44
collaborators
2018–2025
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
14 Talks
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum advantage for learning shallow neural networks with natural data distributions | TQC 2025 | regular | Laura Lewis, Dar Gilboa |
| Learning shallow quantum circuits | QIP 2024 | plenary_short | ▸Hsin-Yuan Robert Huang, Yunchao Liu, Michael Broughton, Isaac Kim, Anurag Anshu, Zeph Landau |
| Exponential learning advantages with conjugate states and minimal quantum memory | TQC 2024 | regular | ▸Robbie King, Kianna Wan |
The ability of quantum computers to directly manipulate and analyze quantum states stored in quantum memory allows them to learn about aspects of our physical world that would otherwise be invisible given a modest number of measurements. Here we investigate a new learning resource which could be available to quantum computers in the future – measurements on the unknown state accompanied by its complex conjugate ρ⊗ρ*. For a certain shadow tomography task, we surprisingly find that measurements on only copies of ρ⊗ρ* can be exponentially more powerful than measurements on ρ⊗K, even for large K. This expands the class of exponential advantages using only a constant overhead quantum memory, or minimal quantum memory, and we provide a number of examples where the state ρ* is naturally available in both computational and physical applications. In addition, we precisely quantify the power of classical shadows on single copies under a generalized Clifford ensemble and give a class of quantities that can be efficiently learned. The learning task we study in both the single copy and quantum memory is physically natural and corresponds to real-space observables with a limit of bosonic modes, where it achieves an exponential improvement in detecting certain signals under a noisy background. In addition to quantifying a fundamentally new and powerful resource in quantum learning, we believe the advantage may find applications in improving quantum simulation, learning from quantum sensors, and uncovering new physical phenomena. |
|||
| Provably accurate simulation of gauge theories and bosonic systems | QIP 2022 | regular | ▸Yu Tong, Victor Albert, John Preskill, Yuan Su |
| Nearly Optimal Quantum Algorithms for Estimating Multiple Expectation Values | TQC 2022 | regular | ▸William Huggins, Kianna Wan, Thomas O'Brien, Nathan Wiebe, Ryan Babbush |
| Fundamental aspects of solving quantum problems with machine learning | QIP 2021 | regular | Hsin-Yuan Robert Huang, Richard Kueng, Michael Broughton, Masoud Mohseni, Ryan Babbush, Sergio Boixo, Hartmut Neven, John Preskill |
Abstract Machine learning (ML) provides the potential to solve challenging quantum many-body problems in physics and chemistry. Yet, this prospect has not been fully justified. In this work, we establish rigorous results to understand the power of classical ML and the potential for quantum advantage in an important example application: predicting outcomes of quantum mechanical processes. We prove that for achieving a small average prediction error, one can always design a classical ML model whose sample complexity is comparable to the best quantum ML model (up to a small polynomial factor). Regarding computational complexity, we show that the class of problems that can be solved by efficient classical ML models with access to sampled data is strictly larger than BPP. Hence, classical ML models may be able to solve some challenging quantum problems after training from data obtained in physical experiments. As a concrete example, we prove that a simple, classical ML model can efficiently learn to predict ground state representations that approximate expectation values of local observables up to a small, constant error. This holds for any smooth family of gapped local Hamiltonians in a finite spatial dimension. |
|||
| Efficient quantum computation of chemistry through tensor hypercontraction | QIP 2021 | regular | Joonho Lee, Dominic Berry, Craig Gidney, William Huggins, Nathan Wiebe, Ryan Babbush |
Abstract We show how to achieve the highest efficiency yet for simulations with arbitrary basis sets by using a representation of the Coulomb operator known as tensor hypercontraction (THC). We use THC to express the Coulomb operator in a non-orthogonal basis, which we are able to block encode by separately rotating each term with angles that are obtained via QROM. Our algorithm has the best complexity scaling for an arbitrary basis, as well as the best complexity for the specific case of FeMoCo. By optimising the surface code resources, we show that FeMoCo can be simulated using about 4 million physical qubits and 3.5 days of runtime, assuming 1 s cycle times and physical gate error rates no worse than 0.1%. |
|||
| Even more efficient quantum computations of chemistry through tensor hypercontraction | TQC 2021 | regular | Joonho Lee, ▸Dominic Berry, Craig Gidney, William Huggins, Nathan Wiebe, Ryan Babbush |
| Efficient and Noise Resilient Measurements for Quantum Chemistry on Near-Term Quantum Computers | QIP 2020 | regular | William Huggins, Nicholas Rubin, Zhang Jiang, Nathan Wiebe, K. Birgitta Whaley, Ryan Babbush |
| Qubitization of arbitrary basis quantum chemistry leveraging sparsity and low rank factorization | QIP 2020 | regular | Dominic Berry, Craig Gidney, Mario Motta, Ryan Babbush |
| Simulating correlated electrons in the surface code with a single T-factory | QIP 2019 | regular | ▸Ryan Babbush, Craig Gidney, Dominic Berry, Nathan Wiebe, Alexandru Paler, Austin Fowler, Hartmut Neven |
| Quantum simulation of chemistry with sublinear scaling in basis size | QIP 2019 | regular | ▸Dominic Berry, Mária Kieferová, Artur Scherer, Yuval Rishu Sanders, Guang Hao Low, Nathan Wiebe, Craig Gidney, Hartmut Neven, Ryan Babbush |
| Low Depth Quantum Simulation of Electronic Structure | QIP 2018 | regular | ▸Ryan Babbush, Nathan Wiebe, James McClain, Hartmut Neven, Garnet Kin-Lic Chan |
| Quantum Simulation of Electronic Structure with Linear Depth and Connectivity | TQC 2018 | regular | Ian Kivlichan, Nathan Wiebe, Craig Gidney, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, Garnet Kin-Lic Chan, Ryan Babbush |
9 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Consumable Data via Quantum Communication | QIP 2025 | Dar Gilboa, Siddhartha Jain |
| On quantum backpropagation, information reuse, and cheating measurement collapse | QIP 2024 | Amira Abbas, Robbie King, Hsin-Yuan Robert Huang, William Huggins, Dar Gilboa, Ramis Movassagh |
| Exponential Quantum Communication Advantage in Distributed Learning | TQC 2024 | Dar Gilboa |
| On quantum backpropagation, information reuse, and cheating measurement collapse | TQC 2024 | Amira Abbas, Robbie King, Hsin-Yuan Robert Huang, William Huggins, Ramis Movassagh, Dar Gilboa |
| Accelerating Quantum Algorithms with Precomputation | TQC 2023 | William Huggins |
| The feasibility of quantum backpropagation | TQC 2023 | Amira Abbas, William Huggins, Ramis Movassagh, Dar Gilboa |
| Virtual Distillation for Quantum Error Mitigation | QIP 2021 | William Huggins, Sam McArdle, Thomas O'Brien, Joonho Lee, Nicholas Rubin, Sergio Boixo, K. Birgitta Whaley, Ryan Babbush |
| Virtual Distillation for Quantum Error Mitigation | TQC 2021 | William Huggins, Sam McArdle, Thomas E. O’Brien, Joonho Lee, Nicholas Rubin, Sergio Boixo, K. Birgitta Whaley, Ryan Babbush |
| Quantum simulation of fermions: locality and error mitigation | QIP 2019 | Zhang Jiang, Ryan Babbush |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Ryan Babbush | 13 |
| William Huggins | 10 |
| Nathan Wiebe | 8 |
| Craig Gidney | 6 |
| Dar Gilboa | 6 |
| Dominic Berry | 5 |
| Hartmut Neven | 4 |
| Hsin-Yuan Robert Huang | 4 |
| Joonho Lee | 4 |
| Amira Abbas | 3 |
| K. Birgitta Whaley | 3 |
| Nicholas Rubin | 3 |
| Ramis Movassagh | 3 |
| Robbie King | 3 |
| Sergio Boixo | 3 |
| Garnet Kin-Lic Chan | 2 |
| John Preskill | 2 |
| Kianna Wan | 2 |
| Michael Broughton | 2 |
| Sam McArdle | 2 |