1
program role
23
collaborators
2020–2025
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
3 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum Algorithms for Sampling Log-Concave Distributions and Estimating Normalizing Constants | QIP 2023 | regular | ▸Andrew Childs, Tongyang Li, Jin-Peng Liu, Chunhao Wang |
| New Approaches for Quantum Copy-Protection | TQC 2021 | invited | Scott Aaronson, ▸Jiahui Liu, Qipeng Liu, Mark Zhandry |
| On Quantum Complexity for Closest Pair and Orthogonal Vectors | TQC 2020 | regular ▸ presenter | Scott Aaronson, Nai-Hui Chia, Han-Hsuan Lin, Chunhao Wang |
The closest pair problem is a fundamental problem of computational geometry: given a set of $n$ points in a $d$-dimensional space, find a pair with the smallest distance. A classical algorithm taught in introductory courses solves this problem in $O(n\log n)$ time in constant dimensions (i.e., when $d=O(1)$). This paper asks and answers the question of the problem’s quantum {time} complexity. Specifically, we give an $\tilde{O}(n^{2/3})$ algorithm in constant dimensions, which is optimal up to a polylogarithmic factor by the lower bound on the quantum query complexity of element distinctness. The key to our algorithm is an efficient history-independent data structure that supports quantum interference. In $\text{polylog}(n)$ dimensions, no known quantum algorithms perform better than brute force search, with a quadratic speedup provided by Grover’s algorithm. To give evidence that the quadratic speedup is nearly optimal, we initiate the study of quantum fine-grained complexity and introduce the \emph{Quantum Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (QSETH)}, which is based on the assumption that Grover’s algorithm is optimal for \textsf{CNF-SAT} when the clause width is large. We show that the na\”{i}ve Grover approach to closest pair in higher dimensions is optimal up to an $n^{o(1)}$ factor unless QSETH is false. We also study the bichromatic closest pair problem and the orthogonal vectors problem, with broadly similar results. |
|||
6 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Quantum Multiple Eigenvalue Gaussian filtered Search: an efficient and versatile quantum phase estimation method | QIP 2025 | Zhiyan Ding, Haoya Li, Lin Lin, Hongkang Ni, Lexing Ying |
| Revisiting Quantum Algorithms for Linear Regressions: Quadratic Speedups without Data-Dependent Parameters | QIP 2025 | Zhao Song, Junze Yin |
| Quantum algorithm for ground state energy estimation using circuit depth with exponentially improved dependence on precision | QIP 2023 | Guoming Wang, Daniel Stilck França, Shuchen Zhu, Peter Johnson |
| QAOA for Network Flow Problems | QIP 2020 | Andrew Potter, Yuxuan Zhang |
| On Quantum Complexity for Closest Pair and Orthogonal Vectors | QIP 2020 | Nai-Hui Chia, Han-Hsuan Lin, Chunhao Wang |
| Quantum Copy-Protection from Hidden Subspaces | QIP 2020 | Jiahui Liu |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| TQC 2025 | program | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Chunhao Wang | 3 |
| Han-Hsuan Lin | 2 |
| Jiahui Liu | 2 |
| Nai-Hui Chia | 2 |
| Scott Aaronson | 2 |
| Andrew Childs | 1 |
| Andrew Potter | 1 |
| Daniel Stilck França | 1 |
| Guoming Wang | 1 |
| Haoya Li | 1 |
| Hongkang Ni | 1 |
| Jin-Peng Liu | 1 |
| Junze Yin | 1 |
| Lexing Ying | 1 |
| Lin Lin | 1 |
| Mark Zhandry | 1 |
| Peter Johnson | 1 |
| Qipeng Liu | 1 |
| Shuchen Zhu | 1 |
| Tongyang Li | 1 |