19
talks
1
posters
6
committee roles
0
leadership roles
2010–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Sum of Squares Spectral Amplification ↗
|
QIP 2026 | regular | Robbie King, Guang Hao Low, Qiushi Han, Eugene DePrince, Alec White, Ryan Babbush, Rolando Somma, Nick Rubin |
We present sum-of-squares spectral amplification (SOSSA), a framework for improving quantum simulation relevant to low-energy problems. We show how SOSSA can be applied to problems like energy and phase estimation and provide fast quantum algorithms for these problems that significantly improve over prior art. We analyze the performance of SOSSA on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, a representative strongly correlated system, and demonstrate asymptotic speedups over generic simulation methods by a factor of the square root of the system size. We then apply SOSSA to electronic structure problems in quantum chemistry, yielding a factor of 4 to 195 speedup over the state of the art in ground-state energy estimation for models of Iron-Sulfur complexes and a CO2-fixation catalyst. |
|||
| Exponential quantum speedup in simulating coupled classical oscillators | QIP 2024 | regular | ▸Rolando Somma, Ryan Babbush, Robin Kothari, Nathan Wiebe |
| Exponential quantum speedup in simulating coupled classical oscillators | QIP 2024 | plenary_short | ▸Rolando Somma, Ryan Babbush, Robin Kothari, Nathan Wiebe |
|
Further improving quantum algorithms for nonlinear differential equations via higher-order methods and rescaling ↗
|
TQC 2024 | regular | ▸Pedro Costa, Philipp Schleich, Mauro Morales |
The solution of large systems of nonlinear differential equations is needed for many applications in science and engineering. In this study, we present three main improvements to existing quantum algorithms based on the Carleman linearisation technique. First, by using a high-precision technique for the solution of the linearised differential equations, we achieve logarithmic dependence of the complexity on the error and near-linear dependence on time. Second, we demonstrate that a rescaling technique can considerably reduce the cost, which would otherwise be exponential in the Carleman order for a system of ODEs, preventing a quantum speedup for PDEs. Third, we provide improved, tighter bounds on the error of Carleman linearisation. We apply our results to a class of discretised reaction-diffusion equations using higher-order finite differences for spatial resolution. We show that providing a stability criterion independent of the discretisation can conflict with the use of the rescaling due to the difference between the max-norm and 2-norm. An efficient solution may still be provided if the number of discretisation points is limited, as is possible when using higher-order discretisations. |
|||
|
Efficient Quantum Simulation of Solid-State Materials via Pseudopotentials ↗
|
TQC 2024 | regular ▸ presenter | Nicholas Rubin, Ahmed Elnabawy, Gabriele Ahlers, Eugene DePrince, Joonho Lee, Christian Gogolin, Ryan Babbush |
First-quantized plane-wave representations provide a very promising approach for quantum algorithms for solid state materials. Pseudopotentials provide a method of further reducing the complexity by avoiding the need to simulate highly localized core orbitals. The complicated functional form of pseudopotentials constitutes a major challenge for the design of quantum algorithms. In this work we provide new techniques to efficiently implement pseudopotentials in quantum algorithms, with orders of magnitude improvement in complexity. Our methods include a high-accuracy QROM interpolation of the exponential function, combined with QROM for the pseudopotential parameters and coherent arithmetic. Moreover, we generalize prior methods to enable the simulation of materials defined by non-cubic unit cells. Finally, we combine these techniques to estimate the resources for block encoding required for simulating commercially relevant instances of heterogeneous catalysis. |
|||
| Quantum computation of stopping power for inertial fusion target design | TQC 2024 | regular | ▸Nicholas Rubin, Alina Kononov, Fionn Malone, Tanuj Khattar, Alec White, Joonho Lee, Hartmut Neven, Ryan Babbush, Andrew Baczewski |
Stopping power is the rate at which a material absorbs the kinetic energy of a charged particle passing through it – one of many properties needed over a wide range of thermodynamic conditions in modeling inertial fusion implosions. First-principles stopping calculations are classically challenging because they involve the dynamics of large electronic systems far from equilibrium, with accuracies that are particularly difficult to constrain and assess in the warm-dense conditions preceding ignition. Here, we describe a protocol for using a fault-tolerant quantum computer to calculate stopping power from a first-quantized representation of the electrons and projectile. Our approach builds upon the electronic structure block encodings of Su et al. [PRX Quantum 2, 040332 2021], adapting and optimizing those algorithms to estimate observables of interest from the non-Born-Oppenheimer dynamics of multiple particle species at finite temperature. We also work out the constant factors associated with a novel implementation of a high-order Trotter approach to simulating a grid representation of these systems. Ultimately, we report logical qubit requirements and leading-order Toffoli costs for computing the stopping power of various projectile/target combinations relevant to interpreting and designing inertial fusion experiments. We estimate that scientifically interesting and classically intractable stopping power calculations can be quantum simulated with roughly the same number of logical qubits and about one hundred times more Toffoli gates than is required for state-of-the-art quantum simulations of industrially relevant molecules such as FeMoco or P450. |
|||
| Quantifying Quantum Advantage in Topological Data Analysis | QIP 2023 | regular | Yuan Su, Casper Gyurik, Robbie King, Joao Basso, Alexander Barba, Abhishek Rajput, Nathan Wiebe, ▸Vedran Dunjko, Ryan Babbush |
|
Doubling the order of approximation via the randomized product formula ↗
|
TQC 2023 | regular | Chien-Hung Cho, Min-Hsiu Hsieh |
Randomization has been applied to Hamiltonian simulation in a number of ways to improve the accuracy or efficiency of product formulas. Deterministic product formulas are often constructed in a symmetric way to provide accuracy of even order 2k. We show that by applying randomized corrections, it is possible to more than double the order to 4k + 1 (corresponding to a doubling of the order of the error). In practice, applying the corrections in a quantum algorithm requires some structure to the Hamiltonian, for example the Pauli strings as are used in the simulation of quantum chemistry. |
|||
| Optimal scaling quantum linear systems solver via discrete adiabatic theorem | QIP 2022 | regular | ▸Pedro C.S. Costa, Dong An, Yuval Sanders, Yuan Su, Ryan Babbush |
| Compilation of Fault-Tolerant Quantum Heuristics for Combinatorial Optimization | QIP 2021 | regular | Yuval Sanders, Pedro Costa, Louis Tessler, Nathan Wiebe, Craig Gidney, Hartmut Neven, Ryan Babbush |
Abstract We compile explicit circuits and evaluate the computational cost for heuristic-based quantum algorithms for combinatorial optimization. We consider several variants of quantum-accelerated simulated annealing as well as adiabatic algorithms, quantum-enhanced population transfer, the quantum approximate optimization algorithm, and other approaches. We provide novel methods for executing the bottleneck subroutines for these heuristics, and our methods can easily be applied to other algorithms where numerical performance matters. We estimate how quickly the subroutines could be executed on a modestly sized superconducting-qubit-based quantum computer with surface code error correction. We conclude that quadratic speedups for heuristic-based quantum optimization algorithms are insufficient for early quantum computers to beat present day classical computers. |
|||
| Efficient quantum computation of chemistry through tensor hypercontraction | QIP 2021 | regular | Joonho Lee, Craig Gidney, William Huggins, Jarrod McClean, Nathan Wiebe, Ryan Babbush |
Abstract We show how to achieve the highest efficiency yet for simulations with arbitrary basis sets by using a representation of the Coulomb operator known as tensor hypercontraction (THC). We use THC to express the Coulomb operator in a non-orthogonal basis, which we are able to block encode by separately rotating each term with angles that are obtained via QROM. Our algorithm has the best complexity scaling for an arbitrary basis, as well as the best complexity for the specific case of FeMoCo. By optimising the surface code resources, we show that FeMoCo can be simulated using about 4 million physical qubits and 3.5 days of runtime, assuming 1 s cycle times and physical gate error rates no worse than 0.1%. |
|||
| Even more efficient quantum computations of chemistry through tensor hypercontraction | TQC 2021 | regular | Joonho Lee, Craig Gidney, William Huggins, Jarrod McClean, Nathan Wiebe, Ryan Babbush |
| Qubitization of arbitrary basis quantum chemistry leveraging sparsity and low rank factorization | QIP 2020 | regular | Craig Gidney, Mario Motta, Jarrod McClean, Ryan Babbush |
| Simulating correlated electrons in the surface code with a single T-factory | QIP 2019 | regular | ▸Ryan Babbush, Craig Gidney, Nathan Wiebe, Jarrod McClean, Alexandru Paler, Austin Fowler, Hartmut Neven |
| Quantum simulation of chemistry with sublinear scaling in basis size | QIP 2019 | regular ▸ presenter | Mária Kieferová, Artur Scherer, Yuval Sanders, Guang Low, Nathan Wiebe, Jarrod McClean, Craig Gidney, Hartmut Neven, Ryan Babbush |
| Hamiltonian simulation with nearly optimal dependence on all parameters | QIP 2015 | regular | Andrew Childs, Robin Kothari |
| Exponential improvement in precision for Hamiltonian-evolution simulation | QIP 2014 | regular ▸ presenter | Richard Cleve, Rolando Somma |
| Discrete simulations of continuous-time query algorithms that are efficient with respect to queries, gates and space | QIP 2012 | regular | Richard Cleve, Sevag Gharibian |
|
↗
|
QIP 2010 | regular | Andrew M. Childs The query complexity of Hamiltonian simulation, unitary implementation abstract | watch | arXiv:0910.4157 |
Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Rapid initial state preparation for the quantum simulation of strongly correlated molecules | QIP 2025 | Yu Tong, Tanuj Khattar, Alec White, Tae In Kim, Guang Hao Low, Sergio Boixo, Lin Lin, Seunghoon Lee, Garnet Kin-Lic Chan, Ryan Babbush, Nicholas Rubin |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2026 | PC | member | — |
| QIP 2023 | PC | member | — |
| TQC 2022 | PC | member | — |
| TQC 2018 | PC | member | — |
| TQC 2017 | PC | member | — |
| QIP 2016 | PC | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Ryan Babbush | 14 |
| Nathan Wiebe | 8 |
| Craig Gidney | 6 |
| Jarrod McClean | 5 |
| Hartmut Neven | 4 |
| Joonho Lee | 4 |
| Rolando Somma | 4 |
| Alec White | 3 |
| Nicholas Rubin | 3 |
| Robin Kothari | 3 |
| Yuval Sanders | 3 |
| Eugene DePrince | 2 |
| Guang Hao Low | 2 |
| Pedro Costa | 2 |
| Richard Cleve | 2 |
| Robbie King | 2 |
| Tanuj Khattar | 2 |
| William Huggins | 2 |
| Yuan Su | 2 |
| Abhishek Rajput | 1 |