical low-temperature thermal state via simulation of the classical Liouvillian operator associated with the Nosé Hamiltonian. We use results from the quantum thermodynamics literature to bound the thermalization time for the discrete system. Additionally, we analyze barren plateau effects that commonly plague quantum optimization algorithms and observe that our approach is vastly less sensitive to this problem than standard gradient-based optimization. Our results suggests that these dynamical optimization approaches may be far more scalable for future quantum machine learning, optimization and variational experiments than was widely believed. |
|||
| Exponentially Improved Product Formulae using Extrapolation | QIP 2025 | regular | Jacob Watkins, James Watson, Gumaro Rendon |
| Exponential quantum speedup in simulating coupled classical oscillators | QIP 2024 | plenary_short | ▸Rolando Somma, Ryan Babbush, Dominic Berry, Robin Kothari |
| Entanglement area law for 1D gauge theories and bosonic systems | QIP 2023 | regular ▸ presenter | Nilin Abrahamsen, Ning Bao, Yuan Su, Yu Tong |
| Quantifying Quantum Advantage in Topological Data Analysis | QIP 2023 | regular | Dominic Berry, Yuan Su, Casper Gyurik, Robbie King, Joao Basso, Alexander Barba, Abhishek Rajput, ▸Vedran Dunjko, Ryan Babbush |
| Nearly Optimal Quantum Algorithms for Estimating Multiple Expectation Values | TQC 2022 | regular | ▸William Huggins, Kianna Wan, Jarrod McClean, Thomas O'Brien, Ryan Babbush |
| Training quantum neural networks with an unbounded loss function | TQC 2022 | regular | ▸Carlos Ortiz Marrero, Mária Kieferová |
| Efficient quantum computation of chemistry through tensor hypercontraction | QIP 2021 | regular | Joonho Lee, Dominic Berry, Craig Gidney, William Huggins, Jarrod McClean, Ryan Babbush |
Abstract We show how to achieve the highest efficiency yet for simulations with arbitrary basis sets by using a representation of the Coulomb operator known as tensor hypercontraction (THC). We use THC to express the Coulomb operator in a non-orthogonal basis, which we are able to block encode by separately rotating each term with angles that are obtained via QROM. Our algorithm has the best complexity scaling for an arbitrary basis, as well as the best complexity for the specific case of FeMoCo. By optimising the surface code resources, we show that FeMoCo can be simulated using about 4 million physical qubits and 3.5 days of runtime, assuming 1 s cycle times and physical gate error rates no worse than 0.1%. |
|||
| Compilation of Fault-Tolerant Quantum Heuristics for Combinatorial Optimization | QIP 2021 | regular | Yuval Rishu Sanders, Dominic Berry, Pedro C.S. Costa, Louis Tessler, Craig Gidney, Hartmut Neven, Ryan Babbush |
Abstract We compile explicit circuits and evaluate the computational cost for heuristic-based quantum algorithms for combinatorial optimization. We consider several variants of quantum-accelerated simulated annealing as well as adiabatic algorithms, quantum-enhanced population transfer, the quantum approximate optimization algorithm, and other approaches. We provide novel methods for executing the bottleneck subroutines for these heuristics, and our methods can easily be applied to other algorithms where numerical performance matters. We estimate how quickly the subroutines could be executed on a modestly sized superconducting-qubit-based quantum computer with surface code error correction. We conclude that quadratic speedups for heuristic-based quantum optimization algorithms are insufficient for early quantum computers to beat present day classical computers. |
|||
| Even more efficient quantum computations of chemistry through tensor hypercontraction | TQC 2021 | regular | Joonho Lee, ▸Dominic Berry, Craig Gidney, William Huggins, Jarrod McClean, Ryan Babbush |
| Entanglement Induced Barren Plateaus | TQC 2021 | regular | ▸Carlos Ortiz Marrero, Mária Kieferová |
| A Theory of Trotter Error | QIP 2020 | regular | Andrew Childs, Yuan Su, Minh Cong Tran, Shuchen Zhu |
| Well-conditioned multiproduct Hamiltonian simulation | QIP 2020 | regular | Guang Hao Low, Vadym Kliuchnikov |
| Efficient and Noise Resilient Measurements for Quantum Chemistry on Near-Term Quantum Computers | QIP 2020 | regular | William Huggins, Jarrod McClean, Nicholas Rubin, Zhang Jiang, K. Birgitta Whaley, Ryan Babbush |
| Quantum singular value transformation and beyond: exponential improvements for quantum matrix arithmetics | QIP 2019 | regular | Andras Pal Gilyen, Yuan Su, Guang Hao Low |
| Simulating correlated electrons in the surface code with a single T-factory | QIP 2019 | regular | ▸Ryan Babbush, Craig Gidney, Dominic Berry, Jarrod McClean, Alexandru Paler, Austin Fowler, Hartmut Neven |
| Hamiltonian simulation in the interaction picture | QIP 2019 | regular | ▸Guang Hao Low |
| Quantum simulation of chemistry with sublinear scaling in basis size | QIP 2019 | regular | ▸Dominic Berry, Mária Kieferová, Artur Scherer, Yuval Rishu Sanders, Guang Hao Low, Jarrod McClean, Craig Gidney, Hartmut Neven, Ryan Babbush |
| Bayesian ACRONYM Tuning | TQC 2019 | regular | John Gamble, Christopher E. Granade |
| Low Depth Quantum Simulation of Electronic Structure | QIP 2018 | regular | ▸Ryan Babbush, Jarrod McClean, James McClain, Hartmut Neven, Garnet Kin-Lic Chan |
| Quantum Simulation of Electronic Structure with Linear Depth and Connectivity | TQC 2018 | regular | Ian Kivlichan, Jarrod McClean, Craig Gidney, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, Garnet Kin-Lic Chan, Ryan Babbush |
| Robust Online Hamiltonian Learning | TQC 2013 | regular | Christopher E. Granade, Christopher Ferrie, David Cory |
34 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Simulating Time Dependent and Nonlinear Classical Oscillators through Nonlinear Schrödingerization | QIP 2026 | ▸Abhinav Muraleedharan |
| Fullqubit alchemist: Quantum algorithm for alchemical free energy calculations | QIP 2026 | ▸Po-Wei Huang, Gregory Boyd, Gian-Luca R. Anselmetti, Matthias Degroote, Nikolaj Moll, Raffaele Santagati, Michael Streif, Benjamin Ries, Hamza Jnane, Daniel Marti-Dafcik, Sophia Simon, Thomas Bromley, Balint Koczor |
| Dividing and Conquering the Van Vleck Catastrophe | QIP 2026 | ▸Sophia Simon, Gian-Luca R. Anselmetti, Raffaele Santagati, Matthias Degroote, Nikolaj Moll, Michael Streif |
| Quantum supervised learning with springs and sticks | TQC 2026 | ▸Luis Mantilla, Abhinav Muraleedharan, Alán Aspuru-Guzik |
In this work we introduce the quantum springs and sticks (QSS) model, a quantum machine learning model that performs supervised learning with an exponential amount of degrees of freedom. The model is based on the springs and sticks model, a classical mechanical system that uses coupled oscillators and dissipation to perform non-linear regression. We map the dynamics to a time-dependent Hamiltonian, which uses the Caldirola–Kanai parametrization to simulate dissipation through unitary evolution. Then, the solution to the supervised learning problem can be extracted via a spectral decomposition. Finally, we simulate our algorithm on simple regression tasks using time-dependent Trotterization, and compare it to the classical Langevin-dynamics version of such algorithm. |
||
| Fullqubit alchemist: Quantum algorithm for alchemical free energy calculations | TQC 2026 | ▸Po-Wei Huang, Gregory Boyd, Gian-Luca R. Anselmetti, Matthias Degroote, Nikolaj Moll, Raffaele Santagati, Michael Streif, Benjamin Ries, Daniel Marti-Dafcik, Hamza Jnane, Sophia Simon, Thomas Bromley, Balint Koczor |
Accurately computing the free energies of biological processes is a cornerstone of computer-aided drug design, but it is a daunting task. The need to sample vast conformational spaces and account for entropic contributions makes the estimation of binding free energies very expensive. While classical methods, such as thermodynamic integration and alchemical free energy calculations, have significantly contributed to reducing computational costs, they still face limitations in terms of efficiency and scalability. We tackle this through a quantum algorithm for the estimation of free energy differences by adapting the existing Liouvillian approach and introducing several key algorithmic improvements. We directly implement the Liouvillian operator and provide an efficient description of electronic forces acting on both nuclear and electronic particles on the quantum ground state potential energy surface. This leads to super-polynomial runtime scaling improvements in the precision of our Liouvillian simulation approach and quadratic improvements in the scaling with the number of particles relative to prior quantum algorithms. Second, our algorithm calculates free energy differences via a fully quantum implementation of thermodynamic integration and alchemy, thereby foregoing expensive entropy estimation subroutines used in prior works. Our results open new avenues towards the application of quantum computers in drug discovery. |
||
| Simulating Time Dependent and Nonlinear Classical Oscillators through Nonlinear Schrödingerization | TQC 2026 | Abhinav Muraleedharan |
We present quantum algorithms for simulating the dynamics of a broad class of classical oscillator systems containing 2^n coupled oscillators (Eg: 2^n masses coupled by springs), including those with time-dependent forces, time- varying stiffness matrices, and weak nonlinear interactions. This generaliza- tion of the Harmonic oscillator simulation algorithm is achieved through an approach that we call “Nonlinear Schrödingerization”, which involves reduction of the dynamical system to a nonlinear Schrödinger equation and then reduced to a time-independent Schrodinger Equation through perturbative techniques. The linearization of the equation is performed using an approach that allows the dynamics of a nonlinear Schrödinger equation to be approximated as a linear Schrödinger equation in a higher dimensional space. This allows Hamiltonian Simulation algorithms to be applied to simulate the dynamics of resulting sys- tem. When the properties of the classical dynamical systems can be efficiently queried, and when the initial state can be efficiently prepared, the complexity of our quantum algorithm is polynomial in n, and almost linear in evolution time for most dynamical systems. Our work extends the applicability of quan- tum algorithms to simulate the dynamics of non-conservative and nonlinear classical systems, addressing key limitations in previous approaches |
||
| Efficient Quantum Simulation Algorithms in the Path Integral Formulation | QIP 2025 | Serene Shum |
| Efficient Quantum Algorithm for Differential Equations under Constraints and Boundary Conditions | QIP 2025 | Philipp Schleich, Tyler Darius Kharazi, Xiang-Yu Li, Jin-Peng Liu, Alán Aspuru-Guzik |
| Application-level benchmarking of trapped ion platforms using non-local games | QIP 2025 | Anton Trong Than, Jim Furches, Henry Luo, Liudmila Zhukas, Xingxin Liu, Sarah Chehade, Kathleen Hamilton, Alaina Marie Green, Carlos Marrero Ortiz, Christopher Monroe, Norbert Linke |
| Quantum Thermal State Preparation via Repeated Interactions | QIP 2025 | Matthew Hagan |
| Quantum advantage in convex optimization via time-dependent hamiltonian simulation in the interaction picture | QIP 2025 | Ahmet Burak Catli, Sophia Simon |
| Variational Methods for Computing Non-Local Quantum Strategies | QIP 2024 | Jim Furches, Carlos Ortiz Marrero |
| Hamiltonian Learning via Shadow Tomography of Pseudo-Choi States | QIP 2024 | Juan Castaneda |
| Improved precision scaling for simulating coupled quantum-classical dynamics | QIP 2024 | Sophia Simon, Raffaele Santagati, Matthias Degroote, Nikolaj Moll, Michael Streif |
| Quantum wavelet transforms and fast quantum algorithm for differential equations | QIP 2024 | Mohsen Bagherimehrab, Kouhei Nakaji, Alán Aspuru-Guzik |
| Quantum Algorithm for Initial and Boundary Value Problems | QIP 2024 | Philipp Schleich, Alán Aspuru-Guzik |
| Generalized Quantum Signal Processing | QIP 2024 | Danial Motlagh |
| Doubling efficiency of Hamiltonian simulation via Generalized Quantum Signal Processing | TQC 2024 | Dominic Berry, Danial Motlagh, Giacomo Pantaleoni |
| Quantum Simulation of Lindbladian Dynamics via Repeated Interactions | TQC 2024 | Matthew Pocrnic, Dvira Segal |
| Generating Approximate Ground States of Molecules using Using Quantum Machine Learning | QIP 2023 | Jack Ceroni, Torin Stetina, Mária Kieferová, Carlos Ortiz Marrero, Juan Miguel Arrazola |
| Interpolation of Trotter data for eigenvalue and expectation value estimation | QIP 2023 | Gumaro Rendon, Jacob Watkins |
| Analytically Realizing Hybrid Boson-Qubit Operations via Hamiltonian Simulation Techniques | QIP 2023 | Christopher Kang, Micheline Soley, Eleanor Crane, Steven M. Girvin |
| Quantum Error Correction with Gauge Symmetries | QIP 2023 | Abhishek Rajput, Alessandro Roggero |
| Entanglement Induced Barren Plateaus | QIP 2021 | Carlos Ortiz Marrero, Mária Kieferová |
| Time-dependent Hamiltonian simulation with L1-norm scaling | QIP 2020 | Dominic Berry, Andrew Childs, Yuan Su, Xin Wang |
| Generative training of quantum Boltzmann machines with hidden units | QIP 2020 | Leonard Wossnig |
| Optimizing quantum optimization algorithms via faster quantum gradient computation | QIP 2019 | Andras Pal Gilyen, Srinivasan Arunachalam, Arjan Cornelissen |
| Optimizing quantum optimization algorithms via faster quantum gradient computation | QIP 2018 | Srinivasan Arunachalam, Andras Pal Gilyen |
| Bounding the costs of quantum simulation of many-body physics in real space | QIP 2017 | Ian Kivlichan, Ryan Babbush, Alán Aspuru-Guzik |
| Quantum Bootstrapping via Compressed Hamiltonian Learning | QIP 2015 | Christopher E. Granade, David Cory |
| Coherently Controlled Quantum Adiabatic Evolutions | QIP 2014 | Mária Kieferová |
| Floating Point Representations in Quantum Circuit Synthesis | QIP 2014 | Vadym Kliuchnikov |
| Quantum Data Fitting | QIP 2013 | Daniel Braun, Seth Lloyd |
| Designing quantum circuits for efficient many-body quantum simulation | QIP 2012 | Sadegh Raeisi, Barry Sanders |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| TQC 2024 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2020 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2017 | organizing | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Ryan Babbush | 12 |
| Dominic Berry | 9 |
| Jarrod McClean | 8 |
| Alán Aspuru-Guzik | 6 |
| Craig Gidney | 6 |
| Mária Kieferová | 6 |
| Sophia Simon | 6 |
| Carlos Ortiz Marrero | 5 |
| Yuan Su | 5 |
| Guang Hao Low | 4 |
| Hartmut Neven | 4 |
| Matthias Degroote | 4 |
| Michael Streif | 4 |
| Nikolaj Moll | 4 |
| Raffaele Santagati | 4 |
| William Huggins | 4 |
| Abhinav Muraleedharan | 3 |
| Andras Pal Gilyen | 3 |
| Christopher E. Granade | 3 |
| Gian-Luca R. Anselmetti | 3 |