1
program role
1
organizing role
81
collaborators
2012–2024
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
9 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Out-of-distribution generalization for learning quantum dynamics and dynamical simulation ↗
|
TQC 2023 | regular | ▸Matthias C. Caro, Hsin-Yuan Robert Huang, Joseph Gibbs, Nic Ezzell, Andrew Sornborger, Lukasz Cincio, Zoe Holmes |
Generalization bounds are a critical tool to assess the training data requirements of Quantum Machine Learning (QML). In this work, we prove the first out-of-distribution generalization guarantees in QML, where we require a trained model to perform well even on testing data drawn from a distribution different from the training data distribution. Namely, we establish out-of-distribution generalization for the task of learning an unknown unitary using a quantum neural network and for a broad class of training and testing distributions. In particular, we show that one can learn the action of a unitary on entangled states using only product state training data. Since product states can be prepared using only single-qubit gates, this advances the near-term prospects of QML for learning quantum dynamics, and further opens up new methods for both the classical and quantum compilation of quantum circuits. Based on these insights, we propose a QML-based algorithm for simulating quantum dynamics on near-term quantum hardware and rigorously prove its resource-efficiency in terms of qubit and training data requirements. We also demonstrate the viability of this algorithm through numerical experiments, both in classical simulations and on quantum hardware. Finally, we embed this algorithm in a broader framework for using QML methods for quantum dynamical simulation on NISQ devices. |
|||
| Analyzing the Loss Landscape of Quantum Neural Networks: Barren Plateaus and Overparametrization | QIP 2022 | regular | Martin Larocca, Marco Vinicio Sebastian de la Roca, Kunal Sharma, Piotr Czarnik, Gopikrishnan Muraleedharan, Diego Garcia-Martin, Nathan Ju |
| Generalization guarantees for variational quantum machine learning | TQC 2022 | regular | ▸Matthias C. Caro, Elies Gil-Fuster, Johannes Jakob Meyer, Jens Eisert, Ryan Sweke, Hsin-Yuan Robert Huang, Marco Cerezo, Kunal Sharma, Andrew Sornborger, Lukasz Cincio |
| Error mitigation with Clifford quantum-circuit data | QIP 2021 | regular | Piotr Czarnik, Andrew Arrasmith, Lukasz Cincio |
Abstract Achieving near-term quantum advantage will require accurate estimation of quantum observables despite significant hardware noise. For this purpose, we propose a novel, scalable error-mitigation method that applies to gate-based quantum computers. The method generates training data $\{X_i^{noisy},X_i^{exact}\}$ via quantum circuits composed largely of Clifford gates, which can be efficiently simulated classically, where $X_i^{noisy}$ and $X_i^{exact}$ are noisy and noiseless observables respectively. Fitting a linear ansatz to this data then allows for the prediction of noise-free observables for arbitrary circuits. We analyze the performance of our method versus the number of qubits, circuit depth, and number of non-Clifford gates. We obtain an order-of-magnitude error reduction for a ground-state energy problem on 16 qubits in an IBMQ quantum computer and on a 64-qubit noisy simulator. |
|||
| Security proof of practical quantum key distribution with detection-efficiency mismatch | QCRYPT 2020 | regular | Yanbao Zhang, Adam Winick, Jie Lin, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
Quantum key distribution (QKD) protocols with threshold detectors are driving high-performance QKD demonstrations. The corresponding security proofs usually assume that all physical detectors have the same detection efficiency. However, the efficiencies of the detectors used in practice might show a mismatch depending on the manufacturing and setup of these detectors. A mismatch can also be induced as the different spatial-temporal modes of an incoming signal might couple differently to a detector. Here we develop a method that allows to provide security proofs without the usual assumption. Our method can take the detection-efficiency mismatch into account without having to restrict the attack strategy of the adversary. Especially, we do not rely on any photon-number cut-off of incoming signals such that our security proof is complete. Though we consider polarization encoding in the demonstration of our method, the method applies to a variety of coding mechanisms, including time-bin encoding, and also allows for general manipulations of the spatial-temporal modes by the adversary. We thus can close the long-standing question how to provide a valid, complete security proof of a QKD setup with characterized efficiency mismatch. Our method also shows that in the absence of efficiency mismatch, the key rate increases if the loss due to detection inefficiency is assumed to be outside of the adversary's control, as compared to the view where for a security proof this loss is attributed to the action of the adversary. |
|||
| Reliable numerical key rates for quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2017 | regular | Adam Winick, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
| Theoretical analysis and proof-of-principle demonstration of self-referenced CV QKD | QCRYPT 2016 | regular | Constantin Brif, Daniel Soh, Norbert Lütkenhaus, Ryan Camacho, Junji Urayama, Mohan Sarovar |
| Unstructured QKD | QCRYPT 2015 | regular | Norbert Lütkenhaus |
| Entanglement-assisted guessing complementary measurement outcomes | TQC 2013 | regular ▸ presenter | — |
27 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| The power and limitations of learning quantum dynamics incoherently | TQC 2024 | Sofiene Jerbi, Joseph Gibbs, Manuel S. Rudolph, Matthias C. Caro, Hsin-Yuan Robert Huang, Zoe Holmes |
| Variational Quantum Algorithms for Semidefinite Programming | QIP 2023 | Dhrumil Patel, Mark M. Wilde |
| Inference Based Quantum Sensing | QIP 2023 | Cinthia Huerta, Max Hunter Gordon, Frederic Sauvage, Akira Sone, Andrew Sornborger, Marco Cerezo |
| Towards Geometric Quantum Machine Learning | QIP 2023 | Frederic Sauvage, Martin Larroca, Marco Cerezo, Nguyen Quynh, Louis Schatzki, Paolo Braccia, Michael Ragone |
| Out-of-distribution generalization for learning quantum dynamics and dynamical simulation | QIP 2023 | Matthias C. Caro, Hsin-Yuan Robert Huang, Joseph Gibbs, Nic Ezzell, Andrew Sornborger, Lukasz Cincio, Zoe Holmes |
| Geometric Quantum Machine Learning Theory and Guarantees | TQC 2023 | Louis Schatzki, Quynh Nguyen, Paolo Braccia, Michael Ragone, Martin Larocca, Frederic Sauvage, Marco Cerezo |
| An Open-source Software Platform for Numerical Key Rate Calculation of General Quantum Key Distribution Protocols | QCRYPT 2021 | Wenyuan Wang, Jie Lin, Ian George, Twesh Upadhyaya, Adam Winick, Shlok Ashok Nahar, Kai-Hong Li, Kun Fang, Natansh Mathur, John Burniston, Max Chemtov, Shahabeddin M. Aslmarand, Yanbao Zhang, Christopher Boehm, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
In this work, we present an open-source software platform that calculates key rate for general QKD protocols, building upon the numerical framework proposed by our group that can perform automated security proof of QKD protocols. The software platform is fully modularized with mutually independent modules for descriptions of protocols/channels, solvers for bounding key rate, and parameter optimization algorithms. It currently supports BB84 and measurement-device-independent QKD (including decoy states), as well as discrete-modulated continuous variable QKD. It also supports finite-size analysis for non-decoy-state protocols. We hope that the open-sourcing can attract theorists to test new protocols and/or contribute to new solvers, as well as appeal to experimentalists who wish to analyze their data or optimize parameters for new experiments. |
||
| Variational Fast Forwarding for Quantum Simulation Beyond the Coherence Time | QIP 2021 | Cristina Cirstoiu, Zoe Holmes, Joseph Iosue, Lukasz Cincio, Benjamin Commeau, Joseph Gibbs, Kaitlin Gili, Andrew Sornborger |
| Barren plateaus preclude learning scramblers | QIP 2021 | Zoe Holmes, Andrew Arrasmith, Bin Yan, Andreas Albrecht, Andrew Sornborger |
| Noise Induced Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Algorithms | QIP 2021 | Samson Wang, Enrico Fontana, Marco Cerezo, Kunal Sharma, Akira Sone, Lukasz Cincio |
| Barren Plateaus and Trainability in Quantum Neural Networks | QIP 2021 | Marco Cerezo, Kunal Sharma, Akira Sone Tyler Volkoff, Lukasz Cincio |
| Reformulation of the No-Free-Lunch Theorem for Entangled Data Sets | QIP 2021 | Kunal Sharma, Marco Cerezo, Zoe Holmes, Lukasz Cincio, Andrew Sornborger |
| Unified approach to data-driven quantum error mitigation | QIP 2021 | Angus Lowe, Max Hunter Gordon, Piotr Czarnik, Andrew Arrasmith, Lukasz Cincio |
| Machine learning of noise-resilient quantum circuits | QIP 2021 | Lukasz Cincio, Kenneth Rudinger, Mohan Sarovar |
| Variational Quantum Algorithm for Quantum Sensor Evaluation | QIP 2021 | Jacob Beckey, Akira Sone, Marco Cerezo |
| Absence of Barren Plateaus in Quantum Convolutional Neural Networks | QIP 2021 | Arthur Pesah, Marco Cerezo, Samson Wang, Tyler Volkoff, Andrew Sornborger |
| Towards an Open-source Software Platform for Numerical Key Rate Calculation of General Quantum Key Distribution Protocols | QCRYPT 2020 | Jie Lin, Ian George, Kai-Hong Li, Kun Fang, Twesh Upadhyaya, Natansh Mathur, Max Chemtov, Shlok Ashok Nahar, Shahabeddin M. Aslmarand, Thomas Van Himbeeck, Yanbao Zhang, Christopher Boehm, Adam Winick, Wenyuan Wang, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
A numerical approach for the calculation of QKD key rates allows a uniform framework to be applied to general QKD protocols. Based on our group's previous work, we would like to build a universal software platform that is fully modularized and user-friendly, where one can easily swap in and out different QKD protocol descriptions, channel simulation models or experimental data, backend numerical solvers, and parameter optimization algorithms. Our goal is to build an open-source platform that can be both useful for theorists testing new protocols as well as experimentalists looking for optimal parameters or analyzing their experimental data. |
||
| Entanglement spectroscopy with a depth-two quantum circuit | QIP 2019 | Yigit Subasi, Lukasz Cincio |
| Entropic Energy-Time Uncertainty Relation Mark M. Wilde | QIP 2019 | Vishal Katariya, Seth Lloyd, Iman Marvian and |
| Quantum Key Distribution with Coherent States | QCRYPT 2017 | Jie Lin, Adam Winick, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
| Security proof of quantum key distribution with detection-efficiency mismatch | QCRYPT 2017 | Yanbao Zhang, Adam Winick, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
| Software for Numerical Calculation of Key Rates | QCRYPT 2016 | Jie Lin, Adam Winick, Yanbao Zhang, Eric Metodiev, Shouzhen Gu, Electra Eleftheriadou, Filippo Miatto, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
| Unstructured quantum key distribution | QIP 2016 | Eric Metodiev, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
| Sifting problems in finite-size quantum key distribution | QCRYPT 2015 | Corsin Pfister, Stephanie Wehner, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
| Improved entropic uncertainty relations and information exclusion relations | QIP 2014 | Marco Piani |
| Entropic Error-Disturbance Relations | QIP 2014 | Fabian Furrer |
| Unification of different views of decoherence | QIP 2013 | — |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| TQC 2021 | program | member | — |
| QCRYPT 2012 | organizing | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Lukasz Cincio | 11 |
| Norbert Lütkenhaus | 11 |
| Marco Cerezo | 9 |
| Andrew Sornborger | 8 |
| Adam Winick | 7 |
| Zoe Holmes | 6 |
| Jie Lin | 5 |
| Kunal Sharma | 5 |
| Yanbao Zhang | 5 |
| Hsin-Yuan Robert Huang | 4 |
| Joseph Gibbs | 4 |
| Matthias C. Caro | 4 |
| Akira Sone | 3 |
| Andrew Arrasmith | 3 |
| Frederic Sauvage | 3 |
| Piotr Czarnik | 3 |
| Christopher Boehm | 2 |
| Eric Metodiev | 2 |
| Ian George | 2 |
| Kai-Hong Li | 2 |