10
talks
1
posters
3
committee roles
0
leadership roles
2018–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organising □local · filled = chair
Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum Advantage from Sampling Shallow Circuits: Beyond Hardness of Marginals | QIP 2026 | regular | Daniel M. Kane, Jackson Morris, Anthony Ostuni, Kewen Wu |
We construct a family of distributions $\{\mathcal{D}_n\}_n$ with $\mathcal{D}_n$ over $\{0,1\}^n$ and a family of depth-$7$ quantum circuits $\{C_n\}_n$ such that $\mathcal{D}_n$ is produced exactly by $C_n$ with the all zeros state as input, yet any constant-depth classical circuit with bounded fan-in gates evaluated on any binary product distribution has total variation distance $1 - e^{-\Omega(n)}$ from $\mathcal{D}_n$. Moreover, the quantum circuits we construct are geometrically local and use a relatively standard gate set: Hadamard, controlled-phase, CNOT, and Toffoli gates. All previous separations of this type suffer from some undesirable constraint on the classical circuit model or the quantum circuits witnessing the separation.
Our family of distributions is inspired by the Parity Halving Problem of Watts, Kothari, Schaeffer, and Tal (STOC, 2019), which built on the work of Bravyi, Gosset, and K\"onig (Science, 2018) to separate shallow quantum and classical circuits for relational problems. |
|||
| Quantum Threshold is Powerful | TQC 2025 | regular | Jackson Morris |
| Complexity-theoretic foundations of BosonSampling with a linear number of modes | QIP 2024 | regular | ▸Ishaun Datta, Adam Bouland, Daniel Brod, Bill Fefferman, Felipe Hernandez, Michal Oszmaniec |
| Classical algorithms for forrelation | QIP 2022 | regular | Sergey Bravyi, ▸David Gosset, Luke Schaeffer |
| The Complexity of Bipartite Gaussian Boson Sampling | QIP 2022 | regular ▸ presenter | Daniel Brod, Juan Miguel Arrazola, Marcos Benicio de Andrade Alonso, Nicolás Quesada |
| Fast simulation of planar Clifford circuits | QIP 2021 | regular | David Gosset, Alex Kerzner, Luke Schaeffer |
Abstract A general quantum circuit can be simulated in exponential time on a classical computer. If it has a planar layout, then a tensor-network contraction algorithm due to Markov and Shi has a runtime exponential in the square root of its size, or more generally exponential in the treewidth of the underlying graph. Separately, Gottesman and Knill showed that if all gates are restricted to be Clifford, then there is a polynomial time simulation. We combine these two ideas and show that treewidth and planarity can be exploited to improve Clifford circuit simulation. Our main result is a classical algorithm with runtime scaling asymptotically as ~$ n^{\omega/2}<n^{1.19}$ which samples from the output distribution obtained by measuring all $n$ qubits of a planar graph state in given Pauli bases. Here $\omega$ is the matrix multiplication exponent. We also provide a classical algorithm with the same asymptotic runtime which samples from the output distribution of any constant-depth Clifford circuit in a planar geometry. Our work improves known classical algorithms with cubic runtime. A key ingredient is a mapping which, given a tree decomposition of some graph $G$, produces a Clifford circuit with a structure that mirrors the tree decomposition and which emulates measurement of the quantum graph state corresponding to $G$. We provide a classical simulation of this circuit with the runtime stated above for planar graphs and otherwise $n t^{\omega-1}$ where $t$ is the width of the tree decomposition. Our algorithm incorporates two subroutines which may be of independent interest. The first is a matrix-multiplication-time version of the Gottesman-Knill simulation of multi-qubit measurement on stabilizer states. The second is a new classical algorithm for solving symmetric linear systems over $\mathbb{F}_2$ in a planar geometry. |
|||
| Interactive quantum advantage with noisy, shallow Clifford circuits | QIP 2021 | regular | Nathan Ju, Luke Schaeffer |
Abstract Recent work by Bravyi et al. constructs a relation problem that a noisy constant-depth quantum circuit (QNC^0) can solve with near certainty (probability 1 - o(1)), but that any bounded fan-in constant-depth classical circuit (NC^0) fails with some constant probability. We show that this robustness to noise can be achieved in the other low-depth quantum/classical circuit separations in this area. In particular, we show a general strategy for adding noise tolerance to the interactive protocols of Grier and Schaeffer. As a consequence, we obtain an unconditional separation between noisy QNC^0 circuits and AC^0[p] circuits for all primes p \geq 2, and a conditional separation between noisy QNC^0 circuits and log-space classical machines under a plausible complexity-theoretic conjecture. A key component of this reduction is showing average-case hardness for the classical simulation tasks---that is, showing that a classical simulation of the quantum interactive task is still powerful even if it is allowed to err on some constant fraction of inputs. We show that is possible even for quantum tasks which are parity-L-hard to simulate. To do this, we borrow techniques from randomized encodings used in cryptography. |
|||
| Interactive shallow Clifford circuits: quantum advantage against NC^1 and beyond | QIP 2020 | regular | Luke Schaeffer |
| A Quantum Query Complexity Trichotomy for Regular Languages | QIP 2019 | regular ▸ presenter | Scott Aaronson, Luke Schaeffer |
| The Classification of Clifford Gates over Qubits | QIP 2018 | regular | ▸Luke Schaeffer |
Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Quantum Threshold is Powerful | QIP 2025 | Jackson Morris |
Committee service
| Conference | Committee | Position | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| TQC 2025 | PC | member | — |
| QIP 2024 | PC | member | — |
| TQC 2023 | PC | member | — |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Luke Schaeffer | 6 |
| Jackson Morris | 3 |
| Daniel Brod | 2 |
| David Gosset | 2 |
| Adam Bouland | 1 |
| Alex Kerzner | 1 |
| Anthony Ostuni | 1 |
| Bill Fefferman | 1 |
| Daniel M. Kane | 1 |
| Felipe Hernandez | 1 |
| Ishaun Datta | 1 |
| Juan Miguel Arrazola | 1 |
| Kewen Wu | 1 |
| Marcos Benicio de Andrade Alonso | 1 |
| Michal Oszmaniec | 1 |
| Nathan Ju | 1 |
| Nicolás Quesada | 1 |
| Scott Aaronson | 1 |
| Sergey Bravyi | 1 |