15
program roles
5
steering roles
1
organizing role
3
leadership roles
88
collaborators
2004–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
33 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Limit on the Power of Entanglement-Assistance in Quantum Communication | QIP 2025 | regular | ▸Lasse H. Wolff, Paula Belzig, Bergfinnur Durhuus, Marco Tomamichel |
| Fault-tolerant quantum input/output | QIP 2025 | regular | Omar Fawzi, ▸Ashutosh Kumar Goswami |
| Making Existing Quantum Position Verification Protocols Secure Against Arbitrary Transmission Loss | QCRYPT 2024 | regular | Rene Allerstorfer, Andreas Bluhm, Harry Buhrman, Llorenç Escolà-Farràs, Florian Speelman, Philip Verduyn Lunel |
Signal loss poses a significant threat to the security of quantum cryptography when the chosen protocol lacks loss-tolerance. In quantum position verification (QPV) protocols, even relatively small loss rates can compromise security. The goal is thus to find protocols that remain secure under practically achievable loss rates. In this work, we modify the usual structure of QPV protocols and prove that this modification makes the potentially high transmission loss between the verifiers and the prover security-irrelevant for a class of protocols that includes a practically-interesting candidate protocol inspired by the BB84 protocol. This modification, which involves photon presence detection, a small time delay at the prover, and a commitment to play before proceeding, reduces the overall loss rate to just the prover’s laboratory. The adapted protocol then becomes a practically feasible QPV protocol with strong security guarantees, even against attackers using adaptive strategies. As the loss rate between the verifiers and prover is mainly dictated by the distance between them, secure QPV over longer distances becomes possible. We also show possible implementations of the required photon presence detection, making the adapted protocol a protocol that solves all major practical issues in QPV. Finally, we discuss experimental aspects and give parameter estimations. |
|||
| Making Existing Quantum Position Verification Protocols Secure Against Arbitrary Transmission Loss | QIP 2024 | regular | ▸Rene Allerstorfer, Andreas Bluhm, Harry Buhrman, Llorenc Escola Farras, Florian Speelman, Philip Verduyn Lunel |
| Discreteness of asymptotic tripartite entanglement measures | QIP 2024 | regular | ▸Jop Briët, Itai Leigh, Amir Shpilka, Fulvio Gesmundo, Jeroen Zuiddam |
| The Quantum Entropy Cone near its Apex | QIP 2024 | regular | ▸Lasse H. Wolff, Bergfinnur Durhuus |
| Going Beyond Gadgets: The Importance of Scalability for Analogue Quantum Simulators | QIP 2024 | regular | ▸Dylan Harley, Ishaun Datta, Frederik Ravn Klausen, Andreas Bluhm, Daniel Stilck França, Albert H. Werner |
| Monogamy of highly symmetric states | QIP 2024 | regular | ▸Rene Allerstorfer, Dmitry Grinko, Ion Nechita, Maris Ozols, Denis Rochette, Philip Verduyn Lunel |
| The resource theory of tensor networks | QIP 2024 | regular ▸ presenter | Vladimir Lysikov, Vincent Steffan, Albert H. Werner, Freek Witteveen |
| Fault-tolerant Coding for Entanglement-Assisted Communication | TQC 2023 | regular | ▸Paula Belzig, Alexander Müller-Hermes |
We study a parameterized version of the local Hamiltonian problem, called the weighted local Hamiltonian problem, where the relevant quantum states are superpositions of computational basis states of Hamming weight k. The Hamming weight constraint can have a physical interpretation as a constraint on the number of excitations allowed or the particle number in a system. We prove that this problem is in QW[1], the first level of the quantum weft hierarchy, and that it is hard for QM[1], the quantum analogue of M[1]. Our results show that this problem cannot be fixed parameter quantum tractable (FPQT) unless certain natural quantum analogue of the exponential time hypothesis (ETH) is false. |
|||
| Position-based cryptography: Single-qubit protocol secure against multi-qubit attacks | TQC 2022 | regular | ▸Andreas Bluhm, Florian Speelman |
| Position-based cryptography: Single-qubit protocol secure against multi-qubit attacks | QCRYPT 2021 | regular | Andreas Bluhm, Florian Speelman |
While it is known that unconditionally secure position-based cryptography is impossible both in the classical and the quantum setting, it has been shown that some quantum protocols for position verification are secure against attackers which share a quantum state of bounded dimension. In this work, we consider the security of the qubit routing protocol. The protocol has the advantage that an honest prover only has to manipulate a single qubit and a classical string of length 2n. We show that the protocol is secure if each of the attackers holds at most n/2 - 3 qubits. With this, we show for the first time that there exists a quantum position verification protocol where the ratio between the quantum resources an honest prover needs and the quantum resources the attackers need to break the protocol is unbounded. The verifiers need only increase the amount of classical resources to force the attackers to use more quantum resources. Finally, we show that the qubit routing protocol is robust with respect to noise, making it appealing for applications. |
|||
| Fault-tolerant coding for quantum communication | QIP 2021 | regular | Alexander Müller-Hermes |
Abstract Designing encoding and decoding circuits to reliably send messages over many uses of a noisy channel is a central problem in communication theory. When studying the optimal transmission rates achievable with asymptotically vanishing error it is usually assumed that these circuits can be implemented using noise-free gates. While this assumption is satisfied for classical machines in many scenarios, it is not expected to be satisfied in the near term future for quantum machines where decoherence leads to faults in the quantum gates. As a result, fundamental questions regarding the practical relevance of quantum channel coding remain open. By combining techniques from fault-tolerant quantum computation with techniques from quantum communication, we initiate the study of these questions. We introduce fault-tolerant versions of quantum capacities quantifying the optimal communication rates achievable with asymptotically vanishing total error when the encoding and decoding circuits are affected by gate errors with small probability. Our main results are threshold theorems for the classical and quantum capacity: For every quantum channel $T$ and every $\epsilon>0$ there exists a threshold $p(\epsilon,T)$ for the gate error probability below which rates larger than $C-\epsilon$ are fault-tolerantly achievable with vanishing overall communication error, where $C$ denotes the usual capacity. Our results are not only relevant in communication over large distances, but also on-chip, where distant parts of a quantum computer might need to communicate under higher levels of noise than affecting the local gates. Session 2B Stage B |
|||
| Upper bounds on device-independent quantum key distribution rates | TQC 2021 | regular | Rotem Arnon-Friedman, Roberto Ferrara, Karol Horodecki, ▸Felix Leditzky |
| Optimization at the boundary of the tensor network variety | TQC 2021 | regular | Daniel Stilck França, Fulvio Gesmundo, ▸Albert H. Werner |
| Tensor network representations from the geometry of entangled states | QIP 2020 | regular | Angelo Lucia, Peter Vrana, Albert H. Werner |
| Asymptotic performance of port-based teleportation | QIP 2019 | regular | Felix Leditzky, ▸Christian Majenz, Graeme Smith, Florian Speelman, Michael Walter |
| Tensor network representations from the geometry of entangled states | TQC 2019 | regular | Angelo Lucia, Peter Vrana, Albert H. Werner |
| Universal points in the asymptotic spectrum of tensors | QIP 2018 | regular | Peter Vrana, ▸Jeroen Zuiddam |
| Catalytic decoupling | QIP 2017 | regular | ▸Christian Majenz, Mario Berta, Frédéric Dupuis, Renato Renner, Fernando G. S. L. Brandão, Mark M. Wilde |
|
Limitations on Quantum Key Repeaters ↗
|
QIP 2015 | regular | Stefan Bäuml, Karol Horodecki, Andreas Winter |
| Limitations on Quantum Key Repeaters | QCRYPT 2014 | regular | Stefan Bäuml, ▸Karol Horodecki, Andreas Winter |
| Continuous variable entropic uncertainty relations in the presence of quantum memory | QCRYPT 2013 | regular | Mario Berta, ▸Fabian Furrer, Volkher Schultz, Marco Tomamichel |
|
“Complete Insecurity of Quantum Protocols for Classical Two-Party Computation.” ↗
|
QIP 2013 | invited | Harry Buhrman, Christian Schaffner |
|
“Recoupling Coefficients and Quantum Entropies.” ↗
|
QIP 2013 | regular | Mehmet Burak Sahinoglu, Michael Walter |
|
“Entanglement Polytopes.” ↗
|
QIP 2013 | regular | Michael Walter, Brent Doran, David Gross |
| Complete insecurity of quantum protocols for classical two-party computation | QCRYPT 2012 | regular | Harry Buhrman, ▸Christian Schaffner |
|
Highly entangled states with almost no secrecy ↗
|
QIP 2010 | regular | Norbert Schuch, Andreas Winter |
| A Conceptually Simple Proof of the Quantum Reverse Shannon Theorem | TQC 2010 | regular | Mario Berta, Renato Renner |
| Postselection-technique with applications to quantum cryptography and the parallel repetition problem | QIP 2009 | regular ▸ presenter | Dejan Dukaric, Robert König, Renato Renner |
| De Finetti theorems for finitely exchangeable conditional probability=20 distributions | QIP 2008 | regular ▸ presenter | Benjamin Toner |
| On the (Im)Possibility of Quantum String Commitment | QIP 2005 | invited | Harry Buhrman, Patrick Hayden, Hoi-Kwong Lo, Stephanie Wehner |
| A new generic proof for the security of quantum key distribution | QIP 2004 | regular | — |
We present a new proof for the security of quantum key distribution. The presented proof is general in nature and applies to prepare-and-measure protocols such as BB84 as well as entanglement-based quantum cryptography such as E91. We use techniques that do not relate to entanglement distillation and thus differ significantly from all known security proofs. In order to derive a general security threshold we apply the recent result on privacy amplification in the presence of a quantum mechanical adversary by König, Maurer and Renner (2003). (This is joint work with Artur Ekert and Renato Renner.) |
|||
26 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| The tetrahedral Horn problem and asymptotics of U(n) 6j symbols | QIP 2026 | Anton Alekseev, ▸Thomas C. Fraser |
| Update on the Bound Key Conjecture | QIP 2026 | Stefan Bäuml, Karol Horodecki, ▸Leonard Sikorski |
| Fault-tolerant Coding for Entanglement-Assisted Communication | QIP 2023 | Paula Belzig, Alexander Müller-Hermes |
| Large deviation principle for quantum marginal and moment map tomography | QIP 2021 | Alonso Botero, Cole Franks, Peter Vrana, Michael Walter |
| Noise-robust exploration of quantum matter on near-term quantum devices | QIP 2020 | Daniel Stilck França, Johannes Borregaard |
| When Do Composed Maps Become Entanglement Breaking? Wolf | QIP 2019 | Alexander Müller-Hermes, Michael |
| Random private quantum states | QCRYPT 2018 | Roberto Ferrara, Cecilia Lancien |
| Private states, quantum data hiding and the swapping of perfect secrecy: Random Constructions | QIP 2018 | Roberto Ferrara, Cecilia Lancien |
| Relative Entropy Bounds on Quantum, Private and Repeater Capacities | QIP 2018 | Alexander Müller-Hermes |
| Tensor rank is not multiplicative under the tensor product | QIP 2018 | Asger Kjærulff Jensen, Jeroen Zuiddam |
| Quantum Circuits for Quantum Channels | QIP 2017 | Raban Iten, Roger Colbeck |
| Clean quantum and classical communication protocols | QIP 2017 | Harry Buhrman, Christopher Perry, Jeroen Zuiddam |
| Relative Entropy Bounds on Quantum, Private and Repeater Capacities | QIP 2017 | Alexander Müller-Hermes |
| Quantum Circuits for Quantum Channels | TQC 2017 | Raban Iten, Roger Colbeck |
| Bell Private States | QCRYPT 2015 | Roberto Ferrara |
| Quantum Circuits for Isometries | QIP 2015 | Raban Iten, Roger Colbeck, Jonathan Home |
| Asymptotic first-order corrections to separability in permutation invariant settings | QIP 2014 | Robert Matjeschk, Friederike Trimborn, Reinhard Werner |
| Precision-guaranteed finite-dimensional quantum tomography | QIP 2014 | Takanori Sugiyama, Peter Turner, Mio Murao |
| Continuous Variable Entropic Uncertainty Relations in the Presence of Quantum Memory | QIP 2014 | Mario Berta, Fabian Furrer, Volkher Scholz, Marco Tomamichel |
| Limitations on privacy swapping | QIP 2013 | Stefan Bäuml, Andreas Winter |
| Entanglement Cost of Quantum Channels | QIP 2012 | Mario Berta, Fernando G. S. L. Brandão, Stephanie Wehner |
| Non-Abelian Duistermaat-Heckman Measures and the Quantum Marginal Problem | QIP 2012 | Michael Walter, Stavros Kousidis, Brent Doran |
| Electric-magnetic duality and topological order on the lattice | QIP 2011 | Oliver Buerschaper, Liang Kong, Miguel Aguado |
| A New Proof of the Quantum Reverse Shannon Theorem | QIP 2010 | Mario Berta, Renato Renner |
| Topological tensor networks, Hopf algebras, and duality | QIP 2010 | Oliver Buerschaper, Juan Martín Mombelli, Miguel Aguado |
| Broadcast copies reveal quantumness of bipartite correlations | QIP 2009 | Marco Piani, Pawel Horodecki, Caterina-Eloisa Mora |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2026 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2026 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2025 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2024 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2023 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2022 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2019 | program | chair | — |
| QIP 2018 | program | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2016 | program | chair | — |
| QIP 2016 | program | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2015 | steering | member | — |
| TQC 2015 | program | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2014 | steering | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2013 | program | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2013 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2013 | program | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2012 | steering | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2011 | organizing | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2011 | steering | chair | — |
| QIP 2010 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2010 | program | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Alexander Müller-Hermes | 6 |
| Harry Buhrman | 6 |
| Mario Berta | 6 |
| Albert H. Werner | 5 |
| Andreas Bluhm | 5 |
| Florian Speelman | 5 |
| Michael Walter | 5 |
| Andreas Winter | 4 |
| Jeroen Zuiddam | 4 |
| Karol Horodecki | 4 |
| Peter Vrana | 4 |
| Renato Renner | 4 |
| Roberto Ferrara | 4 |
| Stefan Bäuml | 4 |
| Daniel Stilck França | 3 |
| Marco Tomamichel | 3 |
| Paula Belzig | 3 |
| Philip Verduyn Lunel | 3 |
| Raban Iten | 3 |
| Rene Allerstorfer | 3 |