5
program roles
58
collaborators
2015–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
11 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fast-forwardable Lindbladians imply quantum phase estimation | QIP 2026 | regular | ▸Zhong-Xia Shang, Naixu Guo, Patrick Rebentrost, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, Qi Zhao |
Quantum phase estimation (QPE) and Lindbladian dynamics are both foundational in quantum information science and central to quantum algorithm design. In this work, we bridge these two concepts: certain simple Lindbladian processes can be adapted to perform QPE-type tasks. However, unlike QPE, which achieves Heisenberg-limit scaling, these Lindbladian evolutions are restricted to standard quantum limit complexity. This indicates that, different from Hamiltonian dynamics, the natural dissipative evolution speed of such Lindbladians does not saturate the fundamental quantum limit, thereby suggesting the potential for quadratic fast-forwarding. We confirm this by presenting a quantum algorithm that simulates these Lindbladians for time $t$ within an error $\varepsilon$ using $\mathcal{O}\left(\sqrt{t\log(\varepsilon^{-1})}\right)$ cost. This, to our knowledge, is the first example of Lindbladian fast forwarding, which shares a fundamentally different mechanism from the fast-forwarding examples of Hamiltonian dynamics. As a bonus, this fast-forwarded simulation naturally serves as a new Heisenberg-limit QPE algorithm. Therefore, our work explicitly bridges the standard quantum limit-Heisenberg limit transition to the fast-forwarding of dissipative dynamics. We also adopt our fast-forwarding algorithm for efficient Gibbs state preparation and demonstrate the counter-intuitive implication: the allowance of a quadratically accelerated decoherence effect under arbitrary Pauli noise. |
|||
| Quantum Lower Bounds for Finding Stationary Points of Nonconvex Functions | QIP 2024 | regular | ▸Chenyi Zhang |
| Efficient Optimal Control of Open Quantum Systems | TQC 2024 | regular | ▸Wenhao He, Xiantao Li, Zecheng Li, Chunhao Wang, Ke Wang |
|
Quantum Non-Identical Mean Estimation: Efficient Algorithms and Fundamental Limits ↗
|
TQC 2024 | regular | ▸Jiachen Hu, Xinzhao Wang, Yecheng Xue, Chenyi Zhang, Han Zhong |
| Quantum Algorithms for Sampling Log-Concave Distributions and Estimating Normalizing Constants | QIP 2023 | regular | ▸Andrew Childs, Jin-Peng Liu, Chunhao Wang, Ruizhe Zhang |
| Hamiltonian simulation with random inputs | QIP 2022 | regular | ▸Qi Zhao, You Zhou, Alexander F. Shaw, Andrew Childs |
| Quantum algorithms for escaping from saddle points | QIP 2021 | regular | Chenyi Zhang, Jiaqi Leng |
Abstract We initiate the study of quantum algorithms for escaping from saddle points with provable guarantee. Given a function $f:\R^{n}\to\R$, our quantum algorithm outputs an $\epsilon$-approximate local minimum using $\tilde{O}(\log^{2} n/\epsilon^{1.75})$ queries to the quantum evaluation oracle (i.e., the zeroth-order oracle). Compared to the classical state-of-the-art algorithm by Jin et al.~with $\tilde{O}(\log^{6} n/\epsilon^{1.75})$ queries to the gradient oracle (i.e., the first-order oracle), our quantum algorithm is polynomially better in terms of $n$ and matches its complexity in terms of $1/\epsilon$. Our quantum algorithm is built upon two techniques: First, we replace the classical perturbations in gradient descent methods by simulating quantum wave equations, which constitutes the polynomial speedup in $n$ for escaping from saddle points. Second, we show how to use a quantum gradient computation algorithm due to Jordan to replace the classical gradient queries in nonconvex optimization by quantum evaluation queries with the same complexity, extending the same result from convex optimization due to van Apeldoorn et al. and Chakrabarti et al. Finally, we also perform numerical experiments that support our quantum speedup. |
|||
| Sampling-based sublinear low-rank matrix arithmetic framework for dequantizing quantum machine learning | QIP 2020 | regular | Nai-Hui Chia, Andras Pal Gilyen, Han-Hsuan Lin, Ewin Tang, Chunhao Wang |
| Quantum algorithm for estimating volumes of convex bodies | QIP 2020 | regular | Shouvanik Chakrabarti, Andrew Childs, Shih-Han Hung, Chunhao Wang, Xiaodi Wu |
| Algorithms and lower bounds for convex optimization using quantum oracles | QIP 2019 | regular | ▸Joran van Apeldoorn, Shouvanik Chakrabarti, Andrew Childs, Andras Pal Gilyen, Sander Gribling, Ronald de Wolf, Xiaodi Wu |
| Quantum SDP Solvers: New Input Models, Improved Algorithms, and Applications | QIP 2019 | regular ▸ presenter | Joran van Apeldoorn, Fernando G. S. L. Brandão, Andras Pal Gilyen, Amir Kalev, Cedric Yen-Yu Lin, Krysta Marie Svore, Xiaodi Wu |
20 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Quantum singular value transformation without block encodings | TQC 2026 | Shantanav Chakraborty, Soumyabrata Hazra, Changpeng Shao, Xinzhao Wang, Yuxin Zhang |
We develop new algorithms for Quantum Singular Value Transformation (QSVT), a unifying framework that encapsulates most known quantum algorithms and serves as the foundation for new ones. Existing implementations of QSVT rely on block encoding, incurring an intrinsic $O(\log L)$ ancilla overhead and circuit depth $\widetilde{O}(L d\lambda )$ for polynomial transformations of a Hamiltonian $H=\sum_{k=1}^L H_k$, where $d$ is the polynomial degree and $\lambda=\sum_{k}\|H_k\|$. We introduce a simple yet powerful approach that utilizes only basic Hamiltonian simulation techniques, namely, Trotter methods, to: (i) eliminate the need for block encoding, (ii) reduce the ancilla overhead to only a single qubit, and (iii) still maintain near-optimal complexity. Our method achieves a circuit depth of $\widetilde{O}(L(d\lambda_{\mathrm{comm}})^{1+o(1)})$, without requiring any complicated multi-qubit controlled gates. Moreover, $\lambda_{\mathrm{comm}}$ depends on the nested commutators of the terms of $H$ and can be substantially smaller than $\lambda$ for many physically relevant Hamiltonians, a feature absent in standard QSVT. To achieve these results, we make use of Richardson extrapolation in a novel way, systematically eliminating errors in any interleaved sequence of arbitrary unitaries and Hamiltonian evolution operators, thereby establishing a general framework that encompasses QSVT but is more broadly applicable. We further design two randomized algorithms for QSVT in settings with only sampling access to the Hamiltonian terms. The first is a direct randomization of standard QSVT, while the second integrates qDRIFT within our interleaved-circuit architecture. Both achieve a complexity quadratic in $d$, which we establish as a lower bound for any randomized method implementing polynomial transformations in this model. Finally, as applications, we develop end-to-end quantum algorithms for solving linear systems and estimating ground state properties of Hamiltonians, both achieving near-optimal complexity without relying on oracular access. Overall, our results establish a new framework for quantum algorithms, significantly reducing hardware overhead while maintaining near-optimal performance, with implications for both near-term and fault-tolerant quantum computing. |
||
| Complexity of Digital Quantum Simulation in the Low-Energy Subspace: Applications and a Lower Bound | QIP 2025 | Weiyuan Gong, Shuo Zhou |
| Near-Optimal Quantum Algorithms for Computing (Coarse) Correlated Equilibria of General-Sum Games | QIP 2025 | Xinzhao Wang, Yexin Zhang |
| Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithms for Maximum Cut on Low-Girth Graphs | QIP 2025 | Yuexin Su, Ziyi Yang, Shengyu Zhang |
| Quantum Algorithms and Lower Bounds for Finite-Sum Optimization | QIP 2025 | Yexin Zhang, Chenyi Zhang, Cong Fang, Liwei Wang |
| Quantum Non-Identical Mean Estimation: Efficient Algorithms and Fundamental Limits | QIP 2025 | Jiachen Hu, Xinzhao Wang, Yecheng Xue, Chenyi Zhang, Han Zhong |
| QCircuitNet: A Large-Scale Hierarchical Dataset for Quantum Algorithm Design | QIP 2025 | Rui Yang, Yuntian Gu, Ziruo Wang, Yitao Liang |
| More Optimistic, Less Regret: Quantum Optimistic Update Algorithms for Zero-Sum Games and Linear Programming | QIP 2024 | Minbo Gao, Zhengfeng Ji, Qisheng Wang |
| A Theory of Digital Quantum Simulations in the Low-Energy Subspace | QIP 2024 | Weiyuan Gong, Shuo Zhou |
| Near-Optimal Quantum Algorithm for Minimizing the Maximal Loss | QIP 2024 | Hao Wang, Chenyi Zhang |
| Robustness and Limitations of Quantum Algorithms for Nonconvex Optimization | QIP 2023 | Weiyuan Gong, Chenyi Zhang |
| Quantum State Preparation with Optimal Circuit Depth: Implementations and Applications | QIP 2023 | Xiao-Ming Zhang, Xiao Yuan |
| Quantum State Preparation with Optimal Circuit Depth: Implementations and Applications | TQC 2023 | Xiao-Ming Zhang, Xiao Yuan |
| Quantum-inspired classical sublinear algorithm for solving semidefinite programmings with low-rank constraints | QIP 2020 | Nai-Hui Chia, Han-Hsuan Lin, Chunhao Wang |
| Distributional property testing in a quantum world | TQC 2019 | Andras Pal Gilyen |
| Quantum-inspired classical sublinear-time algorithm for solving low-rank semidefinite programming via sampling approaches | TQC 2019 | Nai-Hui Chia, Han-Hsuan Lin, Chunhao Wang |
| Exponential Quantum Speed-ups for Semidefinite Programming with Applications to Quantum Learning | QIP 2018 | Fernando G. S. L. Brandão, Amir Kalev, Cedric Yen-Yu Lin, Krysta Marie Svore, Xiaodi Wu |
| Quantum query complexity of entropy estimation | QIP 2018 | Xiaodi Wu |
| Efficient simulation of sparse Markovian quantum dynamics | QIP 2017 | Andrew Childs |
| Optimal State Exclusion for Symmetric Sets of States | QIP 2015 | Giulio Chiribella |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2026 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2026 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2024 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2023 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2022 | program | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Chenyi Zhang | 7 |
| Chunhao Wang | 6 |
| Andrew Childs | 5 |
| Xiaodi Wu | 5 |
| Andras Pal Gilyen | 4 |
| Xinzhao Wang | 4 |
| Han-Hsuan Lin | 3 |
| Nai-Hui Chia | 3 |
| Weiyuan Gong | 3 |
| Amir Kalev | 2 |
| Cedric Yen-Yu Lin | 2 |
| Fernando G. S. L. Brandão | 2 |
| Han Zhong | 2 |
| Jiachen Hu | 2 |
| Joran van Apeldoorn | 2 |
| Krysta Marie Svore | 2 |
| Qi Zhao | 2 |
| Shouvanik Chakrabarti | 2 |
| Shuo Zhou | 2 |
| Xiao Yuan | 2 |