21
talks
17
committee roles
3
leadership roles
2013–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Better completeness for QMA ↗ | QIP 2026 | regular | Scott Aaronson, Freek Witteveen |
A long-standing open problem in quantum complexity theory is whether QMA has perfect completeness, i.e. whether any QMA verifier can be made to have completeness $c=1$. Previous constructions have yielded a completeness parameter exponentially close to 1. We improve this to
doubly-exponentially close to 1. Additionally, we show that QMA has perfect completeness if one allows the verifier an infinite-dimensional (witness) space. We show that this can be achieved using a gate set which is such that the ability to use an infinite-dimensional space does not increase the computational power of QMA.
We also show that when using a finite-dimensional space of polynomially many qubits, a completeness doubly-exponentially close to 1 is optimal among black-box constructions. We show that the soundness can at most be made exponentially small using black-box reductions. |
|||
|
The Compressed Oracle is a Worthy (Multiplicative) Adversary ↗
|
QIP 2026 | regular | Sebastian Zur |
The compressed oracle technique, introduced in the context of quantum cryptanalysis, is the latest method for proving quantum query lower bounds, and has had an impressive number of applications since its introduction, due in part to the ease of importing classical lower bound intuition into the quantum setting via this method. Previously, the main quantum query lower bound methods were the polynomial method, the adversary method, and the multiplicative adversary method, and their relative powers were well understood. In this work, we situate the compressed oracle technique within this established landscape, by showing that it is a special case of the multiplicative adversary method. To accomplish this, we introduce a simplified restriction of the multiplicative adversary method, the MLADV method, that remains powerful enough to capture the polynomial method and exhibit a strong direct product theorem, but is much simpler to reason about. We show that the compressed oracle technique is also captured by the MLADV method. This might make the MLADV method a promising direction in the current quest to extend the compressed oracle technique to non-product distributions. |
|||
|
A Quantum Time-Space Tradeoff for Directed st-Connectivity ↗
|
QIP 2026 | regular | Galina Pass |
Directed $st$-connectivity (DSTCON) is the problem of deciding if there exists a directed path between a pair of distinguished vertices $s$ and $t$ in an input directed graph. This problem appears in many algorithmic applications, and is also a fundamental problem in complexity theory, due to its ${\sf NL}$-completeness. We show that for any $S\geq \log^2(n)$, there is a quantum algorithm for DSTCON using space $S$ and time $T\leq 2^{\frac{1}{2}\log(n)\log(n/S)+o(\log^2(n))}$, which is an (up to quadratic) improvement over the best classical algorithm for any $S=o(\sqrt{n})$. Of the $S$ total space used by our algorithm, only $O(\log^2(n))$ is quantum space -- the rest is classical. This effectively means that we can tradeoff classical space for quantum time. |
|||
| An Improved Quantum Algorithm for 3-Tuple Lattice Sieving | QIP 2026 | regular | Lynn Engelberts, Yanlin Chen, Amin Shiraz Gilani, Maya-Iggy van Hoof, Ronald de Wolf |
The assumed hardness of the Shortest Vector Problem in high-dimensional lattices is one of the cornerstones of post-quantum cryptography. The fastest known heuristic attacks on SVP are via so-called sieving methods. While these still take exponential time in the dimension $d$, they are significantly faster than non-heuristic approaches and their heuristic assumptions are verified by extensive experiments. $k$-Tuple sieving is an iterative method where each iteration takes as input a large number of lattice vectors of a certain norm, and produces an equal number of lattice vectors of slightly smaller norm, by taking sums and differences of $k$ of the input vectors. Iterating these ``sieving steps'' sufficiently many times produces a short lattice vector. The fastest attacks (both classical and quantum) are for $k=2$, but taking larger $k$ reduces the amount of memory required for the attack. In this paper we improve the quantum time complexity of 3-tuple sieving from $2^{0.3098 d}$ to $2^{0.2846 d}$, using a two-level amplitude amplification aided by a preprocessing step that associates the given lattice vectors with nearby ``center points'' to focus the search on the neighborhoods of these center points. Our algorithm uses $2^{0.1887d}$ classical bits and QCRAM bits, and $2^{o(d)}$ qubits. This is the fastest known quantum algorithm for SVP when total memory is limited to $2^{0.1887d}$. |
|||
| Composing Quantum Algorithms | TQC 2025 | invited ▸ presenter | — |
| Taming Quantum Time Complexity | TQC 2024 | regular | ▸Aleksandrs Belovs, Duyal Yolcu |
Quantum query complexity has several nice properties with respect to composition. First, bounded-error quantum query algorithms can be composed without incurring log factors through error reduction (emphexactness). Second, through careful accounting (emphthriftiness), the total query complexity is smaller if subroutines are mostly run on cheaper inputs – a property that is much less obvious in quantum algorithms than in their classical counterparts. While these properties were previously seen through the model of span programs (alternatively, the dual adversary bound), a recent work by two of the authors (Belovs, Yolcu 2023) showed how to achieve these benefits without converting to span programs, by defining emphquantum Las Vegas query complexity. Independently, recent works, including by one of the authors (Jeffery 2022), have worked towards bringing thriftiness to the more practically significant setting of quantum emphtime complexity. In this work, we show how to achieve both exactness and thriftiness in the setting of time complexity. We generalize the quantum subroutine composition results of Jeffery 2022 so that, in particular, no error reduction is needed. We give a time complexity version of the well-known result in quantum query complexity, Q(fcirc g)=ØO(Q(f)cdot Q(g)), without log factors. We achieve this by employing a novel approach to the design of quantum algorithms based on what we call emphtransducers, and which we think is of large independent interest. While a span program is a completely different computational model, a transducer is a direct generalisation of a quantum algorithm, which allows for much greater transparency and control. Transducers naturally characterize general state conversion, rather than only decision problems; provide a very simple treatment of other quantum primitives such as quantum walks; and lend themselves well to time complexity analysis. |
|||
| Quantum Subroutine Composition | QIP 2023 | regular ▸ presenter | — |
| Multidimensional Quantum Walks, with Application to k-Distinctness | QIP 2023 | plenary_short | ▸Sebastian Zur |
| Secure Software Leasing Without Assumptions | QIP 2021 | regular | Anne Broadbent, Sébastien Lord, Supartha Podder, Aarthi Sundaram |
Quantum cryptography is known for enabling functionalities that are unattainable using classical information alone. Recently, Secure Software Leasing (SSL) has emerged as one of these areas of interest. Given a target circuit C from a circuit class, SSL produces an encoding of C which enables the evaluation of C, and also enables a verify procedure, by which the originator of the software becomes convinced that the software is returned --- meaning that the recipient has relinquished the possibility of any further use of the software. Clearly, such functionality is unachievable using classical information alone, since it is impossible to prevent a user from keeping a copy of the software. Recent results have shown the achievability of SSL using quantum information for a class of functions called compute-and-compare (these are a generalization of the well-known point functions). These prior works, however, all make use of setup or computational assumptions. Here, we show that SSL is achievable for compute-and-compare circuits without any assumptions. Our technique is a generic reduction from any quantum message authentication code to such an SSL scheme. Along the way, we also show that point functions can be copy-protected without any assumptions, for a security definition that involves one honest and one malicious evaluator. |
|||
| Secure Multi-party Quantum Computation with a Dishonest Majority | QCRYPT 2020 | regular | Yfke Dulek, Alex Grilo, Christian Majenz, Christian Schaffner |
| Quadratic speedup for finding marked vertices by quantum walks | QIP 2020 | regular | Andris Ambainis, Andras Gilyen, Mārtiņš Kokainis |
| On Quantum Chosen-Ciphertext Attacks and Learning with Errors | TQC 2019 | regular | Gorjan Alagic, Maris Ozols, Alexander Poremba |
| Verifier-on-a-Leash: new schemes for verifiable delegated quantum computation, with quasilinear resources | QCRYPT 2018 | invited ▸ presenter | — |
| On the power of non-adaptive quantum chosen-ciphertext attacks | QCRYPT 2018 | regular | Gorjan Alagic, Maris Ozols, ▸Alexander Poremba |
| Verifier-on-a-Leash: new schemes for verifiable delegated quantum computation, with quasilinear resources | QIP 2018 | regular | ▸Andrea Coladangelo, Alex Bredariol Grilo, Thomas Vidick |
| Quantum homomorphic encryption for circuits of low T-gate complexity | QIP 2016 | regular | ▸Anne Broadbent |
| Quantum communication complexity distributed set joins | TQC 2016 | regular ▸ presenter | — |
| NAND-trees graph connectivity quantum algorithms | TQC 2016 | regular ▸ presenter | — |
| Quantum homomorphic encryption for circuits of low T-gate complexity | QCRYPT 2015 | regular | Anne Broadbent |
| Nested quantum walk | QIP 2014 | regular | ▸Andrew Childs, Robin Kothari, Frédéric Magniez |
| Circuit Obfuscation Using Braids | TQC 2014 | regular | Gorjan Alagic, Stephen Jordan |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2026 | SC | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2022 | SC | member | — |
| QIP 2022 | PC | chair | — |
| TQC 2022 | SC | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2021 | SC | member | — |
| TQC 2021 | SC | chair | Chair |
| QCRYPT 2020 | SC | member | — |
| TQC 2020 | SC | member | — |
| QIP 2019 | PC | member | — |
| TQC 2019 | SC | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2018 | PC | member | — |
| QIP 2018 | PC | member | — |
| TQC 2018 | PC | chair | — |
| QCRYPT 2017 | PC | member | — |
| QIP 2017 | PC | member | — |
| TQC 2016 | PC | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2013 | Local | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Anne Broadbent | 3 |
| Gorjan Alagic | 3 |
| Alexander Poremba | 2 |
| Maris Ozols | 2 |
| Sebastian Zur | 2 |
| Aarthi Sundaram | 1 |
| Aleksandrs Belovs | 1 |
| Alex Bredariol Grilo | 1 |
| Alex Grilo | 1 |
| Amin Shiraz Gilani | 1 |
| Andras Gilyen | 1 |
| Andrea Coladangelo | 1 |
| Andrew Childs | 1 |
| Andris Ambainis | 1 |
| Christian Majenz | 1 |
| Christian Schaffner | 1 |
| Duyal Yolcu | 1 |
| Freek Witteveen | 1 |
| Frédéric Magniez | 1 |
| Galina Pass | 1 |