4
program roles
24
collaborators
2017–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
6 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Directed st-connectivity with few paths is in quantum logspace | TQC 2025 | regular | Roman Edenhofer |
| Quantum speedups for linear programming via interior point methods | QIP 2024 | regular ▸ presenter | Sander Gribling |
| (Quantum) complexity of testing signed graph clusterability | TQC 2024 | regular | ▸Kuo-Chin Chen, Min-Hsiu Hsieh |
This study examines clusterability testing for a signed graph in the bounded-degree model. Our contributions are two-fold. First, we provide a quantum algorithm with query complexity tildeO(N^1/3) for testing clusterability, which yields a polynomial speedup over the best classical clusterability tester known [Florian Adriaens and Simon Apers. Testing cluster properties of signed graphs.]. Second, we prove an tildeØmega(sqrtN) classical query lower bound for testing clusterability, which nearly matches the upper bound from citeadriaens2021testing. This settles the classical query complexity of clusterability testing, and it shows that our quantum algorithm has an advantage over any classical algorithm. |
|||
|
Elfs, trees and quantum walks ↗
|
TQC 2023 | regular | ▸Stephen Piddock |
We study an elementary Markov process on graphs based on electric flow sampling (elfs). The elfs process repeatedly samples from an electric flow on a graph. While the sinks of the flow are fixed, the source is updated using the electric flow sample, and the process ends when it hits a sink vertex. We argue that this process naturally connects to many key quantities of interest. E.g., we describe a random walk coupling which implies that the elfs process has the same arrival distribution as a random walk. We also analyze the electric hitting time, which is the expected time before the process hits a sink vertex. As our main technical contribution, we show that the electric hitting time on trees is logarithmic in the graph size and weights. The initial motivation behind the elfs process is that quantum walks can sample from electric flows, and they can hence implement this process very naturally. This yields a quantum walk algorithm for sampling from the random walk arrival distribution, which has widespread applications. It complements the existing line of quantum walk search algorithms which only return an element from the sink, but yield no insight in the distribution of the returned element. By our bound on the electric hitting time on trees, the quantum walk algorithm on trees requires quadratically fewer steps than the random walk hitting time, up to polylog factors. |
|||
| Quadratic speedup for spatial search by continuous-time quantum walk | TQC 2022 | regular ▸ presenter | Shantanav Chakraborty, Leonardo Novo, Jeremie Roland |
| Quantum speedups for graph sparsification, graph cut problems and Laplacian solving | QIP 2021 | regular | Troy Lee, Ronald de Wolf |
Abstract Graph sparsification underlies a large number of algorithms for graph cut problems and solving Laplacian systems. In its strongest form, "spectral sparsification" reduces the number of edges to near-linear in the number of nodes, while approximately preserving the cut and spectral structure of the graph. We give a quantum algorithm that outputs a classical description of an $\varepsilon$-spectral sparsifier of a weighted graph with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges. It has time complexity $\widetilde O(\sqrt{mn}/\varepsilon)$ in the adjacency array model and $\widetilde O(n^{3/2}/\varepsilon)$ in the adjacency matrix model. These bounds are tight up to polylogarithmic factors, and improve on the optimal classical complexities $\Omega(m)$ and $\Omega(n^2)$, respectively. Using classical algorithms on the obtained sparsifier yields immediate quantum speedups for approximately solving Laplacian systems and for approximating a range of graph cut problems in essentially the same complexity. As a significantly more involved application we show how to speed up the quantum query complexity for computing exactly the edge connectivity of simple graphs. We show upper bounds on the query complexity of $\widetilde O(\sqrt{mn})$ and $\widetilde O(n^{3/2})$ in the adjacency matrix and adjacency array models, respectively. The upper bound for the adjacency matrix model is tight up to logarithmic factors, while for the adjacency array model the best quantum query lower bound we know is $\Omega(n)$. |
|||
14 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Complexity of computations on simplicial complexes in quantum logspace | QIP 2026 | ▸Benjamin Mathieu-Bloise |
| (Non) convex optimization via adiabatic quantum algorithms | QIP 2026 | ▸Elie Bermot, Arthur Braida |
| Quantum property testing in sparse directed graphs | QIP 2025 | Frédéric Magniez, Sayantan Sen, Daniel Szabo |
| Directed st-connectivity with few paths is in quantum logspace | QIP 2025 | Roman Edenhofer |
| Quantum property testing in sparse directed graphs | TQC 2025 | — |
| (No) Quantum ST tradeoff for USTCON | QIP 2023 | Stacey Jeffery, Galina Pass, Michael Walter |
| (No) Quantum space-time tradeoff for USTCON | TQC 2023 | Stacey Jeffery, Galina Pass, Michael Walter |
| A Unified Framework for Quantum Walk Search | QIP 2021 | Andras Pal Gilyen, Stacey Jeffery |
| Expansion Testing using Quantum Fast-Forwarding and Seed Sets | QIP 2020 | — |
| Quantum Speedup for Graph Sparsification and Cut Approximation | QIP 2020 | — |
| Quantum Fast-Forwarding: Markov Chains and Local Graph Clustering | QIP 2019 | Alain Sarlette |
| Quantum Sampling in Square Root of the Search Time | QIP 2018 | Alain Sarlette, Peter Høyer |
| Robust Dynamical Control of Dissipation on Quantum Systems | QIP 2018 | Michiel Burgelman, Alain Sarlette |
| Fast Mixing with Quantum Walks vs. Classical Processes | QIP 2017 | Alain Sarlette, Francesco Ticozzi |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| TQC 2026 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2025 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2025 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2023 | program | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Alain Sarlette | 4 |
| Stacey Jeffery | 3 |
| Galina Pass | 2 |
| Michael Walter | 2 |
| Roman Edenhofer | 2 |
| Andras Pal Gilyen | 1 |
| Arthur Braida | 1 |
| Benjamin Mathieu-Bloise | 1 |
| Daniel Szabo | 1 |
| Elie Bermot | 1 |
| Francesco Ticozzi | 1 |
| Frédéric Magniez | 1 |
| Jeremie Roland | 1 |
| Kuo-Chin Chen | 1 |
| Leonardo Novo | 1 |
| Michiel Burgelman | 1 |
| Min-Hsiu Hsieh | 1 |
| Peter Høyer | 1 |
| Ronald de Wolf | 1 |
| Sander Gribling | 1 |