29
collaborators
2019–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
4 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum Algorithms on Edge Lists: Hiding, Shuffling, and Cycle Finding | TQC 2026 | regular | Amin Shiraz Gilani, Pei Wu, ▸Xingyu Zhou |
The edge list model is arguably the simplest input model for graphs, where the graph is specified by a list of its edges. In this model, we study the quantum query complexity of three variants of the triangle finding problem. The first asks whether there exists a triangle containing a target edge and raises general questions about the hiding of a problem's input among irrelevant data. The second asks whether there exists a triangle containing a target vertex and raises general questions about the shuffling of a problem's input. The third asks whether there exists a triangle; this problem bridges the $3$-distinctness and $3$-sum problems, which have been extensively studied by both cryptographers and complexity theorists. We provide tight or nearly tight results for these problems as well as some first answers to the general questions they raise. Furthermore, given any graph with low maximum degree, such as a typical random sparse graph, we prove that the quantum query complexity of finding a length-$k$ cycle in its length-$m$ edge list is $m^{3/4-1/(2^{k+2}-4)\pm o(1)}$, which matches the best-known upper bound for the quantum query complexity of $k$-distinctness on length-$m$ inputs up to an $m^{o(1)}$ factor. We prove the lower bound by developing new techniques within Zhandry's recording query framework [CRYPTO '19] as generalized by Hamoudi and Magniez [ToCT '23]. These techniques extend the framework to treat any non-product distribution that results from conditioning a product distribution on the absence of rare events. We prove the upper bound by adapting Belovs's learning graph algorithm for $k$-distinctness [FOCS '12]. Finally, assuming a plausible conjecture concerning only cycle finding, we show that the lower bound can be lifted to an essentially tight lower bound on the quantum query complexity of $k$-distinctness, which is a long-standing open question. |
|||
| Evaluating the security of CRYSTALS-Dilithium in the quantum random oracle model | QIP 2025 | regular | Kelsey A. Jackson, Carl Miller |
| Quantum divide and conquer | QIP 2023 | regular | ▸Andrew Childs, Robin Kothari, Matt Kovacs-Deak, Aarthi Sundaram |
| Symmetries, graph properties, and quantum speedups | QIP 2021 | regular | Shalev Ben-David, Andrew Childs, Andras Pal Gilyen, William Kretschmer, Supartha Podder |
Abstract Aaronson and Ambainis (2009) and Chailloux (2018) showed that fully symmetric (partial) functions do not admit exponential quantum query speedups. This raises a natural question: how symmetric must a function be before it cannot exhibit a large quantum speedup? In this work, we prove that hypergraph symmetries in the adjacency matrix model allow at most a polynomial separation between randomized and quantum query complexities. We also show that, remarkably, permutation groups constructed out of these symmetries are essentially the only permutation groups that prevent super-polynomial quantum speedups. We prove this by fully characterizing the primitive permutation groups that allow super-polynomial quantum speedups. In contrast, in the adjacency list model for bounded-degree graphswhere graph symmetry is manifested differentlywe exhibit a property testing problem that shows an exponential quantum speedup. These results resolve open questions posed by Ambainis, Childs, and Liu (2010) and Montanaro and de Wolf (2013). |
|||
12 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Hiding, Shuffling, and Cycle Finding: Quantum Algorithms on Edge Lists | QIP 2026 | ▸Amin Shiraz Gilani, Pei Wu, Xingyu Zhou |
| On the Rational Degree of Boolean Functions and Applications | QIP 2025 | Siddhartha Jain, Vishnu Iyer, Matt Kovacs-Deak, Robin Kothari, Vinayak Kumar, Luke Schaeffer, Michael Whitmeyer |
| Bounds on the Rational Degree of Boolean Functions with Applications | QIP 2024 | Vishnu Iyer, Siddhartha Jain, Vinayak Kumar, Michael Whitmeyer, Matt Kovacs-Deak, Luke Schaeffer |
| Lattice-Based Quantum Advantage from Rotated Measurements | QCRYPT 2023 | Yusuf Alnawakhtha, Atul Mantri, Carl Miller |
Trapdoor claw-free functions (TCFs) are immensely valuable in cryptographic interactions between a classical client and a quantum server. Typically, a protocol has the quantum server prepare a superposition of two-bit strings of a claw and then measure it using Pauli-X or Z measurements. In this paper, we demonstrate a new technique that uses the entire range of qubit measurements from the XY-plane. We show the advantage of this approach in two applications. First, building on (Brakerski et al. 2018, Kalai et al. 2022), we show an optimized two-round proof of quantumness whose security can be expressed directly in terms of the hardness of the LWE (learning with errors) problem. Second, we construct a one-round protocol for blind remote preparation of an arbitrary state on the XY-plane up to a Pauli-Z correction. |
||
| A theory of quantum differential equation solvers: limitations and fast-forwarding | QIP 2023 | Dong An, Jin-Peng Liu, Qi Zhao |
| Lattice-Based Quantum Advantage from Rotated Measurements | QIP 2023 | Yusuf Alnawakhtha, Atul Mantri, Carl Miller |
| A theory of quantum differential equation solvers: limitations and fast-forwarding | TQC 2023 | Dong An, Jin-Peng Liu, Qi Zhao |
| Lattice-Based Quantum Advantage from Rotated Measurements | TQC 2023 | Carl Miller, Yusuf Alnawakhtha, Atul Mantri |
| Efficient quantum measurement of Pauli operators | QIP 2020 | Ophelia Crawford, Barnaby van Straaten, Thomas Parks, Earl Campbell, Stephen Brierley |
| Simulating quantum circuits by classical circuits | QIP 2020 | — |
| A Generalised Variational Quantum Eigensolver | QIP 2019 | Oscar Higgott, Stephen Brierley |
| Variational Quantum Computation of Excited States | QIP 2019 | Oscar Higgott, Stephen Brierley |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Carl Miller | 4 |
| Atul Mantri | 3 |
| Matt Kovacs-Deak | 3 |
| Stephen Brierley | 3 |
| Yusuf Alnawakhtha | 3 |
| Amin Shiraz Gilani | 2 |
| Andrew Childs | 2 |
| Dong An | 2 |
| Jin-Peng Liu | 2 |
| Luke Schaeffer | 2 |
| Michael Whitmeyer | 2 |
| Oscar Higgott | 2 |
| Pei Wu | 2 |
| Qi Zhao | 2 |
| Robin Kothari | 2 |
| Siddhartha Jain | 2 |
| Vinayak Kumar | 2 |
| Vishnu Iyer | 2 |
| Xingyu Zhou | 2 |
| Aarthi Sundaram | 1 |