1
organizing role
1
leadership role
99
collaborators
2011–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
12 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Projective toric designs, quantum state designs, and mutually unbiased bases | QIP 2025 | regular | ▸Joseph Iosue, Connor Mooney, Adam Ehrenberg |
| Quantum Routing and Entanglement Dynamics Through Bottlenecks | TQC 2025 | regular | Dhruv Devulapalli, Chao Yin, Andrew Guo, Eddie Schoute, Andrew Childs, Andrew Lucas |
|
Toward a 2D Local Implementation of Quantum LDPC Codes ↗
|
TQC 2024 | regular | ▸Noah Berthusen, Dhruv Devulapalli, Eddie Schoute, Andrew Childs, Michael Gullans, Daniel Gottesman |
Geometric locality is an important theoretical and practical factor for quantum low-density parity-check (qLDPC) codes which affects code performance and ease of physical realization. For device architectures restricted to 2D local gates, naively implementing the high-rate codes suitable for low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum computing incurs prohibitive overhead. In this work, we present an error correction protocol built on a bilayer architecture that aims to reduce operational overheads when restricted to 2D local gates by measuring some generators less frequently than others. We investigate the family of bivariate bicycle qLDPC codes and show that they are well suited for a parallel syndrome measurement scheme using fast routing with local operations and classical communication (LOCC). Through circuit-level simulations, we find that in some parameter regimes bivariate bicycle codes implemented with this protocol have logical error rates comparable to the surface code while using fewer physical qubits. |
|||
| Circuit complexity and classical simulation of Many-Body Localized Systems | QIP 2023 | regular | ▸Adam Ehrenberg, Abhinav Deshpande, Christopher L. Baldwin, Dmitry A. Abanin |
|
Entanglement Renormalization Circuits for Chiral Topological Order ↗
|
TQC 2023 | regular | Su-Kuan Chu, ▸Guanyu Zhu |
Entanglement renormalization circuits are quantum circuits that can be used to prepare large-scale entangled states. For years, it has remained a mystery whether there exist scale-invariant entanglement renormalization circuits for chiral topological order. In this paper, we solve this problem by demonstrating entanglement renormalization circuits for a wide class of chiral topologically ordered states, including a state sharing the same topological properties as Laughlin's bosonic fractional quantum Hall state at filling fraction 1/4 and eight states with Ising-like non-Abelian fusion rules. The key idea is to build entanglement renormalization circuits by interleaving the conventional multi-scale entanglement renormalization ansatz (MERA) circuit (made of spatially local gates) with quasi-local evolution. Given the miraculous power of this circuit to prepare a wide range of chiral topologically ordered states, we refer to these circuits as MERA with quasi-local evolution (MERAQLE). |
|||
| Tight bounds on the convergence of noisy random circuits to uniform | QIP 2022 | regular | ▸Abhinav Deshpande, Bill Fefferman, Michael Gullans, Pradeep Niroula, Oles Shtanko |
| Optimal State Transfer and Entanglement Generation in Power-law Interacting Systems | QIP 2021 | regular | Minh Cong Tran, Abhinav Deshpande, Andrew Guo, Andrew Lucas |
Abstract We present an optimal protocol for encoding an unknown qubit state into a multiqubit Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger-like state and, consequently, transferring quantum information in large systems exhibiting power-law ($1/r^\alpha$) interactions. For all power-law exponents $\alpha$ between $d$ and $2d+1$, where $d$ is the dimension of the system, the protocol yields a polynomial speedup for $\alpha>2d$ and a superpolynomial speedup for $\alpha\leq 2d$, compared to the state of the art. For all $\alpha>d$, the protocol saturates the Lieb-Robinson bounds (up to subpolynomial corrections), thereby establishing the optimality of the protocol and the tightness of the bounds in this regime. The protocol has a wide range of applications, including in quantum sensing, quantum computing, and preparation of topologically ordered states. |
|||
| The importance of the spectral gap in estimating ground-state energies | QIP 2021 | regular | Abhinav Deshpande, Bill Fefferman |
Abstract The field of quantum Hamiltonian complexity lies at the intersection of quantum many-body physics and computational complexity theory, with deep implications to both fields. The main object of study is the LocalHamiltonian problem, which is concerned with estimating the ground-state energy of a local Hamiltonian and is complete for the class QMA, a quantum generalization of the class NP. A major challenge in the field is to understand the complexity of the LocalHamiltonian problem in more physically natural parameter regimes. One crucial parameter in understanding the ground space of any Hamiltonian in many-body physics is the spectral gap, which is the difference between the smallest two eigenvalues. Despite its importance in quantum many-body physics, the role played by the spectral gap in the complexity of the LocalHamiltonian is less well-understood. In this work, we make progress on this question by considering the precise regime, in which one estimates the ground-state energy to within inverse exponential precision. Computing ground-state energies precisely is a task that is important for quantum chemistry and quantum many-body physics. In the setting of inverse-exponential precision, there is a surprising result that the complexity of LocalHamiltonian is magnified from QMA to PSPACE, the class of problems solvable in polynomial space. We clarify the reason behind this boost in complexity. Specifically, we show that the full complexity of the high precision case only comes about when the spectral gap is exponentially small. As a consequence of the proof techniques developed to show our results, we uncover important implications for the representability and circuit complexity of ground states of local Hamiltonians, the theory of uniqueness of quantum witnesses, and techniques for the amplification of quantum witnesses in the presence of postselection. |
|||
| Implementing a fast unbounded quantum fanout gate using power-law interactions | TQC 2021 | regular | ▸Andrew Guo, Abhinav Deshpande, Su-Kuan Chu, Zachary Eldredge, Przemyslaw Bienias, Dhruv Devulapalli, Yuan Su, Andrew Childs |
| Optimal Protocols in Quantum Annealing and QAOA Problems | TQC 2020 | regular | ▸Lucas Brady, Christopher L. Baldwin, Aniruddha Bapat, Yaroslav Kharkov |
Quantum Annealing and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) are both instances of the same control problem in which a combination of two Hamiltonians is applied to minimize the energy of a quantum state. Previous work has suggested that the bang-bang structure of QAOA is optimal but with significant caveats, leaving open the question of what procedure is optimal in practice. In this work, we formalize the optimal control arguments proving that a time-constrained procedure has a bang at the beginning and end but can take on an annealing-like form in-between. In numerics on transverse field Ising models, we show that bang-anneal-bang procedures are common with optimal time-constrained QAOA Trotterizing the annealing portion. We furthermore show an equivalence between different types of time-constraints in this style of problem. The optimal procedures we find are far removed from a monotonically changing adiabatic path in the short-time limit, but we show that as the allowed time increases, the adiabatic limit and intuition from adiabatic quantum computing apply. |
|||
| Optimal and Secure Measurement Protocols for Quantum Sensor Networks | QCRYPT 2016 | regular | ▸Zachary Eldredge, Michael Foss-Feig, Steven L. Rolston |
| Implementing a quantum algorithm for spectrum estimation with alkaline earth atoms | QIP 2016 | regular | ▸Michael Beverland, Gorjan Alagic, Jeongwan Haah, Gretchen Campbell, Ana Maria Rey |
40 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Two-block and multi-block hyperbolic algebra codes | QIP 2026 | Ali Fahimniya, ▸Yifan Hong |
| Optimally learning functions in interacting quantum sensor networks | QIP 2026 | Erfan Abbasgholinejad, ▸Sean R. Muleady, Jacob Bringewatt, Anthony J. Brady, Yu-Xin Wang, Ali Fahimniya |
| Measuring gravitational lensing time delays with quantum information processing | QIP 2026 | Zhenning Liu, William DeRocco, Shiming Gu, ▸Emil T. Khabiboulline, Soonwon Choi, Andrew Childs, Anson Hook, Daniel Eric Gottesman |
| Measurement-induced entanglement in noisy 2D random Clifford circuits | QIP 2026 | Zhi-Yuan Wei, Jon Nelson, Joel Rajakumar, Esther Cruz, Michael Gullans, Daniel Malz |
| Low Depth Fermion Routing without Ancillas | QIP 2026 | ▸Nathan Constantinides, Jeffery Yu, Dhruv Devulapalli, Ali Fahimniya, Andrew Childs, Michael Gullans, Alex Schuckert |
| Time Independence Does Not Limit Information Flow | QIP 2026 | Dong Yuan, ▸Timothy Connor Mooney, Chao Yin, Adam Ehrenberg, Christopher L. Baldwin, Andrew Childs |
| A quantum semidefinite programming approach to cardinality-constrained portfolio optimization | QIP 2026 | ▸Daniel J. Spencer, M. Isabel Franco-Garrido |
| Differentially private quantum sensor networks | QCRYPT 2025 | Daniel J. Spencer, Kaiyan Shi, Emil T. Khabiboulline, Gorjan Alagic |
Quantum sensing is a promising technology capable of demonstrating clear advantage over comparable classical techniques for precise measurement. One application of quantum sensing is in function estimation, which can be done using a network of entangled quantum sensors, allowing for measurements with greater optimal sensitivity than unentangled sensing protocols. Since quantum sensor networks will likely be used to measure data that should remain private (e.g., biomedical data), it is imperative that these protocols include a cryptographic mechanism to hide sensitive information. In this work, we show that entangled sensor networks are vulnerable to differential attacks. To mitigate these attacks, we introduce secure sensing protocols based on differential privacy. We reconcile Heisenberg-limited scaling and differential privacy and introduce several protocols achieving varying balances between the two. We show that our protocols are resilient to attacks by quantum adversaries and we find advantages in the privacy-utility trade-off when using quantum resources. |
||
| Optimal function estimation with interacting sensor networks | QIP 2025 | Erfan Abbasgholinejad, Jacob Bringewatt, Anthony J. Brady, Ali Fahimniya, Sean R. Muleady, Yuxin Wang, Raphael Kaubruegger, Ana Maria Rey |
| Instability of steady-state mixed-state symmetry-protected topological order to strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking | QIP 2025 | Jeet Shah, Christopher Fechisin, Yu-Xin Wang, Joseph Iosue, James Watson, Yan-Qi Wang, Brayden Ware, Cheng-Ju Lin |
| Quantum Routing and Entanglement Capacity Through Bottlenecks | QIP 2025 | Dhruv Devulapalli, Chao Yin, Andrew Guo, Adam Ehrenberg, Eddie Schoute, Andrew Childs, Andrew Lucas |
| Exponential entanglement advantage in sensing correlated noise | QIP 2025 | Yuxin Wang, Jacob Bringewatt, Alireza Seif, Anthony J. Brady, Changhun Oh |
| Efficient preparation of Dicke states | QIP 2025 | Jeffery Yu, Yuxin Wang, Sean R. Muleady, Nathan Schine, Andrew Childs |
| Covariant Quantum Error-Correcting Codes with Metrological Entanglement Advantage | QIP 2025 | Cheng-Ju Lin, Zi-Wen Liu, Victor Albert |
| Differentially private quantum sensor networks | QIP 2025 | Daniel J. Spencer, Kaiyan Shi, Emil T. Khabiboulline, Gorjan Alagic |
| Fault-tolerant hyperbolic Floquet quantum error correcting codes | QIP 2024 | Ali Fahimniya, Hossein Dehghani, Kishor Bharti, Sheryl Mathew, Alicia Kollár, Michael Gullans |
| Approximate quantum error correction from su(2) states | QIP 2024 | Cheng-Ju Lin, Zi-Wen Liu, Victor Albert |
| Quantum Algorithms for Simulating Nuclear Effective Field Theories | QIP 2024 | James Watson, Jake Bringewatt, Alexander F. Shaw, Andrew Childs, Zohreh Davoudi |
| Efficiently verifiable quantum advantage on near-term analog quantum simulators | QIP 2024 | Zhenning Liu, Dhruv Devulapalli, Dominik Hangleiter, Yi-Kai Liu, Alicia Kollár, Andrew Childs |
| A sharp phase transition in linear cross-entropy benchmarking | QIP 2024 | Brayden Ware, Abhinav Deshpande, Dominik Hangleiter, Pradeep Niroula, Bill Fefferman, Michael Gullans |
| Efficiently verifiable quantum advantage on near-term analog quantum simulators | TQC 2024 | Zhenning Liu, Dhruv Devulapalli, Dominik Hangleiter, Yi-Kai Liu, Alicia Kollár, Andrew Childs |
| Transition of Anticoncentration in Gaussian Boson Sampling | TQC 2024 | Adam Ehrenberg, Joseph Iosue, Abhinav Deshpande, Dominik Hangleiter |
| Sharp complexity phase transitions generated by entanglement | QIP 2023 | Abhinav Deshpande, Bill Fefferman, Soumik Ghosh, Dominik Hangleiter |
| Minimum Entanglement Protocols for Function Estimation | QIP 2023 | Adam Ehrenberg, Jacob Bringewatt |
| A Vapor Cavity QED system for quantum computation and communication | QIP 2023 | Sharoon Austin, Dhruv Devulapalli, Kunal Sharma, Khoi Hoang, Feng Zhou, Kartik Srinivasan |
| Page curves and typical entanglement in linear optics | QIP 2023 | Joseph Iosue, Adam Ehrenberg, Dominik Hangleiter, Abhinav Deshpande |
| Sharp complexity phase transitions generated by entanglement | TQC 2023 | Abhinav Deshpande, Bill Fefferman, Soumik Ghosh, Dominik Hangleiter |
| Optimal Protocols in Quantum Annealing and QAOA Problems | QIP 2021 | Lucas Brady, Christopher L. Baldwin, Aniruddha Bapat, Yaroslav Kharkov |
| Behavior of Analog Quantum Algorithms | TQC 2021 | Lucas Brady, Lucas Kocia, Przemek Bienias, Aniruddha Bapat, Yaroslav Kharkov |
| Quantum routing | QIP 2020 | Aniruddha Bapat, Andrew Childs, Eddie Schoute |
| Optimal Protocols in Quantum Annealing and QAOA Problems | QIP 2020 | Lucas Brady, Aniruddha Bapat, Christopher L. Baldwin, Yaroslav Kharkov |
| Nearly-optimal time-independent reversal of a spin chain | TQC 2020 | Aniruddha Bapat, Eddie Schoute, Andrew Childs |
| Complexity phase transition in interacting and long-range bosonic Hamiltonians | QIP 2019 | Nishad Maskara, Abhinav Deshpande, Minh Cong Tran, Bill Fefferman, Michael Foss-Feig |
| Locality and digital quantum simulation of power-law interactions | TQC 2019 | Andrew Guo, Minh Cong Tran, Yuan Su, James Garrison, Zachary Eldredge, Michael Foss-Feig, Andrew Childs |
| Complexity phase transitions in interacting and long-range bosonic Hamiltonians | TQC 2019 | Nishad Maskara, Abhinav Deshpande, Minh Cong Tran, Michael Foss-Feig, Bill Fefferman |
| QAOA Digitizes an Asymptotic Curve: A Path Sum Approach | TQC 2019 | Lucas Brady, Aniruddha Bapat |
| Fast State Transfer and Entanglement Renormalization Using Long-Range Interactions | QIP 2017 | Zachary Eldredge, Zhe-Xuan Gong, Ali Hamed Mosavian, Michael Foss-Feig |
| Exact sampling hardness of Ising spin models | QIP 2017 | Bill Fefferman, Michael Foss-Feig |
| Complexity of sampling as an order parameter | QIP 2017 | Abhinav Deshpande, Bill Fefferman, Michael Foss-Feig |
| Photonic phase gate via an exchange of Fermionic spin waves in a spin chain | QIP 2011 | Johannes Otterbach, Eugene Demler, Michael Fleischhauer, Mikhail Lukin |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| TQC 2019 | organizing | chair | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Andrew Childs | 14 |
| Abhinav Deshpande | 13 |
| Bill Fefferman | 9 |
| Dhruv Devulapalli | 8 |
| Adam Ehrenberg | 7 |
| Aniruddha Bapat | 7 |
| Dominik Hangleiter | 7 |
| Michael Foss-Feig | 7 |
| Michael Gullans | 6 |
| Ali Fahimniya | 5 |
| Andrew Guo | 5 |
| Christopher L. Baldwin | 5 |
| Eddie Schoute | 5 |
| Lucas Brady | 5 |
| Jacob Bringewatt | 4 |
| Joseph Iosue | 4 |
| Minh Cong Tran | 4 |
| Yaroslav Kharkov | 4 |
| Zachary Eldredge | 4 |
| Alicia Kollár | 3 |