7
program roles
4
steering roles
2
leadership roles
54
collaborators
2010–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
32 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-qubit Toffoli with exponentially fewer T gates | QIP 2026 | plenary_long | ▸Robin Kothari, Chenyi Zhang |
Prior work of Beverland et al. has shown that any exact Clifford+T implementation of the n-qubit Toffoli gate must use at least n T gates. Here we show how to get away with exponentially fewer T gates, at the cost of incurring a tiny 1/poly(n) error that can be neglected in most practical situations. More precisely, the n-qubit Toffoli gate can be implemented to within error ϵ in the diamond distance by a randomly chosen Clifford+T circuit with at most O(log(1/ϵ)) T gates. We also give a matching Ω(log(1/ϵ)) lower bound that establishes optimality, and we show that any purely unitary implementation achieving even constant error must use Ω(n) T gates. We also extend our sampling technique to implement other Boolean functions. Finally, we describe upper and lower bounds on the T-count of Boolean functions in terms of non-adaptive parity decision tree complexity and its randomized analogue. |
|||
| Triply Efficient Shadow Tomography | QIP 2025 | regular | Robbie King, Robin Kothari, Ryan Babbush |
| Quantum advantage from measurement-induced entanglement in random shallow circuits | QIP 2025 | regular | Adam Bene Watts, ▸Yinchen Liu, Mehdi Soleimanifar |
| Quantum state preparation with optimal T-Count | QIP 2025 | regular | Robin Kothari, ▸Kewen Wu |
| Classical and Quantum Algorithms for Characters of the Symmetric Group | TQC 2025 | regular | Sergey Bravyi, Vojtech Havlicek, Louis Schatzki |
| Quantum complexity of the Kronecker coefficients | QIP 2024 | regular | ▸Sergey Bravyi, Anirban Narayan Chowdhury, Vojtech Havlicek, Christian Ikenmeyer, Sathyawageeswar Subramanian, Guanyu Zhu |
| Classical simulation of peaked shallow quantum circuits | QIP 2024 | regular | ▸Sergey Bravyi, Yinchen Liu |
| On reductions from weak to strong simulation | QIP 2023 | regular | Sergey Bravyi, Giuseppe Carleo, ▸Yinchen Liu |
| Classical algorithms for forrelation | QIP 2022 | regular ▸ presenter | Sergey Bravyi, Daniel Grier, Luke Schaeffer |
| Improved approximation algorithms for bounded-degree local Hamiltonians | QIP 2022 | regular | Anurag Anshu, Karen J. Morenz Korol, ▸Mehdi Soleimanifar |
| On the complexity of quantum partition functions | QIP 2022 | regular | Sergey Bravyi, ▸Anirban Narayan Chowdhury, Pawel Wocjan |
| An area law for 2D frustration-free spin systems | QIP 2022 | regular ▸ presenter | Anurag Anshu, Itai Arad |
| On the complexity of quantum partition functions | TQC 2022 | regular | ▸Anirban Narayan Chowdhury, Sergey Bravyi, Pawel Wocjan |
| Improved upper bounds on the stabilizer rank of magic states | TQC 2022 | regular | ▸Hammam Qassim, Hakop Pashayan |
| Fast simulation of planar Clifford circuits | QIP 2021 | regular | Daniel Grier, Alex Kerzner, Luke Schaeffer |
Abstract A general quantum circuit can be simulated in exponential time on a classical computer. If it has a planar layout, then a tensor-network contraction algorithm due to Markov and Shi has a runtime exponential in the square root of its size, or more generally exponential in the treewidth of the underlying graph. Separately, Gottesman and Knill showed that if all gates are restricted to be Clifford, then there is a polynomial time simulation. We combine these two ideas and show that treewidth and planarity can be exploited to improve Clifford circuit simulation. Our main result is a classical algorithm with runtime scaling asymptotically as ~$ n^{\omega/2}<n^{1.19}$ which samples from the output distribution obtained by measuring all $n$ qubits of a planar graph state in given Pauli bases. Here $\omega$ is the matrix multiplication exponent. We also provide a classical algorithm with the same asymptotic runtime which samples from the output distribution of any constant-depth Clifford circuit in a planar geometry. Our work improves known classical algorithms with cubic runtime. A key ingredient is a mapping which, given a tree decomposition of some graph $G$, produces a Clifford circuit with a structure that mirrors the tree decomposition and which emulates measurement of the quantum graph state corresponding to $G$. We provide a classical simulation of this circuit with the runtime stated above for planar graphs and otherwise $n t^{\omega-1}$ where $t$ is the width of the tree decomposition. Our algorithm incorporates two subroutines which may be of independent interest. The first is a matrix-multiplication-time version of the Gottesman-Knill simulation of multi-qubit measurement on stabilizer states. The second is a new classical algorithm for solving symmetric linear systems over $\mathbb{F}_2$ in a planar geometry. |
|||
| Quantum advantage with noisy shallow circuits in 3D | QIP 2020 | regular | Sergey Bravyi, Robert König, Marco Tomamichel |
| Classical algorithms for quantum mean values | QIP 2020 | regular | Sergey Bravyi, Ramis Movassagh |
| Entanglement subvolume law for 2D frustration-free spin systems | QIP 2020 | regular | Anurag Anshu, Itai Arad |
| Slightly beyond product state approximations for a quantum analogue of Max Cut | TQC 2020 | regular | Anurag Anshu, ▸Karen Morenz |
We consider a computational problem where the goal is to approximate the maximum eigenvalue of a two-local Hamiltonian that describes antiferromagnetic Heisenberg interactions between qubits located at the vertices of the graph. Previous work has shed light on this problem’s approximability by \textit{product states}. For any instance of this problem the maximum energy attained by a product state is lower bounded by the Max Cut of the graph and upper bounded by the standard Goemans-Williamson semidefinite programming relaxation of it. Gharibian and Parekh described an efficient classical approximation algorithm for this problem which outputs a product state with energy at least $0.498$ times the maximum eigenvalue in the worst case, and observe that there exist instances where the best product state has energy $1/2$ of optimal. We investigate approximation algorithms with performance exceeding this limitation which are based on optimizing over tensor products of few-qubit states and shallow quantum circuits. We provide an efficient classical algorithm which achieves an approximation ratio of at least $0.53$ in the worst case. We also show that for any instance defined by a $3$ or $4$-regular triangle-free graph, there is an efficiently computable shallow quantum circuit that prepares a state with energy larger than the best product state (larger even than its semidefinite programming relaxation). |
|||
| Simulation of quantum circuits by low-rank stabilizer decompositions | QIP 2019 | regular ▸ presenter | Sergey Bravyi, Dan Browne, Padraic Calpin, Earl Campbell, Mark Howard |
| Approximation algorithms for quantum many-body problems | QIP 2019 | regular | ▸Sergey Bravyi, Robert König, Kristan Temme |
| David Gosset (Waterloo) | TQC 2019 | invited ▸ presenter | — |
|
A compressed classical description of quantum states
Outstanding Paper Award
|
TQC 2019 | invited | John Smolin |
| Polynomial-time classical simulation of quantum ferromagnets | QIP 2018 | regular ▸ presenter | Sergey Bravyi |
| Quantum advantage with shallow circuits | QIP 2018 | plenary | Sergey Bravyi, ▸Robert König |
| Complexity of quantum impurity problems | QIP 2017 | regular ▸ presenter | Sergey Bravyi |
| Improved classical simulation of quantum circuits dominated by Clifford gates | QIP 2017 | regular | ▸Sergey Bravyi |
| Quantum advantage with shallow circuits | TQC 2017 | invited ▸ presenter | — |
| Gapped and gapless phases of frustration-free spin-1/2 chains | QIP 2016 | plenary | ▸Sergey Bravyi |
| Quantum 3-SAT is QMA1-complete | QIP 2014 | regular ▸ presenter | Daniel Nagaj |
| The Bose-Hubbard model is QMA-complete | QIP 2014 | regular | ▸Andrew Childs, Zak Webb |
|
“Universal computation by multi-particle quantum walk.” | | ↗
|
QIP 2013 | regular | Andrew Childs, Zachary Webb |
9 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Quantum complexity of the Kronecker coefficients | TQC 2023 | Sergey Bravyi, Anirban Narayan Chowdhury, Vojtech Havlicek, Guanyu Zhu |
| Hardness of traversing the ground space of commuting Hamiltonians | QIP 2017 | Jenish C. Mehta, Thomas Vidick |
| Exact synthesis of single-qubit unitaries over Clifford-cyclotomic | QIP 2016 | Simon Forest, Vadym Kliuchnikov, David Mckinnon |
We generalize an efficient exact synthesis algorithm for single-qubit unitaries over the Clifford+T gate set which was presented by Kliuchnikov, Maslov and Mosca. Their algorithm takes as input an exactly synthesizable single-qubit unitary--one which can be expressed without error as a product of Clifford and T gates--and outputs a sequence of gates which implements it. The algorithm is optimal in the sense that the length of the sequence, measured by the number of T gates, is smallest possible. In this paper, for each positive even integer n we consider the ``Clifford-cyclotomic'' gate set consisting of the Clifford group plus a z-rotation by pi/n. We present an efficient exact synthesis algorithm which outputs a decomposition using the minimum number of pi/n z-rotations. For the Clifford+T case n=4 the group of exactly synthesizable unitaries was shown to be equal to the group of unitaries with entries over the ring Z[e^{i*pi/n},1/2]. We prove that this characterization holds for a handful of other small values of n but the fraction of positive even integers for which it fails to hold is 100\%. |
||
| Complexity of the Bose-Hubbard Model on simple graphs | QIP 2015 | Andrew Childs, Zak Webb |
| Momentum switches | QIP 2015 | Andrew Childs, Daniel Nagaj, Mouktik Raha, Zak Webb |
| An algorithm for the T-count | QIP 2014 | Vadym Kliuchnikov, Michele Mosca, Vincent Russo |
| Unstructured randomness, small gaps and localization | QIP 2011 | Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, Sam Gutmann, Peter Shor |
| Quantum Adiabatic Algorithms, Small Gaps, and Different Paths | QIP 2010 | Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, Sam Gutmann, Harvey Meyer, Peter Shor |
| Quantum state restoration, or how to perform quantum state tomography with a single copy of a state | QIP 2010 | Edward Farhi, Avinatan Hassidim, Andrew Lutomirski, Daniel Nagaj, Peter Shor |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2026 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2025 | steering | chair | — |
| QIP 2024 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2023 | steering | member | — |
| TQC 2023 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2022 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2020 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2020 | program | co_chair | — |
| QIP 2019 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2018 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2017 | program | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Sergey Bravyi | 17 |
| Andrew Childs | 4 |
| Anirban Narayan Chowdhury | 4 |
| Anurag Anshu | 4 |
| Daniel Nagaj | 3 |
| Edward Farhi | 3 |
| Peter Shor | 3 |
| Robert König | 3 |
| Robin Kothari | 3 |
| Vojtech Havlicek | 3 |
| Yinchen Liu | 3 |
| Zak Webb | 3 |
| Daniel Grier | 2 |
| Guanyu Zhu | 2 |
| Itai Arad | 2 |
| Jeffrey Goldstone | 2 |
| Luke Schaeffer | 2 |
| Mehdi Soleimanifar | 2 |
| Pawel Wocjan | 2 |
| Sam Gutmann | 2 |