1
organizing role
20
collaborators
2015–2024
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
4 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sample Efficient Algorithms for Learning Quantum Channels in PAC Model and the Approximate State Discrimination Problem | TQC 2021 | regular | Kai-Min Chung |
| Sampling-based sublinear low-rank matrix arithmetic framework for dequantizing quantum machine learning | QIP 2020 | regular | Nai-Hui Chia, Andras Pal Gilyen, Tongyang Li, Ewin Tang, Chunhao Wang |
| On Quantum Complexity for Closest Pair and Orthogonal Vectors | TQC 2020 | regular | Scott Aaronson, Nai-Hui Chia, Chunhao Wang, ▸Ruizhe Zhang |
The closest pair problem is a fundamental problem of computational geometry: given a set of $n$ points in a $d$-dimensional space, find a pair with the smallest distance. A classical algorithm taught in introductory courses solves this problem in $O(n\log n)$ time in constant dimensions (i.e., when $d=O(1)$). This paper asks and answers the question of the problem’s quantum {time} complexity. Specifically, we give an $\tilde{O}(n^{2/3})$ algorithm in constant dimensions, which is optimal up to a polylogarithmic factor by the lower bound on the quantum query complexity of element distinctness. The key to our algorithm is an efficient history-independent data structure that supports quantum interference. In $\text{polylog}(n)$ dimensions, no known quantum algorithms perform better than brute force search, with a quadratic speedup provided by Grover’s algorithm. To give evidence that the quadratic speedup is nearly optimal, we initiate the study of quantum fine-grained complexity and introduce the \emph{Quantum Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (QSETH)}, which is based on the assumption that Grover’s algorithm is optimal for \textsf{CNF-SAT} when the clause width is large. We show that the na\”{i}ve Grover approach to closest pair in higher dimensions is optimal up to an $n^{o(1)}$ factor unless QSETH is false. We also study the bichromatic closest pair problem and the orthogonal vectors problem, with broadly similar results. |
|||
|
Upper bounds on quantum query complexity inspired by the Elitzur-Vaidman bomb tester ↗
|
QIP 2015 | regular | Cedric Yen-Yu Lin |
14 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| A sublinear time quantum algorithm for longest common substring problem between run-length encoded strings | QIP 2024 | Tzu-Ching Lee |
| On the Impossibility of General Parallel Fast-forwarding of Hamiltonian Simulation | QIP 2024 | Nai-Hui Chia, Kai-Min Chung, Yao-Ching Hsieh, Yao-Ting Lin, Yu-Ching Shen |
| Efficient learning of $t$-doped stabilizer states with single-copy measurements | TQC 2024 | Nai-Hui Chia, Ching-Yi Lai |
| On the Impossibility of General Parallel Fast-forwarding of Hamiltonian Simulation | TQC 2024 | Nai-Hui Chia, Kai-Min Chung, Yao-Ching Hsieh, Yao-Ting Lin, Yu-Ching Shen |
| On the Impossibility of General Parallel Fast-forwarding of Hamiltonian Simulation | QIP 2023 | Nai-Hui Chia, Kai-Min Chung, Yao-Ching Hsieh, Yao-Ting Lin, Yu-Ching Shen |
| Quantum-inspired classical sublinear algorithm for solving semidefinite programmings with low-rank constraints | QIP 2020 | Nai-Hui Chia, Tongyang Li, Chunhao Wang |
| Sample Efficient Algorithms for Learning Quantum Channels in PAC Model and the Approximate State Discrimination Problem | QIP 2020 | Kai-Min Chung |
| Quantum-inspired sublinear classical algorithms for solving low-rank linear systems | QIP 2020 | Nai-Hui Chia, Chunhao Wang |
| On Quantum Complexity for Closest Pair and Orthogonal Vectors | QIP 2020 | Nai-Hui Chia, Chunhao Wang, Ruizhe Zhang |
| PAC learning quantum process with classical inputs and approximate state discrimination problem | QIP 2019 | Kai-Min Chung |
| Quantum-inspired classical sublinear-time algorithm for solving low-rank semidefinite programming via sampling approaches | TQC 2019 | Nai-Hui Chia, Tongyang Li, Chunhao Wang |
| A Quantum-Proof Non-Malleable Extractor, With Application to Privacy Amplification against Active Quantum Adversaries | QIP 2018 | Divesh Aggarwal, Kai-Min Chung, Thomas Vidick |
| Different Strategies for Optimization Using the Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm | QIP 2015 | Elizabeth Crosson, Edward Farhi, Cedric Yen-Yu Lin, Peter Shor |
| Oracles with Costs | QIP 2015 | Shelby Kimmel, Cedric Yen-Yu Lin |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2024 | organizing | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Nai-Hui Chia | 10 |
| Kai-Min Chung | 7 |
| Chunhao Wang | 6 |
| Cedric Yen-Yu Lin | 3 |
| Tongyang Li | 3 |
| Yao-Ching Hsieh | 3 |
| Yao-Ting Lin | 3 |
| Yu-Ching Shen | 3 |
| Ruizhe Zhang | 2 |
| Andras Pal Gilyen | 1 |
| Ching-Yi Lai | 1 |
| Divesh Aggarwal | 1 |
| Edward Farhi | 1 |
| Elizabeth Crosson | 1 |
| Ewin Tang | 1 |
| Peter Shor | 1 |
| Scott Aaronson | 1 |
| Shelby Kimmel | 1 |
| Thomas Vidick | 1 |
| Tzu-Ching Lee | 1 |