14
collaborators
2024–2026
years active
Contributions
QIP QCrypt TQC talk poster presenter award · △program ◇steering ○organizing · filled = chair
1 Talk
| Title | Conference | Type | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Efficient Quantum Optimization via Dynamical Simulation ↗
|
QIP 2026 | regular | ▸Ahmet Burak Catli, Nathan Wiebe |
We provide several quantum algorithms for continuous optimization that do not require gradient estimation. Instead, we encode the optimization problem into the dynamics of a physical system and coherently simulate the time evolution. Our first two algorithms can find local optima of a differentiable function $f: \mathbb{R}^N \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ by simulating either classical or quantum dynamics with friction via a time-dependent Hamiltonian. We show that for the benchmark problem of optimizing a locally quadratic objective function, these methods require a total of $O(N^2\kappa^2/h_x^2\epsilon)$ queries to a phase oracle to find an $\epsilon$-approximate local optimum, where $\kappa$ is the condition number of the Hessian matrix and $h_x$ is the discretization spacing. In contrast, we show that methods based on gradient descent require $O(N^{3/2}(1/\epsilon)^{\kappa \log(3)/4})$ queries. This corresponds to an exponential separation between the query upper bounds for the benchmark problem. Our third algorithm can find the global optimum of $f$ by preparing a classical low-temperature thermal state via simulation of the classical Liouvillian operator associated with the Nosé Hamiltonian. We use results from the quantum thermodynamics literature to bound the thermalization time for the discrete system. Additionally, we analyze barren plateau effects that commonly plague quantum optimization algorithms and observe that our approach is vastly less sensitive to this problem than standard gradient-based optimization. Our results suggests that these dynamical optimization approaches may be far more scalable for future quantum machine learning, optimization and variational experiments than was widely believed. |
|||
5 Posters
| Title | Conference | Co-authors |
|---|---|---|
| Dividing and Conquering the Van Vleck Catastrophe | QIP 2026 | Gian-Luca R. Anselmetti, Raffaele Santagati, Matthias Degroote, Nikolaj Moll, Michael Streif, Nathan Wiebe |
| Fullqubit alchemist: Quantum algorithm for alchemical free energy calculations | QIP 2026 | ▸Po-Wei Huang, Gregory Boyd, Gian-Luca R. Anselmetti, Matthias Degroote, Nikolaj Moll, Raffaele Santagati, Michael Streif, Benjamin Ries, Hamza Jnane, Daniel Marti-Dafcik, Nathan Wiebe, Thomas Bromley, Balint Koczor |
| Quantum advantage in convex optimization via time-dependent hamiltonian simulation in the interaction picture | QIP 2025 | Ahmet Burak Catli, Nathan Wiebe |
| Exponentially Better Bounds for Quantum Optimization via Dynamical Simulation | TQC 2025 | — |
| Improved precision scaling for simulating coupled quantum-classical dynamics | QIP 2024 | Raffaele Santagati, Matthias Degroote, Nikolaj Moll, Michael Streif, Nathan Wiebe |
Collaborators
| Co-author | Joint talks |
|---|---|
| Nathan Wiebe | 5 |
| Matthias Degroote | 3 |
| Michael Streif | 3 |
| Nikolaj Moll | 3 |
| Raffaele Santagati | 3 |
| Ahmet Burak Catli | 2 |
| Gian-Luca R. Anselmetti | 2 |
| Balint Koczor | 1 |
| Benjamin Ries | 1 |
| Daniel Marti-Dafcik | 1 |
| Gregory Boyd | 1 |
| Hamza Jnane | 1 |
| Po-Wei Huang | 1 |
| Thomas Bromley | 1 |