2
program roles
67
collaborators
2015–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
19 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
|
A distillation-teleportation protocol for fault-tolerant QRAM ↗
|
QIP 2026 | regular | ▸Alexander M. Dalzell, Connor T. Hann, Sam McArdle, Grant Salton, Quynh Nguyen, Aleksander Kubica, Fernando G. S. L. Brandão |
We present a protocol for fault-tolerantly implementing the logical quantum random access memory (QRAM) operation, given access to a specialized, noisy QRAM device. For coherently accessing classical memories of size 2^n, our protocol consumes only poly(n) fault-tolerant quantum resources (logical gates, logical qubits, quantum error correction cycles, etc.), avoiding the need to perform active error correction on all Ω(2^n) components of the QRAM device. This is the first rigorous conceptual demonstration that a specialized, noisy QRAM device could be useful for implementing a fault-tolerant quantum algorithm. In fact, the fidelity of the device can be as low as 1/poly(n). The protocol queries the noisy QRAM device poly(n) times to prepare a sequence of n-qubit QRAM resource states, which are moved to a general-purpose poly(n)-size processor to be encoded into a QEC code, distilled, and fault-tolerantly teleported into the computation. To aid this protocol, we develop a new gate-efficient streaming version of quantum purity amplification that matches the optimal sample complexity in a wide range of parameters and is therefore of independent interest. The exponential reduction in fault-tolerant quantum resources comes at the expense of an exponential quantity of purely classical complexity---each of the n iterations of the protocol requires adaptively updating the 2^n-size classical dataset and providing the noisy QRAM device with access to the updated dataset at the next iteration. We show that this classical operation can be parallelized to poly(n) classical circuit depth, but only in a model where classical sparse matrix-vector multiplication for 2^n-dimensional vectors can be as well. While our protocol demonstrates that QRAM is more compatible with fault-tolerant quantum computation than previously thought, the need for significant classical computational complexity exposes potentially fundamental limitations to realizing a truly poly(n)-cost fault-tolerant QRAM. |
|||
|
Quantum generalizations of Glauber and Metropolis dynamics ↗
|
QIP 2026 | regular | Chi-Fang Chen, Csaba Czabán, ▸João Fernando Doriguello, Balázs Kabella, Michael Kastoryano, József Mák, Zoltan Zimboras |
Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods are an essential tool in classical algorithms design. Especially, the Metropolis sampling algorithm and Glauber dynamics have drastically advanced our understanding of material properties, reaction dynamics, phase transitions, and thermodynamics. Recently, there has been a new wave of quantum MCMC algorithms that draws inspiration from the cooling process in Nature to design continuous-time Quantum Markov chains (i.e., Lindbladians) satisfying (approximate) detailed balance. Nevertheless, the quantum analog of detailed balance, which has been central to classical Markov chain design and analysis, has posed a challenge to quantum algorithms design and has only recently been achieved exactly and (quasi)-locally for an efficiently implementable Lindbladian by [CKG23]. The construction of [CKG23] provably leads to an efficient Gibbs state preparation method in the high-temperature regime. However, proving fast mixing for low temperatures remains an open problem, apart from some (almost) integrable systems. Here we introduce (i) a new continuous-time Lindbladian construction that also leads to quasi-local and detailed-balanced dynamics, and (ii) show that it is fast mixing for high-temperature lattice Hamiltonians. The new construction's major advantage is that it does not increase the number of Kraus operators, which is particularly helpful for numerical studies. We exploit the resulting low Kraus rank through a (iii) novel custom variant of density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) for superoperators to provide numerical evidence for various 1D models (Transverse-field Ising, Heisenberg XXZ) that the Gibbs sampler is mixing fast. We also introduce (iv) new detailed-balanced discrete-time quantum channel variants of all existing continuous-time detailed-balanced Lindbladian construction and (v) show that they are also mixing fast at high-temperatures, and provide some preliminary (vi) resource estimates for their implementation confirming their algorithmic efficiency. |
|||
| A Quantum Speed-Up for Approximating the Top Eigenvector of a Matrix | QIP 2024 | regular | ▸Yanlin Chen, Ronald de Wolf |
| Quantum Thermal State Preparation | QIP 2024 | plenary_short | ▸Chi-Fang Chen, Michael Kastoryano, Fernando G. S. L. Brandão |
| A streamlined quantum algorithm for topological data analysis with exponentially fewer qubits | QIP 2023 | regular ▸ presenter | Sam McArdle, Mario Berta |
| Quantum tomography using state-preparation unitaries | QIP 2023 | regular | Joran van Apeldoorn, ▸Arjan Cornelissen, Giacomo Nannicini |
| Improved Approximation Algorithms for Fidelity Estimation | TQC 2022 | regular | ▸Alexander Poremba |
| (Sub)Exponential advantage of adiabatic quantum computation with no sign problem | QIP 2021 | regular | Matthew B. Hastings, Umesh Vazirani |
Abstract We demonstrate the possibility of (sub)exponential quantum speedup via a quantum algorithm that follows an adiabatic path of a gapped sparse Hamiltonian with no sign problem. This is in sharp contrast with frustration-free stoquastic Hamiltonians, where no such speedup is possible as shown by Bravyi and Terhal (2008). The Hamiltonian that exhibits this speed-up comes from the adjacency matrix of an undirected graph, and we can view the adiabatic evolution as an efficient $\mathcal{O}(\mathrm{poly}(n))$-time quantum algorithm for finding a specific "EXIT" vertex in the graph given the "ENTRANCE" vertex. On the other hand we show that if the graph is given via an adjacency-list oracle, there is no classical algorithm that finds the "EXIT" with probability greater than $\exp(-n^\delta)$ using at most $\exp(n^\delta)$ queries for $\delta= \frac15 - o(1)$. Our construction of the graph is somewhat similar to the ``welded-trees'' construction of Childs et al. (2003), but uses additional ideas for simultaneously achieving a spectral gap and a short adiabatic path. |
|||
| Limitations of the Macaulay matrix approach for using the HHL algorithm to solve multivariate polynomial systems | QIP 2021 | regular | Jintai Ding, Vlad Gheorghiu, Sean Hallgren, Jianqiang Li |
Abstract Recently Chen and Gao~\cite{ChenGao2017} proposed a new quantum algorithm for Boolean polynomial system solving, motivated by the cryptanalysis of some post-quantum cryptosystems. The key idea of their approach is to apply a Quantum Linear System (QLS) algorithm to a Macaulay linear system over $\CC$, which is derived from the Boolean polynomial system. The efficiency of their algorithm depends on the condition number of the Macaulay matrix. In this paper, we give a strong lower bound on the condition number as a function of the Hamming weight of the solution. We describe a Grover-based exhaustive search algorithm that always outperforms their algorithm. Then, we improve upon Chen and Gao's algorithm by introducing the Boolean Macaulay linear system over $\CC$ by reducing the original Macaulay linear system. This improved algorithm could potentially significantly outperform the brute-force algorithm, when the Hamming weight of the solution is logarithmic in the number of variables. Furthermore, we provide a simple and more elementary proof of correctness for our improved algorithm using a reduction employing the Valiant-Vazirani affine hashing method, and also extend the result to polynomial systems over $\FF_q$ improving on subsequent work by Chen, Gao and Yuan \cite{ChenGao2018}. We also suggest a new approach for extracting the solution of the Boolean polynomial system via a generalization of the quantum coupon collector problem \cite{arunachalam2020quantum}. |
|||
| Symmetries, graph properties, and quantum speedups | QIP 2021 | regular | Shalev Ben-David, Andrew Childs, William Kretschmer, Supartha Podder, Daochen Wang |
Abstract Aaronson and Ambainis (2009) and Chailloux (2018) showed that fully symmetric (partial) functions do not admit exponential quantum query speedups. This raises a natural question: how symmetric must a function be before it cannot exhibit a large quantum speedup? In this work, we prove that hypergraph symmetries in the adjacency matrix model allow at most a polynomial separation between randomized and quantum query complexities. We also show that, remarkably, permutation groups constructed out of these symmetries are essentially the only permutation groups that prevent super-polynomial quantum speedups. We prove this by fully characterizing the primitive permutation groups that allow super-polynomial quantum speedups. In contrast, in the adjacency list model for bounded-degree graphswhere graph symmetry is manifested differentlywe exhibit a property testing problem that shows an exponential quantum speedup. These results resolve open questions posed by Ambainis, Childs, and Liu (2010) and Montanaro and de Wolf (2013). |
|||
| Quantum algorithm for Petz recovery channels and pretty good measurements | TQC 2021 | regular | Seth Lloyd, Iman Marvian, ▸Yihui Quek, Mark M. Wilde |
| Quantum Algorithms | QIP 2020 | tutorial ▸ presenter | — |
| Quadratic speedup for finding marked vertices by quantum walks | QIP 2020 | regular | Andris Ambainis, Stacey Jeffery, Mārtiņš Kokainis |
| Sampling-based sublinear low-rank matrix arithmetic framework for dequantizing quantum machine learning | QIP 2020 | regular | Nai-Hui Chia, Tongyang Li, Han-Hsuan Lin, Ewin Tang, Chunhao Wang |
| Algorithms and lower bounds for convex optimization using quantum oracles | QIP 2019 | regular | ▸Joran van Apeldoorn, Shouvanik Chakrabarti, Andrew Childs, Sander Gribling, Tongyang Li, Ronald de Wolf, Xiaodi Wu |
| Quantum SDP Solvers: New Input Models, Improved Algorithms, and Applications | QIP 2019 | regular | Joran van Apeldoorn, Fernando G. S. L. Brandão, Amir Kalev, ▸Tongyang Li, Cedric Yen-Yu Lin, Krysta Marie Svore, Xiaodi Wu |
| Quantum singular value transformation and beyond: exponential improvements for quantum matrix arithmetics | QIP 2019 | regular | Yuan Su, Guang Hao Low, Nathan Wiebe |
| András Gilyén: Quantum Singular Value Transformation & its algorithmic applications | TQC 2019 | invited ▸ presenter | — |
| On preparing ground states of gapped Hamiltonians: an efficient quantum Lovasz local lemma | QIP 2017 | regular ▸ presenter | Or Sattath |
13 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Convergence time of Quantum Gibbs Samplers | QIP 2026 | ▸Balázs Kabella, József Mák, Zoltan Zimboras |
| Quantum generalizations of Glauber and Metropolis dynamics | QIP 2025 | Chi-Fang Chen, João Fernando Doriguello, Michael Kastoryano |
| Iterative Refinement for more efficient tomography and quantum linear equation solving | QIP 2024 | Mohammadhossein Mohammadisiahroudi, Brandon Augustino, Ramin Fakhimi, Giacomo Nannicini, Tamás Terlaky |
| Quantum walk based sampling algorithms | QIP 2023 | Sára Pituk |
| A Unified Framework for Quantum Walk Search | QIP 2021 | Simon Apers, Stacey Jeffery |
| Scalable Benchmarks for Gate-Based Quantum Computers | QIP 2021 | Arjan Cornelissen, Johannes Bausch |
| Finding Angles for Quantum Signal Processing with Machine Precision | QIP 2019 | Rui Chao, Dawei Ding, Cupjin Huang, Mario Szegedy |
| Optimizing quantum optimization algorithms via faster quantum gradient computation | QIP 2019 | Srinivasan Arunachalam, Arjan Cornelissen, Nathan Wiebe |
| The power of block-encoded matrix powers: improved regression techniques via faster Hamiltonian simulation | QIP 2019 | Shantanav Chakraborty, Stacey Jeffery |
| Distributional property testing in a quantum world | TQC 2019 | Tongyang Li |
| Optimizing quantum optimization algorithms via faster quantum gradient computation | QIP 2018 | Srinivasan Arunachalam, Nathan Wiebe |
| Lower bounds for quantum solvers for SDPs and LPs | QIP 2017 | Joran van Apeldoorn, Sander Gribling, Ronald de Wolf |
| Efficient Implementation of Quantum Walk Based Search Algorithms | TQC 2015 | — |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2022 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2021 | program | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Joran van Apeldoorn | 4 |
| Tongyang Li | 4 |
| Arjan Cornelissen | 3 |
| Chi-Fang Chen | 3 |
| Fernando G. S. L. Brandão | 3 |
| Michael Kastoryano | 3 |
| Nathan Wiebe | 3 |
| Ronald de Wolf | 3 |
| Stacey Jeffery | 3 |
| Andrew Childs | 2 |
| Balázs Kabella | 2 |
| Giacomo Nannicini | 2 |
| João Fernando Doriguello | 2 |
| József Mák | 2 |
| Sam McArdle | 2 |
| Sander Gribling | 2 |
| Srinivasan Arunachalam | 2 |
| Xiaodi Wu | 2 |
| Zoltan Zimboras | 2 |
| Aleksander Kubica | 1 |