2
program roles
79
collaborators
2014–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
25 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Sum of Squares Spectral Amplification ↗
|
QIP 2026 | regular | Robbie King, Guang Hao Low, Dominic Berry, Qiushi Han, Eugene DePrince, Alec White, Rolando Somma, ▸Nicholas Rubin |
We present sum-of-squares spectral amplification (SOSSA), a framework for improving quantum simulation relevant to low-energy problems. We show how SOSSA can be applied to problems like energy and phase estimation and provide fast quantum algorithms for these problems that significantly improve over prior art. We analyze the performance of SOSSA on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, a representative strongly correlated system, and demonstrate asymptotic speedups over generic simulation methods by a factor of the square root of the system size. We then apply SOSSA to electronic structure problems in quantum chemistry, yielding a factor of 4 to 195 speedup over the state of the art in ground-state energy estimation for models of Iron-Sulfur complexes and a CO2-fixation catalyst. |
|||
| Quantum simulation of chemistry via quantum fast multipole method | TQC 2026 | regular | ▸Dominic Berry, Kianna Wan, Andrew Baczewski, Elliot Eklund, Arkin Tikku |
Here we describe an approach for simulating quantum chemistry on quantum computers with significantly lower asymptotic complexity than prior work. The approach uses a real-space first-quantised representation of the molecular Hamiltonian which we propagate using high-order product formulae. Essential for this low complexity is the use of a technique similar to the fast multipole method for computing the Coulomb operator with O(eta) complexity for a simulation with eta particles. We show how to modify this algorithm so that it can be implemented on a quantum computer. We ultimately demonstrate an approach with t(eta^{4/3} N^{1/3} + eta^{1/3} N^{2/3})(eta Nt/epsilon)^o(1) gate complexity, where N is the number of grid points, epsilon is target precision, and t is the duration of time evolution. This is roughly a speedup by O(eta) over most prior algorithms. We provide lower complexity than all prior work for N<eta^7 (the regime of practical interest), with only first-quantised interaction-picture simulations providing better performance for N>eta^7. As with the classical fast multipole method, large numbers eta>10^3 would be needed to realise this advantage. |
|||
| Verifiable Quantum Advantage via Optimized DQI Circuits | TQC 2026 | regular | Tanuj Khattar, ▸Noah Shutty, Craig Gidney, Adam Zalcman, Noureldin Yosri, Dmitri Maslov, Stephen Jordan |
Recently, a quantum algorithm called Decoded Quantum Interferometry (DQI) was introduced that achieves an apparent exponential speedup for Optimal Polynomial Intersection (OPI) problem, which has previously been studied in the contexts of cryptography and error correcting codes. However, this left open the question of how many logical gates and logical qubits would be needed to solve a classically intractable instance of OPI. Here, we develop optimized implementations of DQI which greatly reduce its resource requirements. We establish that DQI for OPI is the first known candidate for verifiable quantum advantage with optimal asymptotic speedup: solving instances with classical hardness $O(2^N)$ requires only $\widetilde{O}(N)$ quantum gates, matching the theoretical lower bound. To realize this, we overcome the primary bottleneck of reversible Reed-Solomon decoding by introducing novel quantum circuits for the Extended Euclidean Algorithm (EEA) that reduce the leading-order space complexity to the theoretical minimum of $2nb$ qubits. These improvements are broadly applicable, including to Shor's algorithm for the discrete logarithm. We analyze OPI over binary extension fields $\GF(2^b)$, assess hardness against new classical attacks, and identify resilient instances. Our resource estimates show that classically intractable OPI instances (requiring $>10^{23}$ classical trials) can be solved with approximately 5.72 million Toffoli gates. This is roughly $1000$ times fewer gates than required for factoring RSA-2048 and, remarkably, is also less than the leading interactive protocol for computational proof of quantumness, positioning DQI as a compelling candidate for practical, verifiable quantum advantage. |
|||
| Triply Efficient Shadow Tomography | QIP 2025 | regular | Robbie King, David Gosset, Robin Kothari |
| Optimization by Decoded Quantum Interferometry | QIP 2025 | invited | ▸Stephen Jordan, Noah Shutty, Mary Wootters, Adam Zalcman, Alexander Schmidhuber, Robbie King, Sergei Isakov |
| Quartic quantum speedups for planted inference | QIP 2025 | regular | ▸Alexander Schmidhuber, Ryan O’Donnell, Robin Kothari |
| Exponential quantum speedup in simulating coupled classical oscillators | QIP 2024 | plenary_short | ▸Rolando Somma, Dominic Berry, Robin Kothari, Nathan Wiebe |
| Quantum computation of stopping power for inertial fusion target design | TQC 2024 | regular | ▸Nicholas Rubin, Dominic Berry, Alina Kononov, Fionn Malone, Tanuj Khattar, Alec White, Joonho Lee, Hartmut Neven, Andrew Baczewski |
Stopping power is the rate at which a material absorbs the kinetic energy of a charged particle passing through it – one of many properties needed over a wide range of thermodynamic conditions in modeling inertial fusion implosions. First-principles stopping calculations are classically challenging because they involve the dynamics of large electronic systems far from equilibrium, with accuracies that are particularly difficult to constrain and assess in the warm-dense conditions preceding ignition. Here, we describe a protocol for using a fault-tolerant quantum computer to calculate stopping power from a first-quantized representation of the electrons and projectile. Our approach builds upon the electronic structure block encodings of Su et al. [PRX Quantum 2, 040332 2021], adapting and optimizing those algorithms to estimate observables of interest from the non-Born-Oppenheimer dynamics of multiple particle species at finite temperature. We also work out the constant factors associated with a novel implementation of a high-order Trotter approach to simulating a grid representation of these systems. Ultimately, we report logical qubit requirements and leading-order Toffoli costs for computing the stopping power of various projectile/target combinations relevant to interpreting and designing inertial fusion experiments. We estimate that scientifically interesting and classically intractable stopping power calculations can be quantum simulated with roughly the same number of logical qubits and about one hundred times more Toffoli gates than is required for state-of-the-art quantum simulations of industrially relevant molecules such as FeMoco or P450. |
|||
|
Efficient Quantum Simulation of Solid-State Materials via Pseudopotentials ↗
|
TQC 2024 | regular | ▸Dominic Berry, Nicholas Rubin, Ahmed Elnabawy, Gabriele Ahlers, Eugene DePrince, Joonho Lee, Christian Gogolin |
First-quantized plane-wave representations provide a very promising approach for quantum algorithms for solid state materials. Pseudopotentials provide a method of further reducing the complexity by avoiding the need to simulate highly localized core orbitals. The complicated functional form of pseudopotentials constitutes a major challenge for the design of quantum algorithms. In this work we provide new techniques to efficiently implement pseudopotentials in quantum algorithms, with orders of magnitude improvement in complexity. Our methods include a high-accuracy QROM interpolation of the exponential function, combined with QROM for the pseudopotential parameters and coherent arithmetic. Moreover, we generalize prior methods to enable the simulation of materials defined by non-cubic unit cells. Finally, we combine these techniques to estimate the resources for block encoding required for simulating commercially relevant instances of heterogeneous catalysis. |
|||
| Matchgate Shadows for Fermionic Quantum Simulation | QIP 2023 | regular | ▸Kianna Wan, William Huggins, Joonho Lee |
| Quantifying Quantum Advantage in Topological Data Analysis | QIP 2023 | regular | Dominic Berry, Yuan Su, Casper Gyurik, Robbie King, Joao Basso, Alexander Barba, Abhishek Rajput, Nathan Wiebe, ▸Vedran Dunjko |
| Optimal scaling quantum linear systems solver via discrete adiabatic theorem | QIP 2022 | regular | ▸Pedro C.S. Costa, Dong An, Yuval Rishu Sanders, Yuan Su, Dominic Berry |
| Nearly Optimal Quantum Algorithms for Estimating Multiple Expectation Values | TQC 2022 | regular | ▸William Huggins, Kianna Wan, Jarrod McClean, Thomas O'Brien, Nathan Wiebe |
| Quantum Computer Science at Google | QIP 2021 | invited | Cody Jones |
Abstract This talk will give an update regarding Google’s plans in quantum computing. We will highlight some recent results from our team and discuss some example problems where engagement with the quantum computer science community endemic to QIP will be important as the field advances. The first part of our talk will focus on quantum error-correction and the second part of our talk will focus on quantum algorithms. |
|||
| Fundamental aspects of solving quantum problems with machine learning | QIP 2021 | regular | Hsin-Yuan Robert Huang, Richard Kueng, Michael Broughton, Masoud Mohseni, Sergio Boixo, Hartmut Neven, Jarrod McClean, John Preskill |
Abstract Machine learning (ML) provides the potential to solve challenging quantum many-body problems in physics and chemistry. Yet, this prospect has not been fully justified. In this work, we establish rigorous results to understand the power of classical ML and the potential for quantum advantage in an important example application: predicting outcomes of quantum mechanical processes. We prove that for achieving a small average prediction error, one can always design a classical ML model whose sample complexity is comparable to the best quantum ML model (up to a small polynomial factor). Regarding computational complexity, we show that the class of problems that can be solved by efficient classical ML models with access to sampled data is strictly larger than BPP. Hence, classical ML models may be able to solve some challenging quantum problems after training from data obtained in physical experiments. As a concrete example, we prove that a simple, classical ML model can efficiently learn to predict ground state representations that approximate expectation values of local observables up to a small, constant error. This holds for any smooth family of gapped local Hamiltonians in a finite spatial dimension. |
|||
| Efficient quantum computation of chemistry through tensor hypercontraction | QIP 2021 | regular | Joonho Lee, Dominic Berry, Craig Gidney, William Huggins, Jarrod McClean, Nathan Wiebe |
Abstract We show how to achieve the highest efficiency yet for simulations with arbitrary basis sets by using a representation of the Coulomb operator known as tensor hypercontraction (THC). We use THC to express the Coulomb operator in a non-orthogonal basis, which we are able to block encode by separately rotating each term with angles that are obtained via QROM. Our algorithm has the best complexity scaling for an arbitrary basis, as well as the best complexity for the specific case of FeMoCo. By optimising the surface code resources, we show that FeMoCo can be simulated using about 4 million physical qubits and 3.5 days of runtime, assuming 1 s cycle times and physical gate error rates no worse than 0.1%. |
|||
| Compilation of Fault-Tolerant Quantum Heuristics for Combinatorial Optimization | QIP 2021 | regular | Yuval Rishu Sanders, Dominic Berry, Pedro C.S. Costa, Louis Tessler, Nathan Wiebe, Craig Gidney, Hartmut Neven |
Abstract We compile explicit circuits and evaluate the computational cost for heuristic-based quantum algorithms for combinatorial optimization. We consider several variants of quantum-accelerated simulated annealing as well as adiabatic algorithms, quantum-enhanced population transfer, the quantum approximate optimization algorithm, and other approaches. We provide novel methods for executing the bottleneck subroutines for these heuristics, and our methods can easily be applied to other algorithms where numerical performance matters. We estimate how quickly the subroutines could be executed on a modestly sized superconducting-qubit-based quantum computer with surface code error correction. We conclude that quadratic speedups for heuristic-based quantum optimization algorithms are insufficient for early quantum computers to beat present day classical computers. |
|||
| Even more efficient quantum computations of chemistry through tensor hypercontraction | TQC 2021 | regular | Joonho Lee, ▸Dominic Berry, Craig Gidney, William Huggins, Jarrod McClean, Nathan Wiebe |
| Qubitization of arbitrary basis quantum chemistry leveraging sparsity and low rank factorization | QIP 2020 | regular | Dominic Berry, Craig Gidney, Mario Motta, Jarrod McClean |
| Efficient and Noise Resilient Measurements for Quantum Chemistry on Near-Term Quantum Computers | QIP 2020 | regular | William Huggins, Jarrod McClean, Nicholas Rubin, Zhang Jiang, Nathan Wiebe, K. Birgitta Whaley |
| Simulating correlated electrons in the surface code with a single T-factory | QIP 2019 | regular ▸ presenter | Craig Gidney, Dominic Berry, Nathan Wiebe, Jarrod McClean, Alexandru Paler, Austin Fowler, Hartmut Neven |
| Quantum simulation of chemistry with sublinear scaling in basis size | QIP 2019 | regular | ▸Dominic Berry, Mária Kieferová, Artur Scherer, Yuval Rishu Sanders, Guang Hao Low, Nathan Wiebe, Jarrod McClean, Craig Gidney, Hartmut Neven |
| Low Depth Quantum Simulation of Electronic Structure | QIP 2018 | regular ▸ presenter | Nathan Wiebe, Jarrod McClean, James McClain, Hartmut Neven, Garnet Kin-Lic Chan |
| Quantum Simulation of Electronic Structure with Linear Depth and Connectivity | TQC 2018 | regular | Ian Kivlichan, Jarrod McClean, Nathan Wiebe, Craig Gidney, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, Garnet Kin-Lic Chan |
| Characterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices | QIP 2017 | regular | ▸Sergio Boixo, Sergei Isakov, Vadim Smelyanskiy, Nan Ding, Zhang Jiang, Michael Bremner, John Martinis, Hartmut Neven |
10 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Efficient quantum circuits for solving classically intractable optimization problems using DQI | QIP 2026 | ▸Tanuj Khattar, Noah Shutty, Craig Gidney, Dmitri Maslov, N. Yosri, Stephen Jordan |
| Rapid initial state preparation for the quantum simulation of strongly correlated molecules | QIP 2025 | Dominic Berry, Yu Tong, Tanuj Khattar, Alec White, Tae In Kim, Guang Hao Low, Sergio Boixo, Lin Lin, Seunghoon Lee, Garnet Kin-Lic Chan, Nicholas Rubin |
| Shadow Hamiltonian Simulation | QIP 2025 | Rolando Somma, Robbie King, Robin Kothari, Thomas E. O’Brien |
| The discrete adiabatic quantum linear system solver has lower constant factors than the randomized adiabatic solver | TQC 2024 | Pedro C.S. Costa, Dong An, Dominic Berry |
| Quantum simulation of exact electron dynamics can be more efficient than classical mean-field methods | TQC 2023 | William Huggins, Dominic Berry, Shu Fay Ung, Andrew Zhao, David Reichman, Hartmut Neven, Andrew Baczewski, Joonho Lee |
| Virtual Distillation for Quantum Error Mitigation | QIP 2021 | William Huggins, Sam McArdle, Thomas O'Brien, Joonho Lee, Nicholas Rubin, Sergio Boixo, K. Birgitta Whaley, Jarrod McClean |
| Virtual Distillation for Quantum Error Mitigation | TQC 2021 | William Huggins, Sam McArdle, Thomas E. O’Brien, Joonho Lee, Nicholas Rubin, Sergio Boixo, K. Birgitta Whaley, Jarrod McClean |
| Quantum simulation of fermions: locality and error mitigation | QIP 2019 | Zhang Jiang, Jarrod McClean |
| Bounding the costs of quantum simulation of many-body physics in real space | QIP 2017 | Ian Kivlichan, Nathan Wiebe, Alán Aspuru-Guzik |
| Adiabatic Quantum Simulation of Quantum Chemistry | QIP 2014 | Peter Love, Alán Aspuru-Guzik |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIP 2025 | program | member | — |
| QIP 2021 | program | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Dominic Berry | 16 |
| Jarrod McClean | 13 |
| Nathan Wiebe | 12 |
| Craig Gidney | 9 |
| Hartmut Neven | 8 |
| Joonho Lee | 8 |
| William Huggins | 8 |
| Nicholas Rubin | 7 |
| Robbie King | 5 |
| Sergio Boixo | 5 |
| Robin Kothari | 4 |
| Tanuj Khattar | 4 |
| Alec White | 3 |
| Alán Aspuru-Guzik | 3 |
| Andrew Baczewski | 3 |
| Garnet Kin-Lic Chan | 3 |
| Guang Hao Low | 3 |
| K. Birgitta Whaley | 3 |
| Kianna Wan | 3 |
| Noah Shutty | 3 |