16
talks
2
posters
3
committee roles
0
leadership roles
2016–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
|
A distillation-teleportation protocol for fault-tolerant QRAM ↗
|
QIP 2026 | regular | Alexander M. Dalzell, Andras Gilyen, Connor T. Hann, Sam McArdle, Grant Salton, Quynh Nguyen, Fernando G.S.L. Brandao |
We present a protocol for fault-tolerantly implementing the logical quantum random access memory (QRAM) operation, given access to a specialized, noisy QRAM device. For coherently accessing classical memories of size 2^n, our protocol consumes only poly(n) fault-tolerant quantum resources (logical gates, logical qubits, quantum error correction cycles, etc.), avoiding the need to perform active error correction on all Ω(2^n) components of the QRAM device. This is the first rigorous conceptual demonstration that a specialized, noisy QRAM device could be useful for implementing a fault-tolerant quantum algorithm. In fact, the fidelity of the device can be as low as 1/poly(n). The protocol queries the noisy QRAM device poly(n) times to prepare a sequence of n-qubit QRAM resource states, which are moved to a general-purpose poly(n)-size processor to be encoded into a QEC code, distilled, and fault-tolerantly teleported into the computation. To aid this protocol, we develop a new gate-efficient streaming version of quantum purity amplification that matches the optimal sample complexity in a wide range of parameters and is therefore of independent interest.
The exponential reduction in fault-tolerant quantum resources comes at the expense of an exponential quantity of purely classical complexity---each of the n iterations of the protocol requires adaptively updating the 2^n-size classical dataset and providing the noisy QRAM device with access to the updated dataset at the next iteration. We show that this classical operation can be parallelized to poly(n) classical circuit depth, but only in a model where classical sparse matrix-vector multiplication for 2^n-dimensional vectors can be as well. While our protocol demonstrates that QRAM is more compatible with fault-tolerant quantum computation than previously thought, the need for significant classical computational complexity exposes potentially fundamental limitations to realizing a truly poly(n)-cost fault-tolerant QRAM. |
|||
| Layer codes as partially self-correcting quantum memories | QIP 2026 | regular | Shouzhen Gu, Libor Caha, Shin Ho Choe, Zhiyang He, Eugene Tang |
We investigate layer codes, a family of three-dimensional stabilizer codes that can achieve optimal scaling of code parameters and a polynomial energy barrier, as candidates for self-correcting quantum memories. First, we introduce two decoding algorithms for layer codes with provable guarantees for local stochastic and adversarial noise, respectively. We then prove that layer codes are partially self-correcting quantum memories. With memory times scaling exponentially in the linear size of the system, layer codes outperform the previously demonstrated subexponential scaling of the welded solid code. Notably, we argue that partial self-correction without the requirement of efficient decoding is more common than expected, as it arises from a diverging energy barrier. This draws a sharp distinction between partially self-correcting systems, and partially self-correcting memories. Another novel aspect of our work is an analysis of layer codes constructed from random Calderbank–Shor–Steane codes. We show that these random layer codes have optimal scaling (up to logarithmic corrections) of code parameters and a polynomial energy barrier. Finally, we present numerical studies of their memory times and report behavior consistent with partial self-correction. |
|||
| The benefits and costs of quantum error correction with erasure qubits | QIP 2025 | regular | ▸Shouzhen Gu, Yotam Vaknin, Alex Retzker |
|
Single-shot decoding of good quantum LDPC codes ↗
|
TQC 2024 | regular | ▸Shouzhen Gu, Eugene Tang, Libor Caha, Shin Ho Choe, Zhiyang He |
Quantum Tanner codes constitute a family of quantum low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes with good parameters, i.e., constant encoding rate and relative distance. In this article, we prove that quantum Tanner codes also facilitate single-shot quantum error correction (QEC) of adversarial noise, where one measurement round (consisting of constant-weight parity checks) suffices to perform reliable QEC even in the presence of measurement errors. We establish this result for both the sequential and parallel decoding algorithms introduced by Leverrier and Zemor. Furthermore, we show that in order to suppress errors over multiple repeated rounds of QEC, it suffices to run the parallel decoding algorithm for constant time in each round. Combined with good code parameters, the resulting constant-time overhead of QEC and robustness to (possibly time-correlated) adversarial noise make quantum Tanner codes alluring from the perspective of quantum fault-tolerant protocols. |
|||
| Erasure qubits | TQC 2023 | regular ▸ presenter | Arbel Haim, Yotam Vaknin, Fernando Brandao, Alex Retzker |
We address a question of leveraging the noise bias to simplify quantum error correction (QEC) protocols and improve their performance. We focus on the previously unexplored bias between the amplitude damping and dephasing errors that is fundamental to many quantum technologies. We propose a simple scheme to convert amplitude damping errors into erasure errors. Despite its simplicity, our scheme significantly improves the performance of QEC protocols and can be extended to handle leakage errors. Importantly, we provide two concrete realizations with superconducting circuits, analyzing their performance both from the analytical and numerical perspective. Our results provide a breakthrough shift in the current architecture paradigm. Namely, they suggest that engineering efforts should focus on improving the dephasing and the quality of quantum coherent control, as they effectively limit the performance of fault-tolerant protocols. |
|||
| Using Metrological Bounds in Quantum Error Correction | QIP 2021 | regular | Rafał Demkowicz-Dobrzański |
Abstract We present a simple proof of the approximate Eastin-Knill theorem, which connects the quality of a quantum error-correcting code (QECC) with its ability to achieve a universal set of transversal logical gates. Our derivation employs powerful bounds on the quantum Fisher information in generic quantum metrological protocols to characterize the QECC performance measured in terms of the worst-case entanglement fidelity. The theorem is applicable to a large class of decoherence models, including erasure and depolarizing noise. Our approach is unorthodox, as instead of following the established path of utilizing QECCs to mitigate noise in quantum metrological protocols, we apply methods of quantum metrology to explore the limitations of QECCs. |
|||
| The cost of universality: A comparative study of the overhead of state distillation and code switching with color codes | QIP 2021 | regular | Michael Beverland, Krysta Svore |
Abstract Estimating the reducing overhead of existing fault tolerance schemes is a crucial step toward realizing scalable quantum computers. Many of the most promising schemes are based upon two-dimensional (2D) topological codes such as the surface and color codes. In these schemes, universal computation is typically achieved using readily implementable Clifford operations along with a less convenient and more costly implementation of the $T$ gate. In our work, we compare the cost of fault-tolerantly implementing the $T$-gate in 2D color codes using two leading approaches: state distillation and code switching to a 3D color code. We report that state distillation is more resource-efficient than code switching, in terms of both qubit overhead and space-time overhead. In particular, we find a $T$ gate threshold via code switching of $0.07(1)\%$ under circuit noise, almost an order of magnitude below that for distillation with 2D color codes. To arrive at this result, we provide and implement a simplified end-to-end recipe for code switching, detailing each step and providing important optimization considerations. We not only find numerical overhead estimates of this code switching protocol, but also lower bound various conceivable improvements. We also optimize the 2D color code for circuit noise yielding it's largest threshold to date $0.37(1)\%$, and adapt and optimize the restriction decoder and find a threshold of $0.80(5)\%$ for the 3D color code with perfect measurements under $Z$ noise. We foresee that this analysis will influence the choice of which FT schemes and which salable hardware designs should be pursued in future. |
|||
| Locally unencoding the color code | TQC 2021 | regular | Michael Vasmer |
| Cost of universality: A comparative study of the overhead of state distillation and code switching with color codes | TQC 2021 | regular | Michael Beverland, Krysta Svore |
| Single-shot error correction and universal fault-tolerant computation with the three-dimensional subsystem toric code | TQC 2021 | regular | Michael Vasmer, Joseph Iverson |
| Color code decoding in d >= 2 dimensions | QIP 2020 | regular | Nicolas Delfosse |
| Local efficient decoders and optimal thresholds of topological toric and color codes beyond two dimensions | QIP 2018 | regular ▸ presenter | Nicolas Delfosse, Michael Beverland, Fernando Brandao, John Preskill, Krysta Svore |
| The disjointness of stabilizer codes and limitations on fault-tolerant logical gates | QIP 2018 | regular | Tomas Jochym-O'Connor, ▸Theodore Yoder |
| Advantages of versatile neural-network decoding for topological codes | TQC 2018 | regular | Nishad Maskara, Tomas Jochym-O'Connor |
| Symmetry protected topological order at nonzero temperature | QIP 2017 | regular | ▸Sam Roberts, Beni Yoshida, Stephen Bartlett |
| Unfolding the color code | QIP 2016 | regular ▸ presenter | Beni Yoshida, Fernando Pastawski |
Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Transversal Algorithmic Fault Tolerance and Correlated Decoding for Fast Quantum Computing | QIP 2025 | Hengyun Zhou, Chen Zhao, Madelyn Cain, Dolev Bluvstein, Nishad Maskara, Casey Duckering, Hong-Ye Hu, Nadine Meister, Juan Pablo Bonilla Ataides, Arthur Jaffe, Sheng-Tao Wang, Mikhail Lukin |
| Domain walls from SPT-sewing | QIP 2025 | Yabo Li, Zijian Song, Isaac Kim |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2026 | PC | member | — |
| TQC 2025 | PC | member | — |
| QIP 2022 | PC | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Krysta Svore | 3 |
| Michael Beverland | 3 |
| Shouzhen Gu | 3 |
| Alex Retzker | 2 |
| Beni Yoshida | 2 |
| Eugene Tang | 2 |
| Fernando Brandao | 2 |
| Libor Caha | 2 |
| Michael Vasmer | 2 |
| Nicolas Delfosse | 2 |
| Nishad Maskara | 2 |
| Shin Ho Choe | 2 |
| Tomas Jochym-O'Connor | 2 |
| Yotam Vaknin | 2 |
| Zhiyang He | 2 |
| Alexander M. Dalzell | 1 |
| Andras Gilyen | 1 |
| Arbel Haim | 1 |
| Arthur Jaffe | 1 |
| Casey Duckering | 1 |