2
program roles
5
steering roles
31
collaborators
1998–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
22 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| An Area Law for Metastable States | QIP 2026 | regular | ▸Thiago Bergamaschi, Chi-Fang Chen |
Statistical mechanics assumes that a quantum many-body system at low temperature can be described by its Gibbs state. However, many complex quantum systems only exist as metastable states of dissipative open system dynamics, which substantially deviate from true thermal equilibrium. Why, then, should the predictions of thermal equilibrium--such as the area law--be so unreasonably effective in explaining low-temperature phenomena? In this work, we model metastable states as approximate stationary states of a quasi-local, (KMS)-detailed-balanced master equation representing Markovian system-bath interaction. We show that all metastable states exhibit universal structures that parallel true quantum Gibbs states: an area law of mutual information and a local Markov property. The more metastable the states are, the larger the regions to which these structural results apply. Behind our structural results lies a systematic framework encompassing sharp equivalences between local minima of free energy, a non-commutative Fisher information, as well as approximate detailed-balance and Kubo-Martin-Schwinger conditions, ultimately building towards a quantitative theory of thermal metastability. |
|||
| Public-key pseudoentanglement and the hardness of learning ground state entanglement structure | QIP 2024 | regular | ▸Adam Bouland, Bill Fefferman, Soumik Ghosh, Tony Metger, Chenyi Zhang, Zixin Zhou |
| Quantum Pseudoentanglement | QIP 2023 | regular | Adam Bouland, Bill Fefferman, ▸Soumik Ghosh, Zixin Zhou |
| A polynomial-time classical algorithm for noisy random circuit sampling | QIP 2023 | plenary_long | ▸Dorit Aharonov, Xun Gao, Zeph Landau, Yunchao Liu |
| Tutorial Vazirani: Classical proofs of quantumness | QCRYPT 2021 | tutorial ▸ presenter | — |
| (Sub)Exponential advantage of adiabatic quantum computation with no sign problem | QIP 2021 | regular | Matthew B. Hastings, Andras Pal Gilyen |
Abstract We demonstrate the possibility of (sub)exponential quantum speedup via a quantum algorithm that follows an adiabatic path of a gapped sparse Hamiltonian with no sign problem. This is in sharp contrast with frustration-free stoquastic Hamiltonians, where no such speedup is possible as shown by Bravyi and Terhal (2008). The Hamiltonian that exhibits this speed-up comes from the adjacency matrix of an undirected graph, and we can view the adiabatic evolution as an efficient $\mathcal{O}(\mathrm{poly}(n))$-time quantum algorithm for finding a specific "EXIT" vertex in the graph given the "ENTRANCE" vertex. On the other hand we show that if the graph is given via an adjacency-list oracle, there is no classical algorithm that finds the "EXIT" with probability greater than $\exp(-n^\delta)$ using at most $\exp(n^\delta)$ queries for $\delta= \frac15 - o(1)$. Our construction of the graph is somewhat similar to the ``welded-trees'' construction of Childs et al. (2003), but uses additional ideas for simultaneously achieving a spectral gap and a short adiabatic path. |
|||
| Simpler Proofs of Quantumness | TQC 2020 | regular | Zvika Brakerski, ▸Venkata Koppula, Thomas Vidick |
A proof of quantumness is a method for provably demonstrating (to a classical verifier) that a quantum device can perform computational tasks that a classical device with comparable resources cannot. Providing a proof of quantumness is the first step towards constructing a useful quantum computer. There are currently three approaches for exhibiting proofs of quantumness: (i) Inverting a classically-hard one-way function (e.g.\ using Shor’s algorithm). This seems technologically out of reach. (ii) Sampling from a classically-hard-to-sample distribution (e.g.\ BosonSampling). This may be within reach of near-term experiments, but for all such tasks known verification requires exponential time. (iii) Interactive protocols based on cryptographic assumptions. The use of a trapdoor scheme allows for efficient verification, and implementation seems to require much less resources than (i), yet still more than (ii). In this work we propose a significant simplification to approach (iii) by employing the random oracle heuristic. (We note that we do not apply the Fiat-Shamir paradigm.) We give a two-message (challenge-response) proof of quantumness based on any trapdoor claw-free function. In contrast to earlier proposals we do not need an adaptive hard-core bit property. This allows the use of smaller security parameters and more diverse computational assumptions (such as Ring Learning with Errors), significantly reducing the quantum computational effort required for a successful demonstration. |
|||
| A Cryptographic Test of Quantumness and Certifiable Randomness from a Single Quantum Device | QIP 2019 | regular | Zvika Brakerski, Paul Christiano, Urmila Mahadev, ▸Thomas Vidick |
| Quantum Supremacy and the Complexity of Random Circuit Sampling | QIP 2019 | regular | Adam Bouland, ▸Bill Fefferman, Chinmay Nirkhe |
| Approximate low-weight check codes and circuit lower bounds for noisy ground states | TQC 2018 | regular | Chinmay Nirkhe, Henry Yuen |
| Rigorous RG algorithms and area laws for low energy eigenstates in 1D | QIP 2017 | regular | Itai Arad, Zeph Landau, ▸Thomas Vidick |
| Local tests of global entanglement and a counterexample to the generalized area law | QIP 2015 | plenary | Dorit Aharonov, Aram Harrow, Zeph Landau, Daniel Nagaj, Mario Szegedy |
| A polynomial-time algorithm for the ground state of 1D gapped local Hamiltonians | QIP 2014 | invited | ▸Zeph Landau, Thomas Vidick |
|
“An area law and sub-exponential algorithm for 1D systems.” ↗
|
QIP 2013 | invited | Zeph Landau, Itai Arad, Alexei Kitaev |
| An improved area law for 1D frustration-free systems | QIP 2012 | plenary | Itai Arad, Zeph Landau |
| Quantum Hamiltonian Complexity | TQC 2011 | invited ▸ presenter | — |
| New bridges between Computer Science and Quantum Computation | QIP 2010 | invited | — |
| Adiabatic Quantum Computation | QIP 2002 | invited | — |
| The Non-Abelian Hidden Subgroup Problem | QIP 2001 | invited | — |
| Do Quantum Drunks Walk Faster? | QIP 2001 | invited | Dorit Aharonov, Andris Ambainis, Julia Kempe |
| Quantum computation with highly mixed states | QIP 2000 | invited | — |
| Quantum Algorithms and Complexity | QIP 1998 | regular ▸ presenter | — |
2 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| An efficiently-verifiable test of quantum advantage | QIP 2021 | Gregory D. Kahanamoku-Meyer, Soonwon Choi, Norman Yao |
| Computational pseudorandomness, Complexity=Volume, and constraints on the AdS/CFT duality | QIP 2020 | Adam Bouland, Bill Fefferman |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2008 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2007 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2006 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2006 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2004 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 2003 | steering | member | — |
| QIP 1998 | program | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Zeph Landau | 6 |
| Adam Bouland | 4 |
| Bill Fefferman | 4 |
| Thomas Vidick | 4 |
| Dorit Aharonov | 3 |
| Itai Arad | 3 |
| Chinmay Nirkhe | 2 |
| Soumik Ghosh | 2 |
| Zixin Zhou | 2 |
| Zvika Brakerski | 2 |
| Alexei Kitaev | 1 |
| Andras Pal Gilyen | 1 |
| Andris Ambainis | 1 |
| Aram Harrow | 1 |
| Chenyi Zhang | 1 |
| Chi-Fang Chen | 1 |
| Daniel Nagaj | 1 |
| Gregory D. Kahanamoku-Meyer | 1 |
| Henry Yuen | 1 |
| Julia Kempe | 1 |