28
collaborators
2016–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
4 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Layer codes as partially self-correcting quantum memories | QIP 2026 | regular | ▸Libor Caha, Shin Ho Choe, Zhiyang He, Aleksander Kubica, Eugene Tang |
We investigate layer codes, a family of three-dimensional stabilizer codes that can achieve optimal scaling of code parameters and a polynomial energy barrier, as candidates for self-correcting quantum memories. First, we introduce two decoding algorithms for layer codes with provable guarantees for local stochastic and adversarial noise, respectively. We then prove that layer codes are partially self-correcting quantum memories. With memory times scaling exponentially in the linear size of the system, layer codes outperform the previously demonstrated subexponential scaling of the welded solid code. Notably, we argue that partial self-correction without the requirement of efficient decoding is more common than expected, as it arises from a diverging energy barrier. This draws a sharp distinction between partially self-correcting systems, and partially self-correcting memories. Another novel aspect of our work is an analysis of layer codes constructed from random Calderbank–Shor–Steane codes. We show that these random layer codes have optimal scaling (up to logarithmic corrections) of code parameters and a polynomial energy barrier. Finally, we present numerical studies of their memory times and report behavior consistent with partial self-correction. |
|||
| The benefits and costs of quantum error correction with erasure qubits | QIP 2025 | regular ▸ presenter | Yotam Vaknin, Alex Retzker, Aleksander Kubica |
|
Single-shot decoding of good quantum LDPC codes ↗
|
TQC 2024 | regular ▸ presenter | Eugene Tang, Libor Caha, Shin Ho Choe, Zhiyang He, Aleksander Kubica |
Quantum Tanner codes constitute a family of quantum low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes with good parameters, i.e., constant encoding rate and relative distance. In this article, we prove that quantum Tanner codes also facilitate single-shot quantum error correction (QEC) of adversarial noise, where one measurement round (consisting of constant-weight parity checks) suffices to perform reliable QEC even in the presence of measurement errors. We establish this result for both the sequential and parallel decoding algorithms introduced by Leverrier and Zemor. Furthermore, we show that in order to suppress errors over multiple repeated rounds of QEC, it suffices to run the parallel decoding algorithm for constant time in each round. Combined with good code parameters, the resulting constant-time overhead of QEC and robustness to (possibly time-correlated) adversarial noise make quantum Tanner codes alluring from the perspective of quantum fault-tolerant protocols. |
|||
| An efficient decoder for a linear distance quantum LDPC code | QIP 2023 | regular ▸ presenter | Christopher Pattison, Eugene Tang |
6 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Power and limitations of linear programming decoder for quantum LDPC codes | QIP 2026 | Mehdi Soleimanifar |
| Fast correlated decoding of transversal logical algorithms | TQC 2026 | Madelyn Cain, Dolev Bluvstein, Chen Zhao, Nishad Maskara, Marcin Kalinowski, Alexandra A. Geim, Aleksander Kubica, Mikhail Lukin, Hengyun Zhou |
Quantum error correction (QEC) is required for large-scale computation, but incurs a significant resource overhead. Recent advances have shown that by jointly decoding logical qubits in algorithms composed of transversal gates, the number of syndrome extraction rounds can be reduced by a factor of the code distance d, at the cost of increased classical decoding complexity. Here, we reformulate the problem of decoding transversal circuits by directly decoding relevant logical operator products as they propagate through the circuit. This procedure transforms the decoding task into one closely resembling that of a single-qubit memory propagating through time. The resulting approach leads to fast decoding and reduced problem size while maintaining high performance. Focusing on the surface code, we prove that this method enables fault-tolerant decoding with minimum-weight perfect matching, and benchmark its performance on example circuits including magic state distillation. We find that the threshold is comparable to that of a single-qubit memory, and that the total decoding run time can be, in fact, less than that of conventional lattice surgery. Our approach enables fast correlated decoding, providing a pathway to directly extend single-qubit QEC techniques to transversal algorithms. |
||
| Power and Limitations of Linear Programming Decoder for Quantum LDPC Codes | TQC 2026 | Mehdi Soleimanifar |
Decoding quantum error-correcting codes is a key challenge in enabling fault-tolerant quantum computation. In the classical setting, linear programming (LP) decoders offer provable performance guarantees and can leverage fast practical optimization algorithms. Although LP decoders have been proposed for quantum codes, their performance and limitations remain relatively underexplored. In this work, we uncover a key limitation of LP decoding for quantum low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes: certain constant-weight error patterns lead to ambiguous fractional solutions that cannot be resolved through independent rounding. To address this issue, we incorporate a post-processing technique known as ordered statistics decoding (OSD), which significantly enhances LP decoding performance in practice. Our results show that LP decoding, when augmented with OSD, can outperform belief propagation with the same post-processing for intermediate code sizes of up to hundreds of qubits. These findings suggest that LP-based decoders, equipped with effective post-processing, offer a promising approach for decoding near-term quantum LDPC codes. |
||
| Check-weight-constrained quantum codes: Bounds and examples | TQC 2026 | Lily Wang, Andy Zeyi Liu, Ray Li, Aleksander Kubica |
Quantum low-density parity-check (qLDPC) codes can be implemented by measuring only low-weight checks, making them compatible with noisy quantum hardware and central to the quest to build noise-resilient quantum computers. A fundamental open question is how constraints on check weight limit the achievable parameters of qLDPC codes. Here, we study stabilizer and subsystem codes with constrained check weight, combining analytical arguments with numerical optimization to establish strong upper bounds on their parameters. We show that stabilizer codes with checks of weight at most three cannot have nontrivial distance. We also prove tight tradeoffs between rate and distance for broad families of CSS stabilizer and subsystem codes with checks of weight at most four and two, respectively. Notably, our bounds are applicable to general qLDPC codes, as they rely only on check-weight constraints without assuming geometric locality or special graph connectivity. In the finite-size regime, we derive numerical upper bounds using linear programming techniques and identify explicit code constructions that approach these limits, delineating the landscape of practically relevant qLDPC codes with tens or hundreds of physical qubits. |
||
| Single-shot decoding of good quantum LDPC codes | QIP 2024 | Eugene Tang, Libor Caha, Shin Ho Choe, Zhiyang He, Aleksander Kubica |
| Software for Numerical Calculation of Key Rates | QCRYPT 2016 | Patrick Coles, Jie Lin, Adam Winick, Yanbao Zhang, Eric Metodiev, Electra Eleftheriadou, Filippo Miatto, Norbert Lütkenhaus |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Aleksander Kubica | 6 |
| Eugene Tang | 4 |
| Libor Caha | 3 |
| Shin Ho Choe | 3 |
| Zhiyang He | 3 |
| Mehdi Soleimanifar | 2 |
| Adam Winick | 1 |
| Alex Retzker | 1 |
| Alexandra A. Geim | 1 |
| Andy Zeyi Liu | 1 |
| Chen Zhao | 1 |
| Christopher Pattison | 1 |
| Dolev Bluvstein | 1 |
| Electra Eleftheriadou | 1 |
| Eric Metodiev | 1 |
| Filippo Miatto | 1 |
| Hengyun Zhou | 1 |
| Jie Lin | 1 |
| Lily Wang | 1 |
| Madelyn Cain | 1 |