14
talks
3
posters
4
committee roles
0
leadership roles
2010–2025
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| The power of a single Haar random state: constructing and separating quantum pseudorandomness | QIP 2025 | regular | Boyang Chen, Andrea Coladangelo |
| The power of a single Haar random state: constructing and separating quantum pseudorandomness | QCRYPT 2024 | regular | Boyang Chen, Andrea Coladangelo |
In this work, we focus on the following question: what are the cryptographic implications of having access to an oracle that provides a single Haar random quantum state? We show, perhaps surprisingly, that such an oracle is sufficient to construct quantum pseudorandomness. Pseudorandom states (PRS) are a family of states for which it is hard to distinguish between polynomially many copies of either a state sampled uniformly from the family or a Haar random state. A weaker notion, called single-copy pseudorandom states (1PRS), satisfies this property with respect to a single copy. Our main result is that 1PRS (as well as bit-commitments) exist relative to an oracle that provides a single Haar random state. We build on this result to show the existence of an oracle relative to which 1PRS exist, but PRS do not. This provides one of the first black-box separations between different forms of quantum pseudorandomness. |
|||
| Pseudorandomness with Proof of Destruction and Applications | QCRYPT 2023 | regular | ▸Amit Behera, Zvika Brakerski, Omri Shmueli |
Two fundamental properties of quantum states that quantum information theory explores are pseudorandomness and provability of destruction. We introduce the notion of quantum pseudorandom states with proofs of destruction (PRSPD) that combines both these properties. Like standard pseudorandom states (PRS), these are efficiently generated quantum states that are indistinguishable from random, but they can also be measured to create a classical string. This string is
verifiable (given the secret key) and certifies that the state has been destructed. We show that, similarly to PRS, PRSPD can be constructed from any post-quantum one-way function. As far as the authors are aware, this is the first construction of a family of states that satisfies both pseudorandomness and provability of destruction.
We show that many cryptographic applications that were shown based on PRS variants using quantum communication can be based on (variants of) PRSPD using only classical communication. This includes symmetric encryption, message authentication, one-time signatures, commitments, and classically verifiable private quantum coins. |
|||
| Noise-Tolerant Quantum Tokens for MAC | TQC 2022 | regular | Uriel Shinar, ▸Amit Behera |
| Almost Public Quantum Coins | QIP 2021 | regular | Amit Behera |
Abstract In a quantum money scheme, a bank can issue money that users cannot counterfeit. Similar to bills of paper money, most quantum money schemes assign a unique serial number to each money state, thus potentially compromising the privacy of the users of quantum money. However in a quantum coins scheme, just like the traditional currency coin scheme, all the money states are exact copies of each other, providing a better level of privacy for the users. A quantum money scheme can be private, i.e., only the bank can verify the money states, or public, meaning anyone can verify. In this work, we propose a way to lift any private quantum coin scheme -- which is known to exist based on the existence of one-way functions by Ji, Liu, and Song (CRYPTO'18) -- to a scheme that closely resembles a public quantum coin scheme. Verification of a new coin is done by comparing it to the coins the user already possesses, by using a projector on to the symmetric subspace. No public coin scheme was known prior to this work. It is also the first construction that is close to a public quantum money scheme and is provably secure based on standard assumptions. The lifting technique when instantiated with the private quantum coins scheme by Mosca and Stebila (2010) gives rise to the first construction that is close to an inefficient unconditionally secure public quantum money scheme. |
|||
| A Quantum Money Solution to the Blockchain Scalability Problem | QCRYPT 2020 | regular | Andrea Coladangelo |
| Quantum Money | QCRYPT 2018 | tutorial ▸ presenter | — |
| On the insecurity of quantum Bitcoin mining | QCRYPT 2018 | regular ▸ presenter | — |
| Quantum Tokens for Digital Signatures | QCRYPT 2017 | regular | Shalev Ben-David |
| On preparing ground states of gapped Hamiltonians: an efficient quantum Lovasz local lemma | QIP 2017 | regular | ▸Andras Gilyen |
| Bombs don’t have to explode, forgers can get away scot-free (an adaptive attack on Wiesner’s quantum money) | QCRYPT 2014 | regular | ▸Daniel Nagaj, Aharon Brodutch |
| The Complexity of the Separable Hamiltonian Problem | QIP 2012 | regular | Andre Chailloux |
| Three Proofs of a Constructive Commuting Quantum Lovasz Local Lemma | QIP 2012 | regular | Toby Cubitt, Martin Schwarz, Frank Verstraete, Itai Arad |
|
On the power of a unique quantum witness ↗
|
QIP 2010 | regular | Rahul Jain, Iordanis Kerenidis, Greg Kuperberg, Miklos Santha, Shengyu Zhang |
Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| 51% Attack via Difficulty Increase with a Small Quantum Miner | QIP 2025 | Bolton Bailey |
| Signatures From Pseudorandom States via ⊥-PRFs | QCRYPT 2024 | Mohammed Barhoush, Amit Behera, Lior Ozer, Louis Salvail |
Different flavors of quantum pseudorandomness have proven useful for various cryptographic applications, with the compelling feature that these primitives are potentially weaker than post-quantum one-way functions. Ananth, Lin, and Yuen (2023) have shown that logarithmic pseudorandom states can be used to construct a pseudo-deterministic PRG: informally, for a fixed seed, the output is the same with 1 − 1/poly probability. In this work, we introduce new definitions for ⊥-PRG and ⊥-PRF. The correctness guarantees are that, for a fixed seed, except with negligible probability, the output is either the same (with probability 1 − 1/poly) or recognizable abort, denoted ⊥. Our approach admits a natural definition of multi-time PRG security, as well as the adaptive security of a PRF. We construct a ⊥-PRG from any pseudo-deterministic PRG and, from that, a ⊥-PRF. Even though most mini-crypt primitives, such as symmetric key encryption, commitments, MAC, and length-restricted one-time digital signatures, have been shown based on various quantum pseudorandomness assumptions, digital signatures remained elusive. Our main application is a (quantum) digital signature scheme with classical public keys and signatures, thereby addressing a previously unresolved question posed in Morimae and Yamakawa’s work (Crypto, 2022). Additionally, we construct CPA secure public-key encryption with tamper-resilient quantum public keys. |
||
| Quantum coin hedging, and a counter measure | QCRYPT 2017 | Maor Ganz |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCRYPT 2023 | PC | member | — |
| QIP 2021 | PC | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2020 | PC | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2018 | PC | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Amit Behera | 4 |
| Andrea Coladangelo | 3 |
| Boyang Chen | 2 |
| Aharon Brodutch | 1 |
| Andras Gilyen | 1 |
| Andre Chailloux | 1 |
| Bolton Bailey | 1 |
| Daniel Nagaj | 1 |
| Frank Verstraete | 1 |
| Greg Kuperberg | 1 |
| Iordanis Kerenidis | 1 |
| Itai Arad | 1 |
| Lior Ozer | 1 |
| Louis Salvail | 1 |
| Maor Ganz | 1 |
| Martin Schwarz | 1 |
| Miklos Santha | 1 |
| Mohammed Barhoush | 1 |
| Omri Shmueli | 1 |
| Rahul Jain | 1 |