6
program roles
57
collaborators
2006–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
15 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Is it Gaussian? Testing bosonic quantum states | QIP 2026 | regular | ▸Filippo Girardi, Freek Witteveen, Francesco Anna Mele, Lennart Bittel, Salvatore Francesco Emanuele Oliviero, Michael Walter |
Gaussian states are widely regarded as the most important class of continuous-variable (CV) quantum states, as they naturally arise in physical systems and play a key role in quantum technologies. This motivates a fundamental question: given copies of an unknown CV state, how can we efficiently test whether it is Gaussian? We address this problem from the perspective of representation theory and quantum learning theory, characterizing the sample complexity of Gaussianity testing as a function of the number of modes. For pure states, we prove that just a constant number of copies is sufficient to decide whether the state is exactly Gaussian. We then extend this to the tolerant setting, showing that a polynomial number of copies suffices to distinguish states that are close to Gaussian from those that are far. In contrast, we establish that testing Gaussianity of general mixed states necessarily requires exponentially many copies, thereby identifying a fundamental limitation in testing CV systems. Our approach relies on rotation-invariant symmetries of Gaussian states together with the recently introduced toolbox of CV trace-distance bounds. |
|||
| Efficient unitary designs with a system-size independent number of non-Clifford gates | QIP 2021 | regular | Jonas Haferkamp, Felipe Montealegre-Mora, Markus Heinrich, Jens Eisert, Ingo Roth |
Abstract Many quantum information protocols require the implementation of random unitaries. Because it takes exponential resources to produce Haar-random unitaries drawn from the full n-qubit group, one often resorts to t-designs. Unitary t-designs mimic the Haar-measure up to t-th moments. It is known that Clifford operations can implement at most 3-designs. In this work, we quantify the non-Clifford resources required to break this barrier. We find that it suffices to inject O(t^4log^2(t)log(1/e)) many non-Clifford gates into a polynomial-depth random Clifford circuit to obtain an e-approximate t-design. Strikingly, the number of non-Clifford gates required is independent of the system size -- asymptotically, the density of non-Clifford gates is allowed to tend to zero. We also derive novel bounds on the convergence time of random Clifford circuits to the t-th moment of the uniform distribution on the Clifford group. Our proofs exploit a recently developed variant of Schur-Weyl duality for the Clifford group, as well as bounds on restricted spectral gaps of averaging operators. |
|||
| The axiomatic and the operational approach to resource theories of magic do not coincide | QIP 2021 | regular | Arne Heimendahl, Markus Heinrich |
Abstract Stabiliser operations occupy a prominent role in the theory of fault-tolerant quantum computing. They are defined operationally: by the use of Clifford gates, Pauli measurements and classical control. Within the stabiliser formalism, these operations can be efficiently simulated on a classical computer, a result which is known as the Gottesman-Knill theorem. However, an additional supply of magic states is enough to promote them to a universal, fault-tolerant model for quantum computing. To quantify the needed resources in terms of magic states, a resource theory of magic has been developed during the last years. Stabiliser operations (SO) are considered free within this theory, however they are not the most general class of free operations. From an axiomatic point of view, these are the completely stabiliser-preserving (CSP) channels, defined as those that preserve the convex hull of stabiliser states. It has been an open problem to decide whether these two definitions lead to the same class of operations. In this work, we answer this question in the negative, by constructing an explicit counter-example. This indicates that recently proposed stabiliser-based simulation techniques of CSP maps might be strictly more powerful than Gottesman-Knill-like methods. The result is analogous to a well-known fact in entanglement theory, namely that there is a gap between the class of local operations and classical communication (LOCC) and the class of separable channels. Along the way, we develop a number of auxiliary techniques which allow us to better characterise the set of CSP channels. |
|||
| Stabilizer extent is not multiplicative | TQC 2021 | regular | ▸Arne Heimendahl, Felipe Montealegre-Mora, Frank Vallentin |
| Efficient unitary designs with a system size independent number of non-Clifford gates | TQC 2020 | regular | ▸Jonas Haferkamp, Felipe Montealegre-Mora, Markus Heinrich, Jens Eisert, Ingo Roth |
Many quantum information protocols require the implementation of random unitaries. Because it takes exponential resources to produce Haar-random unitaries drawn from the full n-qubit group, one often resorts to t-designs. Unitary t-designs mimic Haar-randomness up to t-th moments. It is known that Clifford operations can implement at most unitary 3-designs. In this work, we quantify the non-Clifford resources required to break this barrier. Exploiting a recently developed variant of Schur-Weyl duality for the Clifford group, wefind that it suffices to inject $O(t^4*\log^2(t), \log(1/\varepsilon))$ non-Clifford gates into a polynomial depth random Clifford circuit to obtain an ε-approximate t-design. Strikingly, the number n of qubits does not enter – asymptotically, the density of non-Clifford gates is allowed to tend to zero. As an auxiliary result that might be of independent interest, we obtain explicit bounds on the convergence time of random Clifford circuits to the t-th moment of the uniform distribution on the Clifford group. |
|||
| Recovering quantum gates from few average gate fidelities | QIP 2019 | regular | ▸Ingo Roth, Richard Kueng, Shelby Kimmel, Yi-Kai Liu, Jens Eisert, Martin Kliesch |
| Schur-Weyl Duality for the Clifford Group, Quantum Property Testing, and a Robust Hudson Theorem | QIP 2018 | regular | Sepehr Nezami, ▸Michael Walter |
| Guaranteed recovery of quantum processes from few measurements | TQC 2017 | regular | Martin Kliesch, Richard Kueng, Jens Eisert |
|
Information-Theoretic Implications of Classical and Quantum Causal Structures ↗
|
QIP 2015 | regular | Rafael Chaves, Christian Majenz, Lukas Luft, Thiago O. Maciel, Dominik Janzing, Bernhard Schölkopf |
| “Negative Quasi-Probability as a Resource for Quantum Computation.” ↗ | QIP 2013 | regular | Victor Veitch, Christopher Ferrie, Joseph Emerson |
|
“Entanglement Polytopes.” ↗
|
QIP 2013 | regular | Michael Walter, Brent Doran, Matthias Christandl |
|
Non-commutative compressed sensing: theory and applications for quantum tomography ↗
|
QIP 2010 | regular | Yi-Kai Liu, Steven Flammia, Stephen Becker, Jens Eisert |
|
All reversible dynamics in maximally non-local theories are trivial ↗
|
QIP 2010 | regular | Markus Müller, Roger Colbeck, Oscar Dahlsten |
| Most quantum states are useless for measurement-based quantum computation | QIP 2009 | regular | ▸Steven Flammia, Jens Eisert, Michael Bremner, Andreas Winter, Caterina Mora |
| Lieb Robinson bounds and "supersonic quantum communication" | QIP 2009 | regular | ▸Jens Eisert |
24 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Classification of Probabilistic Theories that are Stable Under Teleportation. | QIP 2026 | ▸Lionel Jeevan Dmello |
| From estimation of quantum probabilities to simulation of quantum circuits | QIP 2018 | Hakop Pashayan, Stephen D. Bartlett |
| New no-go theorems regarding phase space negativity and contextuality as resources | QIP 2018 | Felipe Montealegre-Mora, Huangjun Zhu |
| Correlated Noise and the Error Correction Threshold | QIP 2018 | Markus Heinrich |
| The Clifford group fails gracefully to be a unitary 4-design (with applications to state distinguishability, entropic uncertainties, and phase retrieval) | QIP 2017 | Huangjun Zhu, Richard Kueng, Markus Grassl |
| Error regions in quantum state tomography: computational complexity caused by the geometry of quantum states | QIP 2017 | Daniel Suess, Łukasz Rudnicki, Thiago O. Maciel |
| Certifying linear optical circuits via phaseless estimation techniques | QIP 2016 | Daniel Suess, Richard Kueng |
| Improving compressed sensing with the diamond norm | QIP 2016 | Martin Kliesch, Richard Kueng, Jens Eisert |
In low-rank matrix recovery, one aims to reconstruct a low-rank matrix from a minimal number of linear measurements. Within the paradigm of compressed sensing, this is made computationally efficient by minimizing the nuclear norm as a convex surrogate for rank. In this work, we identify an improved regularizer based on the so-called diamond norm, a concept imported from quantum information theory. We show that -for a class of matrices saturating a certain norm inequality- the descent cone of the diamond norm is contained in that of the nuclear norm. This suggests superior reconstruction properties for these matrices. We explicitly characterize this set of matrices, which also contains quantum channels. Moreover, we demonstrate numerically that the diamond norm indeed outperforms the nuclear norm in a number of relevant applications: These include not only the task of quantum process tomography but also signal analysis tasks such as blind matrix deconvolution or the retrieval of certain unitary basis changes. The diamond norm is defined for matrices that can be interpreted as order-4 tensors and it turns out that the above condition depends crucially on that tensorial structure. In this sense, this work touches on an aspect of the notoriously difficult tensor completion problem. |
||
| Error regions in quantum state tomography: computational complexity caused by geometry of quantum states | TQC 2016 | Daniel Suess, Łukasz Rudnicki, Thiago O. Maciel |
| Improving compressed sensing with the diamond norm | TQC 2016 | Martin Kliesch, Richard Kueng, Jens Eisert |
| A unifying framework for relaxations of the causal assumptions in Bell's theorem | QIP 2015 | Rafael Chaves, Richard Kueng, Jonatan Bohr Brask |
| Low rank quantum state tomography from rank-one measurements | QIP 2015 | Richard Kueng, Ulrich Terstiege, Holger Rauhut |
| Matrix product operators and states: NP-hardness and undecidability | QIP 2015 | Martin Kliesch, Jens Eisert |
| A Scalable Quantum State Tomography Scheme for Mixed States | QIP 2014 | Tillmann Baumgratz, Marcus Cramer, Martin Plenio |
| Signal Reconstruction from Quadratic Measurements Using Quantum t-Designs | QIP 2014 | Felix Krahmer, Richard Kueng |
| Stabilizer information inequalities from phase space distributions | QIP 2014 | Christian Majenz, Michael Walter |
| A Restricted Isometry Theorem for Pauli Measurements, and the Sample Complexity of Tomography | QIP 2013 | Yi-Kai Liu, Steven Flammia, Jens Eisert |
| Stabilizer states are spherical 3-designs – with applications to quantum state distinguishability | QIP 2013 | Richard Kueng |
| Quantum compressed sensing with general measurements | QIP 2012 | Matthias Ohliger, Vincent Nesme |
| Concentration of measure for quantum states with a fixed expectation value | QIP 2011 | Markus Müller, Jens Eisert |
| Concentration of measure and the mean energy ensemble | QIP 2010 | Markus Müller, Jens Eisert |
| Index theory for one-dimensional quantum walks and cellular automata | QIP 2009 | Vincent Nesme, Holger Vogts, Reinhard Werner |
| Heralded polynomial-time quantum state tomography | QIP 2009 | Steven Flammia, Stephen D. Bartlett, Rolando Somma |
| All types of local equivalence of stabilizer states coincide | QIP 2006 | Maarten Van den Nest |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2023 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2021 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2020 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2018 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2018 | program | member | — |
| TQC 2017 | program | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Jens Eisert | 13 |
| Richard Kueng | 10 |
| Martin Kliesch | 5 |
| Felipe Montealegre-Mora | 4 |
| Markus Heinrich | 4 |
| Michael Walter | 4 |
| Steven Flammia | 4 |
| Daniel Suess | 3 |
| Ingo Roth | 3 |
| Markus Müller | 3 |
| Thiago O. Maciel | 3 |
| Yi-Kai Liu | 3 |
| Arne Heimendahl | 2 |
| Christian Majenz | 2 |
| Huangjun Zhu | 2 |
| Jonas Haferkamp | 2 |
| Rafael Chaves | 2 |
| Stephen D. Bartlett | 2 |
| Vincent Nesme | 2 |
| Łukasz Rudnicki | 2 |