15
talks
6
committee roles
0
leadership roles
2009–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Is it Gaussian? Testing bosonic quantum states | QIP 2026 | regular | Filippo Girardi, Freek Witteveen, Francesco Anna Mele, Lennart Bittel, Salvatore Francesco Emanuele Oliviero, Michael Walter |
Gaussian states are widely regarded as the most important class of continuous-variable (CV) quantum states, as they naturally arise in physical systems and play a key role in quantum technologies. This motivates a fundamental question: given copies of an unknown CV state, how can we efficiently test whether it is Gaussian? We address this problem from the perspective of representation theory and quantum learning theory, characterizing the sample complexity of Gaussianity testing as a function of the number of modes. For pure states, we prove that just a constant number of copies is sufficient to decide whether the state is exactly Gaussian. We then extend this to the tolerant setting, showing that a polynomial number of copies suffices to distinguish states that are close to Gaussian from those that are far. In contrast, we establish that testing Gaussianity of general mixed states necessarily requires exponentially many copies, thereby identifying a fundamental limitation in testing CV systems. Our approach relies on rotation-invariant symmetries of Gaussian states together with the recently introduced toolbox of CV trace-distance bounds. |
|||
| The axiomatic and the operational approach to resource theories of magic do not coincide | QIP 2021 | regular | Arne Heimendahl, Markus Heinrich |
Abstract Stabiliser operations occupy a prominent role in the theory of fault-tolerant quantum computing. They are defined operationally: by the use of Clifford gates, Pauli measurements and classical control. Within the stabiliser formalism, these operations can be efficiently simulated on a classical computer, a result which is known as the Gottesman-Knill theorem. However, an additional supply of magic states is enough to promote them to a universal, fault-tolerant model for quantum computing. To quantify the needed resources in terms of magic states, a resource theory of magic has been developed during the last years. Stabiliser operations (SO) are considered free within this theory, however they are not the most general class of free operations. From an axiomatic point of view, these are the completely stabiliser-preserving (CSP) channels, defined as those that preserve the convex hull of stabiliser states. It has been an open problem to decide whether these two definitions lead to the same class of operations. In this work, we answer this question in the negative, by constructing an explicit counter-example. This indicates that recently proposed stabiliser-based simulation techniques of CSP maps might be strictly more powerful than Gottesman-Knill-like methods. The result is analogous to a well-known fact in entanglement theory, namely that there is a gap between the class of local operations and classical communication (LOCC) and the class of separable channels. Along the way, we develop a number of auxiliary techniques which allow us to better characterise the set of CSP channels. |
|||
| Efficient unitary designs with a system-size independent number of non-Clifford gates | QIP 2021 | regular | Jonas Haferkamp, Felipe Montealegre-Mora, Markus Heinrich, Jens Eisert, Ingo Roth |
Abstract Many quantum information protocols require the implementation of random unitaries. Because it takes exponential resources to produce Haar-random unitaries drawn from the full n-qubit group, one often resorts to t-designs. Unitary t-designs mimic the Haar-measure up to t-th moments. It is known that Clifford operations can implement at most 3-designs. In this work, we quantify the non-Clifford resources required to break this barrier. We find that it suffices to inject O(t^4log^2(t)log(1/e)) many non-Clifford gates into a polynomial-depth random Clifford circuit to obtain an e-approximate t-design. Strikingly, the number of non-Clifford gates required is independent of the system size -- asymptotically, the density of non-Clifford gates is allowed to tend to zero. We also derive novel bounds on the convergence time of random Clifford circuits to the t-th moment of the uniform distribution on the Clifford group. Our proofs exploit a recently developed variant of Schur-Weyl duality for the Clifford group, as well as bounds on restricted spectral gaps of averaging operators. |
|||
| Stabilizer extent is not multiplicative | TQC 2021 | regular | Arne Heimendahl, Felipe Montealegre-Mora, Frank Vallentin |
| Efficient unitary designs with a system size independent number of non-Clifford gates | TQC 2020 | regular | Jonas Haferkamp, Felipe Montealegre-Mora, Markus Heinrich, Jens Eisert, Ingo Roth |
| Recovering quantum gates from few average gate fidelities | QIP 2019 | regular | ▸Ingo Roth, Richard Kueng, Shelby Kimmel, Yi-Kai Liu, Jens Eisert, Martin Kliesch |
| Schur-Weyl Duality for the Clifford Group, Quantum Property Testing, and a Robust Hudson Theorem | QIP 2018 | regular | Sepehr Nezami, ▸Michael Walter |
| Guaranteed recovery of quantum processes from few measurements | TQC 2017 | regular | Martin Kliesch, Richard Kueng, Jens Eisert |
|
Information-Theoretic Implications of Classical and Quantum Causal Structures ↗
|
QIP 2015 | regular | Rafael Chaves, Christian Majenz, Lukas Luft, Thiago O. Maciel, Dominik Janzing, Bernhard Schölkopf |
| “Negative Quasi-Probability as a Resource for Quantum Computation.” ↗ | QIP 2013 | regular | Victor Veitch, Chris Ferrie, Joseph Emerson |
|
“Entanglement Polytopes.” ↗
|
QIP 2013 | regular | Michael Walter, Brent Doran, Matthias Christandl |
|
Non-commutative compressed sensing: theory and applications for quantum tomography ↗
|
QIP 2010 | regular | Yi-Kai Liu, Steven Flawatch|mmia, Stephen Becker, Jens Eisert |
|
All reversible dynamics in maximally non-local theories are trivial ↗
|
QIP 2010 | regular | Markus Mueller, Roger Colbeck, Oscar Dahlsten |
| Lieb Robinson bounds and "supersonic quantum communication" | QIP 2009 | regular | ▸Jens Eisert |
| Most quantum states are useless for measurement-based quantum computation | QIP 2009 | regular | ▸Steve Flammia, Jens Eisert, Michael Bremner, Andreas Winter, Caterina Mora |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2023 | PC | member | — |
| QIP 2021 | PC | member | — |
| QIP 2020 | PC | member | — |
| QIP 2018 | PC | member | — |
| TQC 2018 | PC | member | — |
| TQC 2017 | PC | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Jens Eisert | 7 |
| Felipe Montealegre-Mora | 3 |
| Ingo Roth | 3 |
| Markus Heinrich | 3 |
| Michael Walter | 3 |
| Arne Heimendahl | 2 |
| Jonas Haferkamp | 2 |
| Martin Kliesch | 2 |
| Richard Kueng | 2 |
| Yi-Kai Liu | 2 |
| Andreas Winter | 1 |
| Bernhard Schölkopf | 1 |
| Brent Doran | 1 |
| Caterina Mora | 1 |
| Chris Ferrie | 1 |
| Christian Majenz | 1 |
| Dominik Janzing | 1 |
| Filippo Girardi | 1 |
| Francesco Anna Mele | 1 |
| Frank Vallentin | 1 |