12
talks
1
committee roles
0
leadership roles
2016–2025
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oracle Separations for the Quantum-Classical Polynomial Hierarchy | QIP 2025 | regular | ▸Avantika Agarwal |
|
Oracle separation of QMA and QCMA with bounded adaptivity ↗
|
TQC 2024 | regular ▸ presenter | Srijita Kundu |
We give an oracle separation between QMA and QCMA for quantum algorithms that have bounded adaptivity in their oracle queries; that is, the number of rounds of oracle calls is small, though each round may involve polynomially many queries in parallel. Our oracle construction is a simplified version of the construction used recently by Li, Liu, Pelecanos, and Yamakawa (2023), who showed an oracle separation between QMA and QCMA when the quantum algorithms are only allowed to access the oracle classically. To prove our results, we introduce a property of relations called slipperiness, which may be useful for getting a fully general classical oracle separation between QMA and QCMA. |
|||
| Degree vs. Approximate Degree and Quantum Implications of Huangs Sensitivity Theorem | QIP 2021 | regular | Scott Aaronson, Robin Kothari, Shravas Rao, Avishay Tal |
Abstract Based on the recent breakthrough of Huang (2019), we show that for any total Boolean function f, deg(f) = O(~deg(f)^2): The degree of f is at most quadratic in the approximate degree of f. This is optimal as witnessed by the OR function. D(f) = O(Q(f)^4): The deterministic query complexity of f is at most quartic in the quantum query complexity of f. This matches the known separation (up to log factors) due to Ambainis, Balodis, Belovs, Lee, Santha, and Smotrovs (2017). We apply these results to resolve the quantum analogue of the Aanderaa--Karp--Rosenberg conjecture. We show that if f is a nontrivial monotone graph property of an n-vertex graph specified by its adjacency matrix, then Q(f)=Omega(n), which is also optimal. We also show that the approximate degree of any read-once formula on n variables is Theta(sqrt{n}). |
|||
| Symmetries, graph properties, and quantum speedups | QIP 2021 | regular | Andrew Childs, Andras Gilyen, William Kretschmer, Supartha Podder, Daochen Wang |
Abstract Aaronson and Ambainis (2009) and Chailloux (2018) showed that fully symmetric (partial) functions do not admit exponential quantum query speedups. This raises a natural question: how symmetric must a function be before it cannot exhibit a large quantum speedup? In this work, we prove that hypergraph symmetries in the adjacency matrix model allow at most a polynomial separation between randomized and quantum query complexities. We also show that, remarkably, permutation groups constructed out of these symmetries are essentially the only permutation groups that prevent super-polynomial quantum speedups. We prove this by fully characterizing the primitive permutation groups that allow super-polynomial quantum speedups. In contrast, in the adjacency list model for bounded-degree graphswhere graph symmetry is manifested differentlywe exhibit a property testing problem that shows an exponential quantum speedup. These results resolve open questions posed by Ambainis, Childs, and Liu (2010) and Montanaro and de Wolf (2013). |
|||
| On Query-to-Communication Lifting of Quantum Adversaries | QIP 2021 | regular | Anurag Anshu, Srijita Kundu |
Abstract We investigate query-to-communication lifting theorems for models related to the quantum adversary bounds. Our results are as follows: 1. We show that the classical adversary bound lifts to a lower bound on randomized communication complexity with a constant-sized gadget. We also show that the classical adversary bound is a strictly stronger lower bound technique than the previously-lifted measure known as critical block sensitivity, making our lifting theorem one of the strongest lifting theorems for randomized communication complexity using a constant-sized gadget. 2. Turning to quantum models, we show a connection between lifting theorems for quantum adversary bounds and secure 2-party quantum computation in a certain "honest-but-curious" model. Under the assumption that such secure 2-party computation is impossible, we show that a simplified version of the positive-weight adversary bound lifts to a quantum communication lower bound using a constant-sized gadget. We also give an unconditional lifting theorem which lower bounds bounded-round quantum communication protocols. 3. Finally, we give some new results in query complexity. We show that the classical adversary and the positive-weight quantum adversary are quadratically related. We also show that the positive-weight quantum adversary is never larger than the square of the approximate degree. Both relations hold even for partial functions. |
|||
| Quantum distinguishing complexity, zero-error algorithms, and statistical zero knowledge | TQC 2019 | regular | Robin Kothari |
| Classical lower bounds from quantum upper bounds | QIP 2018 | regular | ▸Adam Bouland, Ankit Garg, Robin Kothari |
| Separating quantum communication and approximate rank | QIP 2018 | regular ▸ presenter | Anurag Anshu, Ankit Garg, Rahul Jain, Robin Kothari, Troy Lee |
| Quantum Tokens for Digital Signatures | QCRYPT 2017 | regular | Or Sattath |
| Separations in communication complexity using cheat sheets and information complexity | QIP 2017 | regular | ▸Anurag Anshu, Aleksandrs Belovs, Mika Goos, Rahul Jain, Robin Kothari, Troy Lee, Miklos Santha |
| Sculpting quantum speedups | QIP 2017 | regular ▸ presenter | Scott Aaronson |
|
Separations in query complexity using cheat sheets
(Recipient of the QIP 2016 Best Student Paper Prize)
|
QIP 2016 | plenary | ▸Scott Aaronson, Robin Kothari |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2024 | PC | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Robin Kothari | 6 |
| Anurag Anshu | 3 |
| Scott Aaronson | 3 |
| Ankit Garg | 2 |
| Rahul Jain | 2 |
| Srijita Kundu | 2 |
| Troy Lee | 2 |
| Adam Bouland | 1 |
| Aleksandrs Belovs | 1 |
| Andras Gilyen | 1 |
| Andrew Childs | 1 |
| Avantika Agarwal | 1 |
| Avishay Tal | 1 |
| Daochen Wang | 1 |
| Mika Goos | 1 |
| Miklos Santha | 1 |
| Or Sattath | 1 |
| Shravas Rao | 1 |
| Supartha Podder | 1 |
| William Kretschmer | 1 |