3
talks
1
posters
0
committee roles
0
leadership roles
2018–2024
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum Complementarity Approach to Device-Independent Security | TQC 2022 | regular ▸ presenter | Xingjian Zhang, Tian Ye, Hoi-Kwong Lo, Xiongfeng Ma |
| Robust shadow estimation | TQC 2021 | regular | Senrui Chen, Wenjun Yu, Steven Flammia |
| Global Phase Encoding Quantum Key Distribution | QCRYPT 2018 | regular ▸ presenter | Hongyi Zhou, Xiongfeng Ma |
Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Pilot-reference-free continuous-variable quantum key distribution with efficient decoy-state analysis | QCRYPT 2024 | Xingjian Zhang, Anran Jin, Liang Jiang, Richard Penty |
Continuous-variable quantum key distribution (CV QKD) using optical coherent detectors is practically favorable due to its low implementation cost, flexibility of wavelength division multiplexing, and compatibility with standard coherent communication technologies. However, the security analysis and parameter estimation of CV QKD are complicated due to the infinite-dimensional latent Hilbert space. Also, the transmission of strong reference pulses undermines the security and complicates the experiments. In this work, we tackle these two problems by presenting a time-bin-encoding CV protocol with a simple phase-error-based security analysis valid under general coherent attacks. With the key encoded into the relative intensity between two optical modes, the need for global references is removed. Furthermore, phase randomization can be introduced to decouple the security analysis of different photon-number components. We can hence tag the photon number for each round, effectively estimate the associated privacy using a carefully designed coherent-detection method, and independently extract encryption keys from each component. Simulations manifest that the protocol using multi-photon components increases the key rate by two orders of magnitude compared to the one using only the single-photon component. Meanwhile, the protocol with four-intensity decoy analysis is sufficient to yield tight parameter estimation with a short-distance key-rate performance comparable to the best Bennett-Brassard-1984 (BB84) implementation. |
||
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Xingjian Zhang | 2 |
| Xiongfeng Ma | 2 |
| Anran Jin | 1 |
| Hoi-Kwong Lo | 1 |
| Hongyi Zhou | 1 |
| Liang Jiang | 1 |
| Richard Penty | 1 |
| Senrui Chen | 1 |
| Steven Flammia | 1 |
| Tian Ye | 1 |
| Wenjun Yu | 1 |